The Great Big 9/11 Conspiracy Theory Thread [Megamerge]

tunaman · 27-02-2006 6:29am #1

Everybody needs to watch this video.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=psP_9RE0V2I

This is radical stuff and what FLOORS ME is how difficult it is to get people to even LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE.

So threatened are they by the possibility.

You accept the official story because you think that everyone does.

You accept it because you have been fooled into believing it is the patriotic thing to do. It is the governments theory and it is backed up by the government under the auspices of “The official Story” and you don’t give a damn that there is not a stitch of evidence to support it.

The back of your mind has been telling you that something is strange about the whole 911 attack however you keep it suppressed in fear of being labeled a conspiracy theorist hilariously not realizing that the official story is not backed up by one iota of evidence making that theory the only conspiracy theory floating around.

When the truth finally comes out you will be one of those people telling everyone that you knew it all the time.

You will because the lack of backbone you have shown so far indicates that you won’t be able to stomach yourself when you see how easy this case is to crack and how only a complete moron can't understand that they have been lied to after being shown the evidence.

Furthermore you do not care enough about the victims families to take 5 minutes to look at what they are complaining about.

As far as your concerned the show was over after the towers blew up. In your ignorant mind the show is over and everything is back to normal.

You have probably even complained that you have seen the collapse of those towers too many times.

Either look at the evidence or stop hawking the official story as if you know what your babbling about or until you can provide a piece of evidence to support it.

Kernel · 27-02-2006 4:19pm

There's another conspiracy which springs to mind when watching the towers collapse, namely the amount of asbestos that was spread all over NYC.

http://www.asbestos.org/news/wtc_02_newfinding.html

cockmynut · 04-03-2006 5:22pm

It is absolutely insane how so many people refuse to look at the conclusive evidence and just mindlessly believe globalist propaganda. It's sad.

tunaman · 14-03-2006 12:34am

Nobody else has an opinion on the video?

The following is an updated version which has just been released.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=PWgSaBT9hNU&search=9/11%20911%209-11%20september%2011%209/11/01%20stephen%20jones%20david%20ray%20griffin%20jeff%20king%20revisited%20911revisited%20tribute%20wtc%20wtc7

popinfresh · 14-03-2006 1:55am

This topic has been done to death.

Story-bud!! · 15-03-2006 5:09am

http://www.iamthewitness.com/

radiospan · 16-03-2006 10:02pm

The evidence on the videos is compelling all right, but some of the websites listed above, and the websites that are mentioned in the videos seem very one-sided, and often include articles about JFK coverups, fake moon landings etc. Kinda takes from the credibility of the 9/11 theories, I think.

Then there are other websites which set out to disprove and debunk the conspiracy theories. Again, completely one-sided.

Does anyone know of a site where arguments for and against the 9/11 conspiracy theory are laid out and examined sensibly? I can't help but feel I'm reading some conspiracy nut's anti-American propoganda on much of the websites I've seen.

Also, in the 9/11 Revisited video, they spend much time hammering home the point that the Twin Towers were designed to withstand impacts from multiple aircraft. But they did! They say themselves in the video that the towers re-stabalised successfully after the impacts.

tunaman · 17-03-2006 3:27am

Is the American Press still Free?

http://www.911eyewitness.com/truth/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=27

This was the title of a controversial presentation at a prestigious press club in Tokyo, Japan, Tuesday, March 14. The New York Times Tokyo Bureau Chief, Jim Brooks, said that he couldn't attend an official press function about 9/11 or he would be fired. Coincidentally, the Reuters Bureau chief, Daniel Sloan, was also a strong opponent to the event being held, but he and Brooks were voted down by international members and the event was able to go ahead.

911Eyewitness was screened during dinner for 50 international journalists at the Tokyo, Foreign Correspondents Club of Japan and received tremendous applause.

Those in attendance were virtually unanimous in agreement that controlled demolition brought down the towers after watching 911Eyewitness.

The video can be found here.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3498980438587461603&q=911+eyewitness

The lone vocal critic who labeled 911Eyewitness analysis featuring Newton's Laws of Science as "propaganda" was quickly silenced by additional testimony from ex-MI5 agent David Shayler, stating 9/11 was an inside job, streaming from the internet on Google's video site.

http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=shayler

cyrus the virus · 06-04-2006 11:41pm

Heres another video on the 9/11 conspiracy.
If you have an hour and 20, I suggest that you watch it.
Loose Change 2nd Edition

cockmynut · 12-04-2006 1:27am

Loose Change 2nd Edition asks some interesting questions but I'm not entirely convinced about the Pentagon. I'll have to research it a little more before making my mind up. I am, however, 100% convinced that all of it is a conspiracy.

Capt'n Midnight · 17-04-2006 9:14pm

Kernel wrote:

There's another conspiracy which springs to mind when watching the towers collapse, namely the amount of asbestos that was spread all over NYC.

http://www.asbestos.org/news/wtc_02_newfinding.html

yeah there are a lot of health concerns - IIRC on the radio (BBC4 / RTE1 ?) that there were 80,000 (or another number >1) more respiratory problems afterwards, - blame was on air quality and saying it was better than it was to get the wall street up and running asap. - can't find link to statement that the air was safe.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12211725/
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/healthnews.php?newsid=41590

Sizzler · 17-04-2006 9:23pm

Sorry to steam in on this one late folks....Ive got some very strong opinions on this and many a night after a few beers its come up in conversation ;-)

I'll kick it off with....the way the WTC collapsed was STAGED, the chances of it happening like that to one building was extreme...happening to two...ie collapsing so perfectly ...well lets just say theres more chance of you getting rear ended by Elvis on the M50 in rush hour.

Secondly, does anybody REALLY believe that passengers made that plane hit the ground in Pensylvania? Does anybody REALLY believe that a place crashed into the pentagon? NFW.

USA, biggest superpower in the world and they couldnt scramble a few jets to intercept two planes that were flying HUNDREDS of miles off course.

RIDICULOUS.

Sizzler · 17-04-2006 9:27pm

tunaman wrote:

Everybody needs to watch this video.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=psP_9RE0V2I

This is radical stuff and what FLOORS ME is how difficult it is to get people to even LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE.

So threatened are they by the possibility.

You accept the official story because you think that everyone does.

You accept it because you have been fooled into believing it is the patriotic thing to do. It is the governments theory and it is backed up by the government under the auspices of “The official Story” and you don’t give a damn that there is not a stitch of evidence to support it.

The back of your mind has been telling you that something is strange about the whole 911 attack however you keep it suppressed in fear of being labeled a conspiracy theorist hilariously not realizing that the official story is not backed up by one iota of evidence making that theory the only conspiracy theory floating around.

When the truth finally comes out you will be one of those people telling everyone that you knew it all the time.

You will because the lack of backbone you have shown so far indicates that you won’t be able to stomach yourself when you see how easy this case is to crack and how only a complete moron can't understand that they have been lied to after being shown the evidence.

Furthermore you do not care enough about the victims families to take 5 minutes to look at what they are complaining about.

As far as your concerned the show was over after the towers blew up. In your ignorant mind the show is over and everything is back to normal.

You have probably even complained that you have seen the collapse of those towers too many times.

Either look at the evidence or stop hawking the official story as if you know what your babbling about or until you can provide a piece of evidence to support it.

That vid was removed from youtube

Just wondered what it was ?

tunaman · 18-04-2006 1:45am

Sizzler wrote:

That vid was removed from youtube Just wondered what it was ?

It was 9/11 revisited, a very good video which focuses on the evidence supporting the controlled demolition of WTC 1, 2 and 7. However here is an update...

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1951610169657809939&q=9%2F11+revisited&pl=true

The evidence really is overwhelming, but most people have been brainwashed.

Sizzler · 18-04-2006 10:06pm

TOTR. Thanks, I'll have a look at it tonight.

Ciaran500 · 20-04-2006 11:01pm

Hmmm, your original post doesn't look that orignial tunaman, not the first time either.
http://theonlyanswer.org/discus/messages/7268/7609.html?1141794883

You really should stop plagiarizing your posts if you want any chance of people listening to you.

Sizzler · 22-04-2006 1:03pm

This is worth a read..

http://www.shoutwire.com/viewstory/10038/George_W_Bush_IS_a_Liar

bobbyjoe · 16-05-2006 6:03pm

This should be interesting.
The fake video theories begin at 1.02

http://www.judicialwatch.org/5772.shtml

Department of Defense Responds to Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act Request and Related Lawsuit

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that Department of Defense will release a videotape to Judicial Watch at 1:00 p.m. this afternoon that allegedly shows American Airlines Flight 77 striking the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. The Department of Defense is releasing the videotape in response to a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act request and related lawsuit.

