Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The Geniuses' Thread

1356718

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,768 ✭✭✭almostnever


    Geogebra, perhaps?:) Not sure if it's exactly what you're looking for but I find it handy. :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,986 ✭✭✭Craguls


    Geogebra, perhaps?:) Not sure if it's exactly what you're looking for but I find it handy. :)

    Ooooh this looks much prettier than the graphing programme I used for calculus.(Which I'd recommend wholeheartedly except that it's awful)

    Thanks!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,164 ✭✭✭Konata


    Geogebra, perhaps?:) Not sure if it's exactly what you're looking for but I find it handy. :)

    Hmmm, not quite but thanks anyway.

    I need one where you input the data for each axis and then they draw the curve/line for you. Used a programme in physics last year but can't remember what the hell it was called :/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,632 ✭✭✭SligoBrewer


    Hotaru wrote: »
    Hmmm, not quite but thanks anyway.

    I need one where you input the data for each axis and then they draw the curve/line for you. Used a programme in physics last year but can't remember what the hell it was called :/

    Excel?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,164 ✭✭✭Konata


    Excel?

    Forgot about Excel. Used some fancy complicated programme last year but Excel is probably easier.

    EDIT: Actually, no. How the hell do you make a graph on Excel? LC physics feels a long time ago...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,632 ✭✭✭SligoBrewer


    Hotaru wrote: »
    Forgot about Excel. Used some fancy complicated programme last year but Excel is probably easier.

    EDIT: Actually, no. How the hell do you make a graph on Excel? LC physics feels a long time ago...

    Numbers on x axis on one column, numbers on y axis in another.
    Open up a xy scatter from the insert menu.
    Input the data as relevant.
    Insert the relevant trendline into the graph.
    Do you need to do error bars/regression error?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,164 ✭✭✭Konata


    Numbers on x axis on one column, numbers on y axis in another.
    Open up a xy scatter from the insert menu.
    Input the data as relevant.
    Insert the relevent trendline into the graph.
    Do you need to do error bars/regression error?

    Thanks!

    No, it's only Pharmacology stuff so don't need error bars.


  • Moderators Posts: 8,678 ✭✭✭D4RK ONION


    I don't get a lot of it, but I think ye will appreciate it more than me :)



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,082 ✭✭✭Pygmalion


    Hotaru wrote: »
    Hmmm, not quite but thanks anyway.

    I need one where you input the data for each axis and then they draw the curve/line for you. Used a programme in physics last year but can't remember what the hell it was called :/

    Gnuplot?
    I remember using it once, it was fairly easy to control, basically you give it a text file and can basically say "Take the first column as X-axis and second as Y-axis", or "Just take column 4 as Y-axis and ignore the rest, assume X is linear" etc.

    Not sure if you'd have the data in right format for it, but AFAIk it's quite widely used and can handle a lot of things.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,148 ✭✭✭✭KnifeWRENCH


    Pygmalion wrote: »

    You'll never comprehend the disappointment I felt when I clicked that link and discovered that it wasn't a program to plot gnus. :(


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,255 ✭✭✭anonymous_joe


    world-maths-day-2010.jpg?w=329&h=320

    Happy maths day everybody!:D

    I just noticed my birthday is shared with World Maths Day.

    That's depressing.

    On a lighter note, I found some financial data from my old job that I really really shouldn't have floating around the darkest recesses of an old laptop's hard-drives along with various mathematical excel plugins relating to improving performance in video-games.

    The fact that I've ever had girlfriends amazes me sometimes. :pac:


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 7,849 Mod ✭✭✭✭suitcasepink


    Errem how would one go about ripping a dvd? Or like is it that drawn out and complicated a process I'd be best off not doing it?

    Cheers genuis' :)


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 30,912 Mod ✭✭✭✭Insect Overlord


    deise_girl wrote: »
    Errem how would one go about ripping a dvd? Or like is it that drawn out and complicated a process I'd be best off not doing it?

    Cheers genuis' :)

    If you have DVD ripping software on your PC/laptop/mac, then it should be very straight forward. Doesn't take too long either, but again that will depend on your particular computer.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 7,849 Mod ✭✭✭✭suitcasepink


    If you have DVD ripping software on your PC/laptop/mac, then it should be very straight forward. Doesn't take too long either, but again that will depend on your particular computer.
    About the dvd ripping software, stuff comes up when you google, can any of those be used or am I best off buying a thing to do it?

    As you can see I have no idea what im doing.. :o


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 930 ✭✭✭*giggles*


    I thought DVD's were protected from people ripping them? Maybe not. Did I hear correctly that one can rip a Blu-Ray DVD onto a PS3 and save it there?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,082 ✭✭✭Pygmalion


    *giggles* wrote: »
    I thought DVD's were protected from people ripping them? Maybe not. Did I hear correctly that one can rip a Blu-Ray DVD onto a PS3 and save it there?

    That protection is so shoddy it can be countered by a badly written haiku.
    We will use these few
    internal variables:
    t1 through t6,

    unsigned integers.
    k, pointer to five unsigned
    bytes. i, integer.

    So here's how you do
    it: first, take the first byte of
    im -- that's byte zero;

    OR that byte with the
    number 0x100
    (hexadecimal --

    that's two hundred and
    fifty-six to you if you
    prefer decimal).

    Store the result in
    t1. Take byte one of im.
    Store it in t2.

    ... etc.

    :P


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 7,849 Mod ✭✭✭✭suitcasepink


    Pygmalion wrote: »
    That protection is so shoddy it can be countered by a badly written haiku.
    <snip>


    :P
    Soo pyggy...
    Do you know how to rip a dvd? :)
    Or even would you be able to explain to me how to rip it!? :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,082 ✭✭✭Pygmalion


    deise_girl wrote: »
    Soo pyggy...
    Do you know how to rip a dvd? :)
    Or even would you be able to explain to me how to rip it!? :pac:

    I've only ever used this.
    And it's not available on Windows as far as I know, so probably can't help, sorry.


  • Moderators Posts: 8,678 ✭✭✭D4RK ONION


    Search google for DVD shrink then use some free software to burn it to a disk. Done.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,164 ✭✭✭Konata


    Moar computer problems - The current message at the top of my browser is 'The following plug-in has crashed: Shockwave Flash' Youtube videos are just showing up as black screens etc. First showed up when I went to play that Robot Unicorn Attack game this morning... any idea how I fix it?


  • Moderators Posts: 8,678 ✭✭✭D4RK ONION


    Get the latest version of Adobe Flash player installed on your computer. What browser are you using?

    http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,164 ✭✭✭Konata


    Using Chrome. I installed the latest update, all seems to be working now. Thank you!


  • Moderators Posts: 8,678 ✭✭✭D4RK ONION


    No problemo, mi amigo! :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 708 ✭✭✭syncosised


    Robot Unicorn Attack also crashed Flash for me in Chrome. I'm afraid to touch it in Ubuntu though, it took long enough to get working perfectly in the first place! :O


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,383 ✭✭✭Aoibheann


    This is not only nerdy, but is adorable and happy. <3


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,893 ✭✭✭Davidius


    Aoibheann wrote: »
    This is not only nerdy, but is adorable and happy. <3
    Jaysus, somebody really messed up that baloon-like graph. C- stuff right there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,383 ✭✭✭Aoibheann


    Davidius wrote: »
    Jaysus, somebody really messed up that baloon-like graph. C- stuff right there.

    D:

    *narrows eyes*


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,164 ✭✭✭Konata


    Davidius wrote: »
    Jaysus, somebody really messed up that baloon-like graph. C- stuff right there.

    Shtop ruining the happy vibe!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,893 ✭✭✭Davidius


    I'm only trying to help by being critical and realistic. Drawing proper baloon shaped graphs is essential to a graduate's success!





















    Oh it's a heart.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,082 ✭✭✭Pygmalion


    Question for you guys.

    Kinda bored lately and kinda looking to get more up-to-date on my maths (both learning new stuff and remembering what I forgot since doing the LC), anyone got any good sites, books they'd recommend or anything similar.
    I'm of course looking to learn the FUN maths (like calculus, graph theory, perhaps a bit of the old number theory) and none of that loser stuff like probability/statistics.

    Also Davidius I expect at least a response from you. Maybe one or two science people too.
    Don't disappoint me, boards.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,893 ✭✭✭Davidius


    Unfortunately I'm not nearly studious enough to use anything but my notes and supplements but I can give some of the recommended texts for some of my modules.

