Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Iron Man 3

  • 19-10-2010 10:23am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87,485 ✭✭✭✭


    Source
    Disney, Paramount Pictures, and Marvel Studios have announced via press release that Iron Man 3 will be released in on May 3, 2013. Under a new deal, Disney will be responsible for the marketing and distribution of the film, and will also oversee The Avengers. (The studio paid Disney $115 million for the transfer of rights.) Paramount will be releasing Marvel’s Thor on May 6, 2011 and Captain America on July 22, 2011. “Five years ago, when Paramount and Marvel made our initial deal, both our businesses were in very different places,” Paramount CEO and Chairman Brad Grey said in the release. “We are grateful for the partnership we have had with the terrific Marvel team over these years and proud of the work we have done together. Today, this new agreement is the right deal for Paramount, for Marvel, and for Disney. We look forward to working together on Thor and Captain America, and we wish Disney and Marvel the utmost success, in what we know will be a very productive and wide-ranging partnership.”


«13456714

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,028 ✭✭✭✭Basq


    Loved 'Iron Man' but saying 'Iron Man 2' was a massive disappointment is an understatement! :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,295 ✭✭✭✭Duggy747


    To be honest, I found the Iron Man films to be very medicore. Not bad at all but far from being great films, I do like Downey so it was nice that the 1st film boosted his appeal again and brought him back up the ranks.

    Iron "Meh" more like :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,134 ✭✭✭✭maquiladora


    basquille wrote: »
    Loved 'Iron Man' but saying 'Iron Man 2' was a massive disappointment is an understatement! :(

    Agreed. I was stunned by how poor Iron Man 2 was. It felt like it was made not by Favreau but by an inferior director trying to direct like Favreau. Writing was pretty awful too.

    Only saving gace was Black Widow *drool*....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,463 ✭✭✭Antomus Prime


    I thought Iron man 2 was pretty! Loved the fight scene with Stark And Rhodey in Tonys house. The main thing I dodnt like was that just as in Iron man 1, the bad guy was basically just a bigger iron man. But other than thought I thought it was great.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,276 ✭✭✭Memnoch


    Agreed. I was stunned by how poor Iron Man 2 was. It felt like it was made not by Favreau but by an inferior director trying to direct like Favreau. Writing was pretty awful too.

    Only saving gace was Black Widow *drool*....

    Are you kidding that black widow crap was such OTT teenage boy wet dream nonsense and ruined the movie more than it already had been.

    I loved Iron Man but the sequel actually BORED me, though it had all the fanboys drooling with the avengers references etc tossed in resulting in decentish reviews.

    Most of all I found ALL of the action in it to be severely formulaic and uninspired.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,862 ✭✭✭mikhail


    I kind of agree; the best thing about the Black Widow was John Favreau's fight scene.

    I liked Iron Man a lot, though it really comes to pieces towards the end (the dialogue in the climactic battle is especially awful), but the sequel was all over the place. The humour wasn't as consistent as the first one, the action was pretty dull and predictable and the pacing was off - probably due to the Avengers ad shoe-horned into the film. (I liked some of the Avengers material, even smiled at Captain America's shield, but it was clearly foisted on the writer.)


  • Registered Users Posts: 158 ✭✭geoffraffe


    Iron Man 2 can suck my iron balls


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,976 ✭✭✭✭humanji


    I didn't mind Iron Man 2, really. It was pretty much exactly what I've come to expect from a comic based sequel, ie everything from the first one times 2.

    I didn't think it was terrible. It's the type of thing you sit back and let wash over you. As said above, the little nods to the comics and to the Avengers (loved seeing Thor's hammer at the end) were a nice treat, as was Scarlett Johannson, and I thought Sam Rockwell was brilliant in his role (I'm fairly sure almost all of the moments I found funny involved him).

