Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

July 12th...

Options
24

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 33,091 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Dudess wrote: »
    What's intended is triumphalism - it's not some sort of light-hearted, good-natured celebration. It's intimidating and hostile. You'd be naive to think otherwise.

    What's that got to do with the question being raised here? Does that somehow legitimise the sectarianism of 12th July?
    I detest shinners and I'm pretty much an anglophile so this is not me pushing some sort of agenda, but that's not gonna make me become that bit more tolerant of the bigotry on the unionist side - bigotry that led to the republican campaign of violence. I do find people have become more relaxed about it down here (not aiming that at you specifically Ikky Poo).

    It's a bunch of 60 year olds dressing up in bowler hats!!! (again, speicific to the march as per the opening question). My comments on violence and extra-curricular activities has been made known, please refer to original posts.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    Ikky Poo2 wrote: »
    It's a bunch of 60 year olds dressing up in bowler hats!!!
    ... being triumphalist. Marking a triumph of sectarianism. The event in and of itself is based on sectarian divides and one-upmanship. Sure they're free to celebrate it but they can't expect respect for it.

    How come you brought up a part of Irish culture being defined by hatred of the English? I don't think that's relevant other than as currency for "well we can't talk, look at how some Irish people act towards the British" type arguments, which is pointless. It doesn't justify the bigotry of the Orange Order, which was around long before Sinn Féin.


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,091 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Dudess wrote: »
    ... being triumphalist. Marking a triumph of sectarianism.

    How come you brought up a part of Irish culture being defined by hatred of the English?

    They can be as triumphalist as they want, I honestly, do not give a toss as long as they do it peacefully. Triumpalism is not a crime.

    I brought up the cultural reference because it appeared that people were denouncing the parade because it was based on hate. And I still believe that a part of our culture is based on hate. Our histrory is based on repeated invasions by the English, but our culture (how we react to it) is partially based on hate.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,497 ✭✭✭✭Dragan


    Look, if a load of people from the same country want to find a reason to hate each other then let them off.

    How many Northern Ireland flags fly in Northern Ireland?

    Hate to break it to those folk but they are not English. ;)

    They scrape in as being British because a long time ago someone wanted their fathers and grandfathers to build ships.

    Surely that is something to be proud of?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,715 ✭✭✭marco murphy


    I detest shinners and I'm pretty much an anglophile so this is not me pushing some sort of agenda
    What would shinners have to do with it?

    http://tubeimage.com/files/bs8527vk0iluwdl055h6.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    I was just saying I'm not pushing a republican agenda as I don't have time for republican zealots either.

    Quality download - sums up 12th July pretty accurately.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,715 ✭✭✭marco murphy


    Dudess wrote: »
    I was just saying I'm not pushing a republican agenda as I don't have time for republican zealots either.

    Quality download - sums up 12th July pretty accurately.

    Hmm, I don't see why that was worth a ''I despise the shinners'', just to add credibility to your argument. The father of Republicanism was a Protestant, and Republicanism is based on the prinicples of liberty, equality and fraternity. Therefore there is no religious superiority. I'm a Republican, does that mean I can't criticize the parades? I agree with you mostly, but to throw a dig at the shinners and general Republicanism in fear that it would void your argument is silly.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    When I say "shinners" I'm referring to little scumbags in Celtic jerseys like the ones at the Love Ulster parade - the type with the "the ra are fukin maaaaaad bai" attitude (if they were from Cork) and who don't have an iota about Irish politics or history.
    And I also mean those who just rant and rave against anything remotely English but don't say anything constructive (quite a few of them on Boards) and constantly throw out the tiresome "West Brit" phrase every so often.

    I should have made that clearer.

    I don't have a problem with republican ideology at all - in fact I subscribe to it (I have a HUGE problem with the violence though).
    I'm a Republican
    With a username like Poblachtach? Get outta town! ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 28,128 ✭✭✭✭Mossy Monk


    I see no orange men marching outside so I couldn't really give a ****.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,541 ✭✭✭Heisenberg.


    This post has been deleted.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,727 ✭✭✭✭Sherifu


    You know when you've been tangoed!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,283 ✭✭✭PrivateEye


    http://i33.tinypic.com/xgjukn.jpg

    Orange politics explained


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 8,632 ✭✭✭darkman2


    'Orangefest' - dont they mean 'Bigotfest'?


    TBH society up there especially on the Protestant side is locked in the 1600's. Do they not find this embarrasing:confused:


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 8,632 ✭✭✭darkman2


    What would shinners have to do with it?

    http://tubeimage.com/files/bs8527vk0iluwdl055h6.jpg




    Thats pretty funny actually.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,283 ✭✭✭PrivateEye


    The Orange Order, Republican Sinn Féin (the breakaway who haven't accepted the Dail yet :rolleyes: ) and the sort are embarrasing for all of us, because sadly you'll find people out there who think the country is still populated by their sort.

    http://www.indymedia.ie/article/74511
    That article, from before the planned Love Ulster march, has good info on the Orange Order. They've been happy enough to hang around with the likes of Johnny Adair for years, and one or two of them have let their thoughts on immigrants be known over the years too.

    If you think the Orange lot in Ireland are bad, you should see them in Scotland for what its worth.... very bogey far-right wing connections, and a few of them even turn out to boo down the annual Bloody Sunday march.

    To be honest the UK doesn't seem all that interested in the North, most British people see it as a waste of tax money, and I'm sure they'd much rather up and leave. What republicans need to think about is that a single-state island will probably need a new flag/anthem and god knows what else...I know the idea of a 'socialist republic' in Connollys vision say is a nice one, but in reality a nasty civil war would be far more likely.... the next few decades will be all about compromise.
    "Understanding the reactionary origins of the Orange Order is central is understanding why the claims that the marches represent 'Protestant culture' is about on a par with claiming a Ku Klux Klan march represents 'white culture'. Indeed the very promotion of a separate 'Protestant' culture can only be seen as deeply reactionary in the context of the 6 counties. The term 'Protestant' culture is never used to include the Protestant republicans of 1798 or 1934, for instance. As such it's real meaning can only be 'anti-Catholic'"
    from http://flag.blackened.net/revolt/ws99/ws57_order.html



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,107 ✭✭✭flanum


    i wonder what fartfront have to say?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 8,632 ✭✭✭darkman2


    You know what sort of society it is when this makes headlines


    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/7494526.stm


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,148 ✭✭✭✭KnifeWRENCH


    The whole concept of The Orange Order and this march is purely pathetic - OK so they have the right to march wherever they want. But why do they have to make a big deal out of it and dedicate a whole day into celebrating sectarianism? It's extremely obnoxious, they just want to antagonise the Nationalist community.
    I'm not a die-hard Republican but I have absolutely no respect for someone who, in this day and age, still thinks that by wearing a silly costume and going for a walk they are making a big clever political statement.
    They're calling it "Orange-fest" this year to attract tourists lol

    Lol, makes it sound like people go there and throw oranges at each other, like the tomato festival they have in Spain!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,243 ✭✭✭truecrippler


    It's my dogs second birthday today, I'm not fussed :D.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 605 ✭✭✭j1smithy


    These parades should be banned, not for being sectarian, but for being a waste of time and money, not to mention being incredibly boring. :D In fact all parades should be banned, they are the greatest waste tbh...

    The orange parades, well some of them at least, are about provoking people that want to be offended. Those people need a good dose of reality and modern thinking, Neanderthals, the lot of them.

    For one thing, I'm glad we don't have to pay for the annual clean up after that nonsense.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 381 ✭✭beautiation


    It's all about defiance though, isn't it? That's why it's calculated to be so obnoxious. The intimidation side of it is horrible of course, but in a way I can see why they feel the need to have a strong unifying in-your-face celebration of their culture every year. It's pretty clear that Britain doesn't really want them, and none of the parties in the Republic acknowledge their right to have a state on this island even where their numbers are in the majority, so I'd imagine they feel fairly beseiged, and not a bit put out. Their motherland rejects them, their adopted land wishes to reject the legitimicy of their wants. Their nauseating attitude is ever so slightly provoked really. Of course, there's no little amount of hate and bigotry in it from their side. There's a very slow creep towards a 32 county republic in progress now, and there's not much they can do to stop it in these days of integration, when growing numbers of young people are apathetic about who's in charge as long as there's money in their pockets. So the event is calculated by the old school bigwigs to invoke memories of heritage and antagonism as much as possible in order to remind their people of who they are and why trying keeping the north as it is is their duty. Not something I agree with at all, but I certainly think that if the nationalist side showed a bit more respect for the validity of the North's claim to be part of the Union then maybe they wouldn't feel the need to be quite so provocative about celebrating it. I hope this changes, because otherwise this weekend is going to become absolute terrible chaos every year once the 32 county republic comes clearly onto the horizon.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    in a way I can see why they feel the need to have a strong unifying in-your-face celebration of their culture every year.
    Yeah, but these marches were taking place for a long time before they felt their identity becoming threatened - the marches were taking place when unionists had the upper-hand and catholics were the downtrodden ones.
    Their motherland rejects them, their adopted land wishes to reject the legitimicy of their wants.
    Which is Ireland and which is Britain?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,464 ✭✭✭furtzy


    Its a shame the BBC and UTV dedicate their "Glorious Twelfth" programmes to this crowd of sectarian idiots. They might as well cover the KKK rallies.

    I grew up with these morons. I notice the BBC and UTV don't feature the "burn the catholics" songs and try to portray them as nice upstanding gents.

    They are thankfully finished and they know it. You can guarantee on the 13th they'll be gladly taking the euros from the southern papists


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,283 ✭✭✭PrivateEye


    I don't know about their 'majority' really though. Nowadays I think the majority of people in Ireland are indifferent, but think about the time of partition.

    You have THREE counties in Ulster excluded from the state. The reasons for this were obvious- to install a unionist majority.

    Basically you could draw a line around anything in such a way as to get what you want. In the 70s and 80s partition effected everyone in Ulster in terms of day to day business and travel, civil rights and the rest. I don't think the 'majority' were served by partition.

    I always thought a final say on the north should not be put in the hands of all Irish people, but rather citizens of the province. There's no denying the manner in which the province was divided is shaddy at best.

    Like I said, nowadays I think partition is bottom of most peoples list of worries. Different postboxes, cheaper shopping...

    Unionists were a minority in Ulster in the 1920s, Fermanagh, Tyrone, Armagh and parts of Derry and Down had strong nationalist majorities. A 'wee state' wouldn't have been economically viable, so they did a hackjob on the province.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/spl/hi/pop_ups/07/uk_enl_1195853085/img/1.jpg
    He's called 'Sash Gordon' apparently. :rolleyes:

    I seen the coverage on UTV alright and it's an absolute disgrace, trying to portray it all as some kind of cultural walkaround. I really think the Orange Orders days are numbered, like Republican SF and the rest of the dinosaurs, the old ranks die out and sín sín hopefully.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    PrivateEye wrote: »
    I don't know about their 'majority' really though. Nowadays I think the majority of people in Ireland are indifferent, but think about the time of partition.
    Or else getting on an anti republican high horse.
    You have THREE counties in Ulster excluded from the state. The reasons for this were obvious- to install a unionist majority.
    And don't forget gerrymandering.
    Anyway, the fact that they're in the (not very sizable) majority doesn't legitimise them having everything their way and catholics having little or no say ("tyranny of the majority").


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,715 ✭✭✭marco murphy


    When I say "shinners" I'm referring to little scumbags in Celtic jerseys like the ones at the Love Ulster parade - the type with the "the ra are fukin maaaaaad bai" attitude (if they were from Cork) and who don't have an iota about Irish politics or history.

    Oh. I was under the impression you were referring to Sinn Feiners. My bad... :)
    I don't have a problem with republican ideology at all - in fact I subscribe to it (I have a HUGE problem with the violence though).

    Fair enough, but why is it somehow wrong to persue a Republican agenda if it is one of liberty, equality and fraternity, without bigotry and racism? Theres nothing wrong with that. Don't be ashamed. And on the violence, I think and hope that was the end of it, but it has been a regular occurance since the founding of Republicanism and before.
    With a username like Poblachtach? Get outta town!

    Yeh. No shame, I don't hide it when standing up to sectarianism :)
    and a few of them even turn out to boo down the annual Bloody Sunday march.

    Theres a video on YouTube, tags include NF :)
    What republicans need to think about is that a single-state island will probably need a new flag/anthem and god knows what else...I know the idea of a 'socialist republic' in Connollys vision say is a nice one, but in reality a nasty civil war would be far more likely.... the next few decades will be all about compromise.
    Well politics is all about compromise. A flag and an anthem is hardly anything to lose sleep over if it means a united Ireland. Why would a ''socialist republic'' ignite a civil war?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 74 ✭✭baby_blu


    Quality wrote: »
    Whats your opinion on this marching business?

    And the burning of the tricolour up the North?

    dont care about marching, but burning the tricolour? they can **** off to england if they hate ireland so much


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,556 ✭✭✭✭AckwelFoley


    Rawk on!! Boom boom boom



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,283 ✭✭✭PrivateEye


    Why would a ''socialist republic'' ignite a civil war?

    I don't think the prodestant working class would buy into it.

    All historical struggles where the orange and green came together (like the Belfast strikes in 1907) were eventually smashed on sectarian grounds. I think the unionist community would be very skeptical of a united Ireland, even if it was in their interests economically.

    The reunification of Ireland, on any terms, would ignite a civil war I think. They won't just go away like, or start waving green/red flags.

    My family were SF in the 70s, and my Grandad was a firm believer in the 'socialist republic' idea. He was mainly a staunch anti-fascist type of republican, who believed the prodestant working class could be convinced to join a united Ireland if it was in their interests.

    It's not the 70s now, the economics of the country (both sides of the border) are completely different, and I don't think a United Ireland will be something they wil embrace with open arms. Arms however may be seen.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,909 ✭✭✭✭Wertz


    With any "feel good" factor in the North fast disintegrating due to economic slowdown both in the South and the UK, I personally think we're going to see a return to the bad old days, as regards orangie marches/riots, firebombing campaigns by C/R IRA and general unrest in the Province.

    On a side note, was reading something in a paper the other day about the cost of historical investigations and inquiries covering the past 30 years in the North...the costs were simply staggering and have the potential to run to near the billion pound sterling mark; all this money being blown on policing the past, even whgere findings are made or guilt proved, no-one is going to jail because of the GFA...those sort of costs are unsustainable, as is the increased cost of "now" policing that the North's particular socio-polticial problems call for...this combined with inevitable cuts in spending from HM Exchequer means that there are some tough times ahead for Stormont and the people of the North....trouble like what we saw last night was always worse in poorer times and will be again...


Advertisement