Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

National Postcodes to be introduced

16364666869177

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,084 ✭✭✭ukoda


    Another generation? I doubt that. Not in this country which is in love with the mobile phone.....

    Edit: See above post and link - didn't know the figures but doesn't surprise me.

    you can also look up vodafones stats, 61% of their phone base is a smartphone user, and this is rapidly growing


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,040 ✭✭✭yuloni


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,084 ✭✭✭ukoda


    yuloni wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    It's amazing how you can write so much and make no clear point.

    As has already been noted, passing location based data to emergency services can be done fairly easily with some cooperation of parties involved.

    The point im making is - Loc8 is not a good solution to aiding emergency services calls in unfamiliar areas.

    Sending cell tower data to the emergency services has been used for years in the US. What I am proposing is using the Phones location services (Which is a mix of GPS chip, cell tower and wifi if available) to transmit the phones location to emergency services

    The FCC in the US are pushing hard for the telecoms company's involved to send location data more accurately, The EU Is currently reviewing the use of E-GNSS combined with Galileo sats for 112 calls

    The future of emergency services knowing your location IS NOT a postcode of any shape or form.

    If you want to know the future of emergency services easily finding you... Have a read of this http://www.gsa.europa.eu/news/how-enable-better-location-emergency-calls-galileo-and-112

    It's called E112, and the U.S. already has a similar program in place.

    this is the modern solution for emergency services. not Loc8code
    A trial project currently underway is using a smartphone capable of recognising when an emergency call is made, which causes it to activate GNSS and Wi-Fi to collect location data. The data is then sent as a SMS text to the emergency number where it is verified and correlated with the emergency call. The trial has shown good results in urban, rural and domestic environments, including use in a moving vehicle.

    Results like these have convinced Thales Alenia Space’s Bruno Gagnou that GNSS is the right answer for E112 positioning. “The technology is reliable and accurate,” he said. “With obvious benefits for society, lives will be saved, the security of citizens enhanced, and European industry will be supported.”


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,040 ✭✭✭yuloni


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,084 ✭✭✭ukoda


    yuloni wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    because its fricking awkward, completely user unfriendly and generally an outdated solution that no one will use.

    Please read the article i linked to.

    and if the ES think Loc8 is so great and can save lives. then why not team up with them and launch a national awareness marketing campaign to promote it as a life saving service? Loc8 has been around for 4 years now and they've had plenty of time to get up off their butts and market it, but no they used it for their own purposes (haulage) and did F all else with it in 4 years. and now they are complaining the government didn't hand them a contract for the national postcode. well the reason for that is simple. Loc8 is useless as a national postcode.

    im sick to death of listening to the loc8 code promoters completely miss the point that a national postcode needs a database behind it if its to be used for anything more than sending a truck to my house.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,040 ✭✭✭yuloni


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,084 ✭✭✭ukoda


    yuloni wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    mobile phone manufactures allow any 3 third party access the location services of their device once the user grants permission. go have a look at the location services menu of your phone. what an incredibly weak thing to focus on.

    and no i don't agree that its "job done" with Loc8code, i would say its a half arsed attempt thats doomed to fail given its awkwardness.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,040 ✭✭✭yuloni


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,084 ✭✭✭ukoda


    yuloni wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    and now 2 years later after this pilot....nothing has come of it and still 99% of the population have no idea what a loc8code is and no other local authority has adopted them, thats a real success story alright:confused: sigh...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,040 ✭✭✭yuloni


    This post has been deleted.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,084 ✭✭✭ukoda


    yuloni wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    nope, why don't you tell me how many used it?


    (and just so we are clear, i never claimed no one used it, i claimed the general public still don't know about it and no other authority adopted loc8codes for this purpose, so it did not become the 'norm' and was not adopted national as the standard, read what I'm actually saying)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,040 ✭✭✭yuloni


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 148 ✭✭a65b2cd


    yuloni wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    So where are we at? There appears to be three main proposals and the one each person prefers really depends on the problem they are trying to solve!

    1. Give every address point a unique text address. This approach solves the difficulties caused by non-unique address points in a direct manner but it involves a change to at least one-third of existing addresses. This solution would be useful for both finding an address and for delivering post to it but there are concerns around public opposition to changes in existing addresses. It tries to anticipate new buildings by using distance from junctions etc. to number locations.

    2. Eircode has been designed primarily as a postcode. The source file is a register of address points. There will be important benefits such as a more complete and structured register of addresses. Amendments could be made to any incorrect X/Y coordinates associated with these addresses without having an impact on the related Eircode. This approach requires a relatively small change to the existing situation i.e. adding an Eircode as the last line of your address. It avoids anticipating new buildings by not allocating sequential codes to the existing stock of buildings.

    3. Use modern navigation technology to create a location code based on X/Y coordinates. It does not require a text address and is not designed to improve routine delivery of mail. Hence it does not set out to associate only one code to each postal address point. It can be used to identify any location not just an address. It can easily accommodate new buildings.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,084 ✭✭✭ukoda


    yuloni wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    how can you claim its working if you've absolutely no idea if anyone is using it?!

    the point i made in my previous post stands. no other authority adopted it and it did not become the norm or used nationally.

    I maintain Loc8 is not a good solution for use in emergency situations and I've already shown the better alternative that the EU is working on (which has nothing to do with postcodes)

    i have never claimed eircode is any better than Loc8 in this scenario. Eircode will help with rural house call outs, it will not help with the "I'm in the middle of joe murphy's field" type calls - the location aware call to 112 is the solution here.

    Also, i have never claimed eircode won the contract because it can help the ES.... i don't think anyone on this thread has claimed that!

    All I'm saying is, eircode serves the purpose as a national postcode, i refute people claiming Loc8 is the modern solution that should have been chosen because it helps the ES, i think this idea of opening the Point8 app, generating a code, remembering the code, repeating the code to an operator is ridiculous and looks completely redundant when you look at E112 as a real solution.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,040 ✭✭✭yuloni


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭recedite


    ukoda wrote: »
    (and just so we are clear, i never claimed no one used it, i claimed the general public still don't know about it and no other authority adopted loc8codes for this purpose, so it did not become the 'norm' and was not adopted national as the standard, read what I'm actually saying)
    Loc8 was not adopted as the national standard, it was not even considered during the tendering process, which process was slammed by the EU for failing to facilitate indigenous SME's.

    Most Irish people do not use any "postcode", they never have. But they will use whichever one is adopted by the state as the national standard, even if it is a crock of $hit. That's because the state will spend taxpayers money promoting it, and will require it to be used when paying the Property Tax.
    If even a small minority of people (and state agencies) are using loc8, despite it having no official endorsement, and no state funding, they must be using it because it is an elegant solution with a real and ongoing utility.
    This genuine utility is something eircode does not have. Its take up by the public will be based only on compulsion and state subsidies.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,084 ✭✭✭ukoda


    yuloni wrote: »
    A quick Google already shows me 3 prominent authorities using Loc8

    SDCC: http://www.sdcc.ie/the-council/about-us/customer-care/directions
    Laois CoCo: http://www.laois.ie/contactus/
    HSE: http://www.hse.ie/eng/services/list/3/hospitals/ulh/ennis/

    You do realise in the example of the life-bouys... know one needs to know anything about Loc8 until the ES ask... "whats the Loc8 on that life-bouy" = location delivered


    Otherwise, I'm not going back into e112/e911. The concept is what the ES need, no doubt, but I won't think about it again until I see it working. That is a long way off and it might never happen - both you and me know that


    Finally, Point8 was designed so people could generate and navigate to Loc8 codes on the fly. If the ES joined with Loc8... Point8 would be replaced with something designed specifically for the task. Jeez

