Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Criminal Justice Bill 2004

Options
1121315171824

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 11,393 ✭✭✭✭Vegeta


    hey i made a big response here to FLAG where did it go


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 118 ✭✭17HMR


    Vegeta wrote:
    hey i made a big response here to FLAG where did it go

    Got tipped into the Sandbox, it appears.....


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Next week's oireachtas schedule is out and it looks like this is being pushed hard through Dail and Seanad, so get those emails sent today!

    Tuesday 27 June 2006 Dáil Éireann
    4.36 pm

    * Criminal Justice Bill 2004 Order for Report, Report and Final Stages (Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform)


    Wednesday 28 June 2006 Dáil Éireann
    11.36 am

    * Criminal Justice Bill 2004 Report and Final Stages (Resumed to conclude at 10.30 pm if not previously concluded) (Department of Justice Equality and Law Reform)

    Friday 30 June 2006 Seanad Éireann
    11.15 am

    * Criminal Justice Bill 2004 (Dáil) Second Stage [Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform]

    So guillotined through the Dail with little time for debate on whatever amendments that the Minister and others will make, and then straight onto the Seanad stage. Time to start making a list of Senators to write to as well, methinks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 154 ✭✭cantona


    Anyone got a pro-forma addressed document to cover all TD's and Senator's
    E-mails, just to save some time.


  • Registered Users Posts: 588 ✭✭✭Hauk


    Hi guys.

    Quick favour to ask. I've searched through the CJB and couldn't find the piece of legislation that redefines an airsoft gun below 1 joule of energy as a toy. If someone could quote this piece of legislation here for me that would be cool!

    Thanks

    Hauk :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Hauk, it's in the Bill as it goes forward to the Dail tomorrow in section 63:
    63.—Section 4 of the Firearms and Offensive Weapons Act 1990
    is amended in subsection (1)—
    (a) by the substitution of the following paragraph for paragraph (b):
    “(b) an air gun (including an air rifle and air pistol) with a muzzle energy greater than one joule and any other weapon incorporating a barrel
    from which any projectile can be discharged with such a muzzle energy;”,

    That changes the definition of what airguns are firearms under the Act, and thus allows any airgun with a muzzle energy of less than one joule to be classed as a non-firearm and sold as such (ie. over the counter as a toy). Note that this will not include all airsoft guns automatically, and you may have to watch your chronograph and your ammo weight if you're near the limit.

    It's also a bit of a pain that it's one joule and not seven, as that would have meant all ISSF (and a lot of non-ISSF) airguns would have been tradable as non-firearms as well :( And that would have in turn meant that airgun ranges would have been outside the auspices of the Bill (if you'd ever gotten a decent definition of them) which would have been bloody useful for both the ISSF airgun shooters and for the Pony Club tetrathletes and for the Pentathlon people :(


  • Registered Users Posts: 588 ✭✭✭Hauk


    Cheers Sparks!! Really appreciate that!

    Hauk


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Folks, the final amendments to the Bill before the report stage have gone up on the oireachtas website here. You need to read them in conjunction with the Bill as it came from committee stage though, that's here.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,057 ✭✭✭civdef


    When they're published like that, they don't make for easy reading.

    Why they can't produce an amended docmuent with all changed portions highlighted, I don't know.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,393 ✭✭✭✭Vegeta


    civdef wrote:
    When they're published like that, they don't make for easy reading.

    Why they can't produce an amended docmuent with all changed portions highlighted, I don't know.

    I'm sure Sparks is working on that as we speak


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    From a quick reading of it;
    • "target shooting" is not defined, nor is "shooting range", nor "zeroing" or any similar term. On the other hand, all the definitions for the Acts are now moved into the Firearms Act instead of being here and in the Firearms and Offensive Weapons Act.
    • Jim O'Keefe is trying to have the firearms training certificate age raised from 14 to 16 years again, and to have the supervisor's age raised from 18 to 21
    • Aengus O'Snodaigh is trying to have the firearms training certificate made available only for target shooting (as opposed to target shooting and hunting)
    • If a training cert is refused, it'll be the commissioner who writes the explanitory letter, not the minister
    • Aengus wants the training cert to be for one year, not three. Jim O'Keefe wants it to be two years.
    • Howlin wants the Minister to have to consult "such organisations as in the Minister’s opinion are representative of persons engaged in sporting or other lawful use of firearms" before declaring a firearm as restricted.
    • The restriction of firearms on muzzle energy changed to "the muzzle energy of ammunition likely to be used by the firearm". (Howlin again)
    • From Howlin again, if the Minister declares a firearm restriced : "In making an order under subsection (1) the Minister shall have regard to the desirability of facilitating persons engaged in sporting or other lawful use of firearms."
    • Howlin also adds the following (again, regarding the Minister declaring a firearm to be restricted):"“(2) A person aggrieved by an order of the Minister under subsection (1) may give notice in a form to be prescribed by the Minister of his or her grievance and of the grounds for it, and the Minister shall consider such notice and shall make a decision on foot of the notice either to make no amendment to the order under subsection (1) or to may make such amendment to the order under subsection (1) as, in the opinion of the Minister, the circumstances warrant.
      (3) A person dissatisfied by a decision of the Minister under subsection (2) may appeal against such decision to the High Court which may give such directions to the Minister as the circumstances warrant."
    • Howlin wants the time in which we can apply for a renewal of the firearms certificate to be extended to three months before it expires, which would eliminate the overlap problem.
    • On the Minister or Commissioner adding guidelines for firearms act implementation, Howlin adds "In making an order under subsection (1) the Minister shall have regard to the desirability of facilitating persons engaged in sporting or other lawful use of firearms.”; and “(3) Guidelines under this section shall be made available by the Commissioner to
      those likely to be affected thereby.”.
    • Where a licence is for target shooting, membership of clay pigeon shooting clubs is also acceptable (instead of only rifle or pistol shooting, which would be handy for clay pigeon shooters).
    • Jim O'Keefe wants the following added to the legal prerequisites for getting a firearms licence:
      “(f) is of sound mental and psychiatric health,
      (g) has sufficient capacity to possess and operate a firearm responsibly and safely,”.
    • Over the mention of being competent in the use of a firearm before getting the licence for it, Howlin adds "or a bona fide intention to acquire competence", and “or in such other similar firearms as satisfy the issuing person that the applicant will be competent in the use of the firearm concerned”. (ie. if you have a single barrel shotgun, getting a licence for an over-and-under won't mean you have to prove you're competent with one, the experience with the single barrle will serve to prove competence).
    • The definition of who is allowed testifty to your mental health is narrowed from “a person who is a doctor, psychiatrist, dentist, optician, chemist or nurse” to “doctor or psychiatrist”.
    • Howlin adds to the section on club shooting ranges needing to meet standards: “(15) Regulations under subsection (13) insofar as they determine standards by reference to subsection (14)(vi) shall have due regard to the need for shooting ranges to be used by persons who are in the process of acquiring competency in the use of firearms.”.
    • You'll have to be resident in the state for six months before applying for a firearms licence. I'm not certain, but I think that's badly written and may well disentitle shooters coming into Ireland for matches from holding a certificate - thus meaning that they can't come in at all. The amendment is from the minister and is to section 8 (the list of those not entitled to hold a certificate) and it simply says "(f) any person not ordinarily resident in the State for a period of 6 months before applying for a firearm certificate.”. That seems far too wide to me and I don't remember if there's a specific provision in the Acts to allow for tourists to get a licence seperately from the procedure for residents.
    • If you apply for a cert, and you don't get a response inside the three months, then your application is deemed to have been denied, and the lack of response is deemed to be notification. And that overrides section 3(10) which specifically says that we're meant to be notified in writing. That's an amendment from the Minister:
      “(5) For the purposes of this section—
      (a) an issuing person—
      (i) who is required under section 3(9), 4A(7) or 10(4F) to decide on an application within a specified period, and
      (ii) who does not so decide,
      is deemed to have decided to refuse to grant the application,
      (b) the applicant is deemed to have received notice of the decision on the expiration of that period, and
      (c) as the case may be, section 3(10) does not apply in relation to the
      application.

      In other words, forget about getting written notification of not being granted the licence.
    • You can now be ordered to surrender your firearm at the local station or anywhere else the superintendent specifies.


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Guys, if emails get sent to TDs now, they may not be read before the report stage debate starts today, but they'll be seen before it starts again tomorrow, so write in again, even if you have already.


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Sent in to [url=mailto:brendan.howlin@oireachtas.ie?subject=Criminal Justice Bill 2004 Report Stage Debate]Brendan Howlin[/url] (first paragraph was thanking him for the amendments he already put forward):
    But, there is still one existing problem not dealt with, and two that have cropped up in the Ministers's amendments.

    The existing problem is that there is no definition for "target shooting" or "shooting range" in the Bill. And the Bill makes target shooting on an unauthorised shooting range a criminal offence, along with running an unauthorised shooting range, with a penalty of up to seven years in jail and a fine of up to €25,000. How can you have something defined as a criminal offence with such a huge penalty, when you don't even define the terms?

    The new problems are:

    1) You'll have to be resident in the state for six months before applying for a firearms licence. I'm not certain, but I think that's badly written and may well disentitle shooters coming into Ireland for matches from holding a certificate - thus meaning that they can't come in at all. The amendment is from the minister and adds to section 8 (the list of those not entitled to hold a certificate) and it simply says "(f) any person not ordinarily resident in the State for a period of 6 months before applying for a firearm certificate.". That seems far too wide to me and I don't remember if there's a specific provision in the Acts to allow for tourists to get a licence seperately from the procedure for residents. The amendment is number 108, on page 23 of the Report stage amendments.

    The problem here is that we do get people coming in from abroad (and a lot coming down from up north, where two of the three olympic representatives and several of the national champions we've produced in the last two decades have come from). And if I'm right, that amendment will mean that they can't get a certificate down here. It's bad enough that we don't have a free visitor's permit system (or any other form of visitor's permit system) like every other EU country (including Northern Ireland), but this would prevent anyone coming in here for a target shooting competition. And that's not just wrong, it's daft because if you're born in Northern Ireland, you can represent us in the Olympics and you can compete for the National Championship, but this would mean that you wouldn't be able to shoot in the Republic to do so and we'd be obligated to have to hold the Nationals up North every year or face lawsuits over not giving people a fair chance!

    2) If you apply for a cert, and you don't get a response inside the three months, then your application is deemed to have been denied, and the lack of response is deemed to be notification. And that overrides section 3(10) which specifically says that we're meant to be notified in writing. That's an amendment from the Minister:
    "(5) For the purposes of this section—
    (a) an issuing person—
    (i) who is required under section 3(9), 4A(7) or 10(4F) to decide on an application within a specified period, and
    (ii) who does not so decide,
    is deemed to have decided to refuse to grant the application,
    (b) the applicant is deemed to have received notice of the decision on the expiration of that period, and
    (c) as the case may be, section 3(10) does not apply in relation to the
    application.
    In other words, forget about getting written notification of not being granted the licence. The amendment is number 122 on page 25 of the Report stage amendments.

    The problem with this is that while most superintendents (as in, 170 or more of the 183 of them) are very good to shooters and never muck about - but the "problem" ones have actually broken the law in the past (and present - several are up for the high court as we speak) in trying not to grant firearms licences because they get no support from above and if anything goes wrong, it's their personal rear end in the hot seat. It's an understandable predicament, but that's no help to the 180,000 or so people who've done nothing wrong and who deserve better treatment from what is effectively a civil service - to say nothing of how it breaches the Gardai's own code of how it will serve the public!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 118 ✭✭17HMR


    Thanks Sparks. Very helpful overview.

    Still much to be addressed, not least the definitions that have been moved elsewhere. It seems odd that legislation can be put forward where a number of very key terms have yet to be defined ?

    By way of comparison, who would enter into a contract to supply "things to be used in places" without first defining what was meant by "things" and "places" ? So how can legislation be put in place that relates to competence, ranges etc without first those terms being defined and agreed upon. The term "pig in a poke" comes to mind !


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,393 ✭✭✭✭Vegeta


    17HMR wrote:
    Thanks Sparks. Very helpful overview.

    Still much to be addressed, not least the definitions that have been moved elsewhere. It seems odd that legislation can be put forward where a number of very key terms have yet to be defined ?