    We're recommended Calculus - A Complete Course by Robert A. Adams for my Diff. & Integral Calculus module. However it's worth noting that the module is more about explaining where the basics of calculus come from. Honestly it feels more like LC level with a bit more depth (and designed to seem more confusing than it is).

    Looking at the Amazon reviews it either assumes too much knowledge or too little depending on the reader. It also seems on the expensive side. It's supposed to be in the UCD library so I may have a look for myself on Monday.

    Another module I have is about problem solving. While it's mostly only about utilising techniques and forming strategies for solving problems it does teach a bit of number theory. Unfortuntaley it assumes you already know a few things, most of which can be explained by wikipedia if you're bothered.

    Anyhow he recommends "The Art and Craft of Problem Solving" by Paul Zeitz or "How to Solve it" by George Polya. I'm going to check out the former when I get the chance but I don't imagine either explains a lot about Number Theory itself. "Elemetary Number Theory" by Gareth A. Jones was something that was mentioned in my Number Theory module last semester so I'd say it's definitely something to look into.

    I'm afraid I'm a bit useless on the graph theory front, it's a second year module in my case for some reason. Let the fact that I haven't tried learning it independently be a testament to my laziness.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,082 ✭✭✭Pygmalion


    Davidius wrote: »
    Unfortunately I'm not nearly studious enough to use anything but my notes and supplements but I can give some of the recommended texts for some of my modules.

    We're recommended Calculus - A Complete Course by Robert A. Adams for my Diff. & Integral Calculus module. However it's worth noting that the module is more about explaining where the basics of calculus come from. Honestly it feels more like LC level with a bit more depth (and designed to seem more confusing than it is).

    Ah fair enough, I'll look elsewhere for Calculus (although maybe the "more depth" part is worth looking at), actually may repost this in the Maths forum now and check back tomorrow, I'd probably get more answers there.
    Another module I have is about problem solving. While it's mostly only about utilising techniques and forming strategies for solving problems it does teach a bit of number theory. Unfortuntaley it assumes you already know a few things, most of which can be explained by wikipedia if you're bothered.

    Anyhow he recommends "The Art and Craft of Problem Solving" by Paul Zeitz or "How to Solve it" by George Polya. I'm going to check out the former when I get the chance but I don't imagine either explains a lot about Number Theory itself. "Elemetary Number Theory" by Gareth A. Jones was something that was mentioned in my Number Theory module last semester so I'd say it's definitely something to look into.

    Heard quite a few good things said about "How to Solve it", think I actually had a a PDF of it once but never really got around to starting it. Might get it again :P.
    I'm afraid I'm a bit useless on the graph theory front, it's a second year module in my case for some reason. Let the fact that I haven't tried learning it independently be a testament to my laziness.

    I only really saw it incidentally to be honest :P.
    At some computer nerd thing at which it was mentioned, saw it and immediately decided it was the coolest form of Maths, as it's all graphical and useful <3.
    Don't think there are much dedicated books on it, seems to be a fairly small field, it'd probably get a few chapters in some books on relatred subjects more often than books to itself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,383 ✭✭✭Aoibheann


    Are you looking for more proof-y calculus (i.e. analysis) or are you just looking for problems/solutions-y calculus (i.e plain old calculus :P)?

    We've done two courses involving calculus this year. One was called "Advanced Calculus" (oh the ironing) in which we uses Thomas' Calculus - that course was the straight problems one. We've also done an Analysis course this year (it basically builds up to doing the fundamental theorem of calculus etc), and Spivaks Calculus was the recommended textbook.

    Neither are particularly difficult courses though, but the books may prove moreso! :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,082 ✭✭✭Pygmalion


    Aoibheann wrote: »
    Are you looking for more proof-y calculus (i.e. analysis) or are you just looking for problems/solutions-y calculus (i.e plain old calculus :P)?

    We've done two courses involving calculus this year. One was called "Advanced Calculus" (oh the ironing) in which we uses Thomas' Calculus - that course was the straight problems one. We've also done an Analysis course this year (it basically builds up to doing the fundamental theorem of calculus etc), and Spivaks Calculus was the recommended textbook.

    Neither are particularly difficult courses though, but the books may prove moreso! :)

    Either/Both :P. Proof-y would be a bit more interesting IMO, but what fun is maths without problems?

    Looking at getting those books now, Thomas' one doesn't seem to be a problem to get. Wait found the other one too, spelled his name wrong >.>


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,383 ✭✭✭Aoibheann


    Pygmalion wrote: »
    Either/Both :P. Proof-y would be a bit more interesting IMO, but what fun is maths without problems?

    Looking at getting those books now, Thomas' one doesn't seem to be a problem to get. Wait found the other one too, spelled his name wrong >.>

    Proof-y is infinitely cooler. Problems are just applications of proofs.. ¬.¬

    Hopefully you'll find them interesting. I'll have a think and see if I can find anything useful for you! :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,893 ✭✭✭Davidius


    I suppose it's worth mentioning that my calculus course is mostly proofs.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,082 ✭✭✭Pygmalion


    Aoibheann wrote: »
    Proof-y is infinitely cooler. Problems are just applications of proofs.. ¬.¬

    What is a proof if not the solution to a problem phrased as "Find a proof of P(x)"? Eh?
    Also why learn them if you won't apply them?

    Both of the above are rhetorical questions btw.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,082 ✭✭✭Pygmalion


    Davidius wrote: »
    I suppose it's worth mentioning that my calculus course is mostly proofs.

    Because your course is pretty awesome.
    Although problems are fun for when you're not in the mood for anything too taxing or new (which I'm sure doesn't apply to you maths-studs <3).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,383 ✭✭✭Aoibheann


    Pygmalion wrote: »
    What is a proof if not the solution to a problem phrased as "Find a proof of P(x)"? Eh?
    Also why learn them if you won't apply them?

    Both of the above are rhetorical questions btw.

    I feel (and assume my lecturers do, as they use this method very frequently), that all of your questions can be answered by the following:
    *magic hands*


    That, or 42. :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 708 ✭✭✭syncosised


    I'd recommend reading Fermat's Last Theorem. I found it very interesting. It pretty much gives you a whole history of Maths and some of the stuff in it gets pretty complicated. Definitely a lighter read than the rest, you won't need to have a pen and paper beside you for it!

    For those interested, Fermat's Last Theorem states that no three positive integers a, b, and c can satisfy the equation a^n + b^n = c^n for any integer value of n greater than two (thank you, Wikipedia).

    As for textbooks, we were recommended Adams as mentioned earlier, but I don't think I ever used it once. If I ever need a Maths book it's Engineering Mathematics by K.A. Stroud. A massive book, it has pretty much everything you'd ever need! And if you need more, there's Advanced Engineering Mathematics by K.A. Stroud! :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,586 ✭✭✭sock puppet


    Pygmalion wrote: »
    none of that loser stuff like probability/statistics.

    That stung. What a post to wake up to:(


  • Moderators Posts: 8,678 ✭✭✭D4RK ONION


    9x-7i>3(3x-7u), solve for i


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,445 ✭✭✭Jako8


    D4RK ONION wrote: »
    9x-7i>3(3x-7u), solve for i

    9x - 7i>9x - 21u
    nines cancel.
    -7i>-21u
    change inequality when you change signs
    i<3u

    Oh very clever. :p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,082 ✭✭✭Pygmalion


    Jako8 wrote: »
    9x - 7i>9x - 21u
    nines cancel.
    -7i>-21u
    change inequality when you change signs
    i<3u

    Oh very clever. :p

    It's actually a trick question, you can't have inequalities with imaginary numbers.


  • Moderators Posts: 8,678 ✭✭✭D4RK ONION


    EED wrote:
    it was not being used as an imaginary number! very clearly!!! it is just being used as a symbol the same as x and u!

    The person who showed it me's words not mine :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,893 ✭✭✭Davidius


    They clearly have no appreciation for convention.


  • Registered Users Posts: 194 ✭✭earleuginedoyle


    most definatly not :D convention is only fun when you can play around with it :D


  • Moderators Posts: 8,678 ✭✭✭D4RK ONION


    And there she is! You get em EED!


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,944 ✭✭✭Jay P


    Pygmalion wrote: »
    It's actually a trick question, you can't have inequalities with imaginary numbers.

    Well, that's not technically true. In the original question, i was never defined as the square root of -1, or as an element of the complex numbers. i is just a variable in the equation.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 708 ✭✭✭syncosised


    zVT7D.gif

    Discuss.


Advertisement