Osama bin Laden speaks out on climate change

Tilt Gone · 31-01-2010 4:21am

Deleted User wrote: »

fyp!

Anyway there is a big difference between placing a bomb in a crowded area to cause maximum death and injury and overcooking the force required to kill a few gorillas and killing a few civillians.

The Americans are guilty of the latter, two wrongs don't make a right, but one is less evil than the other.

Thanks for the spelling correction but your post is naive to say the least. How do you explain Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

ScumLord · 31-01-2010 4:23am

Tilt Gone wrote: »

Thanks for the spelling correction but your post is naive to say the least. How do you explain Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

They attacked the enemy (as they saw it) not their own people. I can't think of any force that has ever targeted their own people like they do. It just defeats the purpose and makes the whole region look bad.

ascanbe · 31-01-2010 4:28am

Deleted User wrote: »

fyp!

Anyway there is a big difference between placing a bomb in a crowded area to cause maximum death and injury and overcooking the force required to kill a few gorillas and killing a few civillians.

The Americans are guilty of the latter, two wrongs don't make a right, but one is less evil than the other.

So all this time the US were just trying to kill gorillas?
They went to some strange places, if that's the case.
Wow. Their intelligence is even more faulty than i realised.

Tilt Gone · 31-01-2010 4:34am

ScumLord wrote: »

They attacked the enemy (as they saw it) not their own people. I can't think of any force that has ever targeted their own people like they do. It just defeats the purpose and makes the whole region look bad.

Agreed, but I was merely pointing out to the poster that the Americans have dropped their fair share of bombs for maximum damage also. In the first day of those bombings around 150,000 people were killed. Not to mention the after math of people who were killed from burns, radiation poisioning, cancers etc.

ascanbe · 31-01-2010 4:37am

ScumLord wrote: »

They attacked the enemy (as they saw it) not their own people. I can't think of any force that has ever targeted their own people like they do. It just defeats the purpose and makes the whole region look bad.

Well, in reality, they just, kinda, wanted to try out one of their new toys.
See if it was all it was cracked up to be.
It was; but, heh. It's no big deal.
What's killing enormous numbers of people when you've got God on your side?

31-01-2010 4:57am

Tilt Gone wrote: »

Thanks for the spelling correction but your post is naive to say the least. How do you explain Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

The Americans didn't nuke the Japanese community in Los Angeles!

31-01-2010 5:01am

ascanbe wrote: »

So all this time the US were just trying to kill gorillas?
They went to some strange places, if that's the case.
Wow. Their intelligence is even more faulty than i realised.

OK, I couldn't be arsed to check the spelling of Guerrilla, now less of the monkey business.

The WHO would go ape if the Americans did attack gorillas.

ascanbe · 31-01-2010 5:13am

Deleted User wrote: »

OK, I couldn't be arsed to check the spelling of Guerrilla, now less of the monkey business.

The WHO would go ape if the Americans did attack gorillas.

No. Both the specialized agency of the UN and the band have already recieved false warnings about the intentions of the Americans in this regard.
Both have vowed they won't get fooled again.

M5 · 31-01-2010 9:19am

So Bin Laden is saying that we should not use Oil (one of the single biggest contributers to global warming) then? Strange considering that that would effectively consign the majority of his, followers/people he claims to represent, back to the stone age economically. :rolleyes: