nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Group of men in Dublin cause outrage by wearing blackface

duffman3833

http://www.joe.ie/news/pics-group-of-men-in-dublin-cause-outrage-by-wearing-blackface/553540

A group of men in Dublin have caused anger and offense by dressing up in 'blackface' costumes while drinking in the city.

why is this an issue if they are dressing up as characters from films. People dress up at Halloween in all types of costumes like Mr T but racist card never used. This world needs to take a chill pill

Find more posts tagged with

dublin

men

jews did 911

costumes

racist

outrage

Quick Links

Comments

hairyslug

Surely if they kept their faces white and wore that gear they would just look stupid.

HensVassal

The problem with blackface is that it's worn by white people to look like a black person whether that's a movie character or celebrity or what not, OR to look like a minstrel or gollywog but they always look like caricatures of black people so it is a bit of a piss-take.

A white and a black guy could don suits and wigs and toy guns and go to a dress up party as Vince and Jules from Pulp Fiction, but if a white guy tried to black up and imporsonate Jules he'd look ridiculous.

FortySeven

ScumLord wrote: »

I'm confused, is it racist to be black now?

Wasn't it always?

Let me checks my ismpedia.

timmy_mallet

FortySeven wrote: »

timmy_mallet wrote: »

Look, the commenters in thee After Hours board are certainly not those who should be relied upon for deciding what is and isn't racist. After all, they're frequenters of the After Hours board, for god sake.

I disagree. Affable bunch in here, well travelled and socially savvy.

Fell right into the trap there, son. And yet all of them here are closet racists.

Duggy747

timmy_mallet wrote: »

Fell right into the trap there, son. And yet all of them here are closet racists.

Quit your attitude or don't post in this thread again.

Ulysses Gaze

FortySeven wrote: »

I disagree. Affable bunch in here, well travelled and socially savvy.

Sometimes AH reminds me of this

http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/simpsons/images/a/ab/Simpsons_angry_mob.png/revision/latest?cb=20070619165229

[Deleted User]

reason vs religion wrote: »

It's fairly universally accepted that dressing in black-face trivialises the experience of Blacks, who until relatively recently were treated as sub-human. Perhaps it's not racist, but it's certainly grossly inconsiderate and knowingly provocative.

In America maybe but people seem to forget that we aren't in furking USA

FortySeven

timmy_mallet wrote: »

Fell right into the trap there, son. And yet all of them here are closet racists.

I like it when people call me son. Makes me feel young again. I may even attempt to masturbate with my new found youth.

darkpagandeath

timmy_mallet wrote: »

LINK.

pq0n1ct4ve8zf5

That fb post has to be satire surely? Else she done f*cked up with the 'white slavery' and 'fake Jews' comments.

I don't think blackface is harmless, or funny, or right, in any context, I cringe so hard when I see it I nearly hurt myself. But it's hard to pick who's annoying me more here....

timmy_mallet

darkpagandeath wrote: »

timmy_mallet wrote: »

LINK.

A link to what?

darkpagandeath

timmy_mallet wrote: »

A link to what?

Your proof, Everyone knows what a mistral looks like.

FortySeven

darkpagandeath wrote: »

Your proof, Everyone knows what a mistral looks like.

Clearly not, that there is a minstrel.

timmy_mallet

darkpagandeath wrote: »

timmy_mallet wrote: »

A link to what?

Your proof, Everyone knows what a mistral looks like.

At a wish not to labour this any further - what exactly are you looking for proof of and a link to?

timmy_mallet

Deleted User wrote: »

reason vs religion wrote: »

It's fairly universally accepted that dressing in black-face trivialises the experience of Blacks, who until relatively recently were treated as sub-human. Perhaps it's not racist, but it's certainly grossly inconsiderate and knowingly provocative.

In America maybe but people seem to forget that we aren't in furking USA

I don't think blackface stops being offensive when you leave the USofA.

[Deleted User]

Cool Runnings costumes ok and the Valderrama one is well done.. but how do you defend the guys whose costumes consist just of black/brownface and a tshirt and jeans? Or black Roddy Piper?

SEPT 23 1989

those gentlemen look like they are having fun

can't have that

HensVassal

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

I pity the fool who wears a Mr T costume.

Shut up, fool!

darkpagandeath

timmy_mallet wrote: »

At a wish not to labour this any further - what exactly are you looking for proof of and a link to?

very obtuse, our history of black face.

ohnonotgmail

timmy_mallet wrote: »

I don't think blackface stops being offensive when you leave the USofA.

Offensive or racist? It is possible for it to be one but not the other.

The_Valeyard

Nothing racist or wrong with people dressing up as characters from a film, show, etc.

Otherwise I will be outraged and triggered when a black person dresses up as Albert Einstein or Captain Kirk, bla, bla, bla.

People just look for reasons to be offended the get attention online.

darkpagandeath

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

Offensive or racist? It is possible for it to be one but not the other.

News at 11 apartheid in south Africa therefore means white people everywhere have a history of it......

timmy_mallet

darkpagandeath wrote: »

timmy_mallet wrote: »

At a wish not to labour this any further - what exactly are you looking for proof of and a link to?

very obtuse, our history of black face.

Irish people consume(d) English media, do you really need a link to be provided for that? There was even a bloody Lyons tea advert.

What does 'our history of black face' even mean? That for someone to feel offended (or something to be deemed racist) that the nation must have had some documented past relating to it?

[Deleted User]

The_Valeyard wrote: »

Nothing racist or wrong with people dressing up as characters from a film, show, etc.

Otherwise I will be outraged and triggered when a black person dresses up as Albert Einstein or Captain Kirk, bla, bla, bla.

People just look for reasons to be offended the get attention online.

But you can see some lads clearly didn't dress up beyond the blackface

timmyntc

The_Valeyard wrote: »

Nothing racist or wrong with people dressing up as characters from a film, show, etc.

Otherwise I will be outraged and triggered when a black person dresses up as Albert Einstein or Captain Kirk, bla, bla, bla.

People just look for reasons to be offended the get attention online.

As an ethnic orange-rock-man I'm offended by people dressing up as The Thing from Fantastic Four.

ohnonotgmail

darkpagandeath wrote: »

News at 11 apartheid in south Africa therefore means white people everywhere have a history of it......

So its a bit like original sin then?

darkpagandeath

timmy_mallet wrote: »

Irish people consume(d) English media, do you really need a link to be provided for that? There was even a bloody Lyons tea advert.

What does 'our history of black face' even mean? That for someone to feel offended (or something to be deemed racist) that the nation must have had some documented past relating to it?

So that's a no to providing a history of black face grand so.

timmy_mallet

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

timmy_mallet wrote: »

I don't think blackface stops being offensive when you leave the USofA.

Offensive or racist? It is possible for it to be one but not the other.

Both. I don't think I'd take kindly to something telling me I shouldn't feel offended by something. And blackface is racist.

darkpagandeath

riffmongous wrote: »

But you can see some lads clearly didn't dress up beyond the blackface

http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/creepypasta/images/7/7d/Blackface.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20120115051854

Must have missed them in the picture.

ohnonotgmail

timmy_mallet wrote: »

Irish people consume(d) English media, do you really need a link to be provided for that? There was even a bloody Lyons tea advert.

What does 'our history of black face' even mean? That for someone to feel offended (or something to be deemed racist) that the nation must have had some documented past relating to it?

the lady who posted on twitter has the right to take offence. Just like the people who read that post have the right to think thats its all nonsense.