Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

IMO chief exec lump sum

  • 21-12-2012 9:39am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,320 ✭✭✭


    From today's Times:

    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/frontpage/2012/1221/1224328083699.html

    I know it was probably in the contract and knowledge that was available to all members up to now, but that is a totally unjustifiable payment in my opinion. It's one thing if you're the boss of a huge ball-breaking union that's getting concessions for its members left, right and centre, but for representing 5000 members?


«134

Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 11,668 Mod ✭✭✭✭RobFowl


    MrCreosote wrote: »
    From today's Times:

    5000 members? -1

    FYP


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,001 ✭✭✭✭opinion guy


    MrCreosote wrote: »
    I know it was probably in the contract and knowledge that was available to all members up to now

    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2012/1221/1224328082958.html


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41 iratira


    I am sick reading that. I can't understand how someone who is meant to be fighting on the ground with the people can do that.
    No wonder membership costs of the IMO are extortionate.
    It's a lot more demoralizing when you realize why the costs are so extortionate.
    As an aside, consultants should be ashamed of how they handled the new decreased wages for new recruits. They just turned a blind eye- at least nurses have some sense of fairness and support of their colleagues.
    And for the record I think consultants wage is too high but a two tiered system- that's just disrespectful and unfair.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,489 ✭✭✭dissed doc


    iratira wrote: »
    I am sick reading that. I can't understand how someone who is meant to be fighting on the ground with the people can do that.
    No wonder membership costs of the IMO are extortionate.
    It's a lot more demoralizing when you realize why the costs are so extortionate.
    As an aside, consultants should be ashamed of how they handled the new decreased wages for new recruits. They just turned a blind eye- at least nurses have some sense of fairness and support of their colleagues.
    And for the record I think consultants wage is too high but a two tiered system- that's just disrespectful and unfair.

    True. They make it sounds like the IMO has developed itself from scratch to get so many members, but in fact it was legally the only representative body for doctors. Thus, in typical UK style, doctors were unable to negotiate outside of the IMO who could then be trailed along happily by governments. Hence the IHCA.

    The IMO is and always was a ball and chain/hangman's noose on irish doctors. The IMO actively avoid focussing entirely on doctor's employment standards/rights/contracts and have successfully (on behalf of the government) gotten rid of training money, gotten reduced salaries, avoided implementing the european working time directive. This is why they appear politically powerless and why they "lose" all negotations with the government )and why if you genuinely want something done like your contract fulfilled, you have to take personal lawsuits and bypass the IMO entirely'.

    All in all, the IMO is amazing at implementing government policy against doctors and convincing doctors at the same time to pay €1000 a year to be sodomised by the HSE, government and IMO.

    RE± consultants. They were absolutely clear multiple times that they do not want a two tier split and want to maintain standardised national salaries. However, the government and the electorate don´t want that, and it will be easier to manipulate new vs old consultants like public vs. private. Long game, over the next 5 years or so.Divide and conquer, etc.,


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,320 ✭✭✭MrCreosote


    Anyone know the funding streams for the IMO

    5000 members at an average of 1000/year is only 5 million euro. 10% of that on one salary? I'm suppose there are other sources of funding?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 11,668 Mod ✭✭✭✭RobFowl


    MrCreosote wrote: »
    Anyone know the funding streams for the IMO

    5000 members at an average of 1000/year is only 5 million euro. 10% of that on one salary? I'm suppose there are other sources of funding?

    Most members are NCHD's and on a lower subs, no other source of income AFAIK.
    I'm absolutely sickened with this news and am waiting for a reply from them but planning toresign my membership later today...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41 iratira


    Yes that was the IHCA's stance but it was a passive stance as far as I can see. I understand its what the electorate want. I don't necessarily disagree.
    I just think that people making these changes underestimate the issue of equality and respect. The consultant salary is still much more than alot of people earn but I think the feeling a 2 tiered system creates will be bad for morale.
    Perhaps I'm wrong as 100k is still a wage that allows a nice lifestyle.
    As for the IMO, as far as I know they get all the interns to sign up then most people realize what a load of crap it is and opt out after a few years.
    The younger docs probably are more trusting, until they read that article in the paper today! I am pleased that journalists can uncover such abuses.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41 iratira


    Yes that was the IHCA's stance but it was a passive stance as far as I can see. I understand its what the electorate want. I don't necessarily disagree.
    I just think that people making these changes underestimate the issue of equality and respect. The consultant salary is still much more than alot of people earn but I think the feeling a 2 tiered system creates will be bad for morale.
    Perhaps I'm wrong as 100k is still a wage that allows a nice lifestyle.
    As for the IMO, as far as I know they get all the interns to sign up then most people realize what a load of crap it is and opt out after a few years.
    The younger docs probably are more trusting, until they read that article in the paper today! I am pleased that journalists can uncover such abuses.


  • Registered Users Posts: 325 ✭✭ThatDrGuy


    Thanks for this post OP. I nearly had a mi when I read it. I cant believe I ever gave those fuçkers money. Performance-related bonus ? For what? My god funding this guy and his lump sum and his persion is going to eat up the fee's of every NCHD in the country. He is retiring at 55 while the people he was supposed to represent are ignored, marginalised and exploited. Getting chest pain just thinking about it. What is wrong with the Irish ? Why can't we do anything right?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,489 ✭✭✭dissed doc


    ThatDrGuy wrote: »
    Thanks for this post OP. I nearly had a mi when I read it. I cant believe I ever gave those fuçkers money. Performance-related bonus ? For what? My god funding this guy and his lump sum and his persion is going to eat up the fee's of every NCHD in the country. He is retiring at 55 while the people he was supposed to represent are ignored, marginalised and exploited. Getting chest pain just thinking about it. What is wrong with the Irish ? Why can't we do anything right?

    Nothing to do with the `Irish`. It´s the hierarchy system just like the UK. For example, the BMA act in precisely the same way, even ignoring a succesful ballot for industrial action to keep the charade going. The IMO keeps Irish doctors packaged up, by law no/one can negotiate terms and conditions except the IMO and at the end of the day, most of the cash is moved up the hierarchy or feudal system to the few at the top.

    Ironically, the IMO will be completely unable to (surprise) pursue legal action against breaches of contract by the single state employer (HSE) as the money will be directed to his pension. What do you do. the IMO as the only legal representative body in Ireland for doctors in training has every intention based on it´s previous actions to undermine doctors and keep them in line for successive goverments to destroy both professionally and financially.

    But that is what the public electorate want. Its important to remind yourself of that when you leave.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41 iratira


    Don't waste your health on them. Yes you were exploited. We were all exploited ( docs) but now hopefully as this abuse has been recovered, people will cop on and withdraw funding from them.
    perhaps there are good people involved with the IMO who are not just on the take and I feel sorry for them if they exist but let's be honest, they knew what was going on in the organisation and didn't do anything to change it ( or maybe did try - dunno ).
    My advice is keep your 1000k for yourself don't hand it over to this organization. If they dropped the membership fees and made the organization more transparent perhaps they could rebuild their reputation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,845 ✭✭✭2Scoops


    The IMO's income is almost all from membership subs. They operate at a small profit every year, 2/3rds of income goes on salary and and pensions and the rest is spent on overheads and pet projects. This retirement deal, coupled with an expected further decrease in membership for 2012, will more than likely put them in the red. Might be a much-needed wake-up call. The IMO is not a union; it's a 'medical organization' i.e. delusions of grandeur. I honestly wouldn't have a problem with that if there was a legal alternative for Irish doctors to join.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41 iratira


    I read the article but couldn't understand it properly. Its more than a little confusing for a pleb like me. Can anyone with a better knowledge of the area explain what is being said in the Irish times article.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,001 ✭✭✭✭opinion guy


    If you all only read the OP's link you need to read this one also to fully appreciate this story:


    Edit: short summary - pension was renegotiated from original agreement and union fought to be able to give it to him last year. Now they have had to get legal advice before announcing it lest the be accused of 'reckless trading'.

    Reckless trading is a financial legal term to do with the obligations on directors and is the sort of thing banks would be proud of:
    http://www.smurfitschool.ie/aboutsmurfit/news/facultyviews/title,73224,en.html

    In short.....SERIOUS questions need asking and answering here.....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41 iratira


    Wow! I'm stunned. Its curious how they recently blocked their page to non members also so you can't even read general articles.
    Did they think that would entice us to Re join?
    Gosh is there anyone out there whos going to stick with the IMO and if so, can you explain why. I'm interested and open minded to hear about any pros of being a member.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,845 ✭✭✭2Scoops


    More on this controversy by the Irish Medical Times:
    http://www.imt.ie/news/latest-news/2012/12/breaking-news-imo-announces-retirement-plans-for-ceo-george-mcneice.html

    Oh wait, they didn't even mention the controversy. Just a few kind words about how IMO is the 'undisputed representative body for Irish doctors' and how membership has swelled... since the 1980s. :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41 iratira


    Well it probably swells every year when the IMO bring newly qualified interns out for a night out somewhere, feed then with booze and scaremonger them into joining telling them that x y or z could happen to them. After that they are so busy that most won't even reconsider their membership til they cop on to what a rip it is.
    Interns, medical students- be aware of the tactics employed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 325 ✭✭ThatDrGuy


    The more I think about this, the angrier I get. 492,355 euro.... When I left
    it took nearly a whole week's salary to pay the IMO after tax. That week was about 75 hours ( most of it not paid - thanks to the IMO!). I think I paid about 600 euro at the time, so I probably worked about 50 hours (including the ones that apparently didnt happen ) just to pay the IMO. How much of my money was sucked straight into this guys bank account ? All of it. And all the money of around 820 other NCHD's. That means we worked 41,000 hours combined just to lined this fuçker's pockets per year. His lump sum will require another 125,000 hours of doctors lives. Money that was supposed to go to fight for things like safe working conditions ( ignored ) training ( ignored ) leave entitlements ( ignored ) sick leave ( ignored ) fighting against bullying and exploitation ( ignored). Money given in good faith by people to try and improve their dismal station instead enables this guy to retire at 55!! laughing all the way to his swollen bank account.

    What are the options here? I want my membership subscriptions back. I joined a union, not George McNeice's private slush fund. Can I take legal action over misrepresentation ? I have looked at the IMO's accounts. I assume his obscene [ i dont even know if there is word for it, some combination of insanity, bloated , horrific, disgusting, graft, artifice, chicanery , swindle, racket and renumeration ] is hidden in the salary section. The IMO markets itself as a union. This is clear misrepresentation of a service. Could I get my money back under the sale of goods and supply of services act ?

    PS I know that more was appropriated from GP's and consultants too. Sorry for leaving you out of my rant.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 11,668 Mod ✭✭✭✭RobFowl


    ThatDrGuy wrote: »
    PS I know that more was appropriated from GP's and consultants too. Sorry for leaving you out of my rant.

    No worries , well capable of ranting ourselves :rolleyes:

    5 Doctors where I work and the combined salaries fall well short of the esteemed George McNiece .


  • Registered Users Posts: 325 ✭✭ThatDrGuy


    RobFowl wrote: »
    No worries , well capable of ranting ourselves :rolleyes:

    5 Doctors where I work and the combined salaries fall well short of the esteemed George McNiece .

    Dont feel bad. This year George McNiece will take home 1,992,355 euro. As head of the worst union in the country (by a mile) he is earning more than the Presidents of the USA, Germany, France , Australia, Uk , Japan , Russia , Canada and Isreal combined. But he's worth it....


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,815 ✭✭✭Vorsprung


    Damage control email sent!

    Dear colleague

    As President of the Irish Medical Organisation (IMO) I wish to respond to media reports regarding the resignation of the CEO of the organisation, Mr. George McNeice.

    The circumstances of Mr. McNeice’s resignation as CEO are extremely controversial and will cause great distress to members of the IMO as they have to myself and my colleagues on the Management Committee of the organisation; not least given the financial difficulties so many of our members are facing.

    Mr McNeice acted within his rights given his contractual entitlements. However his contract was negotiated many years ago and in a form which left the organisation very exposed to changing economic circumstances and changes in legislation particularly in respect of pension provision and salary increases. I share the anger which I have no doubt all members will feel in relation to this matter.



    The facts are as follows:

    The Chief Executive initiated discussions with the organisation some time ago about the provisions for his retirement. In response the organisation undertook a comprehensive review of the matter including detailing any and all liabilities of the organisation on foot of the CEO’s contractual entitlements and all options available to us in this matter.


    The IMO sought and received advice from various independent parties including actuarial advice, taxation advice and legal advice from two independent Senior Counsel. That legal advice clearly stated that the organisation could not expect to win any legal challenge to the contractual entitlements held by the CEO.


    As a result of this legal advice, the IMO had no option but to initiate talks with the CEO in order to secure a settlement of the matter. Our overriding priority has been to ensure that the organisation retained sufficient financial resources to enable it to represent the interests of our members and to support those members in respect of their work in the Irish health services.


    Through this process extensive efforts were made to achieve a resolution at a lower cost to the organisation. However these were unsuccessful.


    Intensive negotiations with representatives of Mr McNeice then took place over recent weeks and concluded with a legally binding agreement between the two sides which was signed this week. This agreement secured the resignation of Mr McNeice as CEO of the IMO and of all other offices which he held in his role as CEO of IMO. Mr McNeice has no active management role in the organisation since yesterday.


    Because of the legal sensitivities surrounding this matter, I am sure people will appreciate that we unable to consult fully with members. However we did organise a full briefing on this matter while the process was in train for Trustees, member of the Management Committee and other relevant members of the organisation on Monday night last. That briefing included contributions from two independent barristers (Senior Counsel) who were retained to advise the Management Committee on this matter.


    Following that briefing, the Management Committee (which has responsibility for this area under the rules of the organisation) met formally and unanimously agreed that the proposed settlement represented the only option for the organisation to take given the liability it faced. Everyone at that meeting was appalled at the circumstances in which we found ourselves but acted in the best interests of the organisation given that there were no other options available to us.


    In that settlement agreement, the Management Committee secured a reduction of approximately 50% of the organisation’s legal liability to Mr. McNeice arising from his contractual entitlements.


    It has been established on the basis of independent taxation and actuarial advice that Mr McNeice had contractual entitlements to pension and other provisions of circa €20 million.


    The settlement negotiated by the IMO reduced the cost of the settlement to approximately €9.7 million –including a pension fund of approximately €4.5 million, a contractual termination payment of €1.5 million and delayed pension payments of €3.75 million (representing a cost of €2.6 million at today’s values).


    Membership subscriptions in the future are protected and will not be required or used to finance this settlement given that the IMO has made full provision for these payments from its current resources.


    That settlement also required the organisation to issue an agreed statement yesterday to announce Mr McNeice’s retirement.


    Despite this settlement, the IMO remains in a very strong financial position and has the resources it requires to continue to represent members and develop policy as currently. This settlement is being fully provided for in our financial accounts and all relevant details will be disclosed in full in the next set of accounts.


    I have put in place interim management arrangements involving a sub-committee of the Management Committee to oversee the day-to-day management of the organisation over the coming months.


    The sub-committee is made up as follows:

    Dr. Paul McKeown President

    Professor Sean Tierney Treasurer

    Dr. Matt Sadlier Incoming President

    Dr. Ray Walley Chair GP Committee

    Mr. Niall Saul Acting Executive



    Prior to this episode, I had initiated a comprehensive review of Governance Procedures at the IMO. I have now extended the Terms of Reference of that review to include specifically a review of all processes, practices and procedures around the issue of Remuneration to ensure that nothing like this can ever happen again and that there is clear transparency and full risk assessment in respect of key contracts in the future.


    I am convening a special meeting of members on Saturday 12th January next. Further details will issue in due course.


    Yours Sincerely



    Dr. Paul McKeown

    President


  • Registered Users Posts: 325 ✭✭ThatDrGuy


    Thanks Vorsprung. So for the last year when its members have been royally shafted by the HSE, what was the IMO doing? It was hiring barristers to see how many millions of its member's money should be given to its CEO. I used to think the IMO was useless but harmless. I didnt even begin to fathom how god damn useless they were. These are the people negotiating on your behalf. This is the only organisation you are legally allowed to join to represent your basic working rights. This shower. I need to go lie down.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 11,668 Mod ✭✭✭✭RobFowl


    ThatDrGuy wrote: »
    Thanks Vorsprung. So for the last year when its members have been royally shafted by the HSE, what was the IMO doing? It was hiring barristers to see how many millions of its member's money should be given to its CEO. I used to think the IMO was useless but harmless. I didnt even begin to fathom how god damn useless they were. These are the people negotiating on your behalf. This is the only organisation you are legally allowed to join to represent your basic working rights. This shower. I need to go lie down.

    Thanks for that Vorsprun and agree ThatDrGuy

    Have just canceled by IMO membership.
    If thats how good they are at negotiating things entirely with in their control, then God help us with them negotiating with the HSE....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,815 ✭✭✭Vorsprung


    Entitlements (I love it when that word pops up!) of upto 20 million.

    The IMO's income in 2011 was 3.9 million (just had a look at the annual report for the year).

    The mind boggles. I too will be cancelling my membership.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,848 ✭✭✭bleg


    The mind boggles. Really feel sorry for you guys. What an absolute waste of money.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 995 ✭✭✭Ryder


    RobFowl wrote: »
    Thanks for that Vorsprun and agree ThatDrGuy

    Have just canceled by IMO membership.
    If thats how good they are at negotiating things entirely with in their control, then God help us with them negotiating with the HSE....
    ......or that McNeice is a phenomenol negotiator and should be kept on....JOKE. If I wasnt 'overseas' I would be cancelling too...instead I will be asking the to desist from any more communication with me.

    I joined as an intern 12 years ago....a sponsored night out. Didnt renew it after my SHO years because it was all about financial planning, credit cards etc. Rejoined for 2 years when the whole strike issue was being mentioned, but never again. Its a real problem for doctors now. At best, we have incompetent representation. Minimal training aids (in the face of increasing burden of competence assurance), exploitation, non-payment....and worst of all unchallenged negative profiling in the media.

    I think the IMOs fault lies with its members, all of us. Too passive. It sees itself as a health lobby group, with its budget submissions, public health announcements etc, to elevate itself above a mere union. But that is what we need, and evidently dont have.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,807 ✭✭✭take everything


    I got onto the IMO industrial relations section recently about (what seems to me) the illegal non-payment of living-out allowance.
    Granted i'm not a member, but i still wanted to know what the mechanisms for the mysterious non-payment of this were, especially since it is explicitly there in the contract i signed (the 2010 one, which, if i'm not mistaken hasn't changed).

    I simply asked the guy there how this came about assuming he would have been involved in any negotiations about it and therefore well placed to provide the information that i needed.
    No matter how much i asked politely, he couldn't point me to any provision etc that contradicted/overruled the 2010 contract that i signed.

    I asked him about information on the relevant date it disappeared (Feb 01: this year. Supposedly if you weren't working in the HSE on that exact date you don't get it). He couldn't provide me with anything.

    I pointed out to him that i signed the 2010 contract (that includes the allowance). He couldn't reconcile it.

    He was desperate to get me off the phone, eventually cited the get-out clause ("you're not a member") and eventually hung up when the questions got difficult.

    I wasn't asking for anything- only for someone to point me in the direction of when this allowance was dropped.
    I don't believe it has.
    I still believe it's illegal because he couldn't give me this simple piece of information.

    I've ranted about this lately but this seems as good a thread as any to point it out again.

    Had to laugh at this in the imt after i did a bit of googling on this where the IMO themselves admit it would be a breach of contract (second-last paragraph).
    http://www.imt.ie/news/latest-news/2012/07/gp-regs-face-20-pay-cut.html
    It's unbelievable, especially in light of this guy's pay-off.


  • Registered Users Posts: 123 ✭✭resus


    IMO members need to all take that one bold step that will ultimately improve Irish Medicine, and patient care.... resign


  • Registered Users Posts: 325 ✭✭ThatDrGuy


    Oh God. It gets worse.

    http://www.medicalindependent.ie/page.aspx?title=imos_future_in_jeopardy_following_multi_million_euro_pay_out_to_outgoing_ceo

    The IMO has such utter contempt for its membership it thinks it can turn over the entire net worth of the organisation to fund a retirement slush fund for its CEO. The management of the IMO colluded to make this happen. It now thinks a few spin doctored emails can smooth things over and then business as usual. Words fail me. I thought I had seen it all in this country. Wow.

