ohnonotgmail wrote: » why would we want to do that?
boat_builder wrote: » so you wish to see the culture of ireland changed ?
boat_builder wrote: » self preservation
unseenfootage wrote: » I am a big fan of diversity, especially in Ireland. If it weren't for diversity. The Irish would still be eating bacon, cabbage and potato.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » well no, if you propose a major change in social policy there has to be a good reason for it. you dont just do it for the craic.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » why, are they going to wipe us out?
unseenfootage wrote: » I am a big fan of diversity, especially in Ireland.If it weren't for diversity.The Irish would still be eating bacon, cabbage and potato.
Jesus. wrote: » That's fair enough. Where's the cut off point though? Large areas in England have lost all semblance of native culture and are now like mini Arab states. We've got 100k of them already. Isn't that enough?
boat_builder wrote: » you dont think if the muslim population of ireland reached above 10% ( for example ) , the charechter of the nation would change ?
boat_builder wrote: » really , do is the menu in japan extremely limited ? , japan is in no way diverse compared to the usa or western europe what is so inherently great about diversity , i realise liberals believe in it in the way devout catholics believe in transubutation but seriously , what is so inherently good about it ?
ohnonotgmail wrote: » Is the character of our nation set in stone? should it not reflect its citizens?
JT26 wrote: » Why is it food is always used as a positive for multiculturalism?
boat_builder wrote: » are you saying if the muslim population of ireland reached a level where support for sharia law was a demand , we should put in place policy to reflect this ?
ohnonotgmail wrote: » that is not what i'm saying at all. sharia law would be unconstitutional. the constitution can only change when a majority of the population are in favour.
boat_builder wrote: » why take the risk of allowing the conditions for the muslim population to reach a level where sharia law was demanded by the majority of the population ?
ohnonotgmail wrote: » when do you think this is likely to happen?
boat_builder wrote: » if it takes two hundred years , its too soon
Widdershins wrote: » Isn't sharia law already part of the constitutions in some non-mus majority countries ? E.G Britain and Canada ? Or at least there is a major push for it.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » so we should ban all muslim immigration now then, just to be sure? should we ban all non-catholic immigration then?
boat_builder wrote: » we should strictly limit muslim immigration , no other religion is a major problem right now its common sense , security is more important than political correctness , well to everyone accept the media
ohnonotgmail wrote: » what problem is our muslim population causing us?
RustyNut wrote: » Your just making stuff up now. Britain doesn't have a written constitution.