Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

O2 won't cover my warranty

Options
  • 10-07-2012 3:24pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 7,025 ✭✭✭


    Hi all,
    Wondering what I can do about this issue. Last September I bought a Samsung Galaxy S2 from an O2 store and while on holidays in Porto early last month it started acting up. I've never been a messy person with phones and always take good care of what I own so this has never been open to damage from dropping it or spilling anything on it.

    It got to the point of barely being usable so I brought it in to the store and they did some checks and decided it should be sent away (which is what I wanted and thought was required). I had a 2 year warranty with the phone and as I gave it in they seemed very assured that it would be returned good as new.

    A week later I get a text to collect my phone. I arrive to bad news. Liquid damage they tell me corroded the USB port and warranty doesn't cover liquid damage:confused: What else doesn't the warranty cover if that is the case.
    I told the guy it's never had anything spilled on it ever and he replied that "it can be caused by rain or condesation". So my phone apparently absolutely cannot be used in the rain, ever? Who can honestly say they haven't been on their phone or mid text while it rained on them? If it rains I put away my phone as soon as I can.
    On a trip to Dublin today a colleague from work told me his wife worked for a mobile phone company and they were told when they received damaged goods to always go back with "Liquid Damage" regardless of the problem. At the weekend my brother in law said I should contact the National Consumer Agency about it to see what they recommend.
    Has anyone ever had this issue, what course of action did you take or has anyone contacted the NCA with something like this?

    I just need to know if it is worthwhile in the long run.


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,373 ✭✭✭✭foggy_lad


    you could have the phone independantly examined but they may say the same or you could insist on getting all the reports of the testing that was supposed to have been done and have someone go through that to see what they can find. You could also try bringing it to a different phone menders and ask them to examine the phone but they will charge for this as the phone is now branded as officially customer damaged.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,025 ✭✭✭homerun_homer


    I like the idea of independent examination. Who or where can do this?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,181 ✭✭✭bryaner


    Op I'd go back in look for the report and bluff them that your getting it independently assessed see what happens, if they don't buckle get it checked and if it's not liquid damage head for the small claims, shower of <SNIP>..


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Very common fob-off excuse, I don't believe it the majority of the time. Generally if it's true you can request photos of the supposed damage.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,025 ✭✭✭homerun_homer


    I have the report and it says;
    Your phone has extensively been tested by Fonemenders and a technician has found your unit not repairable due to liquid damage - such phones that have been damaged by liquid or moisture are in repairable. Liquid damage invalidates the manufacturers warranty and will render your phone to be Beyond Economical Repair due to corrosion on the main board.

    It also came with a red printed sheet listing the 2 reasons they have for why something came be considered beyond economical repair an they are Liquid damage and Physical Damage.

    It looks like unless I obviously crack/break the phone by dropping it that they use the Liquid Damage excuse regardless.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,181 ✭✭✭bryaner


    <SNIP> fonebenders another shower of <SNIP>, are they even authorised warranty agents for Samsung?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    bryaner wrote: »
    <SNIP> fonebenders another shower of <SNIP>, are they even authorised warranty agents for Samsung?

    Are they authorised warranty agents for anyone? Certainly not Apple for sure.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,181 ✭✭✭bryaner


    Karsini wrote: »
    bryaner wrote: »
    <SNIP> fonebenders another shower of <SNIP>, are they even authorised warranty agents for Samsung?

    Are they authorised warranty agents for anyone? Certainly not Apple for sure.

    Well they have no right in opening any phone if the're not authorised..


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,025 ✭✭✭homerun_homer


    What is NOT covered by your warranty

    The Samsung warranty covers manufacturing defects only. Please note that this does not include consumable items such as batteries, bulbs, ink cartridges etc. The liability of Samsung Electronics (or its appointed maintenance agent) is limited to the cost of repair and/ or replacement of the product under warranty. The warranty is invalidated if the defect is caused (howsoever) by misuse, neglect, and tampering or incorrect adjustment. It is invalidated if unauthorised persons carry out any alterations or repairs.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,181 ✭✭✭bryaner


    What is NOT covered by your warranty

    The Samsung warranty covers manufacturing defects only. Please note that this does not include consumable items such as batteries, bulbs, ink cartridges etc. The liability of Samsung Electronics (or its appointed maintenance agent) is limited to the cost of repair and/ or replacement of the product under warranty. The warranty is invalidated if the defect is caused (howsoever) by misuse, neglect, and tampering or incorrect adjustment. It is invalidated if unauthorised persons carry out any alterations or repairs.

    Could be worth a call Op

    http://m.samsung.com/ie/info/contactus.html#contact1


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 60 ✭✭kujosHeist


    On a trip to Dublin today a colleague from work told me his wife worked for a mobile phone company and they were told when they received damaged goods to always go back with "Liquid Damage" regardless of the problem..

    The phone repair companys get paid for each phone they repair so its not in their interest to send it back unfixed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,181 ✭✭✭bryaner


    I'm just thinking here, I used to work for a company and one of the things we sold were automotive batteries, the fella that sold us the batteries bought them with no warranty and got a discount on them (he would have to honour the warranty).

    Would o2 and the other providers be using similar tactics and using fonebenders to carry out their warranty work?

    Just a thought..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,373 ✭✭✭✭foggy_lad


    bryaner wrote: »
    I'm just thinking here, I used to work for a company and one of the things we sold were automotive batteries, the fella that sold us the batteries bought them with no warranty and got a discount on them (he would have to honour the warranty).

    Would o2 and the other providers be using similar tactics and using fonebenders to carry out their warranty work?

    Just a thought..
    I know someone who used to work in a small hardware shop and the owner would regularly have a loud argument with genuine customers who had brought back stuff that had broken due to defects etc. They would tell him he had to take items back and repair replace or refund but his attitude was that even though the distributor had agreed to take back and credit for any returns even if there was doubt about it being customer damage this ignorant shopkeeper did not want "them basterds" as he called his customers getting the idea they had the right to return anything!

    Imho phone shops appear to work on the same principles.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,131 ✭✭✭subway


    if you are telling the truth, deny it was misued, in wiriting to them (do not lie)
    give them 14 days to accept that they are incorrect or you will lodge with the SCC.
    if they dont reply, take it to SCC, swear an affidavit that it was never subject to misuse other than what would be expected as standard.

    their case will not stand up in court if they cannot prove the phone was misused


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,025 ✭✭✭homerun_homer


    subway wrote: »
    if you are telling the truth, deny it was misued, in wiriting to them (do not lie)
    give them 14 days to accept that they are incorrect or you will lodge with the SCC.
    if they dont reply, take it to SCC, swear an affidavit that it was never subject to misuse other than what would be expected as standard.

    their case will not stand up in court if they cannot prove the phone was misused

    I am telling the truth, the only liquid this phone has been in touch with is rain and that is beyond anyone's control in this country.

    I contact the NCA and they told me to write them a letter and I could use the template they have on their site. If I get no response in the time I give them (10 days) then I can inform them that I will take it up with SCC.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,131 ✭✭✭subway


    cool, well that's the path i would take. you can tell they arent going to engage with you so it will need a registrar to make a judgement.

    i would also advise, to make an effort to speak to a manager (in person) and politely explain the situation, you should also make every effort to get the name of the head of customer service (or equivalent) in order to ensure your letter will reach the right person / department. they can't use ignorance of your letter as an excuse, but it will stand to you if you have given the company plenty of chances to hear your case.

    if it does go to court, explain all the sitautions you would normally use your phone in, provide as much evidence as you can to support your case that the phone was well treated. photographic evidence of its condition, links to cases online that demonstrate similar symptoms, links that explain what happen when the phone is subject to actual misuse etc.

    basically, you don't have to prove the phone wasn't water damaged, there's every possibility that it was (condesnation, rain, vapor from your breath, etc), but that the fault that occured was through normal use. if the phone gets water damaged from being taken out in the rain, is this a reasonable expectation from a phone, if it is, does the manufacturer advise this (most reasonable people would expect to be able to use a moblie phone outdoors, and it rains a lot in ireland so do the math). dont get into a technical battle with them, you are not expected to be technical, just a reasonable person.

    good luck with it and let us know how you get on (and if it does go to court)


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,346 ✭✭✭McGrath5


    I was under the impression that the more phones fonemenders successfully repair, the more they are paid. So is it not in fonemenders interest to successfully repair as many phones are reasonably possible?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,025 ✭✭✭homerun_homer


    I was under the impression that the more phones fonemenders successfully repair, the more they are paid. So is it not in fonemenders interest to successfully repair as many phones are reasonably possible?

    Even at that, if my phone is not covered by warranty should I not be offered a charge to get it fixed? It seems incredibly ridiculous that some corrosion in a USB port would make the phone completely unfixable.


  • Registered Users Posts: 27,126 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Even at that, if my phone is not covered by warranty should I not be offered a charge to get it fixed? It seems incredibly ridiculous that some corrosion in a USB port would make the phone completely unfixable.

    They replace usb ports all the time (I've had 2 done on my S2 due to a dodgy charger)
    I have found fonemenders to be excellent.
    The only reason they wouldnt mend it is if they know that Samsung /O2 wont cover their costs because it was damaged due to water.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,025 ✭✭✭homerun_homer


    GreeBo wrote: »
    They replace usb ports all the time (I've had 2 done on my S2 due to a dodgy charger)
    I have found fonemenders to be excellent.
    The only reason they wouldnt mend it is if they know that Samsung /O2 wont cover their costs because it was damaged due to water.

    And there is the d1ck in the shop telling me to send it away for recycling, if it can be fixed then I'll be satisfied.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,181 ✭✭✭bryaner


    subway wrote: »
    if you are telling the truth, deny it was misued, in wiriting to them (do not lie)
    give them 14 days to accept that they are incorrect or you will lodge with the SCC.
    if they dont reply, take it to SCC, swear an affidavit that it was never subject to misuse other than what would be expected as standard.

    their case will not stand up in court if they cannot prove the phone was misused

    I am telling the truth, the only liquid this phone has been in touch with is rain and that is beyond anyone's control in this country.

    I contact the NCA and they told me to write them a letter and I could use the template they have on their site. If I get no response in the time I give them (10 days) then I can inform them that I will take it up with SCC.

    That's the shot Op give them both barrels


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,181 ✭✭✭bryaner


    GreeBo wrote: »
    Even at that, if my phone is not covered by warranty should I not be offered a charge to get it fixed? It seems incredibly ridiculous that some corrosion in a USB port would make the phone completely unfixable.

    They replace usb ports all the time (I've had 2 done on my S2 due to a dodgy charger)
    I have found fonemenders to be excellent.
    The only reason they wouldnt mend it is if they know that Samsung /O2 wont cover their costs because it was damaged due to water.

    Have a quick look at this thread http://touch.boards.ie/thread/2055672988?page=1#post_61963648

    And then do a boards search for fonemenders and see how many problems people have had with them. There're a very hit and miss shower of ****** fonebenders..


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,025 ✭✭✭homerun_homer


    Update: I contacted Samsung to hear what they would say on the matter and they want to have a look at the phone so are sending me a pack for me to return the phone, complete with a copy of receipt and description of the faults. They will then check to see what the issue is and get back to me.

    It's better to come from the horses mouth as any I suppose.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,131 ✭✭✭subway


    how are samsung going to know if you misused your phone?
    you are wasting your time and weakening your case.

    this is all they check
    http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1456563


  • Registered Users Posts: 834 ✭✭✭Heart Break Kid


    bryaner wrote: »
    <SNIP> fonebenders another shower of <SNIP>, are they even authorised warranty agents for Samsung?

    Fonemenders aren't that bad, they've done well by me on all occasions.
    Had the same problem as the OP, If you look at the USB connection, you will probably see that its gone green or discolored in some way, basically corroded. It happens, O2 hasn't done anything wrong. Its outside your warranty.
    Its tough to except but they have no reason to fob you off, they aren't paying for the repair at the end of the day, its samsung who covers the costs.

    I got quoted by FONFIX at 150 euro, dropped down to Fonemenders, they just replaced it for 40 blips and then had it verified by samsung, came back as good as new, they even booted it to 4.0.

    Happy camper.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,131 ✭✭✭subway


    thats all well and good, but you could have saved yourself 40eu if you knew your consumer rights. (asuming your phone also became faulty through normal use)


  • Registered Users Posts: 834 ✭✭✭Heart Break Kid


    subway wrote: »
    thats all well and good, but you could have saved yourself 40eu if you knew your consumer rights. (asuming your phone also became faulty through normal use)

    i work for the shop i bought my s2 and i know my consumer rights. I could clearly see the usb was corroded, i understand that there is no way that the damage could occur by anything else by liquid. So i was happy to pay 40 blips from a quoted price of 50 to get it fixed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,131 ✭✭✭subway


    unfortunately, the fact that you work in a phone shop, gives you a severe bias in this matter. phone shop employees have, for years, been shown to repeatedly give misleading advice on this forum "because that's shop policy" etc

    condensation and other forms of moisture encroach are to be expected on devices such as phones which will regualrly be in many different environments (hot trains, sweaty nightclubs, humid / damp outdoor areas, etc, etc)
    a device like this should reasonably be expected to withstand such environmental factors (how long do the vast majority of phones last?) so one that does not, where the user can support a claim of correct use, could reasonably deemed to be faulty or poor quality.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,181 ✭✭✭bryaner


    i work for the shop i bought my s2 and i know my consumer rights. I could clearly see the usb was corroded, i understand that there is no way that the damage could occur by anything else by liquid. So i was happy to pay 40 blips from a quoted price of 50 to get it fixed.

    So did you introduce your phone to some form of liquid?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,025 ✭✭✭homerun_homer


    Update: I know not everyone would agree with the fact I got in touch with Samsung to see what would happen there (possibly weaken my case as a result) but the envelope they sent with a packet for me to send them the phone to check arrived. It is not from Samsung however but Fonemenders.

    Now I definitely don't want to send it so I'm contemplating ringing Samsung again and telling them I do not want to go around in circles, I want a fixed phone and blame their design flaw for not making a device that can protect itself/combat condensation or rain.


Advertisement