Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Commando?

Options
1356

Comments

  • Options
    #62
    BroomBurner
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,737 ✭✭✭BroomBurner


    Saw a show with a TV presenter tested out wearing one of C-String things, she just said it was awkward and kept thinking it would fall off, wouldn't give up her knickers for it anyway!

    Prefer shorts-stylee, but commando has to be better than having a thong stuck up between your arse cheeks and chaffing...


  • Options
    #63
    hunter164
    Registered Users Posts: 2,076 ✭✭✭hunter164


    Must try going commando I wonder if the missus will like it. :D


  • Options
    #64
    rainbow kirby
    Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators Posts: 26,928 Mod ✭✭✭✭rainbow kirby


    Wear one of these at the same time. ;)


  • Options
    #65
    citytillidie
    Registered Users Posts: 21,972 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    rainbow kirby wrote: »
    Wear one of these at the same time. ;)


    Done that at a wedding in Scotland, not nice when drunk and you sit down on a cold metal chair.

    ******



  • Options
    #66
    Futurecrook
    Registered Users Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭Futurecrook


    Have gone commando a few times. Used to drive my ex crazy (in a good way) when Id tell him. :D

    Obviously depends on the outfit though. Really tiny short skirt + commando = flashing!

    I went commando to work a few weeks ago. Completely by accident. I was in a rush, hopped out of the shower, threw on a dress, ran out the door. Get to work and realise, "Im not wearing any underwear... :eek:" I was clutching at my dress everytime I sat down that day.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #67
    Curlypinkie
    Closed Accounts Posts: 375 ✭✭Curlypinkie


    Never commando.
    Un.Com.Frta.Ble.
    I prefer thongs, hell even granny knickers to commando. Done it a few times for fun stuff but wouldn't want to walk around like that more than an hour or so.


  • Options
    #68
    Futurecrook
    Registered Users Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭Futurecrook


    Curlypinkie wrote: »
    Never commando.
    Un.Com.Frta.Ble.
    I prefer thongs, hell even granny knickers to commando. Done it a few times for fun stuff but wouldn't want to walk around like that more than an hour or so.

    Agreed. It depends on the situation. No underwear working a 9 hour shift = uncomfortable. :p


  • Options
    #69
    brianthebard
    Closed Accounts Posts: 16,165 ✭✭✭✭brianthebard


    Really? I didn't think it would make that much of a difference to a woman's comfort, although I'm going commando now and its sooooo much more comfortable than binding boxers. Bah!


  • Options
    #70
    MagicMarker
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 32,865 ✭✭✭✭MagicMarker


    Speaking from a man's point of view... A nice pair of sexy underwear is better than no underwear at all. Initially, at least. :)

    As for myself, the only time i go commando (rarely) is at home just after a shower or something, but i much prefer wearing underwear, there has to be some support down there!!


  • Options
    #71
    Futurecrook
    Registered Users Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭Futurecrook


    brianthebard wrote: »
    Really? I didn't think it would make that much of a difference to a woman's comfort, although I'm going commando now and its sooooo much more comfortable than binding boxers. Bah!

    Sometimes it does. I was more uncomfortable in the sense that I was highly conscious of the fact that I was knickerless at work.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #72
    Dudess
    Closed Accounts Posts: 37,215 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    MagicMarker wrote: »
    Speaking from a man's point of view... A nice pair of sexy underwear is better than no underwear at all.
    Yeah I'm a lingerie fanatic so I suppose that's another good reason to wear it.


  • Options
    #73
    brianthebard
    Closed Accounts Posts: 16,165 ✭✭✭✭brianthebard


    Futurecrook wrote: »
    Sometimes it does. I was more uncomfortable in the sense that I was highly conscious of the fact that I was knickerless at work.

    Oh right. That just adds an element of sexy danger though!


  • Options
    #74
    Futurecrook
    Registered Users Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭Futurecrook


    brianthebard wrote: »
    Oh right. That just adds an element of sexy danger though!

    \o/

    Did someone say promotion? :P


  • Options
    #75
    brianthebard
    Closed Accounts Posts: 16,165 ✭✭✭✭brianthebard


    I'm sure you'd get a rise at any rate....


  • Options
    #76
    Nevyn
    Closed Accounts Posts: 43,045 ✭✭✭✭Nevyn


    brianthebard wrote: »
    Really? I didn't think it would make that much of a difference to a woman's comfort, although I'm going commando now and its sooooo much more comfortable than binding boxers. Bah!

    Chaffing, seriously think about the seams of a pair of trousers and the folds of the female gentials, seriously no fun.


  • Options
    #77
    brianthebard
    Closed Accounts Posts: 16,165 ✭✭✭✭brianthebard


    Thaedydal wrote: »
    Chaffing, seriously think about the seams of a pair of trousers and the folds of the female gentials, seriously no fun.

    Hmm, that doesn't sound nice at all. I suppose women's trousers are usually more form hugging than men's though?


  • Options
    #78
    Madame Razz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 13,252 ✭✭✭✭Madame Razz


    Thaedydal wrote: »
    Chaffing, seriously think about the seams of a pair of trousers and the folds of the female gentials, seriously no fun.

    seriously SERIOUSLY no fun!!!

    I thoroughly agree!!!


  • Options
    #79
    Nevyn
    Closed Accounts Posts: 43,045 ✭✭✭✭Nevyn


    brianthebard wrote: »
    Hmm, that doesn't sound nice at all. I suppose women's trousers are usually more form hugging than men's though?

    Yep no ball sack room required, more of a change for camel toe with out underwear.


  • Options
    #80
    challengemaster
    Registered Users Posts: 16,931 ✭✭✭✭challengemaster


    Speaking as a dude...Comfy.


  • Options
    #81
    pookie82
    Registered Users Posts: 2,217 ✭✭✭pookie82


    TBH I don't think there's a hell of a lot of difference between wearing a thong (of the variety which Dudess kindly showcased in her second original pic) and going commando. There's a piece if string wrapped around your genitals in one instance and in the second there's not. If find it hard to take a thong seriously when anyone attempts to class it as underwear. It's little more than an ill-placed breeding ground for yeast infections. All that backwards and forwards motion between your.... ahem.... front and back bits.....YUCK. Could never understand why guys find them sexy. French knickers ftw. Sexy AND comfortable.

    On the commando note - never really tried it except maybe around the house when out of the shower and in pj bottoms or sth. But it just feels odd to me, like my lady bits are unprotected. I think it's a bad idea for any girl who's particularly "sensitive" down there. And there's not a question of me doing it in a skirt. Sorry but I think that signals whoresville.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #82
    Peared
    Registered Users Posts: 1,183 ✭✭✭Peared


    Wow, that's interesting.

    A girl is a whore because of what she chooses to wear/not wear?


  • Options
    #83
    MagicMarker
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 32,865 ✭✭✭✭MagicMarker


    Peared wrote: »
    Wow, that's interesting.

    A girl is a whore because of what she chooses to wear/not wear?
    Of course, and you're a whore if you spit............ or swallow.


  • Options
    #84
    Aisling(",)
    Registered Users Posts: 6,379 ✭✭✭Aisling(",)


    have done it a few times by accident like after swimming and stuff and i do it in my house bt i would feel excesivly sefl concious while i was out and itd be too easy to get aroused


  • Options
    #85
    Dudess
    Closed Accounts Posts: 37,215 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    pookie82 wrote: »
    I find it hard to take a thong seriously when anyone attempts to class it as underwear. It's little more than an ill-placed breeding ground for yeast infections. All that backwards and forwards motion between your.... ahem.... front and back bits.....YUCK. Could never understand why guys find them sexy. French knickers ftw. Sexy AND comfortable.
    I presume guys DON'T think they're sexy unless they are up an ass like this: http://www.microkitten.com/images/c3ru/bikini-micro-string.jpg

    They ain't gonna make two wobbling, dimpled, creased, spotty, stretchmarked, saggy, pocked lumps of lard look sexy... but unfortunately there are many women who think they will.


  • Options
    #86
    Kinetic^
    Closed Accounts Posts: 13,249 ✭✭✭✭Kinetic^


    Peared wrote: »
    I think men prefer them on and to take them off themselves.

    No.


  • Options
    #87
    Zaph
    Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 47,274 ✭✭✭✭Zaph


    Dudess wrote: »
    I presume guys DON'T think they're sexy unless they are up an ass like this: http://www.microkitten.com/images/c3ru/bikini-micro-string.jpg

    They ain't gonna make two wobbling, dimpled, creased, spotty, stretchmarked, saggy, pocked lumps of lard look sexy... but unfortunately there are many women who think they will.

    Tbh, while they do show a nice bum off very well, I don't find them particularly sexy. I'd much rather more modest lingerie such as the aforementioned French knickers, far sexier imo, regardless of the quality of the ass.


  • Options
    #88
    quietobserver
    Closed Accounts Posts: 546 ✭✭✭quietobserver


    Aisling(",) wrote: »
    have done it a few times by accident like after swimming and stuff and i do it in my house bt i would feel excesivly sefl concious while i was out and itd be too easy to get aroused

    without leads to arrousal? i though it would lead to a cold?:eek:


  • Options
    #89
    Kinetic^
    Closed Accounts Posts: 13,249 ✭✭✭✭Kinetic^


    French Knickers ftmfw. /me moonwalks out of this thread


  • Options
    #90
    Dudess
    Closed Accounts Posts: 37,215 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    quietobserver wrote: »
    without leads to arrousal? i though it would lead to a cold?:eek:
    But all that air on such a sensitive area... yep, that'd do it.
    Zaph wrote: »
    Tbh, while they do show a nice bum off very well, I don't find them particularly sexy. I'd much rather more modest lingerie such as the aforementioned French knickers, far sexier imo, regardless of the quality of the ass.
    Yeah, subtle is sexier. Regardless of how great I think a guy's bum is, he must NOT wear a thong!


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #91
    Aisling(",)
    Registered Users Posts: 6,379 ✭✭✭Aisling(",)


    quietobserver wrote: »
    without leads to arrousal? i though it would lead to a cold?:eek:

    air and then the clothes rubbin can be both arousing and irritating and anything silky or like a smooth skirt.
    it jsut spells disaster
    and aswell as horrendus as it is to think.stains may appear in aqward places


Advertisement