Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Terminally ill 16-year-old takes his anti-suicide campaign to RTE

18911131416

Comments



  • Czarcasm wrote: »
    Despair, is not depression, but posters here who have acknowledged that they suffer from depression, chose to interpret his words to suit their frame of mind. It's an interesting conundrum for anyone who says that the perception of a mentally ill person is their reality. It may be semantic to some, but for others it's a damn important distinction to make, that a mentally ill person's reality is colored by their perception.

    Why?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,041 ✭✭✭Seachmall


    Czarcasm wrote: »
    not once in the independent article was the word depression mentioned
    It was. It mentions his campaign is about suicide and depression.

    In common discussion suicide and depression go hand in hand. If his campaign is about 'impulse suicides' and not 'depressive suicides' that would presumably be clarified. But it wasn't (which begs the question; how do you know what he meant?)


  • Registered Users Posts: 632 ✭✭✭Lyra Fangs


    Seachmall wrote: »
    It was. It mentions his campaign is about suicide and depression.

    In common discussion suicide and depression go hand in hand. If his campaign is about 'impulse suicides' and not 'depressive suicides' that would presumably be clarified. But it wasn't (which begs the question; how do you know what he meant?)

    This 100%. If you are able to interpret his words as you see fit, that is, a message of hope and encouragement then we should be able to present our take of his message which to many people on this thread comes across as shaming people who consider suicide.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭Czarcasm


    Seachmall wrote: »
    It was. It mentions his campaign is about suicide and depression.

    In common discussion suicide and depression go hand in hand. If his campaign is about 'impulse suicides' and not 'depressive suicides' that would presumably be clarified. But it wasn't (which begs the question; how do you know what he meant?)


    I see Seachmall you edited your post to include the bolded bit above, possibly because you double checked back over the article like I did just to make sure you checked the article mentions the word depression. Quelle surprise- it doesn't.
    Donal Walsh will continue his campaign to end suicide on The Saturday Night Show this weekend.

    Caitlin McBride – 05 April 2013

    Donal Walsh will be highlighting his campaign to end suicide on The Saturday Night Show tomorrow


    Only in common discussion amongst people suffering from mental illness is suicide considered to go hand in hand with mental illness. You presumed it should be clarified. I didn't assume anything, I read the article that says he is aiming his message at young people in the depths of despair, not adults suffering from mental illness as has been alluded to in this thread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,041 ✭✭✭Seachmall


    Czarcasm wrote: »
    I see Seachmall you edited your post to include the bolded bit above, possibly because you double checked back over the article like I did just to make sure you checked the article mentions the word depression. Quelle surprise- it doesn't.

    Eh,
    He is determined to raise awareness about those battling suicidal thoughts and depression.

    I'm assuming we're talking about the same article, this is from the one linked in the OP.



    Only in common discussion amongst people suffering from mental illness is suicide considered to go hand in hand with mental illness. You presumed it should be clarified. I didn't assume anything, I read the article that says he is aiming his message at young people in the depths of despair, not adults suffering from mental illness as has been alluded to in this thread.
    He mentions people in "financial despair" which would suggest adults.

    And again, it explicitly mentions his campaign is about suicide and depression.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,754 ✭✭✭Odysseus


    Czarcasm wrote: »
    Lyra I've already pointed out just one poster, well, another who I initially took issue with when they too assumed they knew all about suicide, mental illness depression, when all either poster and others have, is a bare minimum grasp understanding of their own mental illness.

    Fcuk me even the normally rational Odysseus surprised me by linking posters to the DSM and telling them if they identify with any of the symptoms they may just be suffering from a mental illness. And nobody pulled up a mental health professional for possibly fostering hypochondria in an unknown audience. Odysseus themselves should have known better that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, a lot of it, can be fatal. Odysseus has years of education and experience in the field of mental health, yet expects people to be able to interpret the DSM from a quick five minute google search.


    I think no body pulled me up; because in fact I was responding to tomthetank's questions and request for information as oppessed to fostering hypochondria.

    Judging by the thanks I got off tom I think I may have given him the information he was looking for, though only he can clarify that.

    You misssed the part when I advised against self-diagnosis then? Are you saying we should not allow non-professionals to read the ICD-10.

    If you want to learn about depression or any of the other various disorders it is not a bad place to start. Since you are reading it for your onw educational purposes; there should be no issue.

    It you take information and use it in a inappropriate manner, well, no one but the person who misuses the information is responsible for that.

    Such when you goggle depressive episode you get the same criteria and wiki gives you links to both texts in the first line. So really tom got no more that what he would have got if he goggled it himself.

    In the context of this thread I have no problem suggesting such resources if a person is interested and wants to learn about a topic or even an individual disorder.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭Czarcasm


    Why?


    This is why-

    Lyra Fangs wrote: »
    This 100%. If you are able to interpret his words as you see fit, that is, a message of hope and encouragement then we should be able to present our take of his message which to many people on this thread comes across as shaming people who consider suicide.


    I never said anyone couldn't interpret his opinion any way they wanted. Of course they can. But condescension and and a dismissive attitude doesn't foster discussion, it only reinforces the negative perception of those suffering from a mental illness. That's why I said I haven't learned anything from 30 pages of back and forth bitching and people waving their e-penis' about like it's a competition to see who can pìss higher up the wall.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,041 ✭✭✭Seachmall


    Czarcasm wrote: »
    people waving their e-penis' about

    For the record; mines bigger than yours.




  • Czarcasm wrote: »
    This is why-





    I never said anyone couldn't interpret his opinion any way they wanted. Of course they can. But condescension and and a dismissive attitude doesn't foster discussion, it only reinforces the negative perception of those suffering from a mental illness. That's why I said I haven't learned anything from 30 pages of back and forth bitching and people waving their e-penis' about like it's a competition to see who can pìss higher up the wall.

    That's how you're seeing it. That's how you seem to see a lot of posts on here. What it looks like to me is that YOU have a dismissive attitude of anything you don't like. Of course people are heated - it's a discussion forum about an emotional topic. What have YOU added of value? You came on to the thread and complained about it.

    My flatmate has read a lot of the thread and has found it extremely enlightening. He would have previously been of the 'ahh pull yourself together' school of thought but he's now gained a whole new perspective. We watched the excellent video of the lecture about depression together. He doesn't see it the way you do at all.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Czarcasm wrote: »
    That's why I said I haven't learned anything from 30 pages of back and forth bitching .

    As far AH threads go, this one has been well, less AH-ish. So :
    30 Pages back?:eek:
    All I can go back is a maximum of 13. :o


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,940 ✭✭✭Corkfeen


    Jernal wrote: »
    As far AH threads go, this one has been well, less AH-ish. So :
    30 Pages back?:eek:
    All I can go back is a maximum of 13. :o

    He hasn't been opened up to the wonders of 50 posts a page....


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,236 ✭✭✭jigglypuffstuff


    Czarcasm wrote: »
    Lyra I've already pointed out just one poster, well, another who I initially took issue with when they too assumed they knew all about suicide, mental illness depression, when all either poster and others have, is a bare minimum grasp understanding of their own mental illness.

    Fcuk me even the normally rational Odysseus surprised me by linking posters to the DSM and telling them if they identify with any of the symptoms they may just be suffering from a mental illness. And nobody pulled up a mental health professional for possibly fostering hypochondria in an unknown audience. Odysseus themselves should have known better that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, a lot of it, can be fatal. Odysseus has years of education and experience in the field of mental health, yet expects people to be able to interpret the DSM from a quick five minute google search.

    All too busy ripping apart a 16 year old's opinion that was aimed at young people, not once in the independent article was the word depression mentioned, and when he said "sleep on it", he meant for young people with suicidal thoughts to hold off on the knee jerk reaction to commit suicide when they're going through a rough patch, as distinct from going through depression.

    Despair, is not depression, but posters here who have acknowledged that they suffer from depression, chose to interpret his words to suit their frame of mind. It's an interesting conundrum for anyone who says that the perception of a mentally ill person is their reality. It may be semantic to some, but for others it's a damn important distinction to make, that a mentally ill person's reality is colored by their perception.


    Why?
    Because perception and reality are 2 very different things, That's basic cognitive psychology
    Czarcasm wrote: »
    it only reinforces the negative perception of those suffering from a mental illness.

    This is exactly what this thread has done!!




  • pone2012 wrote: »
    Because perception and reality are 2 very different things, That's basic cognitive psychology



    This is exactly what this thread has done!!

    It's basic 5-year-old psychology. The question is, how is that relevant within the context of this debate?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭Czarcasm


    Seachmall wrote: »
    Eh,


    I'm assuming we're talking about the same article, this is from the one linked in the OP.


    Apologies for that, I did indeed miss the one line in the whole editorial piece that mentions the word depression once, when the campaign is actually about suicide. You'll have to take issue with the editor of the independent for their artistic licence on that one.
    He mentions people in "financial despair" which would suggest adults.


    Trivial but relevant- I was informed last week of a girl who rang Childline because her father wouldn't give her money to buy phone credit unless she did the dishes! Anecdotal I grant you, but just one example of a teenager in "financial despair". I'm sure you wouldn't have to think too hard to remember a teenager that despaired their financial status, the "I'm soooo broke, FML" mentality.

    And again, it explicitly mentions his campaign is about suicide and depression.


    One damn line in the article, which is not a quote attributed to the teenager, but rather an editorial comment that shouldn't have been let go, because the teenagers campaign as was stated many times in the article, is about suicide, not depression.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,449 ✭✭✭Call Me Jimmy


    pone2012 wrote: »
    Because perception and reality are 2 very different things,

    If you believe in objective reality that is! Imo there's perception one to perception N. Just thought i'd mix it up.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 632 ✭✭✭Lyra Fangs


    Czarcasm wrote: »
    This is why-





    I never said anyone couldn't interpret his opinion any way they wanted. Of course they can. But condescension and and a dismissive attitude doesn't foster discussion, it only reinforces the negative perception of those suffering from a mental illness. That's why I said I haven't learned anything from 30 pages of back and forth bitching and people waving their e-penis' about like it's a competition to see who can pìss higher up the wall.


    Then why have you repeatedly argued with people who have interpreted his opinion as judgmental and insensitive? Yet you say people are entitled to their opinion, why can't you accept that some people don't view his campaign as something positive.

    Just because someone doesn't agree with someone else's opinion doesn't mean they're being dismissive. The boy's heart is in the right place but the campaign was poorly conceived.
    But condescension and and a dismissive attitude doesn't foster discussion, it only reinforces the negative perception of those suffering from a mental illness

    Also I find this slightly insulting. You appear to be insinuating that everyone who have posted in disagreement of the boy's opinion has a mental illness or are speaking on behalf of the mentally ill and because of our "attitude" are aiding in cementing people's negative views of the mentally unwell.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,236 ✭✭✭jigglypuffstuff


    It's basic 5-year-old psychology. The question is, how is that relevant within the context of this debate?


    It is relevant due to the way that young mans words are being perceived by many, in particular some of the people who say they are mentally ill in this forum who have voiced the opinion that he is insensitive and idiotic in his words.

    Let me ask you this. You have stated that the mentally ill people will not take this the way it was intended. So is he wrong for saying it? Or is their perception of what he said wrong?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,041 ✭✭✭Seachmall


    Czarcasm wrote: »
    Apologies for that, I did indeed miss the one line in the whole editorial piece that mentions the word depression once, when the campaign is actually about suicide. You'll have to take issue with the editor of the independent for their artistic licence on that one.

    [...]

    One damn line in the article, which is not a quote attributed to the teenager, but rather an editorial comment that shouldn't have been let go, because the teenagers campaign as was stated many times in the article, is about suicide, not depression.

    Oh please.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,900 ✭✭✭General General


    pone2012 wrote: »
    It is relevant due to the way that young mans words are being perceived by many, in particular the mentally ill of this forum who have voiced the opinion that he is insensitive and idiotic in his words.

    Let me ask you this. You have stated that the mentally ill people will not take this the way it was intended. So is he wrong for saying it? Or is their perception of what he said wrong?

    That would be a matter of perception.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,541 ✭✭✭Smidge


    pone2012 wrote: »
    It is relevant due to the way that young mans words are being perceived by many, in particular the mentally ill of this forum who have voiced the opinion that he is insensitive and idiotic in his words.

    Let me ask you this. You have stated that the mentally ill people will not take this the way it was intended. So is he wrong for saying it? Or is their perception of what he said wrong?

    All due respect but you are the one arguing perception and reality.

    This young man gave his perception of suicide.
    People who have lost loved ones due to mental illness face the reality of suicide.


  • Advertisement


  • pone2012 wrote: »
    It is relevant due to the way that young mans words are being perceived by many, in particular the mentally ill of this forum who have voiced the opinion that he is insensitive and idiotic in his words.

    Let me ask you this. You have stated that the mentally ill people will not take this the way it was intended. So is he wrong for saying it? Or is their perception of what he said wrong?

    That's so ignorant and insensitively worded (not to mention inaccurate), I'm not even going to go there.

    Your second point - Has that not been addressed over and over again? It's not about right and wrong. That's such a childish, black and white view of seeing a complex situation. The issue isn't whether he's right or wrong, the issue is how his 'target audience' are going to react to what he said. As he has no real knowledge of mental illness, I think letting him air his views on national television was a mistake by RTE.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    pone2012 wrote: »

    Let me ask you this. You have stated that the mentally ill people will not take this the way it was intended. So is he wrong for saying it? Or is their perception of what he said wrong?

    Person A : You're <insert statement here>.
    Person b : <estimate response here>

    Is Person A wrong for saying it? Or is Person B's perception of what he said wrong?

    What you're doing is taking the conversation beyond the levels of the pedantic. It's a bit like going :
    "It's true! He hit me last night!"
    "Ahh! But what is 'truth' my dear?"

    Totally irrelevant because in day to day language everyone knows what 'truth' is. Nobody probably knows what the ultimate meaning of 'truth' is but if I said it's the truth that I never stole anything from you, everyone reading this here knows exactly what I mean by this statement and that is all that is necessary.
    Philosophical perceptions and layers, while interesting, are just so unnecessary.

    You already answered your question several posts back when you admitted his choice of words was poor.




  • That would be a matter of perception.

    Hehehe. Indeed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 632 ✭✭✭Lyra Fangs


    Trivial but relevant- I was informed last week of a girl who rang Childline because her father wouldn't give her money to buy phone credit unless she did the dishes! Anecdotal I grant you, but just one example of a teenager in "financial despair". I'm sure you wouldn't have to think too hard to remember a teenager that despaired their financial status, the "I'm soooo broke, FML" mentality.

    I don't get the point you're making with this. He refers to financial despair as something which might drive someone to suicide. Even if he is talking about teenagers I think it would take a little bit more than a lack of phone credit!

    One damn line in the article, which is not a quote attributed to the teenager, but rather an editorial comment that shouldn't have been let go, because the teenagers campaign as was stated many times in the article, is about suicide, not depression.

    Suicide and depression, more generally mental illness, go hand in hand. It's pointless to try to separate the two. Therefore his campaign will focus on both.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭Czarcasm


    Odysseus wrote: »
    I think no body pulled me up; because in fact I was responding to tomthetank's questions and request for information as oppessed to fostering hypochondria.

    Judging by the thanks I got off tom I think I may have given him the information he was looking for, though only he can clarify that.

    You misssed the part when I advised against self-diagnosis then? Are you saying we should not allow non-professionals to read the ICD-10.

    If you want to learn about depression or any of the other various disorders it is not a bad place to start. Since you are reading it for your onw educational purposes; there should be no issue.

    It you take information and use it in a inappropriate manner, well, no one but the person who misuses the information is responsible for that.

    Such when you goggle depressive episode you get the same criteria and wiki gives you links to both texts in the first line. So really tom got no more that what he would have got if he goggled it himself.

    In the context of this thread I have no problem suggesting such resources if a person is interested and wants to learn about a topic or even an individual disorder.


    Odysseus I'm only saying it was a bad call given that you don't have any background information on the poster in order to form a clearer picture of their mental state to decide whether you could be responsible for giving them information on anything. It'd be the very same if someone walked into your clinic- you wouldn't just hand them out the information without a clearer understanding of why they sought it.

    I know you said not to self diagnose, but you might as well have said "don't try this at home". It's not only tom is reading your posts btw. It's one of the long standing issues I've had with the PI and RI forums, giving out advice without being privy to the fuller picture, because you're only getting what the OP thinks is relevant, but that's a discussion to be had elsewhere.


  • Registered Users Posts: 632 ✭✭✭Lyra Fangs


    Czarcasm wrote: »
    Odysseus I'm only saying it was a bad call given that you don't have any background information on the poster in order to form a clearer picture of their mental state to decide whether you could be responsible for giving them information on anything. It'd be the very same if someone walked into your clinic- you wouldn't just hand them out the information without a clearer understanding of why they sought it.

    I know you said not to self diagnose, but you might as well have said "don't try this at home". It's not only tom is reading your posts btw. It's one of the long standing issues I've had with the PI and RI forums, giving out advice without being privy to the fuller picture, because you're only getting what the OP thinks is relevant, but that's a discussion to be had elsewhere.

    He didn't offer the poster advice he simply provided him with some information that the poster requested. Also it would have only taken a quick google search for the poster to find the information for himself. There's not point hiding information from people, in anything, it's important to educate people about mental illnesses so they can seek help if they think they might be unwell or so they can recognise if someone they know is unwell.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,236 ✭✭✭jigglypuffstuff


    That's so ignorant and insensitively worded (not to mention inaccurate), I'm not even going to go there.

    Your second point - Has that not been addressed over and over again? It's not about right and wrong. That's such a childish, black and white view of seeing a complex situation. The issue isn't whether he's right or wrong, the issue is how his 'target audience' are going to react to what he said. As he has no real knowledge of mental illness, I think letting him air his views on national television was a mistake by RTE.

    It may be insensitively worded to you!! however i found it quite insensitive of you to say the child was bitter and insensitive. im not going to be held responsible for how you perceive what I say. if you cant read it for what it is then i dont know what to say to you

    Thats a very far cry from what you said about how bitter and insensitive his view is, you say it like your opinion matters more than his

    I would love the parents of this child to view this thread, just to see some of the reactions of the people that the poor lad tried to reach. Terrible indeed

    Jernal wrote: »
    Person A : You're <insert statement here>.
    Person b : <estimate response here>

    Is Person A wrong for saying it? Or is Person B's perception of what he said wrong?

    What you're doing is taking the conversation beyond the levels of the pedantic. It's a bit like going :
    "It's true! He hit me last night!"
    "Ahh! But what is 'truth' my dear?"

    Totally irrelevant because in day to day language everyone knows what 'truth' is. Nobody probably knows what the ultimate meaning of 'truth' is but if I said it's the truth that I never stole anything from you, everyone reading this here knows exactly what I mean by this statement and that is all that is necessary.
    Philosophical perceptions and layer, while interesting, are just so unnecessary.

    You already answered your question several posts back when you admitted his choice of words was poor.

    Wording is poor agreed, but the message it sent was not


  • Registered Users Posts: 632 ✭✭✭Lyra Fangs


    pone2012 wrote: »
    It is relevant due to the way that young mans words are being perceived by many, in particular the mentally ill of this forum who have voiced the opinion that he is insensitive and idiotic in his words.

    Let me ask you this. You have stated that the mentally ill people will not take this the way it was intended. So is he wrong for saying it? Or is their perception of what he said wrong?

    First, thank you for categorizing us all into one group, FYI we're not all mentally unwell. Second, he was insensitive but no one said he was an idiot; you are clearly putting words in our mouths.

    Finally, I really don't get why you keep bringing up perception. Many posters who are not mentally ill believe him to be insensitive and uninformed so, in that sense, there are not wrong in their perception. Even if their perception was "wrong" or influenced by their mental state it does not take away from the fact that for some his message would be seen as hurtful.




  • pone2012 wrote: »
    It may be insensitively worded to you!! however i found it quite insensitive of you to say the child was bitter and insensitive. im not going to be held responsible for how you perceive what I say. if you cant read it for what it is then i dont know what to say to you

    Thats a very far cry from what you said about how bitter and insensitive his view is, you say it like your opinion matters more than his

    I would love the parents of this child to view this thread, just to see some of the reactions of the people that the poor lad tried to reach. Terrible indeed

    Please just TRY TO READ AND UNDERSTAND what people post. You keep asking the same question over and over and over again because you can't seem to process the information. You have this obsession with perception - how do you not get that EVERYTHING is about perception? That's why people who speak in public need to be careful about how it will come across.

    Imagine you buy some nice shoes, and I say "oh, nice shoes". I genuinely like your shoes and was intending to give you a compliment, but you took it as a sarcastic comment as you thought my intonation was a bit flat and now you hate me and think I'm a nasty cow. Who is 'right'? Who is 'wrong'?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭Czarcasm


    That's how you're seeing it. That's how you seem to see a lot of posts on here. What it looks like to me is that YOU have a dismissive attitude of anything you don't like. Of course people are heated - it's a discussion forum about an emotional topic. What have YOU added of value? You came on to the thread and complained about it.


    That wouldn't be you suggesting that me having an opinion is being a moany hole would it? I read quietly through 30 pages hoping to learn something, I learned nothing, and your post was the straw that broke a very frustrated camel's back. Otherwise I would've happily listened and learned and maybe after listening and learning from other people's stories, might have felt comfortable enough to share my own experiences of suicide and mental illness, or more specifically depression.

    My flatmate has read a lot of the thread and has found it extremely enlightening. He would have previously been of the 'ahh pull yourself together' school of thought but he's now gained a whole new perspective. We watched the excellent video of the lecture about depression together. He doesn't see it the way you do at all.


    Well that's genuinely heartening to hear. At least one person has learned something they didn't know before and it has changed their perception of those who suffer from suicidal ideation and depression. That's all this teenager was trying to do either, was change people's perspectives and try and get them to seek help before they sink into despair and see suicide as the only way to end their suffering.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭Czarcasm


    That's how you're seeing it. That's how you seem to see a lot of posts on here. What it looks like to me is that YOU have a dismissive attitude of anything you don't like. Of course people are heated - it's a discussion forum about an emotional topic. What have YOU added of value? You came on to the thread and complained about it.


    That wouldn't be you suggesting that me having an opinion is being a moany hole would it? I read quietly through 30 pages hoping to learn something, I learned nothing, and your post was the straw that broke a very frustrated camel's back. Otherwise I would've happily listened and learned and maybe after listening and learning from other people's stories, might have felt comfortable enough to share my own experiences of suicide and mental illness, or more specifically depression.

    My flatmate has read a lot of the thread and has found it extremely enlightening. He would have previously been of the 'ahh pull yourself together' school of thought but he's now gained a whole new perspective. We watched the excellent video of the lecture about depression together. He doesn't see it the way you do at all.


    Well that's genuinely heartening to hear. At least one person has learned something they didn't know before and it has changed their perception of those who suffer from suicidal ideation and depression. That's all this teenager was trying to do either, was change people's perspectives and try and get them to seek help before they sink into despair and see suicide as the only way to end their suffering.


  • Registered Users Posts: 632 ✭✭✭Lyra Fangs


    You have this obsession with perception - how do you not get that EVERYTHING is about perception? That's why people who speak in public need to be careful about how it will come across.

    Imagine you buy some nice shoes, and I say "oh, nice shoes". I genuinely like your shoes and was intending to give you a compliment, but you took it as a sarcastic comment as you thought my intonation was a bit flat and now you hate me and think I'm a nasty cow. Who is 'right'? Who is 'wrong'?

    This is what many posters have been saying all along. His heart might be in the right place and he might have the best of intentions but his opinion and beliefs, based on a bad choice of words, could be perceived as judgy, shaming, hurtful and insensitive by some people battling depression or contemplating suicide.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,900 ✭✭✭General General


    pone2012 wrote: »
    It may be insensitively worded to you!!

    So you don't think that it was insensitively worded, the bit where you said:
    pone2012 wrote: »
    It is relevant due to the way that young mans words are being perceived by many, in particular some of the people who say they are mentally ill in this forum who have voiced the opinion that he is insensitive and idiotic in his words.

    pone2012 wrote: »
    however i found it quite insensitive of you to say the child was bitter and insensitive. im not going to be held responsible for how you perceive what I say. if you cant read it for what it is then i dont know what to say to you

    I'm finding it difficult to read it for what it is & not see it as insensitive, when you said:
    pone2012 wrote: »
    ... some of the people who say they are mentally ill in this forum...


    You, however, think that saying something like this is:
    pone2012 wrote: »
    ..a very far cry from what you said about how bitter and insensitive his view is..

    Finally, you add:
    pone2012 wrote: »
    I would love the parents of this child to view this thread, just to see some of the reactions of the people that the poor lad tried to reach. Terrible indeed

    Why would you love that?

    Seriously?

    If you think it is that 'terrible', why?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,900 ✭✭✭General General


    pone2012 wrote: »
    It is relevant due to the way that young mans words are being perceived by many, in particular some of the people who say they are mentally ill in this forum who have voiced the opinion that he is insensitive and idiotic in his words.

    Let me ask you this. You have stated that the mentally ill people will not take this the way it was intended. So is he wrong for saying it? Or is their perception of what he said wrong?

    Hang on... did you edit & replace 'the mentally ill of this forum' with 'some of the people who say they are mentally ill in this forum'?

    Nice.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,754 ✭✭✭Odysseus


    Czarcasm wrote: »
    Odysseus I'm only saying it was a bad call given that you don't have any background information on the poster in order to form a clearer picture of their mental state to decide whether you could be responsible for giving them information on anything. It'd be the very same if someone walked into your clinic- you wouldn't just hand them out the information without a clearer understanding of why they sought it.

    I know you said not to self diagnose, but you might as well have said "don't try this at home". It's not only tom is reading your posts btw. It's one of the long standing issues I've had with the PI and RI forums, giving out advice without being privy to the fuller picture, because you're only getting what the OP thinks is relevant, but that's a discussion to be had elsewhere.

    In such a case as this I would not want background info on the person. I am in a discussion forum; I'm not here to assess someones menat state, as I'm not here in a profession capacity it is titally different to someone coming into a clinic where I'm employed.

    I am not dealing with his personal situation, I am answering a question in general about depressive states, there is a significant difference there.

    That difference is the reason why I do not post in the other forums you mention. I have referred people to the the ICD-10 for informational purposes many times, I have also discussed such material in the psych forum.

    If we where to censor posts because someone might use the information contained in them in a manner which we disagree with, we would post very little.

    I think we are just going to disagree on this one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Hang on... did you edit & replace 'the mentally ill of this forum' with 'some of the people who say they are mentally ill in this forum'?

    Nice.

    Sure what difference does it make? We're all addicted to boards anyway.


  • Registered Users Posts: 632 ✭✭✭Lyra Fangs


    pone2012 wrote: »
    I would love the parents of this child to view this thread, just to see some of the reactions of the people that the poor lad tried to reach. Terrible indeed

    So you think that the posters who have stated that they have a mental illness or previously suffered from a mental illness aren't being appreciative of this boy's effort to "reach them"?

    If anyone on here has the right to comment on this boys actions it is the people he is trying to help. Based on what I've read many if not all of these people agree that his intentions were good, that he simply trying to help those most desperately in need, no one is refuting that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,900 ✭✭✭General General


    Czarcasm wrote: »

    Well that's genuinely heartening to hear. At least one person has learned something they didn't know before and it has changed their perception of those who suffer from suicidal ideation and depression..

    Ahhhhhhhhh. Fair play... after all;
    Czarcasm wrote: »

    I came into this thread hoping to learn more about understanding suicide and mental illness. I learned nothing, and I don't think anyone reading this thread so far will have learned anything other than this thread is one almighty píssing contest with posters who want to listen, and posters who want to understand and be educated, being pretty much told "oh you don't want to listen and you're too stupid to understand anyway".

    Apology accepted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,900 ✭✭✭General General


    Jernal wrote: »
    Sure what difference does it make? We're all addicted to boards anyway.

    Ah, no. I am not addicted. Not me. It's just to be social. Get me out of the house. Well, not OUT of the house... but


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭Czarcasm


    Lyra Fangs wrote: »
    Then why have you repeatedly argued with people who have interpreted his opinion as judgmental and insensitive? Yet you say people are entitled to their opinion, why can't you accept that some people don't view his campaign as something positive.


    I can of course accept that some people don't view his campaign as something positive, can those same people not accept that I am in fact neutral as to where I stand on the effectiveness of his campaign and the platform on which he chose to air his views? I don't know too many teenagers who will be at home on a Saturday night watching that shìte, their parents maybe, but their parents were not the intended audience, at least not by his own words anyway. A much better platform would have been an orchestrated online social media campaign, but how and ever, at least it's got some of us talking about it here now, and it's already responsible for changing one person's perspective.

    Just because someone doesn't agree with someone else's opinion doesn't mean they're being dismissive. The boy's heart is in the right place but the campaign was poorly conceived.


    Well I'm trying to address posters here and I'm being accused of being dismissive. You'll have to take my word for it but I'm far from being dismissive, whereas others have been far more vocal in their dismissal. His heart is indeed in the right place, and yes, the campaign is poorly conceived and ill thought out and even worse execution.

    Also I find this slightly insulting. You appear to be insinuating that everyone who have posted in disagreement of the boy's opinion has a mental illness or are speaking on behalf of the mentally ill and because of our "attitude" are aiding in cementing people's negative views of the mentally unwell.


    I can only yet again ensure you that I haven't come on here to be insulting to anyone. Up to page 30 it was one poster to another essentially saying "you know nawtheeng!". That wasn't a discussion, and when one poster shared their experiences of suicide, depression and mental illness, they were STILL told they know nothing.

    I didn't suggest at all that anyone who disagreed with the teenagers opinion was suffering from a mental illness, I said that the posters who had shared their experiences of suffering from depression who were being condescending to other posters are, as you put it, aiding in the cementing of a negative view of the mentally unwell. I said their reality was colored by their perception. I said that some posters had a bad attitude. There is no link between mental illness and a bad attitude, you came up with that yourself.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,236 ✭✭✭jigglypuffstuff


    Hang on... did you edit & replace 'the mentally ill of this forum' with 'some of the people who say they are mentally ill in this forum'?

    Nice.


    That's exactly what i did. Due to the fact that many of them have also taken the words of the boy in a positive outlook.

    Problem?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,900 ✭✭✭General General


    pone2012 wrote: »
    That's exactly what i did. Due to the fact that many of them have also taken the words of the boy in a positive outlook.

    Problem?

    No. No. Not for me.

    How's the assignment coming along?

    Good stuff.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,236 ✭✭✭jigglypuffstuff


    Czarcasm wrote: »
    I can only yet again ensure you that I haven't come on here to be insulting to anyone. Up to page 30 it was one poster to another essentially saying "you know nawtheeng!". That wasn't a discussion, and when one poster shared their experiences of suicide, depression and mental illness, they were STILL told they know nothing.

    Ah you see the reason for this is that the person in question clearly has a wealth of experience which can be applied to all cases. anyone who challenges that or doesnt agree with the views clearly hasnt a clue, despite their own experience and education. Its very rational indeed...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,345 ✭✭✭✭jimmycrackcorm


    Having watched the show I can't believe how many people thanked the op. But this is after hours I suppose.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,311 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    Hang on... did you edit & replace 'the mentally ill of this forum' with 'some of the people who say they are mentally ill in this forum'?

    Nice.

    Mod: I think the poster wanted to correct a poor choice of words, not saying the edited correction mind is greatly worded either!

    I'd suggest that posters take a step back before they post, it's a naturally subjective subject but it is better to view it objectively, look at the overall point made, rather than give knee jerk responses.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭Czarcasm


    Lyra Fangs wrote: »
    I don't get the point you're making with this. He refers to financial despair as something which might drive someone to suicide. Even if he is talking about teenagers I think it would take a little bit more than a lack of phone credit!


    You'd be... I don't know, maybe you wouldn't be surprised, depends on your experience and your perspective I suppose, just like the people that look at those people who look at people who commit suicide and think "Why?", because they can't think of what they might perceive the person had a reason for committing suicide.

    Suicide and depression, more generally mental illness, go hand in hand.


    No they don't, and that's the whole point of where I'm coming from. A person who commits suicide or has even thought about committing suicide, does not necessarily have to be suffering from any form of mental illness or depression. The two shouldn't be perceived to go hand in hand. There are many people who suffer from mental illness and depression who do not have suicidal ideation. That's the black and white popular misconception, and it was another poster who was admonished for their black and white view and told the issues were far more complex than that. At least I understand that much already.

    It's pointless to try to separate the two.


    I hope I've demonstrated above why it's important that we DO separate the two.

    Therefore his campaign will focus on both.


    I haven't watched the interview yet, so I don't know did the teenager himself make a correlation between both mental illness and suicide, but from the article it was clear that only the journalist or the editor included that assumption, in one line, in an article that made numerous references only to suicide amongst young people in despair.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,041 ✭✭✭Seachmall


    Czarcasm wrote: »
    I haven't watched the interview yet, so I don't know did the teenager himself make a correlation between both mental illness and suicide, but from the article it was clear that only the journalist or the editor included that assumption, in one line, in an article that made numerous references only to suicide amongst young people in despair.

    Earlier you criticised others for interpreting the article in their own way and now you're blatantly dismissing an explicit statement in the article that contradicts your own interpretation of it despite it being your only source.

    But here's another source,



    "They think they have a problem and that this may be a solution. It does make me angry, I'm not going to lie about it. But, like, I've nothing against people with mental illness or anything like that. But these people have to realise that there is help everywhere."

    How will you choose to interpret that?



    Also, he conveys his point much better in the video than was reported in the Indo article.


  • Registered Users Posts: 632 ✭✭✭Lyra Fangs


    Czarcasm wrote: »
    No they don't, and that's the whole point of where I'm coming from. A person who commits suicide or has even thought about committing suicide, does not necessarily have to be suffering from any form of mental illness or depression. The two shouldn't be perceived to go hand in hand. There are many people who suffer from mental illness and depression who do not have suicidal ideation. That's the black and white popular misconception, and it was another poster who was admonished for their black and white view and told the issues were far more complex than that. At least I understand that much already.


    But they should. Being depressed or more generally speaking having a mental illness is one of the most common causes of suicide. In the case of depression it doesn't have to be a long term mental illness but a major life event (such as the death of a love one/redundancy/financial difficulties etc) could have brought on the depression. Also I never implied that all depressed people suffer from suicidal ideation but it is a symptom of many mental illnesses.


    I haven't watched the interview yet, so I don't know did the teenager himself make a correlation between both mental illness and suicide, but from the article it was clear that only the journalist or the editor included that assumption, in one line, in an article that made numerous references only to suicide amongst young people in despair.

    From wikipedia (not the most credible source I know but still) "Suicide is often committed out of despair, the cause of which is frequently attributed to a mental disorder such as depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, alcoholism, or drug abuse or major life events". Is it not plausible that the boy intends to target all people contemplating suicide with his campaign?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,541 ✭✭✭Smidge


    I have just watched the interview again.

    In the whole interview he speaks about the issue at hand for a small portion of it.
    One of the things I missed on first watch is that he mentions his fate and God a number of times.
    He says that if he can be used as a symbol or beacon(by God)to stop young people from taking their own lives then he feels that his death will be worth it.

    So we are back to this old chestnut.
    The church says the suicide is wrong and this lad has decided to become a trumpet to herald this message.

    He spoke very well about his own struggle with his illness but his anger at his perception of young people who are throwing their lives away because they didn't look for a bit of help(his words, not mine)has floored me.

    He gave a simplistic, dismissive and uniformed view about suicide and has understandably offended a lot of families out there who have lost children to this illness.

    I think we would all do well to remember that it is not only his parents who will suffer the loss of a child.
    Thousands of families in Ireland have lost children/young adults to suicide and they do not need this castigation.

    As well meant as it may be


  • Registered Users Posts: 1 BlackFoot


    Well I have been following this discussion since it started and there has been some very interesting posts that I could say show similar experiences and examples as to my own. I do take exception to the young man’s opinions only because it has been broadcasted nationally in which I find to be in bad taste.


    I myself have been trying to deal with depression for the past 17yrs (still only 29).Depression hit me at an early staged in life, early enough that I couldn’t put a word to what I was feeling or explain why. The first time I really could comprehend what suicide really meant I thought it was a logical solution to how I felt. The idea appealed to me in some strange way I can’t really say why but it did it just somehow made sense. I have spent the past 17yrs thinking on a daily basis about suicide yet have not attempted to kill myself. I can only speculate as to why I haven’t tried it and I put it down to my own personal circumstances. At the heights of my depression I can simple say that I wasn’t confronted and backed into a corner. Which ironically was due to family not understanding what was going on. Apparently I was just being lazy staying in bed and never going out for nearly 3yrs. I don’t blame them but I do wonder why no doctor was ever called in I can only guess that having no understanding of the situation or what to do left them confused or shamed in some way. By the time I understood what was happening myself depression what so rooted in me it controlled my decision making, forming bad habits and shutting down connections to people.


    I should make this clear before I go into this topic any further in detail that this young man is facing some tough times and cooping better than most would in a similar situation. I think his actions of raising money for charities is very noble and he deserves respect for spending what time he has left in this selfless way. I believe that what he says he believes in but I do not see anything that suggest he has fully grasps what depression is more specifically chronic depression. I have no issue with the boy but feel those who should know better should at least have tried to explain it to him. I know when I was that age my views where very radical black and white full of passion and believe but little real understanding.

    The main issues I take with his comments may be because of my own experiences and how such a lack of understanding (mine as well) has led to depression being such a dominant problem in my life. I didn’t say I was depressed to anyone until I was around 21 to which the response was disbelieve I didn’t know and left my father in shock. It was a very strange situation I was sort of crawling out of my depression at the time haven been bed ridden for nearly 3yrs (Still had my 3yrs hair growth and facial fluff) .I remember straight away realising he doesn’t get it or just doesn’t understand what to do. What did happen was the next day it’s as if I didn’t say anything and his lazy son just isn’t so lazy anymore.


    Up until I first admitted it I was always so sure that it would just be dismissed as some other small irrelevant issue "cop on with yourself”, “just choose to stop it" or my personal favourite "depression doesn’t exists". On the outside I looked normal no broken bones no cuts bruises so what’s the problem I have no right to complain? I don’t think I spoke another word until a couple of years later when I secretly sought help from the local GP he prescribed some pills and suggested some therapy I quickly made excuses and didn’t return for another 2 years during another low point. I went to a few therapy sessions in which I simply sat and talked about myself mainly for the whole hour while the councillor listened and asked me some questions along the way. I have never spoken so much about myself ever for so long it was a massive relive for a few months. I quickly made excuses and didn’t return to finish all my sessions or continue my meds (pattern here) as I fell deeper into my depression one week.


    So what’s my point well sort of forgot what I was going to say along the way lol

    Maybe it was something like this…
    Those who don’t even understand the very basic concepts of what depression is should at least try too for your own sake and for your loved ones you never know they could be suffering in silence .Tragedy can strike anyone at any time throughout their lives and leave a wake of despair behind. Some people can cope better than others but not all of us can cope the same.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement