Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

A5 - Derry Dual Carraigeway

1246713

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,091 ✭✭✭marmurr1916


    sdonn wrote: »
    ...makes my case for an M4 from Sligo to Mullingar even more appropriate. It would serve more of, y'know, the country paying for it. ;)

    On second thouhgts...perhaps an extended M3 would be better. Nobody would use the M4 to get to Derry (but it would still serve more places than this proposed M2) - but an M3 to Eniskillen, Omagh and Derry would go through less of NI, cost less because there is already motorway as far as Kells, and doesn't have the basket case that is Slane in the way.

    For example...red is M2 Blue with Green N-road D2 spur is M3:

    b7b44.jpg

    Are you proposing both routes should be built? I don't think your M2 route as shown is going to work, especially since it passes through the Sperrin Mountains (shown as the Sperrins AONB, Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, on your map).

    IMO, the main route from Dublin to Derry/Letterkenny is best served by a good-quality DC from Derry to near Monaghan, a proper Monaghan bypass, and then a 2+2 (with sufficient land reserved to enable eventual upgrade to HQDC) from south of Monaghan town to join the M1 near Dundalk.

    AFAIK, a considerable section of the N2 between Castleblayney and Clontibret is already 2+1.

    A route that roughly followed the line of the N53 from the M1 outside Dundalk to link up with the N2 south of Castleblayney (dipping south to avoid crossing the border, then curving back north) would surely be fairly quick and relatively cheap to build.

    This route could then be signed as the official N2, branching off the M1 at Dundalk, cutting across and then up to Castleblayney, then roughly following the line of the existing N2 to join up with the improved A5 at the border.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,875 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Thing is, up North they have a terrible fear of motorways - they haven't built ANY since the 1970s. Plenty of dual carriageway alright, but they're so averse to new blue signs that the N1-A1 link had to be HQDC in its entirity.

    Perhaps Mysterious has some influence up there :rolleyes:

    So if the objective were to be motorway to Donegal, the best idea would be to run it from Emyvale, Co. Monaghan, to Lifford, running for the shortest distance inside Northern Ireland.
    161407.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    You wont get a motorway in the north, the entire of the UK is so completely anti-motorway thesedays. If the Newry bypass had been proposed as an M road, with exactly the same design as was built, it would have been fought to the bitter end.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,630 ✭✭✭Plowman


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    The UK has a lot of poor quality DC (and quite a bit of reasonable). However, after the government shoehorned Twyford Down through on the M3 (think the Tara or Glen of the Downs protests but much MUCH worse), public sentiment started to turn away from roads. Various government since, to buy votes from the hugely powerful green lobby over there, have cancelled basically everything, leaving the UK with bottlenecks far worse than anything we have over here that will probably never be resolved. (eg: Lyndhurst, Arudel, Stonehenge).

    2km of S2 would bypass Lyndhurst but the trustees of the New Forest wont have any of it.
    Stonehenge would be solved by a ~20km scheme of DC, it would be slightly more sensitive than Tara but this also got scrapped.
    Arundel has an S2 bypass with at-grade roundabouts but they cant dual it properly due to opposition.

    This is why we HAVE to get our road projects finished here before public sentiment invariably turns away from motorways.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    We really only need to build Cork - Galway , Galway Bypass to N59 and maybe Longford - Mullingar and the missing M11 piece. Our motorway network is then complete.

    We need rather a lot of 2+2 thereafter but not Motorway/HQDC. 2+2 is only WS2 used better, that is the real message.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,284 ✭✭✭dubhthach


    I see that the A5 will pass within 50 meters of ruined castle of one of the Ó Néill. No doubt this will be used as a Carrickmines/Rath Lugh rolled into one by those opposed

    http://www.gaelsceal.ie/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=866:caislean-taoisigh-ghaelaigh-faoi-leigear&catid=14:nuacht-reigiunach&Itemid=106 (in Irish)

    http://www.alternativea5alliance.com/harry_averys


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Have they put Isaac and Der Guckenspiel on the stand yet ???


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,284 ✭✭✭dubhthach


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    Have they put Isaac and Der Guckenspiel on the stand yet ???

    Yup it's the second link on their webpage, so I bet he's acting as a "consultant"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,091 ✭✭✭marmurr1916


    Eamon Gilmore has stated that the government remains committed to giving funding towards this route:
    Tánaiste Eamon Gilmore has reaffirmed the Government’s commitment to cross-Border infrastructure programmes, including a cancer therapy unit in Derry and the main Dublin to Derry road, writes DAN KEENAN .

    Mr Gilmore was on his first official visit to Belfast for talks since elections to the Dáil and the Assembly. After separate talks with First Minister Peter Robinson and Deputy First Minister Martin McGuinness at Stormont, Mr Gilmore said the Coalition would stand by spending commitments in Northern Ireland estimated at some €466 million. The planned A5 Western Transport Corridor is designed to provide 85km of new road between Derry and the Border at Aughnacloy, Co Tyrone.

    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2011/0604/1224298388228.html


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,639 ✭✭✭Zoney


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    We really only need to build Cork - Galway , Galway Bypass to N59 and maybe Longford - Mullingar and the missing M11 piece. Our motorway network is then complete.

    That's as may be, but it looks like we may be waiting for some time to have a motorway between the 2nd and 3rd cities in the state (M20). As such, even if our motorway network could be considered largely complete, this PR is to some extent undone by having such a major link omitted.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    We should not forget the Monaghan - Aughnacloy seeing as there are some consultants scatching around on that scheme right now. I suspect it will make it to route selection and then it will be ditched.

    Updated in the past few months.

    http://www.monaghan.ie/websitev2/roads/N2Clontibret/FAQs.html
    Question: Why are changes being proposed to the existing N2 between Clontibret and the Northern Ireland border?
    Answer: The N2 between Clontibret and the Northern Ireland border is part of a strategic link servicing Derry and the Northwest, currently providing a poor Level of Service for users and has sections of substandard road with a poor safety record.
    The need to improve the N2 as a strategic link is outlined in Transport 21 and the National Development Plan 2007-2013.
    Question: What benefit will a new or upgraded road bring over the existing N2?
    Answer: An upgraded road will achieve a better level of service for road users by reducing journey times and increasing safety levels whilst also generating wider social and economic benefits.
    Question: Where will the final road go and where does it start and end?
    Answer: The decision on the route has not been made yet (January 2011). A number of Route Corridor Options are currently being examined and consulted on.
    The proposed route will start at the existing roundabout at Clontibret and will terminate at the Northern Ireland border to the south of Aughnacloy.
    Question: When will the Preferred Route Corridor be made public?
    Answer: The selection of the Preferred Route Corridor is programmed for 2011. Following the selection of the Preferred Route Corridor a Public Display will be held to inform members of the public.
    Question: Have the public been consulted on the Scheme?
    Answer: Yes, an initial public consultation in relation to the Constraints Study was held from the 13th to the 15th of July 2009 at venues in Clontibret, Emyvale and Monaghan Town.
    The second public consultation took place on the 7th and 8th of July 2010 in Monaghan Town where a series of shortlisted Route Corridor Options were presented.
    At both consultations, which were widely advertised, members of the public were able to provide feedback using comment forms.
    Further public consultations will be held at later stages in the design process.
    It should be noted that all public consultations held during the Feasibility, Constraints and Route Selection Phases of a road scheme are non-statutory and take place much earlier than required by the Roads Act. The Roads Act only provides for formal public consultation following the publication and submission to An Bord Pleanála of the Compulsory Purchase Order and Environmental Impact Statement (if required). If An Bord Pleanála decide to hold an Oral Hearing into objections to the scheme, then affected landowners (in the case of a CPO) and members of the public (in the case of an EIS) will have an opportunity to address any issues of concern in relation to the scheme.
    Question: Why is the existing and recently constructed N2 Monaghan Town Bypass not being considered to form part of the proposed Scheme?
    Answer: The N2 Monaghan Bypass is a 2.3km single carriageway road with 3 roundabout junctions over its length. Whilst this scheme fulfils the requirements of County Monaghan at a local level and serves as a relief road for Monaghan Town, the N2 Clontibret to NI Border Scheme focuses on improving the N2 as a strategic cross-border link thereby improving transport links between Donegal and Dublin.
    Question: Is the Monaghan to Emyvale Realignment Scheme being considered as an option and why not just upgrade the existing N2 and bypass Emyvale?
    Answer: As part of the Project Consultants commission, a review of the Monaghan to Emyvale Realignment Scheme has been undertaken. As a result the current Red Corridor Option contains elements of the Monaghan to Emyvale Realignment Scheme.
    Sections of the existing N2 are also included in the current appraisal process.
    Question: How does the new A5 route, being proposed between Derry and Aughnacloy, impact on the selection of the Preferred Route Corridor?
    Answer: Whilst both schemes tie in at the same location they are being progressed as individual schemes as they are both in different jurisdictions. However, continuous consultation is undertaken with Road Service Northern Ireland (RSNI) and their appointed consultants to ensure that the schemes do not adversely impact each other.
    Question: What type of cross section will be selected and will it be a motorway or dual carriageway?
    Answer: No definitive recommendations on carriageway type have yet been made in relation to the scheme; this occurs at Design Phase when more detailed traffic, economic and environmental information is available. It should be noted that forecasted traffic volume is not the sole determinant as to whether a scheme is developed to dual carriageway or another standard. In practice, the decision on road type will be determined taking account of traffic and a range of other considerations, including consistency of alignment with adjacent schemes and safety considerations in this regard, scheme specific issues (e.g. topography, ground conditions), access requirements and restrictions, cost, road safety and Government strategy and policy objectives.
    Question: Traffic levels have reduced on the existing N2. How is this change being taken into consideration?
    Answer: The permanent traffic counter at Aughnacloy currently indicates that the AADT (Annual Average Daily Traffic) is of the order of 5,506; however this does not represent the AADT over the length of the study area for the scheme. In order to obtain more representative traffic data, additional traffic counts and surveys that cover the Study Area have been carried out as part of the Route Selection process for the scheme. Currently this information is being assessed and validated and a traffic model is being developed which will predict traffic patterns and AADTs for the design year for the scheme. The reduction in traffic volumes is being taken into account in this traffic model. For purposes of road design, traffic volumes are typically forecasted for a design year 15 years after anticipated road opening (generally equivalent to 18-20 years from the submission of the road scheme proposal to An Bord Pleanála for approval).
    Question: The current N2 is a single carriageway road. What is the capacity of this road and can it not cater for the traffic volumes predicted?
    Answer: In terms of traffic and capacity the maximum capacity of a Standard Single Carriageway designed and built in accordance with the NRA Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB) is of the order of 11,600. However the existing N2 may not necessarily adhere to the exacting standards contained within the DMRB (for example may not have hard shoulders, may have a smaller carriageway width or may have different junction types) and as such would have a far reduced capacity.
    The existing N2 also has a large number of direct accesses which would further reduce capacity and would be contrary to NRA Policy on Development Management and Access to National Roads.
    Question: How much will the Scheme cost?
    Answer: The Feasibility Working Cost (FWC) for the scheme is of the order of €254m. This cost is an overall estimate and includes for construction, land costs, planning and design costs and VAT. It should be noted that the FWC is an order of magnitude estimate which is developed and updated as the scheme progresses and more detailed information becomes available. A more detailed cost estimate will be prepared as part of the Route Selection Report.
    Question: How much are the consultants being paid to carry out the study?
    Answer: The Consultant Engineers for the scheme have been appointed by Monaghan County Council using the Standard Conditions of Engagement for Consultancy Services as per the Department of Finance public procurement process.
    Following a competitive tender in 2008, the consultants were commissioned to undertake a four year study for a fixed fee of €1.8M for a defined scope of works set out in the tender documentation and contract.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Once you get near Derry it is completely different.

    http://www.roadsni.gov.uk/roadimprovements/2010_0330irlal.pdf

    page 11 of 59

    A5 north of Bolies AADT around 18000 in 2007 . There is no way they can avoid Dual south of Derry if they choose to do something.

    Out of interest, here is how NI or UK Road capacity is calculated for a 50MPH road.

    http://www.drdni.gov.uk/appendix_4.3_.pdf
    The CRF represents the AADT that could be used for design purposes if that peak period congestion is acceptable.

    The CRF is given by:
    CRF = CAPACITY * NL * Wf * 100/PkF * 100PkD *AADT/AAWT
    CAPACITY Maximum output per lane
    Dual c/way = 2100 – 20 * %HGVs from examination of counter data, < 5%
    = 2100 – 20* 5
    = 2000vph
    Single c/way = 1380 – 15 * %HGVs from examination of counter data, < 5%
    = 1380 – 15* 5
    = 1305vph
    NL= number of lanes per direction
    Dual c/way NL = 2
    Single c/way NL = 1 (by definition a rural single c/way can only have 1 lane)
    Wf = Width factor
    ( this takes account of whether lane widths are narrower or wider than the ‘standard’ 3.65m)

    ( carriageway widths exclude any hard strips)
    Dual c/way = Cway width / (Number of lanes

    The 'west of the Foyle ' road into Derry , from Lifford , carries 11000 AADT around here, some of which would go east of the river were there a dualler and Lifford/Strabane bypass.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,335 ✭✭✭Redsoxfan


    £11m funding released for Aughnacloy-Derry

    So seems like there's enough commitment for the 6 County section..from one side anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,283 ✭✭✭Deedsie


    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-14811060

    Funding has started from the Irish government.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,907 ✭✭✭munchkin_utd


    Deedsie wrote: »
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-14811060

    Funding has started from the Irish government.
    and committed to the project:

    "The Irish Prime Minister Enda Kenny recently said he remains committed to the project and it has emerged funding has already started."

    Its a department of taoiseach baby so its his money to spend borrow from the IMF


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,145 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    I really must protest vociferously.

    This huge project is only going ahead because of politics. Road planning has been wiped from the board both north and south because of it for several years now. It will be 2014 before you see any significant activity anywhere on the island. In the Republic we're told that road building has been curtailed due to austerity, but the gov has £400M to throw at this! Nuts.

    Wouldn't it be far wiser to split this into three parts, as has been pointed out many times? Derry-Strabane has the highest traffic and is the most urgently needed segment. We could build pieces of this over 10-15 years instead of clearing the board for several years in order to commit all our much-strained resources towards it.

    It hardly needs to be asked how this can be a higher priority than a bypass for Galway City.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,283 ✭✭✭Deedsie


    spacetweek wrote: »
    I really must protest vociferously.

    This huge project is only going ahead because of politics. Road planning has been wiped from the board both north and south because of it for several years now. It will be 2014 before you see any significant activity anywhere on the island. In the Republic we're told that road building has been curtailed due to austerity, but the gov has £400M to throw at this! Nuts.

    Wouldn't it be far wiser to split this into three parts, as has been pointed out many times? Derry-Strabane has the highest traffic and is the most urgently needed segment. We could build pieces of this over 10-15 years instead of clearing the board for several years in order to commit all our much-strained resources towards it.

    It hardly needs to be asked how this can be a higher priority than a bypass for Galway City.

    Ever been to Donegal?


  • Registered Users Posts: 66 ✭✭NITransport


    Another piece of dribble from Belfast Telegraph that initially excited me by its title, but when read, doesn't actually say anything other that Danny Kennedy rhetoric. "I'm remain committed to this, I remain committed to that... but I don't actually commit to anything!"

    Minister alleviates funding fears over £850m Derry-Dublin road
    Transport Minister Danny Kennedy last night gave his backing to the £850m dual carriageway project which will link Londonderry and Dublin.

    It has now emerged that the Department for Regional Development has contributed more than half of the £38m spent to date on the A5 Western Corridor project.

    The largest roads project on the island of Ireland, the scheme will see Dublin linked with Derry, Strabane, Omagh and Donegal via the border at Aughnacloy.

    It emerged yesterday that the Irish government has also stumped up £19m towards both the A5 and the A8 Belfast to Larne projects to date.

    Mr Kennedy revealed the spending following concerns raised over a letter he sent to Derry City Council in July in which he said he intended to “consider proposed investments across my department”.

    However, the minister revealed last night in a statement to the Telegraph: “I support improvements to the A5, A8 and other arterial routes in Northern Ireland.

    “The A5 public inquiry has still to report and I will study the independent inspector’s report and recommendations before concluding my consideration.

    “My department has already committed funding to develop the A5 Western Transport Corridor dualling project with £38m being spent between November 2007 and August 2011. This includes £19m from the RoI government which is towards the A5 and A8 projects.”

    The minister added: “This funding has paid for professional fees associated with the development of the scheme as well as a number of surveys and indeed input from the joint venture contractors who provided advice during the scheme development and public inquiry.

    “It also includes costs associated with the many public consultation events and public inquiry held during May and June 2011.”

    The minister had faced pressure from MLAs in the north west yesterday to commit to the project after the Irish government reiterated that it is intent on meeting its total funding commitment of €400m.

    Foyle SDLP MLA Colum Eastwood emphasised the positive ramifications that the road project will have for the city of Derry.

    He said: “The A5 will significantly cut motorists’ travelling time to the capital in Dublin, it will massively improve road safety and its construction will create jobs. This significant infrastructure project will also hopefully mark a small beginning in rebalancing the historical under investment in the west.”

    And I'm sorry but do you know what its like to come from the only damn region on this god forsaken island that doesn't have a decent university, road network, rail connections or anything. With this in mind this one project that could single handled shut up all those who say west of the Bann discrimination with one piece of investment. That's a lot more important than some bypass for Galway.

    Finally I'd like to point out that Britain has committed to providing £8 billion to the ROI Government, admittedly to protect its own interests, but I'd like to see a small percentage of that being used on a piece of infrastructure that will ensure that the North West in one way is on an even playing field with all other Irish regions. Instead of further providing additional liquidity to ailing banks which truly is throwing money away. RANT. OVER.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,345 ✭✭✭✭jimmycrackcorm


    spacetweek wrote: »
    Derry-Strabane has the highest traffic and is the most urgently needed segment.

    I don't agree with this. Strabane - Omagh is extremely heavy. It's more than commuter traffic.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,235 ✭✭✭lucernarian


    And I'm sorry but do you know what its like to come from the only damn region on this god forsaken island that doesn't have a decent university, road network, rail connections or anything. With this in mind this one project that could single handled shut up all those who say west of the Bann discrimination with one piece of investment. That's a lot more important than some bypass for Galway.

    Finally I'd like to point out that Britain has committed to providing £8 billion to the ROI Government, admittedly to protect its own interests, but I'd like to see a small percentage of that being used on a piece of infrastructure that will ensure that the North West in one way is on an even playing field with all other Irish regions. Instead of further providing additional liquidity to ailing banks which truly is throwing money away. RANT. OVER.
    I don't think west of the Bann discrimination will be alleviated by one megaproject which is arguably overengineered compared to doing more work with the A6 from Belfast to Derry which is well known to be congested. And as far as the NW in general's concerned, the road from Lifford to near Manorcunningham (the N14) is in a deplorable condition and perhaps building that would better serve those coming from the bulk of Donegal as well as cross-border transport in getting the Derry-Omagh stretch built first.


  • Registered Users Posts: 435 ✭✭doopa


    I don't think west of the Bann discrimination will be alleviated by one megaproject which is arguably overengineered compared to doing more work with the A6 from Belfast to Derry which is well known to be congested. And as far as the NW in general's concerned, the road from Lifford to near Manorcunningham (the N14) is in a deplorable condition and perhaps building that would better serve those coming from the bulk of Donegal as well as cross-border transport in getting the Derry-Omagh stretch built first.

    Whilst I'm glad to see this road going ahead it would be a shame if its at the expense of the Derry-Belfast road which is also badly needed. I'm hard pressed to think of two other UK cities (of similar sizes) with such poor infrastructure between them (what with the rail link under constant threat of closure in addition to the crappy road).


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Don't worry, Noel Dempsey flew out of Derry in a jet last year to kill this project off in London. NI Politicians are merely waiting for the inevitable announcement and the sequencing has been choreographed between Dempsey and London.

    It is administrativelysub judice pending the publication of the Inspectors report, that is all.


  • Registered Users Posts: 435 ✭✭doopa


    BBC update - money to be taken from the A5 upgrade to pay for the rail link to Belfast.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-15206593


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,284 ✭✭✭dubhthach


    doopa wrote: »
    BBC update - money to be taken from the A5 upgrade to pay for the rail link to Belfast.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-15206593

    that's from the Northern Ireland executive budget though and not from the contribution we are suppose to be making. I think of course we'll find out come budget day wether that will go ahead. The fact that the two important linking road schemes in Donegal were "cancelled" might cause some doubts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,107 ✭✭✭hi5


    Looks like our contribution is to be postponed.

    http://www.rte.ie/news/2011/1109/roads.html

    The Government is set to postpone its commitment to fund 88km of motorway in Northern Ireland that would link Co Monaghan with Co Derry.

    The proposed A5 dual-carriageway was to run from the border near Aughnacloy through Omagh and Strabane to Derry.

    The work was to be funded by the Government and Northern Ireland's powersharing executive and was part of the St Andrew's Agreement in 2006


  • Registered Users Posts: 435 ✭✭doopa


    So I guess that's it then.

    Though I have seen a fair bit of construction along parts of the route. Mainly seems to be road straightening though, north of Monaghan which is in fairness one of the worst parts of the road.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,010 ✭✭✭Tech3


    As expected the Irish government will not fund this construction of this scheme. Many of us knew there was little to no chance that this scheme would be partly funded. There is simply no money available to build the high priority schemes never mind the A5.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,091 ✭✭✭marmurr1916


    Game over:
    The Irish government has withdrawn funding for a major road upgrade in Northern Ireland.

    It was to have provided £400m towards the cost of the A5 Londonderry to Aughnacloy road upgrade.

    The total cost of the 55-mile upgrade - which would create a key cross-border business route linking Dublin to the north west - was to be £850m.

    The Republic's Transport Minister Leo Varadkar said his government remained "politically committed to the A5".

    He said he expected work to take place in the future, but £400m was "an enormous commitment and difficult to honour given what we're facing".

    NI Finance Minister Sammy Wilson said he was disappointed, but understood the Irish government's position.

    "They couldn't give a commitment between now and 2016," he said.

    "Our budget only runs to 2014-15 so there's no money coming within our own budget period.

    "For this budget period the road cannot be financed and cannot be built."

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-15658959


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 42 kennykill


    http://www.rte.ie/news/2011/1110/budget_capital.html

    Well that's the nail in the coffin for many more 100's of engineers in this country. When 50 jobs are lost in a call center there's uproar, but when they pull finance on projects already being worked on there's no word of the 100's of jobs lost as a result. Not commencing with at least one major infrastructure project in the next 4-5 years is disgraceful and now we'll see even more engineers and highly qualified workers leave these shores for at least 5 years. I am now going to be one of those thanks to these cuts. Focused on job creation they say, try keeping the jobs we already have first.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,021 ✭✭✭Sulmac


    The plot thickens:
    Friday, 11 November 2011
    A5 upgrade 'back on track' - DFM

    Deputy First Minister Martin McGuinness has told UTV the upgrade of the A5 road is "back on track", after he and First Minister Peter Robinson held talks with Taoiseach Enda Kenny on Friday.

    Earlier this week, the Irish Government announced the withdrawal of the £400m funds earmarked for the expansion of the road in the 2011-2015 budget period.

    Dublin blamed "tight fiscal constraints" for the decision.

    However, UTV now understands the Irish Government will announce fresh details of their contribution to the project during next week's North South Ministerial meeting in Armagh. It is expected to be significantly lowered.

    The Irish government contribution to the A5 will only be a fraction of the original £400m but enough to re-profile the project.
    - UTV's Political Editor Ken Reid on Twitter (@KenReid_UTV)


    "It's far from dead," Mr McGuinness told UTV. "I think, as a result of our discussions today, we're greatly heartened by what we've heard and we look forward to completing some work ourselves and the Taoiseach over the course of the coming days."

    "It's fair to say it's back on track again," he added.

    Mr Robinson explained Dublin's contribution would be "re-profiled rather than lost".

    UTV's Political Editor Ken Reid says it doesn't mean the whole A5 project will be going ahead.

    "My Irish Government sources are saying it was hard work but they feel that a contribution should be made.

    "They could look at areas like the road from Derry to Strabane; perhaps that could be given priority."

    Joint financial support to dual the road at a cost of £850m was agreed as part of the St Andrew's Agreement in 2006, and construction was expected to start in 2012.

    The planned 54-mile long carriageway from Londonderry to Aughnacloy was designed to slash travel times from Northern Ireland to the Republic.

    © UTV News


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Enda was reminded that this was an International Treaty what he was breaching. :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,093 ✭✭✭Amtmann


    The Irish Times is carrying the same report. Derry seems very remote from much of the rest of the country without this upgrade, I must say.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,284 ✭✭✭dubhthach


    Tremelo wrote: »
    The Irish Times is carrying the same report. Derry seems very remote from much of the rest of the country without this upgrade, I must say.

    That and most of Donegal, from what I was hearing on the news they were saying €50m in 2015 and another €50m in 2016. I assume with such a reduction in spend (¼ of promised amount) that the design specs of the scheme might be lowered? (2+2 etc.)

    Of course one major disapointment is the cancelling of the interconnecting road schemes in Donegal which would have provided 2+2 from Letterkenny to the A5 at strabane (N14) , plus other scheme going westbound replacing the N15 providing bypasses of Ballybofey/Stranorlar


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,476 ✭✭✭ardmacha


    I assume with such a reduction in spend (¼ of promised amount) that the design specs of the scheme might be lowered? (2+2 etc.)

    The profile of the scheme wasn't hugely different from 2+2 in any case. Perhaps you mean the replacement of GSJ with roundabouts?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,551 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    dubhthach wrote: »
    plus other scheme going westbound replacing the N15 providing bypasses of Ballybofey/Stranorlar

    This failed to get planning permission to begin with, due to Donegal RDO's dreadful junction design habits - they've got serious form on that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,010 ✭✭✭Tech3


    According to new reports the plan is looking at dualing part of the scheme from Derry to strabane first


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Be about 12 miles to the Strabane South junction according to Wesley Johnston. Around 10 miles if they drop the single road section at the northern end,

    See > http://www.wesleyjohnston.com/roads/a5omaghstrabane.html


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,145 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Tech3 wrote: »
    According to new reports the plan is looking at dualing part of the scheme from Derry to strabane first
    Indeed all of us and Wesley have been saying that all along. Makes so much sense:
    Derry-Strabane by 2015
    Strabane-Omagh by 2020
    Omagh-Monaghan by 2025


  • Registered Users Posts: 435 ✭✭doopa


    spacetweek wrote: »
    Indeed all of us and Wesley have been saying that all along. Makes so much sense:
    Derry-Strabane by 2015
    Strabane-Omagh by 2020
    Omagh-Monaghan by 2025

    The problem is that the Omagh Monaghan part of the road is the absolute worst in terms of driving conditions.
    Perhaps the Derry-Strabane is needed from the point of view of the congestion but I'd do it the other way round.

    Any word on how this will connect to the Derry Belfast road? Or will it defo just go straight into Derry?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 66 ✭✭NITransport


    The only problem with the Derry - Strabane stretch is that the nimbies against it have a bit of a point. The congestion will only get worse with the building of this section as people leave later to get to work due to the "decreased journey time" only to find a traffic backlog at the end of the road next the Craigavon bridge. For this scheme to be successful it needs to be tied in with the A6 project near Drumahoe so that through traffic avoids the city, and only city bound traffic have to go through the junction.


  • Registered Users Posts: 435 ✭✭doopa


    The only problem with the Derry - Strabane stretch is that the nimbies against it have a bit of a point. The congestion will only get worse with the building of this section as people leave later to get to work due to the "decreased journey time" only to find a traffic backlog at the end of the road next the Craigavon bridge. For this scheme to be successful it needs to be tied in with the A6 project near Drumahoe so that through traffic avoids the city, and only city bound traffic have to go through the junction.

    True - they've widened the final stretch before the bridge (twice - since they had to redo the footpath on one side) recently so you'd imagine no more capacity can be found there. Therefore it would make sense to link it to the A6 and the outer ring road that would get people to the Foyle Bridge and over to Donegal faster. Apparently though they have zero intention of linking the two. Instead you'll have to come right into the city. Shambles!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,216 ✭✭✭cargo


    Would have to agree with the points been put forward about the Derry - Strabane section. It's not the worst and it'll only create an even bigger build-up back from Derry until they put an ORR around it.

    Would love to see a few improvements along the other sections back to Monaghan first. I was caught for miles one day in a big queue behind a tractor doing 25mph and I dont mean 2 or 3 miles. Nobody could get around it as the evening rushhour traffic was coming against us. It eventually turned off halfway along the Omagh bypass.

    I am a bit biased though as I usually have to stopover in Strabane so am relaxed (or hyper from a coffee boost) again for the last section and I always turn off at New Buildings and take the upper back road in as I'm normally working up that end of town if I'm in Derry.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 12,891 Mod ✭✭✭✭JupiterKid


    I think that there are otrher primary routes in the North that need more urgent attention than the A5. The A6, which links Belfast and Derry, badly needs upgrading and dualling and the A2 at Greenisland is a commuter bottleneck and the A8 (E01) to Larne also needs dualling.

    That said, I think that there is a strong case for sections of ther A5 upgrade to go ahead as soon as possible, starting with a proper bypass for Omagh (replacing the cheap n' nasty 1990s "throughpass" shambles) and perhaps some of the section from Omagh to Strabane.


  • Registered Users Posts: 42 kennykill


    Today's d-day with regard the A5 project. Head-honchos are meeting today to discuss the future of the project and recent failure of the Irish government to hold up fully their end of the deal.

    In my opinion, I reckon that only one section of this will go ahead. I have a gut feeling it will either be the Derry-Strabane stretch or the Strabane-Omagh stretch. Given the Irish governments pathetic contribution, I don't think the NI authorities will do the Omagh-Monaghan on their own. It'll likely be Derry-Strabane stretch as it's the most politically likeable despite the condition of the Strabane-Omagh stretch. Think spacetweek has it spot-on with his time frame. Irish Government will likely come up with better funds in a few years time (post 2015) to aid the completion of the other sections but for now only one section will get the green light using NI funds. Why would they cross the border into the republic with no money from the Irish side?

    It's such a shame and I'm still annoyed at the lack of vision from the Irish Government, it's generated much needed jobs and boost to the areas and further across the island but it seems that it's all about the money. As we all know, money has no heart-beat or feelings. You can cut it and reduce it and it will never know any different, unlike those of us gripping at shortening straws.


  • Registered Users Posts: 435 ✭✭doopa


    Could this be good news for the project?

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-15881919
    UK Government to switch spending to capital projects.


  • Registered Users Posts: 42 kennykill


    doopa wrote: »
    Could this be good news for the project?

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-15881919
    UK Government to switch spending to capital projects.

    Hard to know doopa, one would think that with the agreements with the Irish government would mean the A5 might be exempt from this development and allocated more funds from the UK government. It's likely good news for other NI infrastructure projects on the back burner that aren't linked to the south of Ireland. I think, and don't hold me to this, that the emphasis in the UK is geared towards getting broadband to everybody, with road infrastruture being less priority. I could be wrong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,216 ✭✭✭cargo


    Travelled up and down parts of this again esterday. God I hate it..... I'd say the average speed along this route has to be 35 - 40 mph.


  • Registered Users Posts: 42 kennykill


    It's ok because the Irish government don't travel on it!! Ya it's such a pain of a stretch of road, but the fate of the upgrade won't be known till the new year now, think there's a north/south meeting scheduled mid-Jan but numbers already crunched behind the scenes. Results of the crunching will be out before the meeting I suspect. MIght be enough in the pot for an Omagh by-pass!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,216 ✭✭✭cargo


    I'd settle for a few more bits of overtaking lanes scattered along it but the Strabane to Derry bit will need to be new build. Was just visualising trying to squeeze in extra lanes etc along it and there's way too many houses etc built on top of the road along this stretch.

    I dont mind the S-D bit anyway as I'm normally stopping in Strabane but as for the rest of it south of that!!


  • Advertisement
Advertisement