Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Irish soldiers in WW1

13»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,108 ✭✭✭pedroeibar1


    Jesus. wrote: »
    How many Irishmen really died in that conflict? Was it 30k or 50k?

    Why not look at a few sources? Where did you get those figures? It is generally accepted that 50k died. As P said, where does one draw the line? My great uncle, born in Cork, had emigrated to the US in the early 1900's and went to Canada to join up. So was he Irish, American or Canadian?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    Why not look at a few sources?

    That's why I'm asking you lads! The 50k number is given at Islandbridge, in other words the official Irish government figure. But I've seen newspapers and the like quote 30k.

    If its a question you can't answer then no problem. There's no harm in asking though. That's what a Forum is for :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,578 ✭✭✭jonniebgood1


    Jesus. wrote: »
    That's why I'm asking you lads! The 50k number is given at Islandbridge, in other words the official Irish government figure. But I've seen newspapers and the like quote 30k.

    If its a question you can't answer then no problem. There's no harm in asking though. That's what a Forum is for :)

    Can you give a source for the 30K figure ???


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    Like I said, its a figure I've seen bandied about in newspapers and the like Jonnie


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,108 ✭✭✭pedroeibar1


    I’m researching (trying to!) a young Irishman who quit TCD in 1916/17and was commissioned into the Royal Garrison Artillery Special Reserve in Spring 1918. Would he have gone to a cadet school for training? For how long? Were junior Special Reserve officers in 1918 automatically sent to the combat zone or were they ‘reservists’? I’m (just about) familiar with the RGA / Forts, so could he have been left in Ireland? Any pointers/info gratefully received……
    Tnx.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,678 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    In peacetime, the Special Reserve was for part-time soldiering, a bit like the Territorial Army today. You did a stint of full-time training, and then returned to civilian life, but continued serving with a fairly limited part-time commitment. But, in wartime, the Special Reserve could be mobilised and its members would all have become full-time soldiers again. (And this would happen before any conscription, so Special Reservists would be the first to be called up.)

    The Special Reserve was mobilised in August 1914, so in joining your man would have been becoming a full-time soldier.

    While Special Reserve units could be sent abroad, in practice they were not; they were retained for home defence work. But they were also treated as a reserve for replenishing regular units, so men serving in the Special Reserve could be, and were, reassigned to other units and then sent to France or elsewhere. And in fact very early on in the Great War most special reserve units became training units, pure and simple. A man recruited into the Special Reserve spent a short time being trained, and was then reassigned to the regular army and sent off. Officers in the special reserve could also be reassigned, but this happened less often - there was a core of permanent officers in what was essentially a training role, so they stayed at home permamently while intake after intake of enlisted men passed through their hands and went off to the front. We can imagine what Siegfried Sassoon would have said about it.

    I don't know, however, whether SR units also served as training units for junior officers. Possibly your man joined the SR and became an instructor or training officer; possibly he learned how to fire a revolver, ride a horse and read the King's Regulations before being reassigned to a regular unit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,678 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Jesus. wrote: »
    Come on Pereginus, cut the bullsh*t. We all know everything "depends" on all sorts of things.

    Just give me a figure for people who were born in Ireland and who died fighting in WW1
    I can't. Nobody has ever compiled such a figure reliably, and it would be difficult to do so because many of the death records do not give the deceased's place of birth.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    Okay Peregrinus. Appreciate the detailed response.

    I guess its just something we'll never know


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,108 ✭✭✭pedroeibar1


    Peregrinus wrote: »
    In peacetime, the Special Reserve was for part-time soldiering, a bit like the Territorial Army today. You did a stint of full-time training, and then returned to civilian life, but continued serving with a fairly limited part-time commitment. But, in wartime, the Special Reserve could be mobilised and its members would all have become full-time soldiers again. (And this would happen before any conscription, so Special Reservists would be the first to be called up.)

    The Special Reserve was mobilised in August 1914, so in joining your man would have been becoming a full-time soldier.

    While Special Reserve units could be sent abroad, in practice they were not; they were retained for home defence work. But they were also treated as a reserve for replenishing regular units, so men serving in the Special Reserve could be, and were, reassigned to other units and then sent to France or elsewhere. And in fact very early on in the Great War most special reserve units became training units, pure and simple. A man recruited into the Special Reserve spent a short time being trained, and was then reassigned to the regular army and sent off. Officers in the special reserve could also be reassigned, but this happened less often - there was a core of permanent officers in what was essentially a training role, so they stayed at home permamently while intake after intake of enlisted men passed through their hands and went off to the front. We can imagine what Siegfried Sassoon would have said about it.

    I don't know, however, whether SR units also served as training units for junior officers. Possibly your man joined the SR and became an instructor or training officer; possibly he learned how to fire a revolver, ride a horse and read the King's Regulations before being reassigned to a regular unit.

    Thanks Peregrinus, I’d got much of that but had not realised that the call-up of the SR was a “general" one. What I have difficulty with was why join the SR and not directly into a line Corps/Regiment. Also trying to figure out the training – he left school in England 1916, entered TCD that year but then was commissioned in Spring 1918. As TCD had no TA / ROTC or equivalent he must have volunteered elsewhere? For 1917 I guess he was at a cadet school– would it have been Woolwich, given he was in the RGA? Was there an artillery school in Ireland? I cannot imagine him as a training officer, although he would have been good on a horse and familiar with guns. Kew probably holds the answer........


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,678 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    My wild guess would be that he didn't choose to join the SR; he joined up and was assigned to the SR for training with the expectation that, when trained, he would be commissioned and then reassigned to a regular unit.

    The RGA specialised in heavy artillery - very heavy artillery - and a lot of its training had to be delivered at the places where the very heavy artillery was located - e.g. coastal forts. Having said that, as an officer cadet, your man would have had a good deal of stuff to learn that had nothing to do with firing big guns. The RGA had officer cadet schools; they were all in Britain (Trowbridge, Bournemouth and Weymouth). But by 1917 I'm not sure if regiment-based training was still being observed in practice; I suspect officer cadets from any regiment were often sent to whatever officer cadet school had the next convenient intake. So he could have spent a stint in any OTC facility, followed by a stint at a heavy artillery training unit, which could be anywhere.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,108 ✭✭✭pedroeibar1


    Thanks Peregrinus, very helpful.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,108 ✭✭✭pedroeibar1


    I’ve no connection with this project – the author has posted several interesting comments here in the past so his upcoming publication deserves a mention. Ireland and the First World War: A Photographic History


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,548 ✭✭✭kabakuyu


    Can you give a source for the 30K figure ???

    The figures below came from the Genealogy company Eneclann using the Irish War Memorial Records as their source.

    Of the total of 49,200 in the records,30,987 are recorded as having been born in Ireland.

    No place of birth was recorded for 7,405.

    11,255 were recorded as born outside Ireland,These include 9,162 in England,1,357 in Scotland, 314 in Wales, and 165 in the Channel Islands.30 other countries are represented with much lesser numbers.

    The research was conducted by genealogy company Eneclann using the IWMR as the source.

    Unfortunately the IWMR do not include every Irish born man(some have slipped through the net) or the Irish born who died in the service of the commonwealth nations or in US forces.
    Some years ago historians and some journos(Kevin Myers) suggested a figure of 35,000 may be more accurate, but in my humble opinion I think this figure may also be low, 40,000 may be nearer the true figure.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    Interesting, Kabakuyu.

    Why were the 11,255 recorded as Irish specifically? Is it because they gave their nationality as Irish on their registration/census forms?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,548 ✭✭✭kabakuyu


    Jesus. wrote: »
    Interesting, Kabakuyu.

    Why were the 11,255 recorded as Irish specifically? Is it because they gave their nationality as Irish on their registration/census forms?

    From what I can gather, they were included because they were in Irish regiments when they died.Some no doubt,would have identified as Irish but many others would not have.Non Irish were drafted into Irish regiments when recruitment in Ireland waned.

    Irish regiments always had a sprinkling of non Irish within their ranks even before the war.IIRC according to the 1911 census the Connaught Rangers(in India at the time) was 89% Irish born.

    The 7,000 without a registered country of birth,could contain a large number of men who were Irish born, but it would take a large effort to try to determine the place of birth of these men.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23 Parsnips84


    Hi my great grandad fought in ww1 richard parsons he was blinded in the war and given army housing in churchtown dublin I know this housing was part of a fund set up to take care of the exsoldiers but I have yet to find a service number or regiment id be greatful for any help he lived in number 3 churchtown little if that makes any difference thanks


Advertisement