    Oh and resign. Of course. But that lets this guy walk away with every cent you ever gave the IMO. Everything. This is the plan the leadership have decided on. Imagine the skeletons in the closet they are trying to cover up if Plan A is to give this guy 10 million euro.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,807 ✭✭✭take everything


    ThatDrGuy wrote: »
    Oh God. It gets worse.

    http://www.medicalindependent.ie/page.aspx?title=imos_future_in_jeopardy_following_multi_million_euro_pay_out_to_outgoing_ceo

    . The IMO has such utter contempt for its membership it thinks it can turn over the entire net worth of the organisation to fund a retirement slush fund for its CEO. The management of the IMO colluded to make this happen. It now thinks a few spin doctored emails can smooth things over and then business as usual. Words fail me. I thought I had seen it all in this country. Wow.

    Oh and resign. Of course. But that lets this guy walk away with every cent you ever gave the IMO. Everything. This is the plan the leadership have decided on. Imagine the skeletons in the closet they are trying to cover up if Plan A is to give this guy 10 million euro.


    Just reading that again there.
    20 million, 10 million...
    That's up there with Fingleton et al.

    Meanwhile the 50 hours odd overtime i did in the last couple of weeks are taxed to **** at something like over 60% (after all the USC/PDP crap).
    I know this is a general thing across the board but then losing stuff like the living out allowance (because the IMO couldn't be arsed defending it) on top of this again makes me feel i'm earning nothing.
    Call is not worth doing.

    While this guy retires on Euromillions money.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 995 ✭✭✭Ryder


    Excellent article in the medical Indo....as usual. I resigned from the IMO earlier. Felt a little bad about it, because it isn't the fault of the current committee and I genuinely fear for nchds if it falls.

    But... And its a big but. The imo are more concerned with policy and being seen as influential see rather than getting down and dirty regarding tights. Why else would the IMO constantly have to fight fires all over the country - same ones each time, and then crow triumphantly about their victory. I would have paid money to see them at least fight this o justice, but no....10 million....for what?
    The nchds would likely be no worse off without them, and out of the ashes etc....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,807 ✭✭✭take everything




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41 iratira


    I hope people are withdrawing membership? I did years ago but it's important they understand that they took the piss too much this time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 201 ✭✭chanste


    As a final year med student, I definitely will not be joining the IMO now. From the looks of some of the posts from class mates on facebook, I'm not the only one. As other people have said, there are doubtless people in the IMO who are working hard and honestly, but I hope this brings the organisation down. It needs replacing for the interest of Irish medicine.


  • Registered Users Posts: 608 ✭✭✭Anthony16


    ThatDrGuy wrote: »
    Dont feel bad. This year George McNiece will take home 1,992,355 euro. As head of the worst union in the country (by a mile) he is earning more than the Presidents of the USA, Germany, France , Australia, Uk , Japan , Russia , Canada and Isreal combined. But he's worth it....

    How can these pen pushers still be getting away with this s***?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,458 ✭✭✭OMD


    Ryder wrote: »
    Excellent article in the medical Indo....as usual. I resigned from the IMO earlier. Felt a little bad about it, because it isn't the fault of the current committee and I genuinely fear for nchds if it falls.

    But... And its a big but. The imo are more concerned with policy and being seen as influential see rather than getting down and dirty regarding tights. Why else would the IMO constantly have to fight fires all over the country - same ones each time, and then crow triumphantly about their victory. I would have paid money to see them at least fight this o justice, but no....10 million....for what?
    The nchds would likely be no worse off without them, and out of the ashes etc....

    The IMO have failed NCHDS for so long. I laugh at members on here every so often saying what a good job the IMO do. People claiming getting a €100 here or there was a great victory.
    The fact is, the major problem facing NCHDS today is the hours they are working.
    The biggest problem last year was the hours.
    The biggest problem 10 years ago was the hours.
    The biggest problem 20 years ago was the hours.
    The biggest problem 30 years ago was the hours.
    I am sure there is a bigger disaster of a representative organisation than the IMO but for sheer incompetence in dealing with the biggest issue (and let's be honest, the only real issue) it is hard to think of one at the moment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 246 ✭✭palmcut


    It seems that some contracts have to be honoured; yet the HSE can seemingly ignore contracts with health professionals at will.


  • Registered Users Posts: 325 ✭✭ThatDrGuy


    Its a question of contempt. The HSE has contempt for health professionals so they break our contracts. The IMO has contempt for its members so they honour their own contracts.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9 laoisdoc


    I am utterly shocked at this scandal. I rang the IMO on Christmas Eve and cancelled my membership of the IMO. I have been a member for almost 20years. There are many unanswered questions and somehow I doubt if they will be answered at the meeting the IMO is organising for early January.
    • If McNeice was entitled legally to 20 million, how come a settlement has been reached for 10 million? This beggars belief and raises many more questions If he could be negotiated down from 20 to 10 million why not further
    • Who agreed to allow his annual bonus to be added to his next year's basic pay on an annual basis
    • Who agreed to make his remuneration confidential - it has been impossible for IMO members to find out the pay of IMO employees
    • We need clarification are there other confidential packages in place with other employees of IMO? Do other employees have bonuses added to basic pay for the following year
    • If the IMO is paying this from resources that are not associated with members subscriptions then what are these resources?
    • What other worms are there in the closet? EG every big IMO meeting somebody asks why the AGM is always in Killarney. At the last meeting the questioner was rubbished by a former president of the IMO. Is there some secret deal going with Killarney.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,190 ✭✭✭Squeaky the Squirrel


    Why were some of ye members/what do you get for being a member?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41 iratira


    It looks like its too late to sort out the questions you are asking.
    Cut your losses and leave the IMO.
    There must be a huge amount of other abuses in the ****ed up culture of the IMO.
    Its not logical that there wouldn't be.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 555 ✭✭✭Xeyn


    Why were some of ye members/what do you get for being a member?

    Less disposable income is probably the sum of it.
    They are the only recognised union for doctors in the country which is the only reason people were a member.
    They have been quite ineffectual for some time for NCHDs.


  • Registered Users Posts: 123 ✭✭resus




  • Registered Users Posts: 22 DubDocX


    laoisdoc wrote: »
    I am utterly shocked at this scandal. I rang the IMO on Christmas Eve and cancelled my membership of the IMO. I have been a member for almost 20years. There are many unanswered questions and somehow I doubt if they will be answered at the meeting the IMO is organising for early January.
    • If McNeice was entitled legally to 20 million, how come a settlement has been reached for 10 million? This beggars belief and raises many more questions If he could be negotiated down from 20 to 10 million why not further
    • Who agreed to allow his annual bonus to be added to his next year's basic pay on an annual basis
    • Who agreed to make his remuneration confidential - it has been impossible for IMO members to find out the pay of IMO employees
    • We need clarification are there other confidential packages in place with other employees of IMO? Do other employees have bonuses added to basic pay for the following year
    • If the IMO is paying this from resources that are not associated with members subscriptions then what are these resources?
    • What other worms are there in the closet? EG every big IMO meeting somebody asks why the AGM is always in Killarney. At the last meeting the questioner was rubbished by a former president of the IMO. Is there some secret deal going with Killarney.

    It's an absolute disgrace and I agree, there are 9.7 million unanswered questions that no doubt will not be touched on at the meeting on the 12th, in true IMO fashion. Although I will be holding off resigning so I will still be entitled to attend the meeting!

    The only reason members found out about this is because it was leaked to the press a day after the farcical press release from the president. But I've no doubt the cover up is still continuing and will do so until such time we stand up and demand answers and do not allow ourselves to be rubbished by former presidents, directors and highly paid spin doctors of the IMO.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,489 ✭✭✭dissed doc


    DubDocX wrote: »
    It's an absolute disgrace and I agree, there are 9.7 million unanswered questions that no doubt will not be touched on at the meeting on the 12th, in true IMO fashion. Although I will be holding off resigning so I will still be entitled to attend the meeting!

    The only reason members found out about this is because it was leaked to the press a day after the farcical press release from the president. But I've no doubt the cover up is still continuing and will do so until such time we stand up and demand answers and do not allow ourselves to be rubbished by former presidents, directors and highly paid spin doctors of the IMO.

    In fairness to the IMO, they do appear to literally attempting to deal with it "on a national level" :) so don't expect anything from the 12th. They usually placate with meaningless broad statement like "on a national level" so what will they now?

    "we understand your concerns"
    "your anger is valid"
    "we will endeavour to ensure you still have ongoing union representation across the country"

    And a ballot for strike about broken contracts, removal of training funds, bullying by hospital management and illegal working hours? Will never happen.


  • Registered Users Posts: 325 ✭✭ThatDrGuy


    It will be an managed spin doctored event with the usual pat pat easy boy approach. They will decry the amounts from the pulpit
    but say nothing about the culture of feckless apathy that generated them. They will pretend that the IMO is full of hard working crusaders
    of justice and if you all just pull together then we can rise to this challenge. Sabres rattle. Local frivolous issue that had been ignored for months will be thrust to the floor. Look - ! This is what we are going to do, this is our plan. See how we are still relevant. This is how we will reshape the future ! We will take on the HSE, the system, the government, the xxx. The speeches and recriminations and *this is the only way* will take strangely long. Lot of waffle. In the interests of the meeting please save your questions for the end. First question or two cherry picked.. issues sideline. Sorry, thats all we have time for. Duck the head, go to ground. Frenzied re-marketing campaign - more dwindling members cash blown on PR. Poor SC shot around on a whistleblown tour of RES's, - we didnt know, corruption at the top, we work so hard etc etc. .. Strike coming up next month, we are the only union. if you dont join us the HSE will eat your babies. Slowly they will rebuild, continue the cycle of contempt.. Mc Niece will get his millions, the NCHDs will eat cake.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 995 ✭✭✭Ryder


    To be fair, they probably do work hard. In addition to the probably limited corruption, the main problem is of trying to be all things to all men. The interests of consultants, NCHDs and GPs are not necessarily all the same, and thats the reason we dont see any proper action being taken. The lack of interest in engaging on the recent decision to cut new entrant pay reaffirmed that for me. Consultants, quiet rightly, have a job to do. NCHDs the same, but I dont think that the NCHDs hold the balance of power in the IMO, and engagement is limited at best.

    I also read recently, that the IMO have a policy unit. Why? Why does a doctors unit need to formulate health policy? Its not as if the DOH can do it themselves, or take the IMOs submission into account. Plain fact is, NCHDs need a union, and the IMO isnt it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 22 DubDocX


    I agree Ryder, I don't think NCHDs hold the balance of power in the IMO but I can't imagine there is a very large Consultant membership? I'd say most consultants go to the IHCA. And the IMO can't even negotiate for GPs because of competition law? So who do they represent well? As you say Ryder they are trying to be all things to all men.

    That said, as a GP, we need a strong representative body, but the IMO is not that.

    I am furious with the evident corruption, at our expense - granted it is most likely limited to the senior bods, but that's no excuse.

    If the organisation is to survive, there will need to be a serious reshuffle - get rid of the usual spin doctor brigade who orchestrate meetings not allowing genuine members concerns to be addressed. Who no doubt are in the midst of a serious cover up and blame game operation afraid of their lives of what else will be exposed


  • Registered Users Posts: 9 laoisdoc


    What we need is a whistleblower from within the IMO hierarchy to reveal what is really going on in that organisation.
    I agree with one of recent contributors that the upcoming meeting is going to be set up to obfuscate...I think the description of the upcoming meeting was brilliant and describes so many meetings I have been to


  • Registered Users Posts: 325 ✭✭ThatDrGuy


    Any word from the meeting? Why was it held in mullingar? Could they not find a venue in the blasket islands? Top rte news story of the day. Even my mother thinks doctors are over paid now thanks to that ****er


  • Advertisement
Advertisement