KingBrian2 wrote: » You can't substantiate those remarks I dare say. Most professional armies don't allow that to happen.
dav3 wrote: » We can't really take the Hungarian's word for it, their perception of what their muslim population is, is way off. Maybe they're not that bright, or maybe they're easily influenced by right wing populism, although the two usually do go hand in hand. Similar to some people on here, see more than one middle eastern or dark skinned person in their town or village on the same day = we're being overrun.http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2016/03/daily-chart-15http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/original-size/images/2016/03/blogs/graphic-detail/20160326_woc936_1.png
Ulysses Gaze wrote: » They also have a history with Muslims that goes back centuries to the Ottoman's so perhaps that has an influence on their thinking as well? .
line console zero wrote: » You people are unbelievable. We are under attack daily by Extreme Muslims and you are falling over each other to criticise Christians and draw hollow, meaningless , inaccurate comparisons that serve only to distract from the problem at hand and drive a narrative wedge into any dialogue that even begins to address the SCUM that are attacking us. sick sick people.
unseenfootage wrote: » There are more incidents like this, in Africa and who knows, where else.French troops accused of 'forcing girls into bestiality' in CAR as rape claims mount against UN peacekeepershttp://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/french-troops-accused-of-forcing-girls-to-have-sex-with-dog-in-car-as-rape-claims-against-un-a6961711.html
KingBrian2 wrote: » That is a UN peacekeeper matter and it is for the UN to keep its troops under control. We know Central Africa is in the midst of a sectarian war and the troops are there to sort out the mess.
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » Bob24 wrote: » Things can change fast. No-one was considering Brexit very seriously until the result of the vote. No-one was considering Trump a very serious contender at the Republican primary until it became obvious he had become unstoppable. Ah now, people were certainly taking Brexit seriously prior to the result. As it happens, the polls were wrong about Brexit, but that doesn't turn Probability Theory on its head. The French opinion polls show a strong sentiment in favour of Alain Jupp , and against Sarkozy and Le Pen. This corresponds to most people's experiences of French politics. Jupp is a very popular politician, as well as being unambiguously right wing. This is a very rare thing in French politics, especially for a former PM; the last man to fit that bill was Jacques Chirac. If Juppe gets the nomination, he will be the next French President. Mark my words. Feel free to requote this post in 2017 and force me to eat my hat if I am wrong. Jupp to win, Le Pen to end her career in disappointment, just like her father.
Bob24 wrote: » Things can change fast. No-one was considering Brexit very seriously until the result of the vote. No-one was considering Trump a very serious contender at the Republican primary until it became obvious he had become unstoppable.
A Little Pony wrote: » I knew Brexit would win. Socially you could tell the mood of the nation *UK*.
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » This corresponds to most people's experiences of French politics. Juppé is a very popular politician, as well as being unambiguously right wing.
Moo Moo Land wrote: » Who is this directed at? Who is criticising Christians and in what context? Who is the we in "we are under attack daily"?
unseenfootage wrote: » Why not in Gaelic?
line console zero wrote: » Your questions are meaningless because you already know the answers, you just want to drag me into some inane debate about nothing. No thanks.
JPCN1 wrote: » Christian europeans. They're running out of ones to kill in the ME.
average hero wrote: » I'm really distraught over this. This, over everything has made me really question everything politically. Europe, the refugees, everything. An elderly priest in a small town in France. The symbolism. The manner of his execution. I'm distraught.
Moo Moo Land wrote: » I am a European atheist and consider organised religion to be a toxic influence on society. I believe though that radical Muslims have a special hatred for atheists.
unseenfootage wrote: » I cannot fathom how it can be correct? You are suggesting that they are not concerned one iota that we are killing them, they are not fazed at all and all that they are concerned with is destroying our way of life?
AlekSmart wrote: » It's now gone well beyond a "Suggestion",it's increasingly self-evident across the E.U. A significant proportion are doing just what you cannot fathom,and they are becoming emboldened to do it more often and with increasing ferocity...and you are equally correct in suggesting that this significant number have little care or concern about us killing "them",for in their radical Islamic mindset,the level of destruction and suffering which they can inflict upon "us" unbelievers will repay them a thousandfold in whatever hereafter they believe in. I fully accept that many reasonable,intelligent,educated Westerners cannot fathom such intensity of belief,but make no mistake,that level of blind hatred is well embedded across a broad swathe of modern Islam.....ignore it at your peril.
One day, in Afghanistan. Ahmed: "Allah Akbar! The Americans killed my whole family with an airstrike." Mohammad: "What will you do, oh Ahmed?" Ahmed: "Never mind, it's okay."A few days later: Mohammad: "Hey Ahmad, you hear the Irish legalized the gay marriage?" Ahmed: "Bloody Infidels. I will make suicide bomb against them!" Sounds ridiculous to suggest that people will shrug off a foreign entity killing them yet be prepared to sacrifice their life to kill their citizens because of something like legalization of gay marriage.
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » Who are you claiming goes out of their way to preach against it? You cannot possibly claim to know what is preached inside even a minority of Saudi-funded mosques and Islamic centres. As Bob24 said, Wahhabism is sufficiently extremist as to 'prime' recruits for further radicalisation, whether inside or outside the mosque. It is undoubtedly a concern if the Saudi-sponsored version of Islam is being actively preached in this country. The man whom the US Embassy said controls Islam in Ireland is a man who believes homosexuality should be punished with lashing, and that rape victims need to be absolved from guilt. It amazes me that people get irate about dead Irish bishops, who showed horrible lack of compassion in how they dealt with child sex-abuse scandals, and yet we are silent about ongoing hate speech being possibly advanced in our society by a man who thinks rape victims have some sort of guilt attaching to them.
Moo Moo Land wrote: » Never heard of him. Does he appear in public much? Given he doesn't give interviews in English, what does this make him? A terrorist? Are there any more muslim leaders in Ireland who don't speak English?
KingBrian2 wrote: » We already have a Muslim population that needs a Mosque for their community to thrive in, what we don't need is to ostracize an entire community for the actions of a few. Scant details of a flourishing Jihad movement instead we have radical preachers who are trying to recruit from anyone who is disillusioned with society. Ireland is very tolerant towards Muslims and all religions Jews, Hindu's Sikhs or whatever. Part of living in a free country.
unseenfootage wrote: » I posted this earlier. Would like your response.
AlekSmart wrote: » At the risk of repitition...a significant (and apparently increasing) number of modern radical muslims do not think as you appear to believe they do. They areproving this,now almost on a daily basis. It does not concern me overly,what interpretation you wish to put on your examples,all I see is the reality of a situation within Western Europe which cannot be blithely answered by such interpretations.