    I'll watch Iron Man 3. I'm not going to expect a masterpiece, but it'll be a bit of fun. I just hope they put some better villains in it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,364 ✭✭✭paddyismaddy


    humanji wrote: »
    I didn't mind Iron Man 2, really. It was pretty much exactly what I've come to expect from a comic based sequel, ie everything from the first one times 2.

    I didn't think it was terrible. It's the type of thing you sit back and let wash over you. As said above, the little nods to the comics and to the Avengers (loved seeing Thor's hammer at the end) were a nice treat, as was Scarlett Johannson, and I thought Sam Rockwell was brilliant in his role (I'm fairly sure almost all of the moments I found funny involved him).

    I'll watch Iron Man 3. I'm not going to expect a masterpiece, but it'll be a bit of fun. I just hope they put some better villains in it.

    scar jo and rockwell best things about 2


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,184 ✭✭✭Ridley


    Hopefully it's more IM1 than IM2 (and doesn't give the whole film away in the trailer again).

    Interested in seeing a live-action take on The Mandarin which They've supposedly been building toward.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,988 ✭✭✭constitutionus


    thatll probably play better after thor.

    IF it doesnt tank.

    people have no prob with tech villains as it plays into themes of the arms race but one thats borderline mystical is a hard sell to the average cinema goer.

    prety much the only marvel movie aliens that comes to mind is the silver surfer and the galactus cloud so the mandarin getting his rings from a crashed space ship is gonna be tough if they go with his origin.

    with thor, despite the mythological stuff, its basically super advanced aliens. at least from how the trailer was done.

    im NOT against mandarin, just saying it tough.


  • Registered Users Posts: 121 ✭✭distraction


    I enjoyed the Ironman movies more than any other marvel film adaptation, not looking forward to Thor, looks cheap IMO


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 21,634 ✭✭✭✭Richard Dower


    Jon Favreau not directing, well that's a load of sh*te!

    http://insidemovies.ew.com/2010/12/14/jon-favreau-will-not-direct-iron-man3/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,330 ✭✭✭niallon


    Stories abound that they gave him the boot through confusing the plot to the point that he'd leave as he is rumoured to have netted a total of 10 million for Iron Man 2 and they didn't fancy coughing up for a third.

    To be honest, I think judging by the quality of the second a change of director is a welcome change. Unless of course the more likely scenario occured which is that studio intervention is what messed up the second, personally my least favourite parts were those that focused on Fury, SHIELD and the reasons behind Stark feeling a need to rely on both, in other words, the factors that lead directly to The Avengers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,698 ✭✭✭✭BlitzKrieg


    iron man 2 was a 2 hour long mac vs pc advert parody

    Stark = mac (its all shiney and streamlined and good at parties and being popular)

    hammer = pc (big bulky mass produced and prone to bugs)

    mickey rourke = tetris :D (he was robbed!)

    Yes I have indeed made the film about .5% more bareable to watch.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,330 ✭✭✭niallon


    http://ie.movies.ign.com/articles/114/1140278p1.html

    Basically says that he wants to do something original instead of getting stuck in the expectations mill for Iron Man 3

    To me it sounds like a combination of creative differences with ulterior motive as I suggested earlier and also him genuinely not fancying going up against the fan expectations of a third Iron Man film (which would be following The Avengers) as well as the expectations for improvement from all those that weren't happy with Iron Man 2


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,976 ✭✭✭✭humanji


    niallon wrote: »
    Stories abound that they gave him the boot through confusing the plot to the point that he'd leave as he is rumoured to have netted a total of 10 million for Iron Man 2 and they didn't fancy coughing up for a third.

    To be honest, I think judging by the quality of the second a change of director is a welcome change. Unless of course the more likely scenario occured which is that studio intervention is what messed up the second, personally my least favourite parts were those that focused on Fury, SHIELD and the reasons behind Stark feeling a need to rely on both, in other words, the factors that lead directly to The Avengers.
    Considering the studio also kicked out Edward Norton, I'd say it's a safe bet the studio pulled the plug on Favreau and they're all pretending that it's just time for him to move on.

