Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Luas - Red Line General Discussion

  • 26-10-2007 11:15am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,606 ✭✭✭


    Just set up this thread for general discussion on the Luas Red Line.

    Myself I travel (HEUSTON - BUSÁRAS)(CONNOLLY - HEUSTON) 5 days a week.

    My biggest peevs are bums and beggars on the Luas Platforms.

    Especially at Connolly & Heuston where i get the classic " I haven't got enough money for my train home"

    Then they are there the next day - Did you still not get that train home?

    People with bags on they're backs on crowded luas' is also a major annoying thing.

    People who try to cram on when there is absolutely no room..

    Other than this i find it is actually a lifesaver of a service.
    Don't know wat i would do without it.

    Looking for your thoughts on it and your grievances


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,253 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Other than this i find it is actually a lifesaver of a service.
    Don't know wat i would do without it.
    What did you do before it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,606 ✭✭✭Carroller16


    Had to get the 10 bus from the Phoenix Park into town and be stuck in traffic on the north circular road for about half an hour


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 911 ✭✭✭steve-o


    Other than this i find it is actually a lifesaver of a service.
    Don't know wat i would do without it.
    I don't use it myself, but I've seen comments here that the bus along the quays is often faster.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,606 ✭✭✭Carroller16


    Normally it doesn't go up as far as Busaras though... and although the Luas does be jammers... them buses aren't very reliable and often more packed


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,285 ✭✭✭BanzaiBk


    Frequent Hueston - Connolly user here, for when I'm coming back/going to Cork. I'm using it a lot more than I thought I would considering where I'm living. I agree, I don't know what I'd do without it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,316 ✭✭✭KC61


    From my own experience, the continuous bus lane along the quays means that the 90 and 92 now get you to O'Connell Bridge faster than the LUAS every time.

    Even walking to Abbey Street from the bus I have found that I will still get there faster than the LUAS.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 371 ✭✭MiniD


    KC61 wrote: »
    From my own experience, the continuous bus lane along the quays means that the 90 and 92 now get you to O'Connell Bridge faster than the LUAS every time.

    Even walking to Abbey Street from the bus I have found that I will still get there faster than the LUAS.

    I would agree. The bus is a much quicker option than Luas. The tram crawls along for much of the route and the lights are programmed to stop every tram at Queen Street. The light at O'Connell Street can add an extra two minutes and if there is a car blocking the junction at Capel Street, the tram looses it's priority.

    The bus has really improved on the north quays and will drop you off at Batchelors Walk, which is a more central location than Abbey Street.

    It's mad to think, but by the time the Red Luas runs from Connolly to Heuston, the Green Luas has probably completed it's journey to Sandyford.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,606 ✭✭✭Carroller16


    True I really must try it out. But I work on Sir John Rogerson's Quay so getting off at Busáras is handy for me


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,858 ✭✭✭paulm17781


    MiniD wrote: »
    I would agree. The bus is a much quicker option than Luas. The tram crawls along for much of the route and the lights are programmed to stop every tram at Queen Street. The light at O'Connell Street can add an extra two minutes and if there is a car blocking the junction at Capel Street, the tram looses it's priority.

    It goes to show, they spent all this money putting the Luas through the city when Bus priority would have done the same job.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,074 ✭✭✭BendiBus


    True I really must try it out. But I work on Sir John Rogerson's Quay so getting off at Busáras is handy for me

    There must be a handier 90 bus stop than Busaras Luas for Sir John Rogersons Quay? Eden, Custom House, North Wall Quays?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,159 ✭✭✭rednik


    Again the wrong information is given. The tram does not have to stop at QUEEN STREET and has priority at this junction. It does have to stop at the previous junction inbound. Why do you think there have been so many accidents at the Queen St junction?, due to the idiotic drivers going through red lights on a continuous basis day after day.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,606 ✭✭✭Carroller16


    The previous junction inbound would be MONTPELIER HILL/ TEMPLE ST WEST ... does it really have to stop there


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,316 ✭✭✭KC61


    BendiBus wrote: »
    There must be a handier 90 bus stop than Busaras Luas for Sir John Rogersons Quay? Eden, Custom House, North Wall Quays?

    The 90 does not stop at Busarus, but continues straight onto Custom House Quay.

    There are several stops between Butt Bridge and Guild Street, handy for the pedestrian bridge/water taxi.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,159 ✭✭✭rednik


    Actually the previous junction inbound is Blackhall Place and the trams used to have priority here also but due to drivers breaking the lights this was changed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,107 ✭✭✭John R


    True I really must try it out. But I work on Sir John Rogerson's Quay so getting off at Busáras is handy for me

    The 90 stops outside the Custom House and continues down Custom House Quay until Commons St. That would leave you a few minutes closer than Busaras.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,316 ✭✭✭KC61


    John R wrote: »
    The 90 stops outside the Custom House and continues down Custom House Quay until Commons St. That would leave you a few minutes closer than Busaras.

    It actually continues to Guild Street John since it and the 90A were merged!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 371 ✭✭MiniD


    rednik wrote: »
    Again the wrong information is given. The tram does not have to stop at QUEEN STREET and has priority at this junction. It does have to stop at the previous junction inbound. Why do you think there have been so many accidents at the Queen St junction?, due to the idiotic drivers going through red lights on a continuous basis day after day.

    Apologies, I got my junctions mixed up, but my point still stands. Does it really matter what junction the tram is forced to stop at? Passengers are still delayed!

    While it may officially have priority at Queen Street, it seems drivers have been advised to slow down at junctions, as many trams I have been on have crawled these junctions.

    The 90 stops outside CHQ, which is beside the new footbridge. I think this would be much handier than Busaras.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,159 ✭✭✭rednik


    The point is why do the trams slow at this junction. Because of morons who do not respect the rules of the road. It is the same at O'Connell St with Dublin Bus and others blocking the junction even though there is a great big yellow box.
    The service could be great but we do not live in an ideal world. Instead we have to make do with no enforcement of traffic laws.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,606 ✭✭✭Carroller16


    Carroller16 The previous junction inbound would be MONTPELIER HILL/ TEMPLE ST WEST ... does it really have to stop there

    Thought about it and the junction previous inbound is actually Blackhall Place


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,088 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    KC61 wrote: »
    From my own experience, the continuous bus lane along the quays means that the 90 and 92 now get you to O'Connell Bridge faster than the LUAS every time.

    Same here...
    True I really must try it out. But I work on Sir John Rogerson's Quay so getting off at Busáras is handy for me

    The 90 goes straight down the quays and will leaving you closer to the south Docklands then any Luas stop.

    Get off just before the Sean O'Casey ped bridge, and Sir John Rogerson's Quay is just beyond the bridge (although it's long quay).

    You're also more likely to get a seat.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,860 ✭✭✭SteM


    I get the Luas, Tallaght - Busaras and back every day.

    The amount of people that drag huge suitcases onto the Luas at rush hour and then just leave them in the middle of the aisle is amazing.

    Also it's hard to understand why people who live in Smithfield would cram onto a luas for 3 or 4 stops in the morning. When I lived so close to the city centre I cycled in and out of work, there's no way I would have put myself through all of that hassle of a crammed tram every morning.

    I've been living in Jobstown for 6 months now and in the evening it's quicker for me to

    Walk Risnsend - Busaras
    Luas Busaras - The Square
    Cycle The Square - Jobstown

    than it is for me to

    Walk from my office to 77 terminus in Ringsend (1 minute)
    Bus Ringsend - Jobstown
    Walk - 77 terminus in Jobstown - my house (2 minutes)

    That seems pretty crazy to me considering the bus goes a much more direct route. The traffic in this city is awful (I always lived in the city centre before and never really noticed!). It's no wonder people shy away from using Dublin bus.

    OT about the 77 journey home - my biggest annoyance is when cars are pulling off Macken St left onto Pearse Street. When the lights are about to turn red some drivers pull through them but can't actually get onto Pearse Street so they block the bus lane. I've often been on the 77 to go home and this move has added 10 minutes onto the journey - junctions like this should have traffic cameras on them and drivers blocking bus or Luas lanes (happens at Hueston on the Luas line a lot too) like that should be fined.

    Edit: Bus drivers in this city must have the patience of saints - driving in city traffic would drive me mad within a few weeks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,965 ✭✭✭trellheim


    Unfortunately there's no traffic cameras that issue fines [ a la London etc ] for illegal turns and so on [ The council would make a fortune ]

    For example, where I live, Ranelagh. beside the barge , at the junction with the canal, you may note all right turns are banned. [ from any direction ]

    Why ?

    Because there's no pedestrian lights - so it adds some safety measure.

    But every 2 minutes someone thinks "I'm special" and breaks this rule, frequently dashing across existing traffic and nearly killing a pedestrian who has enough problems trying to cross the traffic.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 371 ✭✭MiniD


    SteM wrote: »
    The amount of people that drag huge suitcases onto the Luas at rush hour and then just leave them in the middle of the aisle is amazing.

    Also it's hard to understand why people who live in Smithfield would cram onto a luas for 3 or 4 stops in the morning. When I lived so close to the city centre I cycled in and out of work, there's no way I would have put myself through all of that hassle of a crammed tram every morning.

    Considering the Luas connects two major rail stations and a bus terminal, you would think there would be more priority for people with luggage. It's worse with buggies, a buggy can take up the space of 3 people standing, and it's not uncommon for a tram to have many buggies on board.

    As for people making short journies, you're probably right, but many connect with other modes of transport, so if someone in Smithfield can save 10 minutes in the morning then they will. Also, with many passengers holding a pre-paid ticket, they will want to use the service.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,221 ✭✭✭BrianD


    Interesting what the OP said about anti-social behaviour on the LUAs. As we all know, LUAS stations are unmanned and monitored only by CCTV and mobile patrols.

    The current RPA plan for the metro is to build basic stations with little or no services in an effort to save costs. These stations will be similar to the LUAs stops - I imagine - but will be underground. These will become havens for anti-social behaviour. Are we going to end up with a situation where the Metro will become a no-go area for passengers who will fear for their safety?

    One of the biggest challenges that many urban transit systems have faced in the past decades is reassuring passengers that the system is a safe means for all passengers to travel. Should the RPA rethink their strategy?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 961 ✭✭✭aliveandkicking


    BrianD wrote: »
    The current RPA plan for the metro is to build basic stations with little or no services in an effort to save costs. These stations will be similar to the LUAs stops - I imagine - but will be underground. These will become havens for anti-social behaviour. Are we going to end up with a situation where the Metro will become a no-go area for passengers who will fear for their safety?

    Ever thought of a career writing for the Sunday Business Post or the Indo? They love this sort of scaremongering bullsh1t. I remeber an article labelling the trams as "silent deadly killers." Sounds like you could be the man to do a similar article about the metro so why not send them your CV :rolleyes:

    Seriously why will the underground stations become "havens for anti-social behaviour"? I really don't understand how you can think this . Brightly lit, CCTV everywhere, one way out. Every other major city in Europe has underground stations and they are not "havens for anti-social behaviour" why is Dublin so different.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    BrianD wrote: »
    Interesting what the OP said about anti-social behaviour on the LUAs. As we all know, LUAS stations are unmanned and monitored only by CCTV and mobile patrols.

    The current RPA plan for the metro is to build basic stations with little or no services in an effort to save costs. These stations will be similar to the LUAs stops - I imagine - but will be underground. These will become havens for anti-social behaviour. Are we going to end up with a situation where the Metro will become a no-go area for passengers who will fear for their safety?

    One of the biggest challenges that many urban transit systems have faced in the past decades is reassuring passengers that the system is a safe means for all passengers to travel. Should the RPA rethink their strategy?
    What's your solution to this perceived problem?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 8,632 ✭✭✭darkman2


    Ever thought of a career writing for the Sunday Business Post or the Indo? They love this sort of scaremongering bullsh1t.

    Are you joking? Ive been on the Luas twice and both times scumbags you would not imagine where on the tram. The first time a lady overheard two little gougers talking about their time in the childrens court - which everyone heard (you see they hitch the ride to the court on the red line - probrably dont pay but thats beyond the point). The Lady (old) enquired - 'what were you there for?' Supprise, supprise among the litany of offences the little toerag mentioned - 'putting stones on the Luas track!' - Ive seen older groupy scumbags on the tram the second time (the return journey) you certainly would not want to meet in a dark, unmanned, underground station. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 961 ✭✭✭aliveandkicking


    darkman2 wrote: »
    Are you joking?

    No I wasn't joking. Comments like BrianD made earlier about stations becoming "havens for anti-social behaviour" really really gets up my nose. For the years the Luas was getting built we got a constant stream of negative scaremongering stories about the Luas that all turned out to be completely false. Stuff like how you can't put trams running into Tallaght at night because they would be vandalised, how trams would get stoned going past Fatima, how the trams were silent deadly killers, how an open fare system could never work in Ireland all, sorts of absolute bullsh1t like that.

    Now we have BrianD starting it about the metro before the press have even started it.

    I'll ask this again - why will underground stations in Dublin be "havens for anti-social behaviour" when they are not in London, Paris, Madrid etc. etc. etc. Are you saying we are the only city in the world with scumbags?

    How many stabbings/shootings/rapes etc have taken place either on the Luas or at one of the stations since it opened. I can't think of one can you?


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,088 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    Ever thought of a career writing for the Sunday Business Post ...

    Funny that since the Post talks down crime compared to nearly every other Irish newspaper. BUT lets not let facts get in your way!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,221 ✭✭✭BrianD


    No I wasn't joking. Comments like BrianD made earlier about stations becoming "havens for anti-social behaviour" really really gets up my nose. For the years the Luas was getting built we got a constant stream of negative scaremongering stories about the Luas that all turned out to be completely false. Stuff like how you can't put trams running into Tallaght at night because they would be vandalised, how trams would get stoned going past Fatima, how the trams were silent deadly killers, how an open fare system could never work in Ireland all, sorts of absolute bullsh1t like that.

    Now we have BrianD starting it about the metro before the press have even started it.

    I'll ask this again - why will underground stations in Dublin be "havens for anti-social behaviour" when they are not in London, Paris, Madrid etc. etc. etc. Are you saying we are the only city in the world with scumbags?

    How many stabbings/shootings/rapes etc have taken place either on the Luas or at one of the stations since it opened. I can't think of one can you?

    You missing the point! The fact of the matter is that stations on the systems that you mentioned are built to a specification that ensures public security. Let's face it a tram stop in Dublin is similar to a bus stop so you wouldn't expect it to be manned and in fact with CCTV is probably more secure than you average bus stop.

    However, it would appear that the RPA are planning to put the LUAS stop model underground (given that the metro is a LUAS) and this is simply unacceptable from a security point of view and you will find that there will be passengers that will not use the system.

    Is Dublin the only city that has scumbags? Of course not but you will find that there is a level of anti-social behaviour and thuggery here and is tolerated as the norm that you simply don't have in other cities. Give them an empty concrete box underground and they'll love it. Would I be correct in saying that thugs effectively 'ran' IR out of the station at Broombridge (may have incorrect station name)? Would you send your kids down to an unmanned Metro at night? It's all perception.


    BTW Alive, I support the LUAS project and want to see more public transport projects built in the city but we must have standards.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,221 ✭✭✭BrianD


    murphaph wrote: »
    What's your solution to this perceived problem?

    My solution to the perceived problem and you hit the nail on the head, it's all about passenger perception, is that full service stations will have to be built if the stations are to be underground. Even on NY subway stations that can be quite big, there is probably only one guy in a bulletproof kiosk but there is a perception for both wrong doer and passenger that there is a presence. Also the stations should be turnstiled so it's not free access.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 371 ✭✭MiniD


    It's no secret that there are serious security problems on the Luas. In-fact, Veolia has recently employed security for some stops. You can put all the CCTV you want at stops, but when you have groups of people off their face on drink and drugs, they just don't care.

    I have posted here many times of stories involving serious anti-social behaviour. I would say any regular Luas passenger will have a story to tell. From early morning to late at night, the stops, particularly at Jervis, and Abbey Street constantly have drunks and junkies hanging around.

    I have been harassed at stops, I have had junkies and drunks fall on me on the tram, I have been on trams where security have had to remove junkies who had passed out (the latest being last Thursday at Jervis), I have been on trams where the Gardai have been called because passengers have been harassed by a scumbag. I have seen junkies prepare their drugs on the tram. On numerous occasions, I've seen up to 20 teenagers jump on the tram while it traveled between Blackhorse and Fatima, and run screaming through the carriage. I was on a tram recently where the teenagers were taking turns to ride outside the tram, sitting on the rear windscreen.

    I welcome how every drivers constantly presses the audio message to remind passengers of pickpockets. While it seems Veolia is taking the matter seriously, I believe the bigger problem involves the Gardai and the courts. I don't remember anybody ever being charged because of anti-social behaviour on public transport, which is a problem, as a lot of people view it as a dangerous way to travel.

    Last week we had a major bus route pull out of an area in South Dublin because of driver attacks. There are currently two other areas of Dublin which do not a have a service after dark for similar reasons. Two years ago we had a man thrown from the upstairs of a moving double deck bus. What needs to happen before somebody takes control and makes public transport a safe place.

    BrianD has made an excellent point of how we should be planning now for Metro. We should be looking at the current problems on Luas and making sure they are wiped out before Metro arrives.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,221 ✭✭✭BrianD


    And it's not easy to stamp out. Even on the DART where there is more staff in evidence (cue various comments), there are still groups of louts. I believe that there are groups of junkies who travel up and down the line on inclement days turning the DARt into an impromptu hostel.

    The fact of the matter, it's difficult to secure manned stations so why make the situation more difficult with these basic stations?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    Oh just play Beethoven's 9th at them over and over and over again and the little scallywags will be on their way! ;)

    Seriously, manning all stations should be a last resort. Build the station, then if anti-social behaviour manifests itself it will still be possible to man stations later, though mobile patrols might be much more cost effective and achieve the same result. Drivers can easily alert control of a group of yobs hanging around and not boarding trams. Would take a mobile security patrol no more than 10 mins to get there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,107 ✭✭✭John R


    murphaph wrote: »
    Oh just play Beethoven's 9th at them over and over and over again and the little scallywags will be on their way! ;)

    Seriously, manning all stations should be a last resort. Build the station, then if anti-social behaviour manifests itself it will still be possible to man stations later, though mobile patrols might be much more cost effective and achieve the same result. Drivers can easily alert control of a group of yobs hanging around and not boarding trams. Would take a mobile security patrol no more than 10 mins to get there.

    That is the most stupid rubbish I have read from you in some time. Having Unmanned underground stations is a recipe for disaster and the idea that nothing should be done until the inevitable problem happens is disgraceful.

    Alot of damage can be done to property and person in 10 minutes,

    It is far better to start with secure stations that are scumbag-unfriendly, once they take over it is far harder to remove them and by then public confidence in the system will already be gone.

    BrianD is 100% correct, there is no question that an unmanned large underground structure will be a no-go area after dark in Dublin for all but the worst scum in our society. There is a reason that pedestrian subways have been removed from the likes of Ballymun; they were big problem areas for all kinds of crime and anti-social behaviour.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,221 ✭✭✭BrianD


    Furthermore, I think underground stations need to be manned in the event of a non-scumbag emergency ... fire etc.

    The Veolia patrols are largely ineffective for one reason only - they have no real power to police the lines. As someone else pointed out, we need to have a transport police with powers of arrest etc. This could be a part of the central or Dublin transport authority.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,860 ✭✭✭SteM


    Getting on the 8:30am Luas in The Square this morning I noticed there was a queue of about 20-25 people waiting to use the ticket machines and some of them missed at least 2 trams.

    I have an annual ticket so I don't normally queue but can anyone tell me if you're able to purchase normal single/return tickets prior to your journey ie the night or day before or do you have to get your ticket on the day of travel?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,606 ✭✭✭Carroller16


    No. If your buying a single ticket it is valid up to 90 minutes from time of purchase. Return tickets are valid from time of purchase until the Last Tram that day.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,986 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Just because a station is manned doesn't mean there won't be anti social behaviour. I was recently in Paris for a weekend and I saw two pick pockets happen and that was in a manned station.

    It isn't a particular problem with LUAS or Metro, rather it is a problem with all public transport in Ireland including bus, DART and train. What we badly need is a section of the Gardai dedicated to public transport who work in close cooperation with ticket inspectors, drivers and security and a court system that takes serious anti social behaviour on public transport.

    I assume that the unmanned METRO stations will actually have a lot of security, mobile patrols and hopefully the Gardai will be encouraged to frequently visit these stations and ride the Metro.


  • Registered Users Posts: 204 ✭✭daniel3982


    They dont have manned underground stations in Newcastle and they work fine, they do have CCTV everywhere and microphones and speakers so if you act up the controller tells you to stop it or you'll get nicked. They have ticket inspector/security teams who sweep the system in high-vis jackets too taking any scroats they catch off the metro and fining them. It works great, although I believe they are going to install ticket barriers at some of the main stations soon.

    They are really good with their fines though, and anyone who doesnt pay gets their name on a board and taken to court for a much bigger fine.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,606 ✭✭✭Carroller16


    Going on from what was said earlier about the 90 Bus being quicker from Heuston - Busaras(Area) than the Luas ...

    I done a little expiremnt yesterday and today...

    I boarded the Luas at Heuston on 30 October at 08.47 and arrived at Busáras at 09.01

    a total of 14 minutes

    Boarded the 90 bus this morning 31 October at 08.51 an arrived at the IFSC (Busaras Area) at 09.05

    a total of 14 minutes

    So technically it was a draw. But the 90 bus was cheaper at €1.20 a journey wasn't crammed and left me closer to Sean O'Casey Memorial Bridge.

    So i think that from now on the 90 is the way in the mornings....


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,986 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    So i think that from now on the 90 is the way in the mornings....

    Very good comparison.

    I always take the Luas as it always takes the same amount of time, whereas the bus could get caught in traffic and you would be delayed. Now that mightn't be such a big deal if your just heading to work, but it can be a major deal if your trying to catch a train.

    As you take the bus over the next few weeks, keep track of the time and lets us know how it performs over a few weeks. It would be very interesting to hear.

    Another thing to remember is that one of the most important reasons why the bus is now quiet and fast is because so many people have changed over to LUAS from it.

    Before the luas I remember massive throngs of people trying to get on the bus and the bus taking 15 minutes just to load at one bus stop.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,606 ✭✭✭Carroller16


    The 92 is very popular from Heuston but altho the seats were full on the bus ya could stand with plenty of room... Maybe it's just this week with the Mid Term on ... but the Bus Lane goes right down to Capel St.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,144 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Going on from what was said earlier about the 90 Bus being quicker from Heuston - Busaras(Area) than the Luas ...

    I done a little expiremnt yesterday and today...
    This might be true for your journey, but I still don't think it proves anything.

    For a user who is already on the Luas coming in from Tallaght, it's more convenient to just stay on rather than having to disembark and wait for the bus. Also, we don't have integrated ticketing, so you'd have to pay a second fare.

    For a user who's not arriving on the Luas, you just choose whichever is faster or arrives first - if that's the bus, then so what, it doesn't really prove anything. You're only showing that the bus is faster over that short city centre section. This doesn't mean, for example, that bus is generally better than Luas, for the city as a whole.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,316 ✭✭✭KC61


    spacetweek wrote: »
    This might be true for your journey, but I still don't think it proves anything.

    For a user who is already on the Luas coming in from Tallaght, it's more convenient to just stay on rather than having to disembark and wait for the bus. Also, we don't have integrated ticketing, so you'd have to pay a second fare.

    For a user who's not arriving on the Luas, you just choose whichever is faster or arrives first - if that's the bus, then so what, it doesn't really prove anything. You're only showing that the bus is faster over that short city centre section. This doesn't mean, for example, that bus is generally better than Luas, for the city as a whole.

    I was making the point that many people stand at Heuston Station waiting for an already packed tram to city centre while the 90/91/92 buses leave, often with plenty of space available.

    The advent of the continuous bus lane along the quays means that for that journey, the bus is now faster consistently than LUAS, but many people have not realised it. The reasons are that LUAS has 4 stops along the route, and that it has several junctions where they often come to a halt. The volume of buses along the quays means that the loads are cleared relatively easily so on average the buses have fewer stops.

    I am not making a general comment regards the LUAS - just that specific journey.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,965 ✭✭✭trellheim


    Yes but do those people have an integrated train+luas ticket ?

    Then they would have to pay for the bus separately.

    Or does the trainfare include the 90?


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,088 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    trellheim wrote: »
    Yes but do those people have an integrated train+luas ticket ?

    Then they would have to pay for the bus separately.

    Or does the trainfare include the 90?

    As far as I know the intercity add-on includes the 90... but at times there can be vast amounts of people who get of trains with no 'city centre' add-on (see long lines of people at Luas ticket machines on Sunday evenings/nights etc).


Advertisement