Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Guide - Getting the most out of your high speed Virgin Media (UPC) 240mb/s service

13468920

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 27 Redshoestoo


    I'm paying full wack for TV and Internet with UPC, however I am not getting fibre internet because on my road the UPC cable hangs from house to house and fibre does not work when exposed to the elements, only when buried under the ground. Check how UPC arrives at your home is it in cables that are exposed and at risk of being cut by builders, which happened on my street a couple of days ago, and we were without internet and TV for 24 hours.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,072 ✭✭✭ItHurtsWhenIP


    I'm paying full wack for TV and Internet with UPC, however I am not getting fibre internet because on my road the UPC cable hangs from house to house and fibre does not work when exposed to the elements, only when buried under the ground. Check how UPC arrives at your home is it in cables that are exposed and at risk of being cut by builders, which happened on my street a couple of days ago, and we were without internet and TV for 24 hours.

    I'm afraid that this is utter BS. There is fibre optic cable running along Eircom poles as part of the core network, totally exposed to the elements.

    The cable you are talking about is a copper cable (co-ax I think) that UPC strings along from distributed nodes, which have fibre run to them from UPC that provide their fibre-powered broadband across the co-ax.


  • Registered Users Posts: 27 Redshoestoo


    I read this in an article today posted on bonkers.ie
    'Fibre optic cables are very delicate, however. They’re thinner than a human hair after all! They can’t be laid above ground or in shallow earth, where they’ll be at the mercy of the elements.'
    It was in an article by Mark Whelen. Go to bonkers.ie and click on 'TV broad band and phone' his article is highlighted at the bottom of the page.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,072 ✭✭✭ItHurtsWhenIP


    I read this in an article today posted on bonkers.ie
    'Fibre optic cables are very delicate, however. They’re thinner than a human hair after all! They can’t be laid above ground or in shallow earth, where they’ll be at the mercy of the elements.'
    It was in an article by Mark Whelen. Go to bonkers.ie and click on 'TV broad band and phone' his article is highlighted at the bottom of the page.

    Oh dear ... you are taking technical advice from a price comparison website ... :rolleyes:

    I don't know what Mark Whelan is - he might be a consumer expert, but he has very limited cabling knowledge. I will re-iterate - that Eircom have core network fibre optic cable strung along their poles to my local exchange from the next village (10KM away) and from there to the next village (12KM away) and all the way back to Tipperary Town. This is exposed to the harshest of elements and is only disconnected by falling trees.

    In fact, please see attached photo of this cable as it reaches the exchange in my village ... OK the elements were nice on the day this photo was taken, but generally they are less than pleasant. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,072 ✭✭✭ItHurtsWhenIP


    OK - Sorry - I don't mean to be nasty. Yes - Fibre optic cable is better placed into underground ducting as it protects it from a lot (but not a JCB :P).

    However it is perfectly fine to be out in the open too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,072 ✭✭✭mass_debater


    Just as well they coat it in polyethylene


  • Registered Users Posts: 27 Redshoestoo


    I have no idea based on your photo what kind of cable that is, it looks like plain black cable to me:)
    Part of my point with UPC cable is that it is much more precariously placed than cable from telegraph poles.
    It is subject to the vagaries of home owners and builders. It follows the roof lines of each house down the road and then jumps to the next house. One home owner demolished and built a new house and refused to have the ugly cable hanging across his expensive new build so the cable was buried underneath his house, it goes down one side of the house, and then comes up the other, and then continues its journey down the road from house to house.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,072 ✭✭✭mass_debater


    I have no idea based on your photo what kind of cable that is, it looks like plain black cable to me:)
    Part of my point with UPC cable is that it is much more precariously placed than cable from telegraph poles.
    It is subject to the vagaries of home owners and builders. It follows the roof lines of each house down the road and then jumps to the next house. One home owner demolished and built a new house and refused to have the ugly cable hanging across his expensive new build so the cable was buried underneath his house, it goes down one side of the house, and then comes up the other, and then continues its journey down the road from house to house.

    UPC is coax to the building


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,072 ✭✭✭ItHurtsWhenIP


    I have no idea based on your photo what kind of cable that is, it looks like plain black cable to me:)
    Well my friendly Eircom linesman told me it was a 48 core fibre optic cable and I believe him :P.
    Part of my point with UPC cable is that it is much more precariously placed than cable from telegraph poles.
    It is subject to the vagaries of home owners and builders. It follows the roof lines of each house down the road and then jumps to the next house. One home owner demolished and built a new house and refused to have the ugly cable hanging across his expensive new build so the cable was buried underneath his house, it goes down one side of the house, and then comes up the other, and then continues its journey down the road from house to house.
    Yeah - I lived in Limerick city and Dublin before and that was the way Chorus/NTL ran their co-ax. It wasn't great and they could only run it with every house's agreement. My parent's next door neighbour held up Westward Cable (showing my age) running it along our road in Limerick. It took months of asking them nicely to let it through so we could get more than 2 feckin channels!!! :eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    I'm paying full wack for TV and Internet with UPC, however I am not getting fibre internet because on my road the UPC cable hangs from house to house and fibre does not work when exposed to the elements, only when buried under the ground. Check how UPC arrives at your home is it in cables that are exposed and at risk of being cut by builders, which happened on my street a couple of days ago, and we were without internet and TV for 24 hours.

    Your issue is not with the cables. But just that you had your service cut by builders.

    Builders could also snag a overhead cable on telephone pole or cut cables underground when digging.

    If they didn't go house to house it would take a lot longer to put all the cables under ground and cost more.

    That said I think it looks terrible and often its fitted very poorly.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,169 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    He sort of has a point. Eircom go out in spurs from aerial DPs while UPC run all non UG cables along properties. This means cutting a drop can take out a dozen homes vs just one or maybe two POTS lines.

    Its that or them not servicing you as it'd cost loads more.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,184 ✭✭✭k123456


    http://jamescausian.hubpages.com/hub/TP-Link-Archer-C7-vs-C8

    Beamforming on the C8



    Re laptop Nics, not easy to change a wired 100mb nic to 1gb, as they are usually part of the Motherboard (LOM)

    Desktop should be easy enough, if PCI card

    Wireless nics, very easy to change, check your laptop model hardware owners manual, your present NIC will prob only support bgn protocols, to get most out of your ac router , ac compliant wifi nic needed
    http://www.cnet.com/uk/how-to/how-to-upgrade-your-laptops-wi-fi-card/
    https://www.google.ie/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=best+wireless+ac+card+for+laptop



    I've ordered intel 7260 ac wi nic


  • Registered Users Posts: 811 ✭✭✭Rock Paper Scissors


    Just seen on the first page of this thread that the technicolor upc router has to be "hacked" via SNMP commands to activate bridge mode.

    Guys does anyone who uses the Technicolor router from UPC have a TP link archer router connected to it successfully via bridge mode?




  • Registered Users Posts: 68 ✭✭scrummonkey


    great thread, thanks to all.
    So i followed the guide and set my tc7200 as modem only and linked it to my archer c8. Am on upc 120 mb package. The wifi signal works great only intermittently, as it is constantly dropping now. Sometimes i can't connect any device,e.g. mac air, iPhone, iPad, iMac , to the internet. After a while the signal is perfect again. Anyone any ideas what is causing this please ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,072 ✭✭✭mass_debater


    great thread, thanks to all.
    So i followed the guide and set my tc7200 as modem only and linked it to my archer c8. Am on upc 120 mb package. The wifi signal works great only intermittently, as it is constantly dropping now. Sometimes i can't connect any device,e.g. mac air, iPhone, iPad, iMac , to the internet. After a while the signal is perfect again. Anyone any ideas what is causing this please ?

    Change channel, it may be interference


  • Registered Users Posts: 68 ✭✭scrummonkey


    Change channel, it may be interference

    thanks for reply. No one else seems to be on my 5ghz channel (36) and connection still drops. On 2.4ghz changing channel has no effect .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,072 ✭✭✭mass_debater


    thanks for reply. No one else seems to be on my 5ghz channel (36) and connection still drops. On 2.4ghz changing channel has no effect .

    Change channel anyway, see does it improve


  • Registered Users Posts: 68 ✭✭scrummonkey


    Change channel anyway, see does it improve

    tried it, no improvement. :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,137 ✭✭✭✭TheDoc


    This thread is really interesting.

    I have been on 240mbps since it came out, and have been pretty chuffed with the performance. Down by the router my HTPC and NAS are hooked in via Ethernet and my HTPC fetches speeds just on the 240mb, which is brilliant considering its my main download manager etc.

    however I've been getting tetchy with my main pc, which is running via power/homeplugs. Below is my latest speedtest.
    4559130662.png


    To be honest I don't suffer lag or issues in games, which is my main purpose for my PC, but being the main Pc, I'm just greedy and want more.
    The homeplugs are doing the best they can.

    I'm in rented accommodation, and not sure if I can/should drill holes for Ethernet. Would be dead handy. Cable could go outside the house, up the back wall, into the room above, where my main PC is. I'd prefer to go out and in, rather then up through the ceiling, since god knows what cabling etc. is there.

    But seeing people report on 200mb speeds over wifi is really impressive. Maybe to avoid hassle of cabling and drilling holes, I might look into this. What sort of outlay are we talking when it comes to buying the TPlink modem/router and then a wifi adaptor to harness the speeds in myPC?

    To be honest I keep posting about this every so often, think I need to stop being lazy, and just cable the ****ing thing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,417 ✭✭✭griffdaddy


    TheDoc wrote: »
    This thread is really interesting.

    I have been on 240mbps since it came out, and have been pretty chuffed with the performance. Down by the router my HTPC and NAS are hooked in via Ethernet and my HTPC fetches speeds just on the 240mb, which is brilliant considering its my main download manager etc.

    however I've been getting tetchy with my main pc, which is running via power/homeplugs. Below is my latest speedtest.
    4559130662.png


    To be honest I don't suffer lag or issues in games, which is my main purpose for my PC, but being the main Pc, I'm just greedy and want more.
    The homeplugs are doing the best they can.

    I'm in rented accommodation, and not sure if I can/should drill holes for Ethernet. Would be dead handy. Cable could go outside the house, up the back wall, into the room above, where my main PC is. I'd prefer to go out and in, rather then up through the ceiling, since god knows what cabling etc. is there.

    But seeing people report on 200mb speeds over wifi is really impressive. Maybe to avoid hassle of cabling and drilling holes, I might look into this. What sort of outlay are we talking when it comes to buying the TPlink modem/router and then a wifi adaptor to harness the speeds in myPC?

    To be honest I keep posting about this every so often, think I need to stop being lazy, and just cable the ****ing thing.

    Just get an Archer C7 or C8 and ac wireless card or USB adapter. Probably cost about 120 all in. If you get a USB adapter it's probably something you'll use for a long time to come, assuming the pc has Usb 3 ports.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,137 ✭✭✭✭TheDoc


    griffdaddy wrote: »
    Just get an Archer C7 or C8 and ac wireless card or USB adapter. Probably cost about 120 all in. If you get a USB adapter it's probably something you'll use for a long time to come, assuming the pc has Usb 3 ports.

    Yeah I've a fair few USB 3 ports.

    That would be a decent enough price to get consistent speeds of the sort others are talking. My house doesn't have overly thick walls. As is I get decent wifi speeds on my phone in the Pc room, so I'd say the PC could get good ones.

    Going to tinker with the 5ghz speeds later see how it gets on. Will need to check devices though to ensure they are compatable.

    Nexus 4 original release, Nexus 7 original release and an iPhone 5 are the wireless devices we use, along with a PS4 upstairs. The 5ghz thing sounds interesting, never bothered changing it as I only use wifi in the front room, where the router is itself.

    My only concern with wifi as always, is potential drop outs and dropped signals.

    I must also check what router I have from UPC provided, to see if its eligible for this messing :) To be honest it sounds like the investment would pay off itself considering it would be my own router and wireless card, useable down the line also.

    Just remember trying to solve an internet crisis with Eircom two years ago, I bought a Linksys WRT610N Dual N Band Wireless Router , wonder if that would be any use


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,184 ✭✭✭k123456


    TheDoc wrote: »
    This thread is really interesting.

    I have been on 240mbps since it came out, and have been pretty chuffed with the performance. Down by the router my HTPC and NAS are hooked in via Ethernet and my HTPC fetches speeds just on the 240mb, which is brilliant considering its my main download manager etc.

    however I've been getting tetchy with my main pc, which is running via power/homeplugs. Below is my latest speedtest.
    4559130662.png


    To be honest I don't suffer lag or issues in games, which is my main purpose for my PC, but being the main Pc, I'm just greedy and want more.
    The homeplugs are doing the best they can.

    I'm in rented accommodation, and not sure if I can/should drill holes for Ethernet. Would be dead handy. Cable could go outside the house, up the back wall, into the room above, where my main PC is. I'd prefer to go out and in, rather then up through the ceiling, since god knows what cabling etc. is there.

    But seeing people report on 200mb speeds over wifi is really impressive. Maybe to avoid hassle of cabling and drilling holes, I might look into this. What sort of outlay are we talking when it comes to buying the TPlink modem/router and then a wifi adaptor to harness the speeds in myPC?

    To be honest I keep posting about this every so often, think I need to stop being lazy, and just cable the ****ing thing.


    Borrow or buy a network cable cat5e or greater
    test using the network cable, if the speed is not much better over cable, you might have a problem with your ETH Nic, ; update drivers , Nic FW and Bios


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,137 ✭✭✭✭TheDoc


    k123456 wrote: »
    Borrow or buy a network cable cat5e or greater
    test using the network cable, if the speed is not much better over cable, you might have a problem with your ETH Nic, ; update drivers , Nic FW and Bios

    PC speeds have been consistent like the above. To be honest I keep my drivers up to date, and just went through a clean windows 10 install there over the weekend, where all drivers were updated. I'm like 100% sure its just a limitation of the home plugs.

    The speed to my HTPc is perfect which is connected by Ethernet, typically 230-235mbps, its really an incredible stable service. I just want to optimise the main PC upstairs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,184 ✭✭✭k123456


    TheDoc wrote: »
    Yeah I've a fair few USB 3 ports.

    That would be a decent enough price to get consistent speeds of the sort others are talking. My house doesn't have overly thick walls. As is I get decent wifi speeds on my phone in the Pc room, so I'd say the PC could get good ones.

    Going to tinker with the 5ghz speeds later see how it gets on. Will need to check devices though to ensure they are compatable.

    Nexus 4 original release, Nexus 7 original release and an iPhone 5 are the wireless devices we use, along with a PS4 upstairs. The 5ghz thing sounds interesting, never bothered changing it as I only use wifi in the front room, where the router is itself.

    My only concern with wifi as always, is potential drop outs and dropped signals.

    I must also check what router I have from UPC provided, to see if its eligible for this messing :) To be honest it sounds like the investment would pay off itself considering it would be my own router and wireless card, useable down the line also.

    Just remember trying to solve an internet crisis with Eircom two years ago, I bought a Linksys WRT610N Dual N Band Wireless Router , wonder if that would be any use

    Keep an eye on ebay too, lots of ac routers there,
    this went for stg 16
    http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/231633852311?_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,137 ✭✭✭✭TheDoc


    k123456 wrote: »
    Keep an eye on ebay too, lots of ac routers there,
    this went for stg 16
    http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/231633852311?_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT

    Might try find someone who has a rake of cat5e or cat6, and just run the cable upstairs and see what speeds I get.

    I guess ideally I'd like to stay cabled. Have a switch up by the main pc, where the homeplugs go into. If I can get a cable into that from downstairs, be cool to see what the speeds look like, and if it hits the 230+ like downstairs.

    To find someone with 15-20metres of cable :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,184 ✭✭✭k123456


    TheDoc wrote: »
    Might try find someone who has a rake of cat5e or cat6, and just run the cable upstairs and see what speeds I get.

    I guess ideally I'd like to stay cabled. Have a switch up by the main pc, where the homeplugs go into. If I can get a cable into that from downstairs, be cool to see what the speeds look like, and if it hits the 230+ like downstairs.

    To find someone with 15-20metres of cable :D

    Lots of cable Ebay, get cat6


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Eason Unimportant Pajamas


    So I got a Horizon box recently and supposedly 240mb internet, but it's not getting anywhere close to that speed. Just wondering does the guide apply to the Horizon box too? Does anyone know how you log into the internet settings on Horizon? I've tried 192.162.0.1 and 192.162.1.1 but neither page loads.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 470 ✭✭bob11


    Hi there,

    Great thread here ..

    just about to buy a new wlan modem to improve my UPC wifi speeds.

    I see that there is an TP Link archer C9 now available with faster spec.
    I presume that this would be better to future proof my installation ?

    Bob


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,184 ✭✭✭k123456


    bob11 wrote: »
    Hi there,

    Great thread here ..

    just about to buy a new wlan modem to improve my UPC wifi speeds.

    I see that there is an TP Link archer C9 now available with faster spec.
    I presume that this would be better to future proof my installation ?

    Bob


    I googled archer c7 vs c8, and c8 vs c9, not a huge amount of difference in em

    I went for the c8, as I couldn't see a massive difference between c8 and c9

    one important thing the c8 has over the c7, is usb 3


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,184 ✭✭✭k123456


    An example of the difference a decent router will make over the UPC one

    Had UPC router, wireless was getting 10-20mb

    ON laptop ; Changed to AC compatible NIC, speed went up to 20-30 still connected to upc wifi router

    Set up Archer c8 yesterday, now getting 240mb wireless on laptop (about 4 metre away, signal travelling thru one wall)

    Android phones now averaging 50 mb
    were 30mb before

    Interestingly while the Androids are all recent enough phones, with ac compatible NICS, they are not seeing the ac 5ghz ssid, only the laptop does. Looks like an issue with the phones, and not the router.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,137 ✭✭✭✭TheDoc


    What sort of AC compatible NIC/Adapter would I be looking at for a PC?

    I've some N technology wireless adapters knocking around, might actually plug one in to get a feel for what the wireless signal is like on my PC, and how it carries from downstairs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,184 ✭✭✭k123456


    TheDoc wrote: »
    What sort of AC compatible NIC/Adapter would I be looking at for a PC?

    I've some N technology wireless adapters knocking around, might actually plug one in to get a feel for what the wireless signal is like on my PC, and how it carries from downstairs.

    https://www.google.ie/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=best%20ac%20wireless%20card

    If you are looking one for a PC, you get could get a USB or PCI (slot type)

    I went for a Intel 7260HMW , but afik, they come in different form factors, to suit whatever you have , laptop , PC etc , ; USB, Pci, mini pci (laptop) etc

    I'm not sure , but I guess a USB one might lose some speed if you have USB 2 ports

    Another one, that's got good reviews is "Bigfoot" wifi adapters


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,031 ✭✭✭✭Johnboy1951


    I wonder if this one would give consistently high speed connections

    http://www.komplett.ie/product/zkb-03netw/20221960/intel-netwerk-controller-ac-3160-mini-pci-e/details.aspx
    Data transfer rate (max) 433 Mbit/s


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,184 ✭✭✭k123456


    Just a PS on using the 5ghz faster network with Android Phones, previously the phones were only picking up the slower 2.4g network

    Wasn't picking up the 5ghz ac faster network , on Androids , What I did : to fix, using the TP link Gui, changed the channel on 5ghz from auto to a numbered channel, on one Android got downloads on 200mb, on another 100mb , impressive speeds for a phone


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,169 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    k123456 wrote: »
    Just a PS on using the 5ghz faster network with Android Phones, previously the phones were only picking up the slower 2.4g network

    Wasn't picking up the 5ghz ac faster network , on Androids , What I did : to fix, using the TP link Gui, changed the channel on 5ghz from auto to a numbered channel, on one Android got downloads on 200mb, on another 100mb , impressive speeds for a phone

    Handsets may not support DFS which is used in Auto mode but not static mode.


  • Registered Users Posts: 68 ✭✭scrummonkey


    So anyone any ideas why my set up with an archer 8 is constantly dropping ? I followed guide as per instructions here, it got so bad I had to revert to that tc 7200 rubbish again ..... Did I just throw €110 down the drain re the c8 ? Or what should I be looking for as a cause of the problem ? Need help guys as am not that tech savvy ......


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,934 ✭✭✭MarkAnthony


    So anyone any ideas why my set up with an archer 8 is constantly dropping ? I followed guide as per instructions here, it got so bad I had to revert to that tc 7200 rubbish again ..... Did I just throw €110 down the drain re the c8 ? Or what should I be looking for as a cause of the problem ? Need help guys as am not that tech savvy ......

    Are the DHCPs enabled on both devices. That's what I did - silly me. If you dont specifiy the address range you'll get conflicts.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2 Monzo_


    Recently changed to the 240mb/s service as we've been struggling with slow speeds for such a long time. Unfortunately the change has done nothing. All the speed tests hover between the 30mb and 50mb mark using the ethernet cable. Using the internet upstairs is an utter pain and it's only just about bearable downstairs. I got in touch with them and they claim the modem is a new model and that the line has no issues.

    Any suggestions on what to do next? A couple of my housemates generally stick to their rooms so would getting an adapter or something for the upstairs hallway be a worthwhile option? Being honest I don't know too much about them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,184 ✭✭✭k123456


    Hi, see post page one, basically you need to test your speed, using a pc or laptop with a 1gb capable network card and a 1gb capable cable (cat5e cat6), you should be seeing close to 240mb wired


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 789 ✭✭✭Fakman87


    Lads I got UPC today and my test came back at 80Mbs wireless. The white box that I connected the horizon box to is an old NTL box. Could this slower speed be due to this or only down to being wireless? Thanks.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,031 ✭✭✭✭Johnboy1951


    Fakman87 wrote: »
    Lads I got UPC today and my test came back at 80Mbs wireless. The white box that I connected the horizon box to is an old NTL box. Could this slower speed be due to this or only down to being wireless? Thanks.

    Check it wired.

    Wireless can vary greatly depending on a lot of variables.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 789 ✭✭✭Fakman87


    Check it wired.

    Wireless can vary greatly depending on a lot of variables.

    Thanks. I don't have a cable so will have to buy one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,184 ✭✭✭k123456


    Hi Folks, I have a c8 and am configuring
    these Optional Extra steps 12 to 15

    If you are going to be running servers or playing games, it maybe a good idea to also implement the following optional steps:

    12) Connect to your new routers web admin interface
    13) Set the "WAN Connection Type" to Static IP (found under Network -> WAN on the Archer C7).
    14) Then enter the following:
    IP Address: 192.168.0.2
    Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0
    Default Gateway: 192.168.0.1
    15) Click Save (you may need to reboot the server


    currently under dynamic
    Use These DNS Servers is unticked
    dns server ips are greyed out
    and have the folowing ips
    89.101.160.5 and 89.101.160.4

    However when I changed from dynamic to static
    I am being prompted to hard code dns addresses


    Do I go with addresses above, or what should I put in


    Thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,031 ✭✭✭✭Johnboy1951


    k123456 wrote: »
    Hi Folks, I have a c8 and am configuring
    these Optional Extra steps 12 to 15

    If you are going to be running servers or playing games, it maybe a good idea to also implement the following optional steps:

    12) Connect to your new routers web admin interface
    13) Set the "WAN Connection Type" to Static IP (found under Network -> WAN on the Archer C7).
    14) Then enter the following:
    IP Address: 192.168.0.2
    Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0
    Default Gateway: 192.168.0.1
    15) Click Save (you may need to reboot the server


    currently under dynamic
    Use These DNS Servers is unticked
    dns server ips are greyed out
    and have the folowing ips
    89.101.160.5 and 89.101.160.4

    However when I changed from dynamic to static
    I am being prompted to hard code dns addresses


    Do I go with addresses above, or what should I put in


    Thanks

    Those IPs - 89.101.160.5 and 89.101.160.4 - belong to UPC.

    Unless UPC provide you with a fixed IP address for your WAN side then you cannot use it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 92 ✭✭Dublin Deluge


    Thanks for the excellent guide! I also bought the TP-LINK Archer C8 and my experience has been mostly positive. I just had some connectivity problems to report, which, in summary, can be solved by just putting your UPC technicolor modem in bridge mode. Hope this info might help other people in the same situation.

    Here are the details:

    I was a bit reluctant to go the whole way and put my UPC technicolor modem in bridge mode, so I kept my archer as a subnet of the technicolor network. Speeds were overall great on wireless, (depending on device and distance to router, etc) and this setup worked perfectly for about a month. This week however something weird started to happen. The Archer router started to go offline/lose connection and then recover connectivity after about 5 minutes. This would happen randomly. At the beginning I thought it was the UPC connection, but I was able to connect to the internet if connected directly to the technicolor via ethernet whilst the archer was dropping the internet. It wasn't a problem on the archer wifi, as you couldn't access the Internet during a dropout even if connected to the archer by ethernet cable..

    I concluded that either there was something in the Archer that was losing the connection to the internet OR that the Technicolor was somehow disconnecting the Archer sporadically. The Archer had a static IP on the Technicolor and this static IP address was in the DMZ in the Technicolor, so I didn't really know what to do.

    Pretty much as a stab in the dark I decided to put the Technicolor in bridge/modem-only mode following this guide (using the Linux method):

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2057106714

    After setting the technicolor in bridge mode I stopped having connectivity issues. My internet connection has been solid for the last 36 hours or so.

    However, I'm still not sure why I started having these connectivity issues after about a month of not having problems.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,184 ✭✭✭k123456


    `Hi Folks, re technicolor in bridge mode

    Will this affect my LAN wired ports/ and/or the telephone port ?

    I too have an Archer c8, and have yet to bridge it

    Thanks





    An Aside

    For those that are using wired connections, I have noticed that the wired ports perform better on the Archer, than the UPc technicolor 7200 ;
    Using a Minix X8 Android TV box (Nic is limited to 100mb) and cat 6 cabling 20metre cable run
    direct to technicolor 7200, speedtest 65mb download average
    direct to Archer c8, average 95mb :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,006 ✭✭✭beno619




  • Registered Users Posts: 92 ✭✭Dublin Deluge


    k123456 wrote: »
    `Hi Folks, re technicolor in bridge mode

    Will this affect my LAN wired ports/ and/or the telephone port ?

    I too have an Archer c8, and have yet to bridge it

    I don't have anything connected to the Technicolor ethernet ports other than the archer c8 router. So I don't know what would happen if I connect another device like a laptop... Haven't even tried. I assume it shouldn't get an IP address....

    The telephone port on the technicolor works fine. I can make and receive phone calls no problem.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,184 ✭✭✭k123456




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,031 ✭✭✭✭Johnboy1951


    k123456 wrote: »

    Oh yeah, I really trust Google to not spy on me ...... right! :rolleyes:


Advertisement