Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Legal Highs

Options
2456736

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,960 ✭✭✭DarkJager


    Yeah but then you have the unfortunate side effect of having a bunch of stupefied high people zombieing around the place. At least the only people like that now are the ones to desperate to escape reality to care. If drugs are fully legalised, it removes the negative attributions from society's psyche and more people will feel more comfortable taking them.

    I'd take a bit of crime in exchange for a land of the living dead any day.

    Anyway, this thread is about legal highs not legalising highs.

    So you'd prefer to have a country full of violent drunks than quiet mellowed out stoners? You must be out of your mind.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    Yeah but then you have the unfortunate side effect of having a bunch of stupefied high people zombieing around the place. At least the only people like that now are the ones to desperate to escape reality to care. If drugs are fully legalised, it removes the negative attributions from society's psyche and more people will feel more comfortable taking them.

    I'd take a bit of crime in exchange for a land of the living dead any day.
    Just because you'd go out and smoke yourself stupid day in day out because somethings been made legal doesn't mean everyone would. Some of us have jobs to go to you know. Drugs don't pay for them selfs. Are you currently a raving alcoholic because alcohol is freely available?


    You need help sir.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 55 ✭✭StopWhispering


    DarkJager wrote: »
    So you'd prefer to have a country full of violent drunks than quiet mellowed out stoners? You must be out of your mind.

    Not as out of my mind as the "mellow stoners". The country will always be full of violent drunks, whether full legalisation of drugs happens or not. So your point is moot.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 55 ✭✭StopWhispering


    ScumLord wrote: »
    Just because you'd go out and smoke yourself stupid day in day out because somethings been made legal doesn't mean everyone would. Some of us have jobs to go to you know. Drugs don't pay for them selfs. Are you currently a raving alcoholic because alcohol is freely available?


    You need help sir.

    Of course, not all people would go out and toke till their eyes bleed but it would be difficult to argue that a lot more people would if the stigma (deserved or not) was reversed. Surely a mind altering drug being used considerably more in society would have some effect?


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    Of course, not all people would go out and toke till their eyes bleed but it would be difficult to argue that a lot more people would if the stigma (deserved or not) was reversed. Surely a mind altering drug being used considerably more in society would have some effect?
    They'd try it yes, but like with alcohol it takes a dedicated few to spend all day every day stoned as a badger.

    All you have to do is look at the country's that have legalized cannabis they all have much lower use than we do.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 78 ✭✭kavoweb


    society will always catagorise its "beasts".........every generation has its selected downfalls,gambling,music,booze,drugs ....not everybody peers downwards from our respective dizzy heights:rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,960 ✭✭✭DarkJager


    Not as out of my mind as the "mellow stoners". The country will always be full of violent drunks, whether full legalisation of drugs happens or not. So your point is moot.

    No my point isn't moot. You support the use of a drug more dangerous than weed, but is only acceptable because its "legal". And as for painting stoners as some sort of goons - I've smoked every day for the last 8 years, have a job that pays the bills, a good social life and am very well educated. So take your generalisations elsewhere thanks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,960 ✭✭✭DarkJager


    Of course, not all people would go out and toke till their eyes bleed but it would be difficult to argue that a lot more people would if the stigma (deserved or not) was reversed. Surely a mind altering drug being used considerably more in society would have some effect?

    Weed is not a mind altering drug - please do your homework before you start spouting nonsense.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 55 ✭✭StopWhispering


    ScumLord wrote: »
    They'd try it yes, but like with alcohol it takes a dedicated few to spend all day every day stoned as a badger.

    All you have to do is look at the country's that have legalized cannabis they all have much lower use than we do.

    What you say it true but those are different countries, clearly their governments trusted their citizens not to go nuts but this is Ireland. I'm not saying you can't trust Marijuana (as I consider no more dangerous and addictive than alcohol and dozens of times less addictive than cigarettes) but I'm saying you can't trust the public to use it appropriately. Other countries have legalised alcohol as have we and we consume considerably more than all but one other country in Europe.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 78 ✭✭kavoweb


    darkjager is exactly right and in one fell swoop,proves that ultimately,it is the individuals responsibility to either be a "legal stoned goon" or just a stoned "goon". the "legality" of it is indifferent to the user.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 55 ✭✭StopWhispering


    DarkJager wrote: »
    No my point isn't moot. You support the use of a drug more dangerous than weed, but is only acceptable because its "legal". And as for painting stoners as some sort of goons - I've smoked every day for the last 8 years, have a job that pays the bills, a good social life and am very well educated. So take your generalisations elsewhere thanks.

    Well I don't know you so I have to make generalisations in order to make reference to weed users.

    Marijuana alters your neurochemistry so yes, it is a mind-altering drug. What do you think the high is? Magic?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 55 ✭✭StopWhispering


    kavoweb wrote: »
    darkjager is exactly right and in one fell swoop,proves that ultimately,it is the individuals responsibility to either be a "legal stoned goon" or just a stoned "goon". the "legality" of it is indifferent to the user.

    If the "legality" is indifferent to the user then how can the user be expected to exercise responsibility to be a "legal stoned goon"?


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    What you say it true but those are different countries, clearly their governments trusted their citizens not to go nuts but this is Ireland. I'm not saying you can't trust Marijuana (as I consider no more dangerous and addictive than alcohol and dozens of times less addictive than cigarettes) but I'm saying you can't trust the public to use it appropriately. Other countries have legalised alcohol as have we and we consume considerably more than all but one other country in Europe.
    So what your saying is the law is wrong but Irish people are dicks so it doesn't matter?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 55 ✭✭StopWhispering


    ScumLord wrote: »
    So what your saying is the law is wrong but Irish people are dicks so it doesn't matter?

    Ha ha! Well for want of a better phrase. I think Irish people (of which I am one) just require more legislation than other societies. I think some drugs such as Marijuana should be legalised and regulated but I am unsure whether this is necessarily a good thing for the public.

    Back to point: I think legal highs are just plain dangerous.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29 jeckel


    the legal smokes are pretty effective but they feel more toxic when used over a period of time. if you can get good weed you're probably better off smoking that but i'ld smoke the legal stuff before a lot of the crap i've gotten over the years.

    to be honest, it's so easy to get legal highs of every sort that it seems a complete waste of time to keep the old reliables illegal, legalise them and tax them to the nines, that'll sort the budget out.

    nothing like a bit of escapism in times of economic crisis.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,960 ✭✭✭DarkJager


    Well I don't know you so I have to make generalisations in order to make reference to weed users.

    Marijuana alters your neurochemistry so yes, it is a mind-altering drug. What do you think the high is? Magic?

    Its a mood and perception enhancing drug, not mind altering. For example, LSD is a mind altering drug - it completely removes all boundaries, rules and normality from reality. Smoking weed will simply make you feel relaxed, music sounds way better, food tastes better and you are generally just happy and chilled out.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 55 ✭✭StopWhispering


    DarkJager wrote: »
    Its a mood and perception enhancing drug, not mind altering. For example, LSD is a mind altering drug - it completely removes all boundaries, rules and normality from reality. Smoking weed will simply make you feel relaxed, music sounds way better, food tastes better and you are generally just happy and chilled out.

    Well to define whether it is or not, we must first define the mind and I'm not prepared to get into that as it's WAY off topic.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 166 ✭✭TedB


    DarkJager wrote: »
    Its a mood and perception enhancing drug, not mind altering. For example, LSD is a mind altering drug - it completely removes all boundaries, rules and normality from reality. Smoking weed will simply make you feel relaxed, music sounds way better, food tastes better and you are generally just happy and chilled out.

    I was crying tears of joy while listening to Nina Simone last night. Not only is that very sad and unusual, but incredibly relaxing. There's no feeling like it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 55 ✭✭StopWhispering


    TedB wrote: »
    I was crying tears of joy while listening to Nina Simone last night. Not only is that very sad and unusual, but incredibly relaxing. There's no feeling like it.

    Nina Simone is awesome!


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,061 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    kavoweb wrote: »
    rapidly descending into a farce guys....bit steep of a tangent considering the post initially started on legal highs.... :confused:
    Welcome to After Hours.
    Please remember to switch your brian back on before you leave.

    ScumLord wrote: »
    Just because you'd go out and smoke yourself stupid day in day out because somethings been made legal doesn't mean everyone would. Some of us have jobs to go to you know. Drugs don't pay for them selfs. Are you currently a raving alcoholic because alcohol is freely available?


    You need help sir.
    Attack the post, not the poster.


    As for legalising drugs, it doesn't make them any less addictive.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 747 ✭✭✭WillieCocker


    Well to define whether it is or not, we must first define the mind and I'm not prepared to get into that as it's WAY off topic.

    What a load of wet poo.
    You can define it as you please and when someone else defines it, you must change the subject then pretend to be avoiding going off topic.:pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29 jeckel


    DarkJager wrote: »
    LSD is a mind altering drug

    not in ireland, it's not, in ireland it's usually more useful for blotting really small fountain pens.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,587 ✭✭✭Pace2008


    TedB wrote: »
    I
    It sets your heartrate mad and it tastes like absolute dung, but it does give you a very very distinct 'high' and a great stoney buss for ages. It seems to be a cocktail of herbs thrown together.
    Don't be fooled by the packaging, there's nothing 'herbal' about it. It probably contains JWH-018 which is a a synthetic cannabinoid.

    Calling a product 'natural' doesn't ensure its safety anyway, it's just a marketing ploy to appeal to hippies and stupid people. LSD is semi-synthetic and isn't physically harmful at all, while Datura grows out of the ground and will make you delirious for days and possibly kill you if eaten.

    Re. all the legal Coke substitutes; I'm pretty sure they just contain a high dose of caffeine.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 166 ✭✭TedB


    Pace2008 wrote: »
    Don't be fooled by the packaging, there's nothing 'herbal' about it. It probably contains JWH-018 which is a a synthetic cannabinoid.

    Calling a product 'natural' doesn't ensure its safety anyway, it's just a marketing ploy to appeal to hippies and stupid people. LSD is semi-synthetic and isn't physically harmful at all, while Datura grows out of the ground and will make you delirious for days and possibly kill you if eaten.

    Re. all the legal Coke substitutes; I'm pretty sure they just contain a high dose of caffeine.

    Will people please take care not to assume people who have tried this are morons? I'm well aware of the differing implications of 'herbal' and a 'bunch of herbs thrown together'. Jeez. Your wrecking my buzz man.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,587 ✭✭✭Pace2008


    TedB wrote: »
    Will people please take care not to assume people who have tried this are morons? I'm well aware of the differing implications of 'herbal' and a 'bunch of herbs thrown together'. Jeez. Your wrecking my buzz man.
    I wasn't suggesting you were stupid at all. If the packaging says it's a herbal mix - which it is, it just so happens that the active ingredient is not - then it wouldn't be unreasonable to assume that it is, in fact, a herbal mix. I was saying that people who assume that a product is safe because it's natural are stupid, or at least misguided.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,150 ✭✭✭kumate_champ07


    DarkJager wrote: »
    Weed is not a mind altering drug - please do your homework before you start spouting nonsense.

    orly?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,150 ✭✭✭kumate_champ07


    DarkJager wrote: »
    Its a mood and perception enhancing drug, not mind altering.
    perception is all in the mind.
    what about when you take too much and the paranoia sets in and walls get bigger and you start to hear quiet sounds as loud sounds and your mind starts racing and you become scared ****less?
    ye i guess it doesnt alter your mind at all.

    its well known in the medical world that longterm and even short term use of cannabis can lead to psychological(mind) disorders.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 747 ✭✭✭WillieCocker



    its well known in the medical world that longterm and even short term use of cannabis can lead to psychological(mind) disorders.

    It's also well known (should say speculated) that the illness was there all along and that cannabis enhances it and brings it to the fore.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,150 ✭✭✭kumate_champ07


    It's also well known (should say speculated) that the illness was there all along and that cannabis enhances it and brings it to the fore.

    so the person is ill but is not ill at the same time?
    how do they know that they might start hearing voices if they smoke cannabis?

    i know alot of people that use it but there are serious risks involved for some people. the mind is a powerful thing and when 'altered' can cause damage.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 747 ✭✭✭WillieCocker


    so the person is ill but is not ill at the same time?
    Do i sound like Dr.Greenthumb?
    Most of the posts here are spouting opinion not fact, and they do say if you have a mental illness , cannabis will make it worse.
    Do you think they would know about the illness before they smoke?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement