Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest
Alien Abduction
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
Covered in the Daily Wail today:Our close encounters: Meet the alien abductees - and the pictures they drew to prove they weren't imagining it all...
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
But you don't at all seem interested or willing to question your reality.
i'm quite capable, comfortable, and very well able to question my reality.. perhaps you should do the same! you're not asking me to question mine, you're asking me to question yours.
i give up anyway this is obviously not a conversation i can have with you, but no hard feelings
good luck on your endeavor.. i don't even know what you're saying, it's just semantic spaghetti.. perhaps you should try listening once a while, you might actually learn something. 0 -
Lol. So much self contradiction, hypocrisy and irony and in IMO, a very good example of how both are rampant in the UFO community.i'm quite capable, comfortable, and very well able to question my reality.. perhaps you should do the same! you're not asking me to question mine, you're asking me to question yours.
i give up anyway this is obviously not a conversation i can have with you, but no hard feelings good luck on your endeavor.. i don't even know what you're saying, it's just semantic spaghetti.. perhaps you should try listening once a while, you might actually learn something.0 -
-
-
-
-
-
If you think it's a religious belief, you obviously haven't studied ufology very much King Mob, and i'm not talking about the sensationalist sh!te most people have been educated with. There is no burden of proof on anyone but yourself if you can't come to terms with it, if you want to be a skeptic, by all means do, but at least be a real one and not a sideshow of clichés. All the information is there, go look at it, find it, research and digest it and come up with your own opinion, all your arguments have been iterated a thousand times before, it's like a bad record playing itself to death. Why do i need to accept that i'm wrong? I'm not wrong, i don't need you or anyone else to tell me that. Is it close minded of me to believe that you simply cannot understand me or many others because you haven't experienced anything like what we've been talking about? No, that's just common sense. It's just a pity that it's gonna take humanity so long to undertand or accept any of it. You're parading science as the very thing you seem to abhor, a religion in itself, a doctrine or a mandate by which you describe your logic, there's nothing admirable about that, any kid who can read a book can come to the same conclusions that you have. You just don't seem to get the point i'm making! and as i've said, many times ovvvvvverrrrr, it does not matter to me whether or not you believe it, because i believe it myself, because i have seen it, and it was every bit as real as the light of day, so i don't need to spend my time debating with people about it, because seriously, what is the point? if i wasn't drunk right now i probably would not have bothered with this at all.. but there you go.. time for bed.. god speed and all that 0
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
And I've yet to see a single claim that withstood any level of scrutiny or provided anything that would convince any rational person.
Then contrary to what you would have us believe, you have failed to do much if any research into the subject.
Even when the U.S Air Force conducted investigations back in the 50's under Project Blue Book, they could not categorise and rationalise all events. approximately 5% remained unidentified. any reasercer, or skeptic worth their salt knows this fact. So by your above statement, you have actually shown how little you know on the subject.
which is not altogether surprising, because its very hard to understand or learn anything when you are instantly going to deny any evidence presented to you.But you're drifting away from the point.
The idea of sleep paralysis being the root of some abduction stories are only used in stories where it is a plausible (typically the most plausible) explanation.
Claiming that it is used else where, or that it is the only explantion skeptics provide is a dishonest strawman.
i think you like the word "strawman".
Again, I'm finding some of your posts hilariously hypocritical.
Your claiming that anyone who doesn't agree with you are somehow mentally deficient while you are desperately trying to argue that UFO claimants aren't and that skeptics are unwilling to consider other explanations, while you are doing the same.
Not at all, I know pleanty of great skeptics, who I regularly talk with. They are ALWAYS willing to entertain the possibility of something Being beyond their understanding, and let the evidence lead them in an unbiased way to whatever conclusion it will.
Anyway, as you are entrenched in your non belief, there is no point attempting to offer any further logic, or explanation to you. I am sure in times past there were many like you, who absolutely would not accept the Earth was anything but flat, and called anyone who dared open their mind and speculate otherwise a heretic. Eventually their sky fell, and their world collapsed, as I am sure it will be one day for many like you when our infantile race finally matures.
Enjoy the remainder of the dark ages, while they last 0 -
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
There has been theories that anti-gravity has been discovered for a long time now.
Theres guys all over the world apparently geting raided for carrying out experiments in that area of science.And having machinery taken away.
Wether thats true i cant be sure.But i have seen some interesting videos of bottles and rocks molding together under electricity or some other force and floating inside an empty tube.
Its posible that if you can create a gravitational field around a craft you could travel at insane speed and turn at right angles speeding up time inside the gravitational field allowing it to appear(or is) like it is going faster outside.
I forget the theory behind it, but to it when i read inot it, i was satisfied it could well be a good explanation for these types of sightings.
Aka government secret projects.
Some even thought humans from the future!
Antigravity.....:eek:
So what you are saying is this is an antigravity craft .. OMG Doesnt that sound crazy ...... I mean, imagine, if Electrogravitation was a reality , and imagine if it were integrated into some of todays military aircraft. imagine if what the Belgians saw, was actually a next generation tactical reconnaisance Aircraft. Wouldnt that be something....
Look at the "blur" around the wing of the B2 Spirit. And before the debunkers point out that its simply the aircraft going through the sound barrier, and this is simply a "Prandtl-Glauert singularity". look at the direction of the cone. A supersonic shock collar extends from the nose of the aircraft (as shown below). I have personally seen many aircraft flying close to , or breaking the sound barrier. This one appears to be extending around the wing and body, in reverse to the direction of travel.
If there are any aeronatical engineers out there, do the math on the fuel payload of the B2, and its stated range. Also there is "supposedly" a charge across the leading edge of the wing in the order of between aproximatly 700KV.-1MV+ (cannot be sure of the exact value) Any student of Electrogravitics will understand the implication of this.0 -
Advertisement
-
There has been theories that anti-gravity has been discovered for a long time now.
Theres guys all over the world apparently geting raided for carrying out experiments in that area of science.And having machinery taken away.
Wether thats true i cant be sure.But i have seen some interesting videos of bottles and rocks molding together under electricity or some other force and floating inside an empty tube.
Its posible that if you can create a gravitational field around a craft you could travel at insane speed and turn at right angles speeding up time inside the gravitational field allowing it to appear(or is) like it is going faster outside.
I forget the theory behind it, but to it when i read inot it, i was satisfied it could well be a good explanation for these types of sightings.
Aka government secret projects.
Some even thought humans from the future!
Oh, and you might like to take a look at this link.
http://starburstfound.org/electrograviticsblog/
I wont mention it any further, as its off topic, but maybe we should start another conspiracy thread on Electrogravitic technology as used in todays modern military aircraft. But to be honest, its really not much of a conspiracy these days.
I have actually personally had a B2 spirit fly over my head, at less than 250 ft. I must say , for such a powerful aircraft it was very,very quiet indeed.
0 -
-
Or it could be some other effect besides the cone of vapour during a sonic boom. (Which is not called Prandtl-Glauert signularity.)Ninjamonkey wrote: »
Look at the "blur" around the wing of the B2 Spirit. And before the debunkers point out that its simply the aircraft going through the sound barrier, and this is simply a "Prandtl-Glauert singularity". look at the direction of the cone. A supersonic shock collar extends from the nose of the aircraft (as shown below). I have personally seen many aircraft flying close to , or breaking the sound barrier. This one appears to be extending around the wing and body, in reverse to the direction of travel.
Like say the haze that appears when an aircraft makes a manoeuvre that creates a pocket of low pressure.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/22221147@N02/3934431639/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/22221147@N02/3934431187/
http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4111/4982079281_ce17160908_z.jpg
http://ih0.redbubble.net/image.9792544.4953/flat,550x550,075,f.jpg
The only two options aren't the poorly represented one skeptics might provide or magic/aliens/unknown technology.0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
Enough to know that your half assed condescending dismissals of explanations you don't like seem to be the exact same ones that people seem to think mean old skeptics use against your ideas
I like it , a little emotion ....Methinks I may be pushing buttons.. :mad::mad::mad:
dont take it personally, you are a great adversary;)Yes, and viewed from certain directions at certain times could make it seem that it is doing the opposite.
Eh, actually No , I have SEEN it myself, from many angles, it looks the same.The first example for instance seems to have it's cone coming both from the front and the back at almost the same time.
Yes, this again is quite normal, and the cone is still expanding away from the direction of travel. This is normal as the pressure waves compress. The reason there are 2 cones, is because of the way the airflow is interacting with the fuselage, and the elevators/tailplane. Both are generating the shockwave. You can see this in many wind tunnel simulations.
To better illustrate my example, you will notice from the images below, the way the supersonic shockwave extends away from the direction of flight, as the pressure waves move back across the aircraft.
0 -
-
And none of this addresses any of my points.
I know that the cone expands away from the direction of flight. However as the example showed, as certain angles and at certain times and taking the picture out of context, it can appear that cone is doing something else.
But again, I gave you a list of other possibilities that you've ignored because they don't fit your preferred conclusion and you can't address them.
well, I do apologise if I have misread your post, I did believe after looking at the provided links, and reading your opinion on the cone being viewed from another angle may make it look like its not extending frm the direction fo flight.
I thought I addressed your points. usual banter aside, I honestly am open to any serious discussion on the matter, possibly not in this thrread as it may be off topic. However, my main point was the cone shown in the pic of the B2, is actually NOT generated by supersonic flight. Its wrong. It does not extend from the direction fo flight, in fact it extends from the rear over the fuselage.
Also given what I will say is the "fact", as It is now well documented, and also admitted by the USAF, that the B2 charges the leading edge of the wing, to extremely high voltages, It would appear this "cone" is not a vapour cone at all.
I am not suggesting anything alien, or mystical, or magical. simply the applied physics of a known theory of extending the wing area, through ionic charge of the surrounding air. Not exactly antigravity, but shall we say , a slight boost to the thrust to weight ratio
I would suggest checking out " the Hunt for Zero Point", by a respected Janes Aviation journalist called Nick Cook. Believe me, there is nothing at all alien related in there, but it does talk about experiments the Germans were working on during WWII, which were taken back to the U.S after the war, with the scientists, under project Paper Clip.
Much of the testing was done, at the White Sands missile Range, which runs over 3,200 Sq mi of New Mexico. Yes, i am a skeptic at heart, and I believe that reading this book, also points to a logical and plausible explanation to another fabled event that happened somewhere around New Mexico, in July 1947.
Experiments which were ongoing, with esteemed scientists, such as Werner Von Braun himself, were alegedly carried out from that testing site, with craft that may have been misinterpreted, by the average person, as something unknown, had they stumbled across wreckage strewn across a ranch.
But back to the point, I do apologise, had I misread or misinterpreted your posts. I simply wanted to draw attention to the B2 picture, which many people say is simply the B2 breaking the sound barrier.0 -
-
argosy2006 wrote: »
1.A standard Vapor trail
2&3. A meteor
4.Couds
5.Chinese Lanterns
6.Chinese Lanterns with attached flashing LED's
7 A Snowmobile
8.Sun eflecting on ice/Snowmobile / reflection on Camera Prism
9. the Planet Venus,with camera prism relection
10 . our old friend the Chinese Lanterns again
11 Multiple aircraft on the ILS approach to an airport
12 Fuzzy picture of something - possibly nose material stuck on camera lens
13 Standard Rocket or missile
14 Airliner at night
15 . International space station out of focus
16 meteor
17 meteor
18 meteor
Unfortunately, nothing there strikes me as unusual, and believe me, if i did I would be the first to champion it.0 -
-
But again, this may not be the case because of the angle and timing of the photo. You have not addressed this point.
Furthermore I pointed to the examples of planes pulling vapour while they are manoeuvring which you have not addressed.
And then I suggested the possibility that the plane can generate a cloud of vapour just by virtue of it's aerodynamics, which you have also ignored.
It being a sonic boom is not the only alternative explanation and you need to address these other, more likely one before you can claim it as evidence of this technology you believe in (which seems to be backtracked from your original implication of anti gravity).
Points taken, I have to conceed I cannot determine what the exact manoevres of the aircraft were at the given time, that is impossible. I do not believe it would generate such a cloud of "vapour" by virtue of its aerodynamics. I have seen a B2 in flight, and this did not occur. - Admittedly, only first hand observation of a B2 in operation is the evidence here, and maybe if I watched enough B2's for long enough, ... well, i dont know... we will have to leave that as an unknown.
Lastly, i was not claiming this as evidence, but an indication, that something is not as it should be as you will see if you check out this picture, many journalists mis-interpret this as a sonic shockwave.
I think your argument holds water, and we will agree with your hyposthesis on this occasion. I stand down
I do however believe there has been significant advances in the field of electrogravitics, of course I cannot bear any proof, and I am not asking you to believe, or agree with me. It is an interesting field of research, and one which I KNOW for a fact, has much research ongoing.
Please do not ask me to prove how i know, as I cannot. - inasmuch, as I am not at liberty to answer the question.0 -
-
-
Advertisement
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21kW39IcLKA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj4IbXxIMc8
Advertisement