“This is in response to your December 14, 2004 Freedom of Information Act Request, FOIA appeal of March 27, 2005, and complaint filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia,” wrote William Kammer, Chief of the Department of Defense, Office of Freedom of Information. “Now that the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui is over, we are able to complete your request and provide the video…”

Judicial Watch originally filed a Freedom of Information Act request on December 15, 2004, seeking all records pertaining to September 11, 2001 camera recordings of the Pentagon attack from the Sheraton National Hotel, the Nexcomm/Citgo gas station, Pentagon security cameras and the Virginia Department of Transportation. The Department of Defense admitted in a January 26, 2005 letter that it possessed a videotape responsive to Judicial Watch’s request. However, the Pentagon refused to release the videotape because it was, “part of an ongoing investigation involving Zacarias Moussaoui.” Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit on February 22, 2006 arguing that there was “no legal basis” for the Defense Department’s refusal to release the tape.

“We fought hard to obtain this video because we felt that it was very important to complete the public record with respect to the terrorist attacks of September 11,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Finally, we hope that this video will put to rest the conspiracy theories involving American Airlines Flight 77. As always, our prayers remain with all those who suffered as a result of those murderous attacks.”

A copy of the video will be made available on Judicial Watch’s Internet site, www.judicialwatch.org.

Judicial Watch is a non-partisan, educational foundation organized under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue code. Judicial Watch is dedicated to fighting government and judicial corruption and promoting a return to ethics and morality in our nation's public life.

Iceman_5000 · 16-05-2006 6:18pm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4987716.stm

Has this tape been put on the internet yet? I would very much like to see it.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848

Thats the best overall video i have seen on 9/11.....

Dirk Gently · 16-05-2006 8:09pm

Just seen it on sky news. ( I think )

Don't think many conspiracy theorists will be convinced if what I seen on sky news was the full video.

Squaddy · 16-05-2006 9:09pm

I am outraged at this video. They are so F**king clever. This is the same video they released a few years ago. This is just propaganda to get people not to believe conspiracy theorists.

You can clearly see this is not a Boeing plane. 1. It does not look like one. 2. It is soo small. Its the size of a missile or a small corporate jet.

If a boeing hit this building at 530 mph why the hell was the wall still standing after it and why is there no trace of the plane.

We where told that it vaporised but how the hell did they identify 184 bodies out of 189?? and why the hell was the lawn untouched.

I was looking at the video on Sky News and your man said that you can clearly see it low to the ground. I thought the official explanation was that it bounced off the lawn?!!?

And if the hi-jacker was so clever to hi-jack a plane would he be that stupid to fly into the west side pulling off an impossible turn, even the best pilot in the world cannot make such a sharp turn, when he could of just simply crashed into the east wing killing thousands of people and all the top officials but no he crashed into the side which was being renovated and the only section able to withstand this attack and while this side was being renovated their was all construction shi*e on the lawn why was this all untouched.

SpitfireIV · 16-05-2006 9:18pm

Iceman 5000, I just seen that short video clip of the Pentegon on Sky World News, they say that this is the proof that a commercial airliner smashed into the building......in reality though its no different to the clip thats shown in 'Loose Change'. All you see is something enter the right of the frame....a nose of some flying object......then the explosion.

Like I said, its no different to what we've seen and still does not explain anything else so I cant see what the point of it being released was or what they hope to gain from it, still a lot more serious questions that need to be answered.

CroppyBoy1798

Sizzler · 16-05-2006 9:21pm

After watching the loose change video for the first time last month I have to say it would take pretty convincing footage to change my mind, so after reading this

http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/05/16/pentagon.video/index.html

all I can say is...show me the footage ! I am really gonna take some convincing !

What odds on the footage being enchanced in some way??

ReefBreak · 16-05-2006 9:26pm

Anyone who believes the conspiracy theories behind the Pentagon attack is an absolute, complete and utter idiot. End of story.

SpitfireIV · 16-05-2006 9:35pm

ReefBreak wrote:

Anyone who believes the conspiracy theories behind the Pentagon attack is an absolute, complete and utter idiot. End of story.

ReefBreak, we're all adults here and capable of our own opinions, I strongly believe that there is more to the Pentegon than meets the eye, there has to be given all the over whelming proof and facts. Perhaps a 757 did hit it, but there IS more that we dont know about, you have to agree on that.

But if you can give me a reason why I, or anyone else should not believe the conspiracy sorrounding the Pentegon events then I would honestly like to hear it.

CroppyBoy1798

Sizzler · 16-05-2006 9:42pm

ReefBreak wrote:

Anyone who believes the conspiracy theories behind the Pentagon attack is an absolute, complete and utter idiot. End of story.

LOL

What an excellent argument ! Bollox.

Take a look at the vid thats just been released (its on cnn.com) and show me where the 777 is on the clip ?? In case you're not sure how big a 777 is, its about the size of 10 semi detached gaffs in length....so if you can see that on the vid you are a better man than me.

Looks more like a mickey mouse rocket to me.

billy the squid · 16-05-2006 10:01pm

ReefBreak wrote:

Anyone who believes the conspiracy theories behind the Pentagon attack is an absolute, complete and utter idiot. End of story.

Instead of trolling, why not state your reasons why you believe the conspiracy theory is invalid.

Dirk Gently · 16-05-2006 10:04pm

ReefBreak wrote:

Anyone who believes any of the conspiracy theories behind the Pentagon attack is a complete and utter idiot. End of story.

which conspiracy story is that? The official one or all the others.
I don't neccessary believe any of the explainations out there but I have to say the official one is probably the hardest one to believe considering the lack of evidence to support it.

I was really hoping to see clear footage of a plane crashing into the building so I could dismiss all the other stories but what I've seen does more to support the unofficial conspiracy stories than dismis them.

This answers no questions for me.

oscarBravo · 16-05-2006 10:05pm

Squaddy wrote:

You can clearly see this is not a Boeing plane. 1. It does not look like one. 2. It is soo small. Its the size of a missile or a small corporate jet.

I can't see a plane at all, but hey.

As a matter of interest, have you ever been to the Pentagon? It is a fuppin huge building, and pictures of it can be misleading, leading to the assumption that things beside it are smaller than they are.

Squaddy wrote:

If a boeing hit this building at 530 mph why the hell was the wall still standing after it and why is there no trace of the plane. ...he crashed into the side which was being renovated and the only section able to withstand this attack

*ahem*

Squaddy wrote:

And if the hi-jacker was so clever to hi-jack a plane would he be that stupid to fly into the west side pulling off an impossible turn, even the best pilot in the world cannot make such a sharp turn...

Pulling off an impossible turn would be pretty stupid, alright. Maybe he pulled off a possible turn instead?

drdre · 16-05-2006 10:11pm

Squaddy wrote:

I am outraged at this video. They are so F**king clever. This is the same video they released a few years ago. This is just propaganda to get people not to believe conspiracy theorists.

You can clearly see this is not a Boeing plane. 1. It does not look like one. 2. It is soo small. Its the size of a missile or a small corporate jet.

If a boeing hit this building at 530 mph why the hell was the wall still standing after it and why is there no trace of the plane.

We where told that it vaporised but how the hell did they identify 184 bodies out of 189?? and why the hell was the lawn untouched.

I was looking at the video on Sky News and your man said that you can clearly see it low to the ground. I thought the official explanation was that it bounced off the lawn?!!?

And if the hi-jacker was so clever to hi-jack a plane would he be that stupid to fly into the west side pulling off an impossible turn, even the best pilot in the world cannot make such a sharp turn, when he could of just simply crashed into the east wing killing thousands of people and all the top officials but no he crashed into the side which was being renovated and the only section able to withstand this attack and while this side was being renovated their was all construction shi*e on the lawn why was this all untouched.

Yes you are right, its all bloody bush causing this hype.it doesnot look like a plane in the building.in my opinion i donot even think osama did all this.i am a muslim myself and heard alot of different stories from different people.i still think all the wars in iraq etc(you know what i mean) are ALL caused by bush and the americans.and if osama did do all this then american deserve it as they are killing inocent people every second all over the world.

GAAman · 16-05-2006 10:14pm

Been tryin to access the judicial site for awhile now keeps timin out etc

:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:

"They" got to it!!!!!

Tellox · 16-05-2006 10:16pm

An aeroplane hitting the pentagon how it did is unbelievable, stupid, and would take an idiot to believe. Thankfully, The victims in the prank were america, so not many eyebrows were raised. And if you didnt believe the official far-fetched story involving black boxes vaporising and passports withstanding the blast, youre unpatriotic scum.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&q=Loose+Change+2nd+Edition&pl=true

drdre · 16-05-2006 10:19pm

Tellox wrote:

An aeroplane hitting the pentagon how it did is unbelievable, stupid, and would take an idiot to believe. Thankfully, The victims in the prank were america, so not many eyebrows were raised. And if you didnt believe the official far-fetched story involving black boxes vaporising and passports withstanding the blast, youre unpatriotic scum.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&q=Loose+Change+2nd+Edition&pl=true

Yes you are right, its bloody americans who are the dumbass.well im not thick.i can see its not a plane but bush might think it is.i swear to god i donot know how he became president.the is proper thick;)

Tellox · 16-05-2006 10:29pm

Well, that was a little unfair of me - not ALL americans are thick. But the one's believing this story are.

Tellox · 16-05-2006 10:36pm

Watched the vids, still utter bull****.
No clear depiction of an aeroplane at all, video only shows stills every couple of seconds - why is it that the security center of the most powerful country in the world's security camera's only show stills every couple of seconds?

Nothing new here at all.

Squaddy · 16-05-2006 10:41pm

Is it jus me but did anyone notice the building flaming up before that object hit it?

SpitfireIV · 16-05-2006 10:53pm

Guys of course the American media are going to portray this is the definitive proof that it was a 757 hit the pentegon (even though we all can plainly see there is NO evidence here), they cant say otherwise as GE (General Electronics) owns most of the major networks (including news) in the US and they are making an absolute fortune out of the Iraq war, so its in there favor. And British TV, will of course rally with its American counterparts and claim the same thing.

They claim this clip should put all conspiracy theories to rest.........I think all its done is refreshed the situation in peoples minds, there are LOTS more questions that need answering, and I cant believe how Americans are sitting back and for the most part doing nothing, how they could be so blind to all this!

I guess they will all sleep peacefully now after seeing that footage, and having there minds put at rest.

And you know what else, no matter how bad we might think this country is at times, thank god we have some form of a civalised goverment who wouldnt have us believe what the American goverment are shoveling out to there people.

CroppyBoy1798

ReefBreak · 16-05-2006 11:20pm

LOL

What an excellent argument ! Bollox.

Take a look at the vid thats just been released (its on cnn.com) and show me where the 777 is on the clip ?? In case you're not sure how big a 777 is, its about the size of 10 semi detached gaffs in length....so if you can see that on the vid you are a better man than me.

- The Pentagon decided to send a missile into it's own building killing 170 of it's own people. Yeah. Right.
- A missile took down the place, and it just happened to crash into the Pentagon when it came down. On the same day that that 19 terrorists slammed planes into the Twin Towers/Pennsylvania field. What a coincidence! Yeah. Right.
- There was no plane, just a missile. Meanwhile, the people on the plane are now living on a secret island in the middle of the pacific. Yeah. Right.

[snip]please dont be calling people idiots only starts arguments , detracts from main topic, ta - miju [/snip]

segadreamcast · 16-05-2006 11:30pm

CroppyBoy1798 wrote:

they cant say otherwise as GE (General Electronics) owns most of the major networks (including news) in the US and they are making an absolute fortune out of the Iraq war, so its in there favor.

Fecking conspiracy nuts. Don't let lies get in the way of a good story, eh lads?

Now when you say most of the networks, what you'd really be meaning is one, no? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_assets_owned_by_General_Electric . Inform yourself about things or don't bother trying to stir to be honest.*

*And before you say "no Noel, Telemundo is another network". Firstly, no it isn't, its parent company is NBC and, secondly, two networks still isn't nearly the same as "most networks" now, is it?

SpitfireIV · 16-05-2006 11:39pm

ReefBreak wrote:

- The Pentagon decided to send a missile into it's own building killing 170 of it's own people. Yeah. Right.
- A missile took down the place, and it just happened to crash into the Pentagon when it came down. On the same day that that 19 terrorists slammed planes into the Twin Towers/Pennsylvania field. What a coincidence! Yeah. Right.
- There was no plane, just a missile. Meanwhile, the people on the plane are now living on a secret island in the middle of the pacific. Yeah. Right.

Grow up you idiots.

Mate, take a look at 'Loose Change' it might just make you think......you never know.

Killing people, ie Americans may have been part of the plan, ie to ignite a great sence of patriotism and a mad frenzy to serve justice on the culprits in revenge.

Perhaps a missile was sent into the Pentegon on purpose. Why was there just a single hole in the building?? No wings, no engines, no tail section, and NO damage on the exterior where these would have struck, just the hole. But then they would have us believe that the engines, made of steel and titanium vapourised on impact (not possible)...YET...they could identify the majority of bodies on the plane. Yeah, right!

The events at the WTC and Pennslyvania still do not add up so they cant yet be compared to the Pentegon, the terrorists.....you know some of them are still alive, right?

ReefBreak · 16-05-2006 11:46pm

Perhaps a missile was sent into the Pentegon on purpose. Why was there just a single hole in the building?? No wings, no engines, no tail section, and NO damage on the exterior where these would have struck, just the hole. But then they would have us believe that the engines, made of steel and titanium vapourised on impact (not possible)...YET...they could identify the majority of bodies on the plane. Yeah, right!

Can you please tell me where all the passengers that were on the plane are right now? Trapped on an island somewhere? Shot dead and buried in a field when the plane landed? What happened to the plane itself? Stored in an underground-complex-from-a-James-Bond-film-style area in South America?

I'll say it again, if you believe the missile theory, you are a fool, and you should genuinely feel embaressed for yourself..

SpitfireIV · 16-05-2006 11:50pm

Like I said, look up 'Loose Change' on You Tube or Google Video. That'll explain it all to you.

If I'm a fool, then so be it, but at least I'm a fool thats looked at both sides of the story.

ReefBreak · 16-05-2006 11:50pm

you know some of them are still alive, right

This is another theory is it? Let me guess, they were mutants grown in a CIA lab somewhere with powers to survive the heat of a fireball produced by a plane-load of burning fuel. Am I close?

SpitfireIV · 16-05-2006 11:52pm

Mate, I'm thinking your just trolling now.

The BBC did an investigation, I think 9 of the 'alledged' hi-jackers are still alive and well, but hey, thats not my theory, its the BBC's.

ReefBreak · 16-05-2006 11:52pm

CroppyBoy1798 wrote:

If I'm a fool, then so be it, but at least I'm a fool thats looked at both sides of the story.

You are fool if you think there was no plane, or that a missile brought down the plane. So at least you admit it.

Silverfish · 16-05-2006 11:53pm

This is the released Pentagon security tape in film strip sequence.

I would really like if someone could point out the plane, pls k thx.

my.php?image=cam16rm.jpg

SpitfireIV · 16-05-2006 11:56pm

Careful Silverfish....you risk being branded a fool, lol.

I cant see a plane there, they obviously chopped out frames.

ReefBreak · 16-05-2006 11:56pm

CroppyBoy1798 wrote:

Mate, I'm thinking your just trolling now.

The BBC did an investigation, I think 9 of the 'alledged' hi-jackers are still alive and well, but hey, thats not my theory, its the BBC's.

You believe that a load of passengers and a plane just vanished into thin air, and I'm the own that's trolling?

The BBC did an investigation that showed 9 of the hijackers were alive? What programme was it? When was it on? Something tells me it wasn't an Horizon special, that's for sure.

SpitfireIV · 16-05-2006 11:57pm

ReefBreak ----> LOOSE CHANGE

ReefBreak · 17-05-2006 12:01am

Silverfish wrote:

This is the released Pentagon security tape in film strip sequence.

I would really like if someone could point out the plane, pls k thx.

Simple video technology lesson here guys: In order to save space, security cameras have a fairly slow frame rate. It simply didn't have time to catch the plane before it hit the building. Never mind, I'm sure all the passengers were explained all this when they arrived on their desert island. Just before they were told they could never see their family or friends again, and just after they were told they were part of a conspiracy that caused the deaths of over 3000 americans.

This thread is typical of the worst of "intelligent" debate (or lack of) on the internet.

Silverfish · 17-05-2006 12:04am

ReefBreak wrote:

You believe that a load of passengers and a plane just vanished into thin air, and I'm the own that's trolling?

The BBC did an investigation that showed 9 of the hijackers were alive? What programme was it? When was it on? Something tells me it wasn't an Horizon special, that's for sure.

If you can quit yelling like a kid that's had too much sugar, and actually pay attention to what is being said to you instead of just quoting people and yelling random stuff, watch the Loose Change video.

In fact, Here it is again, just for you.

To save you having to click that troublesome '1' to get back to the first page.

Now, most of the questions you're asking people here are dealt with in this video, we've all watched it, and I presume people like me who have seen it are sick trying to answer questions for people who haven't bothered to watch it.

Now, to pre-empt your next little outburst, I'm sure not everyone believes Loose Change to be the utter truth but it does raise a few valid questions, and does inspire people to think a bit more about what happened.

The Great Big 9/11 Conspiracy Theory Thread [Megamerge]

Do you believe a 757 hit the pentagon? 100 votes

Comments