Baza210 wrote: » WINDOWS 7 IS... GOOD. =O
mathew wrote: » no soldering involved at all.. thats in second year
TheAmateur wrote: » Yup, that seems to be the reasoning behind that lecture. Whats the craic with this mangonel yoke anyways is it a flat-pack with a small circuit? Any soldering to do?
Baza210 wrote: » this is an INVERTER would've sufficed..
Baza210 wrote: » Tri-rotor huh, that'll be a 20B from a Cosmo.. wouldn't be into drag racing myself though, more drifting. Also, Digital Electronics was seriously dragged out..This is an AND gate, this is an OR gate, this is an INVERTER would've sufficed..
mathew wrote: » Mangonelling??
TheAmateur wrote: » I'm guessing it's a 2nd year thing?
mathew wrote: » Particularly English and Latin in Analogue 2E6 :P
The 13b-REW?
TheAmateur wrote: » All I can say about that exp. is that it makes you look forward to a chemistry-free second year.
mathew wrote: » Its fantastic... it does pop up a bit here and there.. as do most subjects tho.. Particularly English and Latin in Analogue 2E6 :P
TheAmateur wrote: » Pretty bad isn't it? I handed mine in today about half-done. And there were a few hours put into it too. Alls I know is the rate is 2.5x10^-4 / dt, dt being whatever time you recorded for that particular solution and the rate constant k = [concentration of S2O8]^alpha X [concentration of I]^beta / rate alpha = order of reaction with respect to S208 beta = order of reaction with respect to I I think I got alpha = 1 and beta = 1 but that's probably wrong. It "explains" that in the chemistry book anyways. All my rate constants were x10^-3, I think the avg. (there's a bit where they ask for the avg. of three) was 4.12x10^-3 . My E act was about 40 kJ M^-1 I think. All I can say about that exp. is that it makes you look forward to a chemistry-free second year. Also, the management accept no liability for incorrect equations I may or may not have remembered correctly.
Baza210 wrote: » Empathise HARD on the CH2 front.
devinejay wrote: » Don't knock the Wankel till you see about 700bhp from a theoretical 1.4 litres!
Nice bridge Baza, but I still maintain that being one of the first groups to do the experiment we were at serious disadvantage. We managed 20N and 1.15N/€ with no previous exposure to truss design.
I may have mentioned this before but Wileyplus drives me nuts. Is it just me or has the site been down all weekend?
Baza210 wrote: » Do you like rotary-powered sports cars?
TheAmateur wrote: » wat
kearnsr wrote: » If you ever design something warn me before I use it Baza210 wrote: » Do you like rotary-powered sports cars?
kearnsr wrote: » If you ever design something warn me before I use it
TheAmateur wrote: » Which chemistry experiment have you done btw? Trying to write up C2 atm and I'd love to see if anyone's got numbers for the rates close to what I got. I had to round 1.6 up to 2 to find one of the orders, so that's probably not right anyways...