    Those authorities were already using it. As I said no one else has adopted it in 2 years and it hasn't been widely used at all

    And exactly, people don't need to know about loc8 to read them from a bouy. (They may as well have put markers on them like the motorways, loc8 added no extra value) Which is far different to generating their own on the fly via an app. Which is what I claim is awkward and will never take off

    E112 is the modern solution for ES and it will take off. Loc8 is like an awkward solution that has so many inherent problems to be effective.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,084 ✭✭✭ukoda


    recedite wrote: »
    Loc8 was not adopted as the national standard, it was not even considered during the tendering process, which process was slammed by the EU for failing to facilitate indigenous SME's.

    I'm not talking about it being adopted as the national standard for postcodes. I was referring to it being adopted as the national standard for all bouys in Ireland and by all local authority's for its life saving abilities?

    People used loc8 because there was no alternative. But not to take away from loc8 it is a very good navigation code. I just feel it's not suitable as a national postcode.


  • Registered Users Posts: 325 ✭✭tvc15


    recedite wrote: »
    Loc8 was not adopted as the national standard, it was not even considered during the tendering process, which process was slammed by the EU for failing to facilitate indigenous SME's.

    Most Irish people do not use any "postcode", they never have. But they will use whichever one is adopted by the state as the national standard, even if it is a crock of $hit. That's because the state will spend taxpayers money promoting it, and will require it to be used when paying the Property Tax.
    If even a small minority of people (and state agencies) are using loc8, despite it having no official endorsement, and no state funding, they must be using it because it is an elegant solution with a real and ongoing utility.
    This genuine utility is something eircode does not have. Its take up by the public will be based only on compulsion and state subsidies.

    I would largely agree with this other than take up only based on compulsion. My main hope for Eircode is easier delivery of takeaway food to my address! That's based not on government compulsion but on the fact that its a national postcode and more likely to be used


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,708 ✭✭✭Curly Judge


    At the meeting yesterday on Pearse St. one of the interesting little snippet let slip by John Duggan, who spoke for Eircode, was that P.A Consultants had got the gig to provide oversight to the implementation of the postcode contract.
    This was supposed to go for tender but they appear to have been appointed without any tender process being entered into.
    Add to that the fact that PA Consultants and their senior staff have been head neck and heels involved in fashioning the whole structure and set up of the post code project.
    So....effectively, they will be pronouncing on their own work and competence.
    Can anyone give a guess at what conclusion they will come to?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    You are assuming everyone has a smart phone and there is adequate coverage.

    The first project should have been to solve the lack of precise addresses in rural Ireland - that has not been done.

    The actual design chosen, from the little we know about it, is flawed in many ways. It is a pity there has not been public discussion about the design.

    In my opinion, a numeric post code has overwhelming advantages, and following the phone numbering system also has advantages. A 5 digit code that gets down to 100 or so addresses would be good to start with, and leave the precise code for Government use, and let them pay for the maintenance of it.

    Everyone doesn't have a smartphone but Ireland has one of the highest penetrations of smartphones in the world. Most people have one and in a few years it's likely that everyone will.

    We have more mobile phones than people.

    They don't exclusively rely on smarphones for rescues in Iceland but it's a major help.

    You can't just always assume the lowest common denominator of technology either.

    The app can send information via SMS so it doesn't always require data coverage. All it does is transmit your GPS coordinates via SMS or EDGE, 3G, 4G if that's available.

    You might as well make use of technology when it's available.

    For a 112 call from the side of a road it's very very useful to be able to send your precise location rather than some vague notion.

    This kind of thing doesn't need any codes at all. It's pure GPS.

    Iceland's postal code system (3 digit codes) would be next to useless for locating someome and they just signpost people's first names or house names in rural areas. There didn't seem to be any road names, just road numbers similar to Ireland.

    Sign would literally say Björk
    > 1km


  • Registered Users Posts: 371 ✭✭larchill


    SpaceTime wrote: »
    Sign would literally say Björk
    > 1km

    @ least they have some sort of indicator where people are :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,764 ✭✭✭my3cents


    larchill wrote: »
    @ least they have some sort of indicator where people are :)

    Try that in Ireland and someone would turn the sign around :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,548 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    my3cents wrote: »
    Try that in Ireland and someone would turn the sign around :rolleyes:

    Which is why you mount signs on two poles.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭recedite


    So....effectively, they will be pronouncing on their own work and competence.
    Can anyone give a guess at what conclusion they will come to?
    A bit like the guy who built the Priory Hall apartments, and then self-certified that they complied with all the building regulations. What could possibly go wrong...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,084 ✭✭✭ukoda


    At the meeting yesterday on Pearse St. one of the interesting little snippet let slip by John Duggan, who spoke for Eircode, was that P.A Consultants had got the gig to provide oversight to the implementation of the postcode contract.
    This was supposed to go for tender but they appear to have been appointed without any tender process being entered into.
    Add to that the fact that PA Consultants and their senior staff have been head neck and heels involved in fashioning the whole structure and set up of the post code project.
    So....effectively, they will be pronouncing on their own work and competence.
    Can anyone give a guess at what conclusion they will come to?

    Anything else worth mentioning from that meeting?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 896 ✭✭✭Bray Head



    The first project should have been to solve the lack of precise addresses in rural Ireland - that has not been done.


    This point has been thrown about on this thread a lot. It is both relevant and irrelevant!

    First, it is irrelevant as any type of postCODE chosen would not solve this problem.

    Second, it IS relevant, as it illustrates what eircode will NOT attempt to do. It is not trying to replace or augment the existing address system in rural Ireland which we can all agree is a mess. That was a lost cause 100 years ago even. Setting up a sensible address system from scratch would be nice but it would be HUGELY controversial, likely to encounter mass resistance from those who like their existing "address" thank-you-very-much and would be VASTLY more expensive.

    Overlaying this messy address system with a system of unique codes makes sense. Whether is is a Loc8-type or an eircode-type is a matter largely of taste. Largely, I prefer the latter. But arguing that Ireland needs a reformed address system is a completely different issue - perhaps for a different thread even!

    PS: Apologies for the caps, I don't seem to be able to use italics, etc, as a sub-50 post user.


  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Bray Head wrote: »

    PS: Apologies for the caps, I don't seem to be able to use italics, etc, as a sub-50 post user.
    Just type at the start and at the end (without the spaces)


    that should work.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,394 ✭✭✭Sheldons Brain


    Bray Head wrote: »
    Overlaying this messy address system with a system of unique codes makes sense. Whether is is a Loc8-type or an eircode-type is a matter largely of taste. Largely, I prefer the latter. But arguing that Ireland needs a reformed address system is a completely different issue - perhaps for a different thread even!

    I don't need an improved address, like I don't need a new name. But I can use a bank a/c number or PRSI number where appropriate without changing my name. This is the role of postcodes.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    my3cents wrote: »
    Try that in Ireland and someone would turn the sign around :rolleyes:

    They've developed this amazing Icelandic technology which Irish local authorities are still investigating. It's called 'the bolt'

    There are holes on the pole and the sign is affixed to it by magic in such a way that it cannot be easily turned.

    They've also got the incredible grooved signpost a technology so advanced it would be difficult to explain to nonscientific types.

    Remarkable what can be done with science!

    Relying on elves to guard the signs simply didn't work.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 254 ✭✭TheBustedFlush


    SpaceTime wrote: »
    They've developed this amazing Icelandic technology which Irish local authorities are still investigating. It's called 'the bolt'

    There are holes on the pole and the sign is affixed to it by magic in such a way that it cannot be easily turned.

    Remarkable what can be done with science!

    Relying on elves to guard the signs simply didn't work.

    Ah but the fellas who puts the hole in the pole, forgot about the hole in the ground. Now they just turn the pole around.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 896 ✭✭✭Bray Head


    Article in today's Irish Times from Barry O'Halloran. As a 'new user' I cannot be trusted to post the link apparently so would appreciate if someone else would.

    Not too much new that intrepid followers of this thread won't be familar with.
    "At some point next year, all 2.2 million individual addresses in the Republic will be assigned their own seven-digit post code – to be known as an Eircode – that will identify them from all others in the State.
    It has been a long time coming. According to Liam Duggan, chief executive of Eircode, the Capita subsidiary the State is paying between €15 million and €16 million to introduce and apply the system"

    I thought this was interesting though:
    "Over the last 18 months, it has been designing the code and building a database of addresses to go with it, drawing on 100 million different entries in 20 different public-sector databases.

    And the familiar for and against:
    The National Ambulance Service says that it welcomes the introduction of a proposed postcode system “as it will enable address verification, thereby assisting services in reaching patients in a timely manner”.
    However, not everyone agrees, John Kidd, national chairman of the Irish Fire and Emergency Services Association, a trade union with 1,200 members, says it will not be any use for callouts for accidents on roads or anywhere other than inside buildings. Duggan responds by pointing out the system is meant to identify addresses, not points on roads or motorways.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    Ah but the fellas who puts the hole in the pole, forgot about the hole in the ground. Now they just turn the pole around.

    No they've this other thing called "the foundation" amazing technology that prevents rotation of poles.

    Most places don't just stick a sign post into a hole. Even a light breeze would turn it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,084 ✭✭✭ukoda


    Bray Head wrote: »
    Article in today's Irish Times from Barry O'Halloran. As a 'new user' I cannot be trusted to post the link apparently so would appreciate if someone else would.

    http://www.irishtimes.com/business/sectors/retail-and-services/living-by-numbers-how-eircode-system-pinpoints-your-address-1.1976062


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    Nice article but still an oddly self-restricted system that's not leveraging either GPS or human ability to decipher readable, well designed codes


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,864 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    ukoda wrote: »

    What a load of XXXXXXXX

    It is a bad description of a bad system. The article reads like it came from a press release from Eircode, with a few added touches for colur. No hard details, like the cost of access to the database, which is essential for its use.

    Nor does it suggest that fixing the basic problem of non-unique addresses that can be read by a human without the need for access to a database. It is like giving out PPS numbers to the guys that fix water leaks. Hang on .......


  • Registered Users Posts: 325 ✭✭tvc15


    ukoda wrote: »

    Ha! That article is heavily commented on by a Gary Delaney with over half of all comments on the article doing nothing but badmouthing Eircode and promoting loc8! So which one of you guys is Gary Delaney?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,764 ✭✭✭my3cents


    tvc15 wrote: »
    Ha! That article is heavily commented on by a Gary Delaney with over half of all comments on the article doing nothing but badmouthing Eircode and promoting loc8! So which one of you guys is Gary Delaney?

    Probably the same guy that signs up to new accounts here so he can send anonymous PM's berating people who disagree with him.


  • Registered Users Posts: 397 ✭✭Geogregor


    I found this bit particularly interesting:
    “That is a recipe for chaos,” he argues. Duggan points out that the Republic could be divided into billions of co-ordinates, while there are just 2.2 million addresses. “If you have a big enough house you could have five GPS co-ordinates,” he says. Ultimately, he maintains that there would still have to be a database identifying the addresses at each co-ordinate.

    Is that true?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,764 ✭✭✭my3cents


    Geogregor wrote: »
    I found this bit particularly interesting:


    Is that true?

    If you can only have one postcode for a residence then you need a database to indicate which of the possible positional codes is used.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,084 ✭✭✭ukoda


    And this bit really shows up the the wild claims of the eircode haters on this thread
    Reports claim it will be looking for a minimum price of €5,000. In fact, minimum subscriptions are likely to be less than €200, while there will be a certain amount of free access on its website. The company has submitted its price plans to the Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources, and is waiting for that to be signed off.


  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    my3cents wrote: »
    If you can only have one postcode for a residence then you need a database to indicate which of the possible positional codes is used.
    I would imagine that the one at the driveway or front door would make the most sense.

    I know that with Loc8 some people use a different code for the rear entrance when expecting deliveries.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,084 ✭✭✭ukoda


    And I'm actually cringing at Gary Delanys comments on the article.


  • Registered Users Posts: 325 ✭✭tvc15


    ukoda wrote: »
    And I'm actually cringing at Gary Delanys comments on the article.

    Lets see will he own up to posting in this thread, theres no way ssomeone like that hasn't found the enormous boards tgread on postcodes and not chipped in!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,764 ✭✭✭my3cents


    ukoda wrote: »
    And I'm actually cringing at Gary Delanys comments on the article.

    Think this says it all
    GaryDelaney
    @ChrisSheldrick no recommendation for Lat/longs from me. I'm the inventor of Loc8 Code ...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    The system's not ideal but, I still think it's better than the short poems we have for addresses at the moment.

    I think a lot of us probably just want to avoid that ridiculous conversation:

    "No, really, there's no zip/post code!"
    "Really?"
    "No we don't have them in Ireland"
    "Are you sure?'
    "Yes!"
    "I need a postcode for the delivery"
    "Oh, OK just use Cork 02100"

    At this stage I just want SOMETHING rolled out.

    A European or American style 5 digit code would be great but numbering houses and naming roads would be a monumental struggle against all sorts of local political and snobbery nonsense.

    This is a total cludge of a system but, it has some hope od vaguely working for some things.

    Loc8 or some modified version of it would have been handier.

    Is there any way Loc8 and Eircode could be integrated?

    Like using a version of Loc8 for all non-letterbox addresses and having Loc8's mapping capable of recognising an eircode? Maybe integrate the eircode first 3 digits into Loc8?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Carawaystick


    ukoda wrote: »
    And this bit really shows up the the wild claims of the eircode haters on this thread
    IrishTimes wrote:
    Reports claim it will be looking for a minimum price of €5,000. In fact, minimum subscriptions are likely to be less than €200, while there will be a certain amount of free access on its website. The company has submitted its price plans to the Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources, and is waiting for that to be signed off.

    Likely?
    A completely unattributed statement there, I wouldn't bet the farm on it just yet.
    How can they be starting in the spring and have no idea of prices and winter starting on Saturday...


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,084 ✭✭✭ukoda


    Likely?
    A completely unattributed statement there, I wouldn't bet the farm on it just yet.
    How can they be starting in the spring and have no idea of prices and winter starting on Saturday...

    They have worked out the prices, they are currently under review by the DCENR, once approved they will publish them

    so as they already have their pricing structure done, its unlikely they would put a figure out in the public thats totally off the mark

    did you just read the word likely in the quote and ignore the rest of the words??


  • Registered Users Posts: 254 ✭✭TheBustedFlush


    ukoda wrote: »
    They have worked out the prices, they are currently under review by the DCENR, once approved they will publish them

    so as they already have their pricing structure done, its unlikely they would put a figure out in the public thats totally off the mark

    did you just read the word likely in the quote and ignore the rest of the words??

    Think you're right on that one. "Likely" is a classic journalist phrase like "it is understood", "sources say", "someone close to", etc, etc.

    In other words, that's what it's going to be, (assuming approval), but they can't officially say so. €5k was never a minimum price for a copy of the database - €200 sounds much more likely as a starting cost for a single business user. They've also said there'll be a special rate for charities and for research/academic institutions.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,084 ✭✭✭ukoda


    http://freepostcodelottery.ie

    Well one company is quick off the mark!!

    I suspect we'll see a lot of this stuff starts to come out soon as the postcode is launched


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement