Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

NFL DRAFT 2012

1246726

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,599 ✭✭✭matthew8


    6'1", 248lbs (overweight), 4.93 40 yard dash, Didn't take part in the bench press. Small arms too but I forget the exact measurement. He was phenomenal in 2010, was okay for the first half of 2011, things went downhill towards the end of the year (resulted in him getting benched). I thought a good combine would salvage a first round pick or early 2nd, but showing up out of shape and running that slow is just pathetic. Let's just say his interviews won't save him, he's already blamed as many people as he can for his poor year.

    In a way I'm happy because now the Ravens should draft an OL in the 1st round rather than Burflict.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,929 ✭✭✭JaMarcus Hustle


    God, his second run was 5.10.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,395 ✭✭✭✭mikemac1


    matthew8 wrote: »
    In a way I'm happy because now the Ravens should draft an OL in the 1st round rather than Burflict.

    Give me Peter Konz, center, Wisconsin


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,599 ✭✭✭matthew8


    God, his second run was 5.10.
    Burflict? Sounds terrible. But I don't know how fast that is. What would that translate to on a 100m track? 14 seconds?
    mikemac1 wrote: »
    Give me Peter Konz, center, Wisconsin

    I pay no attention to non-NFL football. What odds would you give on him being fully ready to start in 2013?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,225 ✭✭✭Chardee MacDennis


    Dontari Poe, a 6'4", 346lbs defensive tackle ran a faster 40 than Vontaze Burfict. Burfict is instantly out of the first 3 rounds after his disgraceful weekend. Such a shame, was a huge fan of his when he looked like a sure fire 1st rounder after his 2010 season.

    An 8'9" broad jump and just under 30" vert, wtf...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,362 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    I wonder if rich eisen will beat 6.18 in the 40 this year ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,225 ✭✭✭Chardee MacDennis


    Just watched a few of the workouts with Poe. That is a large man, doing some things a large man shouldn't be able to do.

    How much will his stock be affected by this? Anyone know where was he predicted to be going before the weekend?

    Walterfootball.com had him at 34 to the Colts.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,929 ✭✭✭JaMarcus Hustle


    matthew8 wrote: »
    Burflict? Sounds terrible. But I don't know how fast that is. What would that translate to on a 100m track? 14 seconds?

    I couldn't tell you, not really sure what would be a good guess for 100m. To put it in perspective though, Peyton Manning ran a 4.89 at his combine!

    I pay no attention to non-NFL football. What odds would you give on him being fully ready to start in 2013?

    Konz was flawless all last year. He'd be a terrific pick. Only reason I don't have him going to the Ravens is Id be surprised if he's still available. If he is, it would be amazing value. He would be ready to start definitely but I'm not familiar with your situation at centre - are ye stuck for a starter immediately?


  • Registered Users Posts: 110 ✭✭RGIII


    I hope Burfict goes undrafted. Doesn't deserve to take up a roster spot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,599 ✭✭✭matthew8


    I couldn't tell you, not really sure what would be a good guess for 100m. To put it in perspective though, Peyton Manning ran a 4.89 at his combine!




    Konz was flawless all last year. He'd be a terrific pick. Only reason I don't have him going to the Ravens is Id be surprised if he's still available. If he is, it would be amazing value. He would be ready to start definitely but I'm not familiar with your situation at centre - are ye stuck for a starter immediately?

    Birk's fine for another year. And it's probably preferable not to start a rookie. Birk can still play to a high standard but not for much longer.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,947 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Liked this, RGIII comes across as pretty smart and a nice kid too. I really, really hope he makes it in the NFL.

    http://www.nfl.com/videos/auto/09000d5d82742179/RGIII-shows-his-smarts


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Jimmy Little Partridge


    Just watched a few of the workouts with Poe. That is a large man, doing some things a large man shouldn't be able to do.

    How much will his stock be affected by this? Anyone know where was he predicted to be going before the weekend?

    i think the combine has to be take with a pinch of salt for every jpp theres 10 mike mamulas


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,225 ✭✭✭Chardee MacDennis


    i think the combine has to be take with a pinch of salt for every jpp theres 10 mike mamulas

    Matt Williamson on Football Today was saying that performance could push him top 10.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,249 ✭✭✭Stev_o


    If ever there was a person in the world id to go mute it would have to be Jamie Dukes, a f*cking clueless idiot.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,395 ✭✭✭✭mikemac1


    Bucky Brooks is on the other stream, he's knowledgable and doesn't shout everything like Dukes


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,395 ✭✭✭✭mikemac1


    Why are there official and unofficial times?

    Surely the computer has the time and that's it. How could it change? :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,249 ✭✭✭Stev_o


    mikemac1 wrote: »
    Why are there official and unofficial times?

    Surely the computer has the time and that's it. How could it change? :confused:

    They don't real the official times according to the computer till later on in the day. Everything else is stop watch AFAIK.


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Jimmy Little Partridge


    is there any players in this draft that you think look like mirror images of current nfl players


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,249 ✭✭✭Stev_o


    Currently Ron Brooks showing some blistering numbers, being in the secondary he was he was very much over shadowed but this guy could be a first round talent that drops into the 2nd/3rd down based on the reputation of his team mates. Going to be a steal for some team.


  • Registered Users Posts: 110 ✭✭RGIII


    Eisen vs Luck vs Cam vs RG3

    rich_medium.gif


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Jimmy Little Partridge


    RGIII wrote: »
    Eisen vs Luck vs Cam vs RG3

    rich_medium.gif

    lol go on ritch ya legend


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Jimmy Little Partridge


    steve mariucchi said interviewed rg3 and said it was one of the most impressive interviews hes ever done and that guy knows his qbs


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    Anyone reckon there's even a slight chance that RGIII will go ahead of Luck, or is Luck being the number #1 pick all done and dusted now?

    Also, give me your top 10 predictions for the first round :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,172 ✭✭✭✭kmart6


    Colts are locked on Luck...if they did go with RG3 it would easily be seen as the shock of the draft, and would make for some frantic action for the teams picking after!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,929 ✭✭✭JaMarcus Hustle


    Definitely Luck, talk is that they want to wrap it up before the draft.

    Also, Peter King says the Rams have received an offer for their #2 from "a team you'd never expect".

    Jets anyone?


  • Registered Users Posts: 385 ✭✭deise_boi


    Jets anyone?

    Fingers crossed for Buffalo! please please please please please


  • Registered Users Posts: 947 ✭✭✭Silver-Tiger


    Definitely Luck, talk is that they want to wrap it up before the draft.

    Also, Peter King says the Rams have received an offer for their #2 from "a team you'd never expect".

    Jets anyone?

    Maybe, but with Sanchez being what he is they would hardly be the most unexpected of teams. Dallas?

    Every summer i never read a gossip column related to the soccer because they are all bull**** rumours. Strange because i can't get enough of the bull**** rumours in the NFL @ draft time :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 947 ✭✭✭Silver-Tiger


    deise_boi wrote: »
    Fingers crossed for Buffalo! please please please please please

    Thoughts on Fitzmagic for the future?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,172 ✭✭✭✭kmart6


    The video for all the comparisons of Eisen's 40's is here. Worth a watch alone for his reaction to beating Tebow!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,286 ✭✭✭OAOB


    Jets anyone?

    Thought the Jets were in cap trouble, if they trade up for RGIII and cut Sanchez do they make much of a saving?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,137 ✭✭✭Onecoolcookie


    Which team do people think will take a punt on Brock Osweiler? I've been impressed whenever I've watched him but obviously there's a long way to go and he's nowhere near ready to start in the NFL but if he landed at the right team and was able to sit behind a starting QB for a few years I think he could be a very good prospect.

    I was interested to see Cliff Harris at the combine aswell, touted as being one of the best cornerbacks of his draft class before being dumped from the Oregon programme he was disappointing but I'm sure a team will take a chance on him in the lower rounds.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    OAOB wrote: »
    Thought the Jets were in cap trouble, if they trade up for RGIII and cut Sanchez do they make much of a saving?

    Just out of interest, regarding contracts in the NFL, if Sanchez is cut would the Jets have to pay up all his remaining years or what way does it work?

    Cheers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,444 ✭✭✭frostie500


    Do NFL reporters even watch college ball? It's hard not to ask that question when so many people were shocked by Andrew Luck's athletic ability in the combine. It seemed from reading reports that most of the NFL experts had never actually bothered to watch him play for Stanford where he consistently displayed a terrific ability to move outside the pocket and anyone who saw him lay the wood on the USC DB after throwing an interception knows how strong Luck is.