    I didn't mind the second one at all. It was exactly what I expected it to be. You people need to have very low expectations! :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,942 ✭✭✭missingtime


    Both movies suffered from a bit too much silliness in my opinion. I know they are comic book movies but some parts were just a bit cringe. And I dont really know if I like the character of Tony Stark, he's a bit of wanker to be honest.

    That said, the fight scene at the end of iron man 2 turned me into a 10 year old boy. It was awesome.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 21,634 ✭✭✭✭Richard Dower


    Both movies suffered from a bit too much silliness in my opinion. I know they are comic book movies but some parts were just a bit cringe. And I dont really know if I like the character of Tony Stark, he's a bit of wanker to be honest.

    That said, the fight scene at the end of iron man 2 turned me into a 10 year old boy. It was awesome.

    He's a douchebag....lets be honest!.....how could he diss Leslie Bibb like that!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,707 ✭✭✭fluke


    Iron Man 2 felt less like a sequel and more like a stop gap story.

    That being said I'll be sad to see Favreau go.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,208 ✭✭✭✭aidan_walsh


    Because thats what it was. Its the setup for Tony going into the Avengers, and providing some background for more that we're going to see in Thor and Captain America (
    Howard Stark rumoured to be a bigger character in CA, for example
    ).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,463 ✭✭✭Antomus Prime


    Because thats what it was. Its the setup for Tony going into the Avengers, and providing some background for more that we're going to see in Thor and Captain America (
    Howard Stark rumoured to be a bigger character in CA, for example
    ).

    Sounds Interesting :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,707 ✭✭✭fluke


    Because thats what it was.

    Yeah but it should've more self-contained rather than a commercial for the avengers.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,165 ✭✭✭✭brianthebard


    humanji wrote: »
    Considering the studio also kicked out Edward Norton, I'd say it's a safe bet the studio pulled the plug on Favreau and they're all pretending that it's just time for him to move on.

    I didn't mind the second one at all. It was exactly what I expected it to be. You people need to have very low expectations! :D

    Yeah that's pretty much it, possibly people's opinion's of comic book adaptations have been overly heightened by batman/dark knight, there have been so many in the past 10 years or so but the majority are middle of the road/mediocre bordering on hackneyed action movies tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,330 ✭✭✭niallon


    possibly people's opinion's of comic book adaptations have been overly heightened by batman/dark knight,

    This ^^^^

    I remember going to see Hellboy 2 a week after The Dark Knight and just thinking I'd just watched the greatest piece of crap I've ever see, and this is from a massive Hellboy fan.

    Went again a few weeks later under orders and subsequently viewing it on DVD it's one of my favourite comic book adaps but TDK spoiled it, and it has been the same for me with every comic book adap since, not that I now see Iron Man 2 as a masterpiece but definitely my immediate opinion of it in the cinema was extremely more negative than it should have been!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,560 ✭✭✭✭Kess73


    B (
    Howard Stark rumoured to be a bigger character in CA, for example
    ).



    Well he is in a lot of the promo shots for Captain America, so I imagine he has a bit of screen time.


    I see they have had to give up on having cameos by one or both of
    Wolverine (as James Howlett) and Magneto (as a young Erik Lehnsherr)
    as both tie into the WWII timeline, and
    Wolverine
    fought alongside Cap during WWII in the comics.

    Seems that the issues over legal rights could not be agreed upon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87,485 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,942 ✭✭✭missingtime


    JP Liz V1 wrote: »

    Very interesting choice, makes me a lot more interested in the whole project now.

    Will Iron Man get to say the immortal line of "I'm getting too old for this ****"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,081 ✭✭✭ziedth


    I wonder how much RDJ has effected this decision. Like i'm pretty sure he has thanked him many times for casting him in kiss kiss bang bang.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,420 ✭✭✭Magic Eight Ball


    It seems kind of pointless if Shane Black only directs.
    The guy is a fantastic writer. If he was brought on board early enough to have a sizeable influence on the story IM3 could be something very special.

    + it's not even clear if he's a good director, Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang is all about the script.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,420 ✭✭✭Magic Eight Ball


    Shane Black IS writing IM3 :D
    We’ve known since last month that Kiss Kiss Bang Bang writer/director Shane Black would be directing Iron Man 3. The question that remained was whether he would also be writing the script. As it turns out, the answer is yes. At the Omaha Film Festival this weekend, Black appeared at a panel and briefly discussed Iron Man 3, including a few details about the script. Read more after the jump.

    According to a report on Ain’t It Cool News, Black is scheduled to meet with star Robert Downey, Jr. this week in order to discuss the screenplay. Downey will be contributing to the script as well, although it is not clear at this point in what capacity or to what extent. The two have worked together previously on the excellent Kiss Kiss Bang Bang, which starred Downey and was written and directed by Black.

    Black also said that the studio was not pleased with the direction of Iron Man 2, and that Iron Man 3 would be doing something a little different. Instead of the iron-suited dustups of the first two films, Iron Man 3 will be more along the lines of a Tom Clancy-style thriller, with Iron Man fighting “real world villains.”

    Also notable is Black’s statement that Iron Man 3 will not feature other Marvel heroes. Way back when plans for The Avengers were first announced, plenty of people (myself included) wondered how Marvel would sustain such a complicated, interrelated universe containing so many different film franchises — or whether it even planned to. As it turns out, the crossovers we’ve already seen were just setting up the stage for The Avengers. After that film comes out in May, Black says, we can expect to see a return to single-character stories. Though I still wouldn’t be surprised to see winking references to other Marvel heroes in Iron Man 3.

    All in all, it sounds like Iron Man 3 is headed in a very good direction. Although Iron Man 3 will only be Black’s second directorial credit, he’s already proven himself as a screenwriter with films like Lethal Weapon and The Long Kiss Goodnight. The clever, funny tone of Kiss Kiss Bang Bang proved an excellent fit for Downey’s skills, and if Black and Downey can recapture some of that magic for Iron Man 3, it should make for a very entertaining time at the theater.

    http://www.slashfilm.com/iron-man-3-tom-clancythriller/#


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,976 ✭✭✭✭humanji


    Iron Man 3 will be more along the lines of a Tom Clancy-style thriller, with Iron Man fighting “real world villains.”

    Not mad on that part. I kind of like the OTT supervillains we're starting to get. Hopefully they'll get the tone right.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,782 ✭✭✭Mark Hamill


    Instead of the iron-suited dustups of the first two films, Iron Man 3 will be more along the lines of a Tom Clancy-style thriller, with Iron Man fighting “real world villains.”

    I dont see how real world villians will be much a trouble to Iron Man....
    IronmanTank.gif


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,976 ✭✭✭✭humanji


    My fear is that some exec is thinking that they should go the "Batman Begins" route of realistic superheroes, and keep away from the fantastical stuff. "Tom Clancy" and "superheroes" are two phrases that don't go together too well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,463 ✭✭✭Antomus Prime


    humanji wrote: »
    My fear is that some exec is thinking that they should go the "Batman Begins" route of realistic superheroes, and keep away from the fantastical stuff. "Tom Clancy" and "superheroes" are two phrases that don't go together too well.

    Agree with you on that one, but as I mentioned before they should use some of the bad guys that arent just bulked up versions of the Iron Man suit


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,721 ✭✭✭Otacon


    Of the main comic-book heroes, Batman and Iron Man always struck me as very similar. They were both regular, though brilliant, men who created their abilities, rather than randomly acquiring them.

    Of any Marvel hero, Iron Man is probably the one best suited to 'real world villains'.

    Still, I have liked pretty much everything Shane Black has done so I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt anyway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 139 ✭✭Dick Burns


    happy to see shane black getting iron man 3 and like his idea for it,no offence to Jon Favreau i loved iron man one my all time favourites i liked Iron man 2 i just thought it was sorta rushed and kinda went no where as a story arc (i.e batman begins then to the dark knight) and there wasnt much action in iron man 2 either?it kidna was like crash course in the avengers in parts

    robert downey is perfect for tony stark and war machine is awesome,i think the tom clancy idea for iron man 3 will be super

    2012
    the avengers
    the dark knight rises
    the amazing spiderman
    the man of steel

    What a year for films


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,039 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Read about Extremis a while back, and they released a Motion Comic version of the original comic story arc on Netflix this month.

    Having watched that (the story arc is available standalone: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Iron-Man-Extremis-Warren-Ellis/dp/0785122583/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1304991594&sr=1-1) have to say it's short enough and good enough a framework that it could quite possibly make a very good structure for the next movie.

    Thats when I read up on who they brought in for Iron Man 1 and where the Origin Story in it was taken out of: The Extremis plot arc.
    Wikipedia wrote:
    The story arc incorporates an updated origin for Iron Man. Tony Stark is a weapons designer whose weapons are being used against Al Qaeda in Afghanistan prior to the first Gulf War. During an inspection tour, one of Stark's own bombs detonates, sending a piece of shrapnel into his chest, nearly killing him. He is then captured by Afghani terrorists. As with the original origin story, Tony creates the armor with Dr. Ho Yinsen and escapes the terrorists, but Yinsen does not survive.

    --

    The origin and armor of Iron Man used in the 2008 film Iron Man closely resemble those introduced in "Extremis". Based on his work on "Extremis", artist Adi Granov was brought on as a producer for the film,[6] and he created the final designs for Iron Man's armor.[10] On the DVD of Iron Man, "Extremis and Beyond" is included as a special feature.[11] In other featurettes, Adi Granov and Warren Ellis were interviewed on the origin, the suits, John Pillinger (the interviewer), and the suit being on a crate, not a briefcase. In Iron Man 2, a small plot arc of the story involves Tony trying to find a solution to the palladium poisoning from his Iron Man arc reactor, eventually coming to creating a new element for a pacemaker resembling Extremis armor.
    IronManV5-1.jpg
    extremis-armor.jpg
    After being critically injured during a battle with a nanotech-enhanced foe, Stark injected his nervous system with a modified techno-organic virus to save his own life. This fused Stark's armor to his body, allowing him to store the inner layers of the Iron Man armor in the hollows of his bones as well as control it through direct brain impulses. The Extremis enhancement has turned Stark into a cyborg, whereby the usage of his existing lockchip (a personal area networking implement implanted in his forearm) is directly integrated into his nervous system.

    His new armor is no longer a bulky unit which houses its own AI "response server" and miscellaneous interfaces for neural control. Instead, it is more lightweight (constructed of a pliable crystalline material with a molecular structure that can collimate into super-hard planes upon the application of an electrical field) and less complex (as it interfaces directly to Stark's brain via the Extremis-modified cybernetic connections), and has much faster response time since it effectively functions like Stark's second skin.

    He is also able to remotely connect to external communications systems such as satellites, cellular phones, and computers through the PAN interconnect (that is now thought-controlled). Because the armor's operating system is now directly connected to Stark's nervous system, its response time has been significantly improved.

    Another major departure from the previous armors is expansion of repulsor technology. The "repulsor flight system" provides lift (something like anti-gravity) and positive flight control (pitch, roll and yaw), while the usual rocket boots provide the armor with thrust. The same repulsor technology allows the individual pieces of the armor to levitate and assemble themselves, by modulating what Stark referred to as "vectored Repulsor fields".

    Furthermore, the Extremis process has endowed Stark with a 'healing factor' and possibly even enhanced physical abilities, as he was confident enough to challenge Logan/Wolverine to a fight (and even challenging to see who's capable of recovering faster from the other's attack). It was later stated that the Extremis enhancement speeds up a person's repair process and hence the body's cells died and regenerated at a faster rate. This effectively made Tony Stark immune to cancer and gave him his 'healing factor'.

    In the Iron Man: The Inevitable storyline, it was shown that it's not only Tony Stark's body and the interfacing undersheath that has self-healing properties. Even the Iron Man armor has the ability to self-heal and self-repair, presumably through the use of nanotechnology. The armor is also able to store power throughout its structure, indicating that instead of having main batteries mounted around the waist as in the older Iron Man armors, the Extremis armor incorporates distributed and decentralized energy storage.

    Note: Although Extremis for reasons of simplicity is referred to as "a virus", it is not. The Extremis process involved injecting several billion microscopic nanotubes, which act as information carriers, into the brain. The brain is then partly reprogrammed; the so-called "repair center," that part of the brain which maintains an "integrity map" of the body, is told that the body is wrong. The physical reaction is that the entire body regrows itself, remaking itself per the Extremis instructions. Extremis itself, the original information package, is not involved; neither are "nanobots."

    After the entire Stark 'dataspine', the central data processing center which governed all, or at least the pertinent chunk of Stark technology, was infected with a hyper-advanced, Skrull-developed computer virus during the Secret Invasion, Tony lost the ability to use Extremis' interface functions and consequently the armor was rendered obsolete. For the "World's Most Wanted" storyline, Tony has begun using older armors, such as the Heroes Return armor and the Classic Red and Gold.
    A theory, mind. But if I was looking for a good idea for a movie, Extremis certainly fits the bill.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,482 ✭✭✭brianregan09


    Screw the realism wheres i want to see Mandarin and Fing Fang Foom lol but seriously the extremis idea sounds pretty awesome, Was a pretty cool arc which i enjoyed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,560 ✭✭✭✭Kess73


    Otacon wrote: »
    Of the main comic-book heroes, Batman and Iron Man always struck me as very similar. They were both regular, though brilliant, men who created their abilities, rather than randomly acquiring them.

    Of any Marvel hero, Iron Man is probably the one best suited to 'real world villains'.
    Still, I have liked pretty much everything Shane Black has done so I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt anyway.



    Daredevil? MoonKnight?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,039 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Kess73 wrote: »
    Daredevil? MoonKnight?
    daredevil-farrell_as_bullseye.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,435 ✭✭✭wandatowell


    humanji wrote: »
    "Tom Clancy" and "superheroes" are two phrases that don't go together too well.

    You aint never heard of Jack Ryan nah??? :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    Fing Fang Foom

    Now there's a reference and a half...

    Foom-iron-man.gif&sa=X&ei=6RLLTZC2MMfOhAfImuWoAg&ved=0CAQQ8wc&usg=AFQjCNGn9y_1INfKIEZMMbBqawLlUQr8wQ


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,039 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    no, thanks.


  • Site Banned Posts: 1,856 ✭✭✭paddy kerins


    Ben Kingsley in talks to play the villain. Story set to be based on the Extremis storyline

    http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=57630


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,039 ✭✭✭✭Overheal




  • Registered Users Posts: 79 ✭✭Thoms Yorkie Bars


    Guy Pearce is also in. Always good to see him in things


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,716 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    More interesting to me is that the film is going to be largely shot and financed in China, which is nigh on unheard of for a Hollywood film. Along with this and the upcoming Inseparable (a fairly awful Chinese comedy starring Kevin Spacey of all people) it seems likely that we're going to see a very strong effort on China's part to gain prominence on Western screens.

    Sorry: nerdy industry forecast. You may get back to your narrative speculations.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,039 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    They'll probably set Futurepharm in China as a new Stark venture, which is where they will be developing the Extremis nanite/virus.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,569 ✭✭✭✭Frisbee


    Kess73 wrote: »
    Daredevil? MoonKnight?

    I freaking loved Moon Knight!!

    I'm looking forward to IM3. It's never going to be a movie to make you think really but the action scenes are pretty solid and Downey Jr. is the perfect person to play Stark and put in a grea tperformance in both so far.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement