Howth Tram to Return

Seanmk1 wrote: »

Feasibility study on e-tenders today.

Description: Consultancy services in respect of Feasibility Study on reinstatement of Howth Tram
Buyer: Fingal County Council

https://irl.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/publicpurchase_frameset.asp?PID=100108&B=&PS=1&PP=

Is this the same body that's going to shoehorn the Fry Model Railway into a cottage at Malahide? Incidentally the tender documents don't seem to be available on that link. It will never happen - you heard it here first.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZrEmvTwkbNY

Here's something to look at while you dream of trams rattling up and down the Hill of Howth.

https://consult.fingal.ie/en/submission/CVQ-1202

and a pleasant reminder of what CIE and the Irish government blithely threw away.

The Hill of Howth Tram was one of the big three things for locals and tourists to do in Dublin along with the Nelson Pillar and the Zoo. At least we have the Guinness Tourist Trap Storehouse. :rolleyes:

ClovenHoof

I think it is a brilliant idea. Would be a colossal success. The right of way is all in tact for the most part.

Just because CIE killed it off, does not mean we should emulate their pathological stupidity and negativity for all eternity.

This is waste of time and money (except for the consultants) for 3 main reasons:

There'll be no room beside Howth Station for a terminus due to development works beginning on the old Teeling site (now Dog Groomers/Garden Centre/Beshoff Motors/Bosco's car repair shed. Those businesses are getting the heave-ho in the next few months.

Even if the above was somehow magically solved, the bridge would need to be rebuilt at a greater height.

Lastly there's no way there'll be enough demand for it and almost none during winter. The 88 bus which replaced the tram, is long gone, partially replaced by a 31B service, which at first went around the hill to Howth Station. There wasn't even enough demand for that so now it only goes to the Summit. They did try to bring back a reduced 88 route as the 31C which was quickly axed due to lack of demand. Any one who travels around the hill often (me) knows that the 31A/B buses are almost empty for most the hill route. If it was to be only a tourist attraction the cost/benefit would be very negative.

I wish I could get a consultant's fee for that.

ClovenHoof

This is a tourist project, not a commuter one.

Secondly, with the right marketing and imagination it could be huge attraction.

FCC are not tendering for a time machine or their own Fluas.

Finally located the tender documents and I'm none the wiser. It will be a nice little earner for some Irish or UK tourism consultants. Of course, they could contact the likes of the Festiniog Railway to see how they approached the reconstruction of the Welsh Highland Rly and seek some advice.But sadly, no, much better to get a firm of consultants and end up with something like Blennerville or the Clonakilty Model Railway Village.

McAlban

Would love to see it. But I think it's Just more money into Aecom's pockets...

end of the road

ClovenHoof wrote: »

Just because CIE killed it off, does not mean we should emulate their pathological stupidity and negativity for all eternity.

i agree but it's easier said then done unfortunately.

Banjoxed

Quick! Quick! Think of all the tired and hungry tourists deprived of a cycleway that we haven't thought of since 1959!

Banjoxed wrote: »

Quick! Quick! Think of all the tired and hungry tourists deprived of a cycleway that we haven't thought of since 1959!

Well if Galway and Mayo want their railway, we want our feckin tram! Oh, and a greenway alongside it too.

McAlban

The Parts of the Alignment that weren't already converted into the R105, are now either Shared Cycle/Footpaths, or have houses built on it.

ClovenHoof

McAlban wrote: »

The Parts of the Alignment that weren't already converted into the R105, are now either Shared Cycle/Footpaths, or have houses built on it.

A new alignment at these locations is easier with a tram than heavy rail.

Just build an interpretative centre in Howth station, with multi-media audio visuals and talking heads and leave it that. Even that would give the consultants and their friends an excuse to run up big bills. :rolleyes:

ted1

Del.Monte wrote: »

Here's something to look at while you dream of trams rattling up and down the Hill of Howth.

https://consult.fingal.ie/en/submission/CVQ-1202

and a pleasant reminder of what CIE and the Irish government blithely threw away.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZrEmvTwkbNY

The Hill of Howth Tram was one of the big three things for locals and tourists to do in Dublin along with the Nelson Pillar and the Zoo. At least we have the Guinness Tourist Trap Storehouse. :rolleyes:

While not technically Dublin the bray head cable car also belongs on the list

ted1

tricky D wrote: »

This is waste of time and money (except for the consultants) for 3 main reasons:

There'll be no room beside Howth Station for a terminus due to development works beginning on the old Teeling site (now Dog Groomers/Garden Centre/Beshoff Motors/Bosco's car repair shed. Those businesses are getting the heave-ho in the next few months.

Even if the above was somehow magically solved, the bridge would need to be rebuilt at a greater height.

Lastly there's no way there'll be enough demand for it and almost none during winter. The 88 bus which replaced the tram, is long gone, partially replaced by a 31B service, which at first went around the hill to Howth Station. There wasn't even enough demand for that so now it only goes to the Summit. They did try to bring back a reduced 88 route as the 31C which was quickly axed due to lack of demand. Any one who travels around the hill often (me) knows that the 31A/B buses are almost empty for most the hill route. If it was to be only a tourist attraction the cost/benefit would be very negative.

I wish I could get a consultant's fee for that.

Look at Lisbon and how they have integrated old trams with new trams and finicolars. Toursits love them and from that view alone could make if feasible

ted1 wrote: »

While not technically Dublin the bray head cable car also belongs on the list

At least CIE weren't responsible for closing that.:D

Atlantic Dawn

Would it not cost tens of millions to reinstate for a completely unknown tourist market? What they should first do to research the market is buy a fleet of 20 of these incredibly slow and annoying tourist mini buses that delay traffic and run them around the summit first to check demand...

Also did this same Fingal County Council not give planning permission recently for the complete developement for all lands from the railway station to the nearest level crossing, surely they are just burning good money with this report?

Grandeeod wrote: »

At least CIE weren't responsible for closing that.:D

Bet that pissed them off.

Atlantic Dawn wrote: »

Also did this same Fingal County Council not give planning permission recently for the complete developement for all lands from the railway station to the nearest level crossing, surely they are just burning good money with this report?

Yes planning permission (re)granted for the site from 53°23'20.21"N 6° 4'31.34"W to Baltray tennis courts at about 53°23'23.68"N 6° 4'57.39"W, so there's no room for a terminus pretty much with or without a siding unless it's built on the reinstated bridge somehow.

McAlban

tricky D wrote: »

Yes planning permission (re)granted for the site from 53°23'20.21"N 6° 4'31.34"W to Baltray tennis courts at about 53°23'23.68"N 6° 4'57.39"W, so there's no room for a terminus pretty much with or without a siding unless it's built on the reinstated bridge somehow.

There was never a Terminus there in the original Tramway.It was Mudflats. The Bridge may not be high enough for the DB buses going through howth village however.

If they had sense they would try and tie it into the national transport museum in Deerpark.

Prague has a fantastic Historical Tram Tour you can do. However... They still have a lot of their original tram lines...

McAlban wrote: »

There was never a Terminus there in the original Tramway.It was Mudflats.

The terminus was there to the west of the 6° 4'31.34"W north/south line which is the eastern limit of the new development. It was just south of the signal box and extended further west to merge with the main rail line. This is viewable on the OSI HISTORIC 25" view [ http://maps.osi.ie/publicviewer/#V2,727937,739391,12,9 ]. The platforms were east of the signal box but wholly in what is now the lands being developed - so no room for a new/reinstated terminus. The mudflats were further west as can be seen in the map.

McAlban wrote: »

If they had sense they would try and tie it into the national transport museum in Deerpark.

Now there's something which could be fantastic if the powers that be would give it decent funding. Currently it's a sad ramshackle place despite the huge effort and dedication of those who work there.

Other issues include ownership of parts of the bridge approach from the west side of the bridge (where the Dog House is). Somewhat oddly the southern wall of the approach (the bit behind the ad hoarding on the left of your photo) is owned by the house to the south (they have a stairway from the back yard up to the deck. The rest of the deck is owned by CIE but below is owned or leased at the very least by the Wrights.

Fwiw pic of the old tram master's cottage though the sign calls them electric cars!

howth%20tram%20cottage900_zps862ugevv.jpg

tricky D wrote: »

The rest of the deck is owned by CIE.

That's it then. The project is doomed!:D

Sam Russell

Could they run the tram from Howth summit to as far as Howth Junction instead of the Dart? Just a thought - could add a few extra stops.