    I think all the talk about Luck replacing Manning at Indy and being the closest prospect to Peyton to come out in years made so many writers expect Luck to be unathletic. This isnt to disparage Manning who is one of the best ever at keeping plays alive and moving within the confines of his pocket to give himself time. But I think thats what everyone expected from Luck.

    When you add in the likes of Peter King commenting about Stephen Hill, the Georgia Tech wideout who ran well but whose:
    "2011 season was odd. He didn't have a 100-yard receiving game in his last nine games; only twice did he catch more than three balls in a game. In three seasons, he caught only 49 passes"

    Georgia Tech's triple option offence is hardly the best system for a reciever to show their skills. To give some perspective last year's GT starting QB throw 150 passes, completed less then half of those and threw for 1600 yards 11 TDs. Hill accounted for over 800 yards and five TDs. So even though his numbers dont pop off the stats sheet having watched Tech play it was always obvious how big a part of that offence he was.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,929 ✭✭✭JaMarcus Hustle


    Paully D wrote: »
    Just out of interest, regarding contracts in the NFL, if Sanchez is cut would the Jets have to pay up all his remaining years or what way does it work?

    Cheers.

    They wouldn't, however they would still see an impact on their salary cap based on whatever his signing bonus is.

    For example, if you have a player on a 5 year contract worth 10 million (for simplicity, let's say it's 2 million per year). You can cut him after 2 years and not have to pay the remaining 6 million. But when he signed that contract, there would have been a signing bonus - let's say 2 million. While that 2 million would have went to him when he signed, it represents a 400k hit on your salary cap for each of those 5 years (think of the accounting concept of accrued expenses and your on the right track). If you cut him after 2 years, you've already accrued for 2 x 400k cap hits, but because you've cut him, the remaining 1.2 million (3 x 400k) will count against your salary cap straight away for season 3.

    As far as if the Jets would have room for a #2 pick on their current cap - it would take some stellar contract renegotiations to create the space but under the new CBA, it's achieveable as a #2 pick is no longer a ridiculous 50 million dollar investment. (Re: contract restructuring - I posted a good article in the Banter thread on how the Steelers have done brilliant work in this area so far this offseason in an attempt to be able to afford keeping hold of Mike Wallace - would definitely recommend reading it.)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,444 ✭✭✭frostie500


    Rich's 40 is on now! Always the best part of the combine!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 385 ✭✭deise_boi


    Thoughts on Fitzmagic for the future?

    He's a decent QB. He's good enough to lead the team to the playoffs, but his accuracy and arm strength are suspect. His stats regarding interceptions are poor, but quite an amount of them are as a result of having only one top receiver to pick out (Johnson). I'd really to see how Fitz would play if he didnt have to rack up 30+ points each game to win - this can be solved if the we draft a pass rusher in the 1st (Ingram or Perry) and keep the bulk of the D-line fit next season.

    It's a tough situation with the Bills and this draft. They could go all out and trade up for RGIII and avail of the get out clause in Fitz's ridiculously overpriced contract. But you're talking a hefty sum - probably 5 picks for 1. If it were me? I'd go for it. A franchise QB like RGIII is exactly what's needed to re-energise the franchise. Quality FA receivers will want to come to Buffalo to play for him. But, Gailey and the Bills GM are of the "build through the draft" school of team building, and as such I really can't see them risking it.

    Really it's just a case of seeing where Manning & Flynn go before we get a picture of who's likely to trade up for RG.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,172 ✭✭✭✭kmart6


    frostie500 wrote: »
    Rich's 40 is on now! Always the best part of the combine!
    You know that was hours ago yeah?!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,444 ✭✭✭frostie500


    kmart6 wrote: »
    You know that was hours ago yeah?!

    Sh!t im watching it on the NFL Network they must be just showing repeats all night! Ha! Still, a great effort by Rich this year!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,172 ✭✭✭✭kmart6


    Was thinking that's what you were doing alright! There's a gif and link to the comparisons on the last page....but you'll have seen them if your watching NFL Network!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,225 ✭✭✭Chardee MacDennis


    Paully D wrote: »
    Anyone reckon there's even a slight chance that RGIII will go ahead of Luck, or is Luck being the number #1 pick all done and dusted now?

    Also, give me your top 10 predictions for the first round :)

    if the Colts pick Luck and it goes wrong, they can say "well everyone expected him to be amazing, we had to take him no 1". If they pick RGIII and Luck is who everyone says he is, the decision would be lambasted for years.

    The only sensible thing to do is take Luck really...


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,929 ✭✭✭JaMarcus Hustle


    if the Colts pick Luck and it goes wrong, they can say "well everyone expected him to be amazing, we had to take him no 1". If they pick RGIII and Luck is who everyone says he is, the decision would be lambasted for years.

    The only sensible thing to do is take Luck really...

    Exactly. It's pretty much the same thing Peyton Manning said when he was entering the draft - he warned the Colts that if they didn't select him with their #1 pick, he would make them regret it by beating them for the next 15 years anytime he would face them. Luck hasn't said as much, but he doesn't have to. The Colts just know it's implied!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,510 ✭✭✭Hazys


    if the Colts pick Luck and it goes wrong, they can say "well everyone expected him to be amazing, we had to take him no 1". If they pick RGIII and Luck is who everyone says he is, the decision would be lambasted for years.

    The only sensible thing to do is take Luck really...

    TBF no decent organization would forgoe their hours of analysis and gut feeling to pick a player based on what the media might say about it...

    Otherwise Reggie Bush, the last sure thing, would have been a Texan.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,444 ✭✭✭frostie500


    Hazys wrote: »
    TBF no decent organization would forgoe their hours of analysis and gut feeling to pick a player based on what the media might say about it...

    Otherwise Reggie Bush, the last sure thing, would have been a Texan.

    Or Houston's own Vince Young! Its amazing now to look back and remember the outcry when Williams was selected number one


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,947 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I'm a huge fan of RGIII but my memories of past drafts are keeping me from going overboard about him.

    Just think about every year you have been following the game and remember how many times a QB who can fun fast get gets overhyped by the media.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,339 ✭✭✭me-skywalker


    Some fantastic RB performances. I would love the Packers to take a gamble on David Wilson but I expect McCarthy to give Starks another shot. I'm undecided about Grant but considering our running game isn't a classic part of our offense we should just trade him and take the gamble on a rookie.


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Jimmy Little Partridge


    eagle eye wrote: »
    I'm a huge fan of RGIII but my memories of past drafts are keeping me from going overboard about him.

    Just think about every year you have been following the game and remember how many times a QB who can fun fast get gets overhyped by the media.

    he seems to have a better arm and mind than the rest though as he said hes a qb who's an athlete as opposed to an athlete whos a qb also i think steve mariucci said he gave the best interview he had ever seen and seems like the most intelligent qb hes seen in years so i think the time he ran was just the cherry on top

    also i knew luck was quick but i did not realise he was that quick


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,965 ✭✭✭Syferus


    The reason RG3 has gone supernova is because he's shown himself to be a smart player on top of being a great athlete. The fact he really is over 6''2 (whereas scouts were thinking he'd barely clock over 6''0) and a solid weight just means he's got every single thing a team could want in a QB.

    The way the league's going and with how a similar type of player, Newton, transformed the entire verve of a franchise his first season will mean people will rightly be betting the farm on Griffin. Get your QB right and the path to the play-offs becomes a whole lot more direct.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,225 ✭✭✭Chardee MacDennis


    Hazys wrote: »
    TBF no decent organization would forgoe their hours of analysis and gut feeling to pick a player based on what the media might say about it...

    Otherwise Reggie Bush, the last sure thing, would have been a Texan.

    The draft is a crap shoot in the first round no matter the research. Did someone post that article up here regarding draft pick success rates? It's only a little better than blind luck anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,225 ✭✭✭Chardee MacDennis


    eagle eye wrote: »
    I'm a huge fan of RGIII but my memories of past drafts are keeping me from going overboard about him.

    Just think about every year you have been following the game and remember how many times a QB who can fun fast get gets overhyped by the media.

    it's the hype about his smarts that's got me, I knew he was a sharp guy (took law in college and is currently studying for his masters afaik) but in my limited following of the draft in previous years I haven't heard a guys intelligence being talked about so much considering his physical abilities.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,172 ✭✭✭✭kmart6


    Ah there's some years where blind luck can't be said, this year is a case for that with Luck,RG3,Blackmon and others!

    I'd agree that say outside the top 5 can be pure pot luck, because there is never going to be a huge amount of elite guys!


  • Advertisement
Advertisement