    By way of comparison, who would enter into a contract to supply "things to be used in places" without first defining what was meant by "things" and "places" ? So how can legislation be put in place that relates to competence, ranges etc without first those terms being defined and agreed upon. The term "pig in a poke" comes to mind !

    I agree with 17HMR here, it seems common sense has gone out the window.

    Someone needs to tap the Minister on the shoulder and go "but you've just banned people from abroad competing in Irish shooting competitions"

    That may not be Mc.Dowell's intention but then he did it by accident and shows up his unsuitability to be drafting legislation on firearms. It may be intentional, but either way the question needs to be asked.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 801 ✭✭✭jaycee


    You can now be ordered to surrender your firearm at the local station or anywhere else the superintendent specifies.

    Not alone that ...

    On page 55 section 40(5) it says that surrendered firearms may be disposed of as is deemed fit . No mention of compensation either. :eek:


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    jaycee wrote:
    Not alone that ...
    On page 55 section 40(5) it says that surrendered firearms may be disposed of as is deemed fit . No mention of compensation either. :eek:
    Is that to do with this firearms amnesty thing McDowell's been talking about or about firearms demanded to be brought in under the Act though?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 801 ✭✭✭jaycee


    Dunno ..

    It isn't clear .. but the term "surrendered firearms" jumped out at me.

    BTW..
    One of the proposals Page 23 - 113

    “, has secure storage for required material and equipment and is separate
    and distinct from living quarters”.

    —Aengus Ó Snodaigh.

    This relates to reloading .. and in practice might require building on an extension, I'm not too sure as to what the definition of separate and distinct is.


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Looked it up JC, that doesn't seem like something we need worry about, it's to do with the Amnesty the Minister is talking about. ie. He says there's an amnesty, people hand in firearms they don't want, the gardai get to dispose of them however the gardai see fit.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,057 ✭✭✭civdef


    IIRC, there is a provision that if currently licenced firearms are unable to be legally held due to provisions in the new bill, compensation may be payable.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 47 grizi


    It appears that tourists come under the Firearms (Firearm Certificates for Non-Residents) Act 2000 and here is a simple description from http://www.cybershooters.org/law.htm:
    In 1998, the Irish courts ruled that the Minister of Justice could only grant non-resident firearm certificates to people who met the same conditions as residents under the Acts - that essentially made it impossible for certificates to be issued, as there is no way the Minister can check the background of a person resident in another country.

    This led to the Firearms (Temporary Provisions) Act 1998, which authorises the Minister to issue a firearm certificate to anyone who holds a European Firearm Pass, or any other license or permit from their home country that the Minister feels is acceptable. The Act was valid for one year, while the Ministry considered permanent amendments to the Firearms Acts 1925 - 90. However, it was extended for a further year.

    It was finally repealed and replaced by the Firearms (Firearm Certificates for Non-Residents) Act 2000. This Act gave the Minister for Justice the power to grant firearm certificates to non-residents, and he may take the fact that an applicant holds a European Firearms Pass if they are resident in another EU State, or holds a license equivalent to a firearm certificate if they reside outside the EU, as evidence of suitability. However, this is not a requirement and the Minister may grant a certificate if he is satisfied the applicant is a suitable person to hold one. After two years, the power to grant certificates moved to the Garda Superintendent for the area in which the non-resident intends to reside in while in Ireland, and applications will then have to be made to the Garda. The Act also empowered the Minister for Arts, Heritage, Gaeltacht and the Islands to grant game licenses to non-residents for the "hunting and killing of animals".


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,393 ✭✭✭✭Vegeta


    but the minister then wishes to do this which kind of over writes the above "(f) any person not ordinarily resident in the State for a period of 6 months before applying for a firearm certificate.”

    We are really looking for clarification on what type of firearm certificate, a permanent one or a temp one for competition use.

    We are just being cautious as you know "assumptions are the mother of all fcuk ups" so we don't want to take any chances


  • Registered Users Posts: 47 grizi


    I would take it that this part is setting the minimum length of time before you are considered to be ordinarily resident Ireland for firearms purposes.

    For tourists and competition participants, they would be covered by the firearms for non-residents act. The apparent contradiction may be allowed for in the definition of a firearms certificate
    “firearm certificate” means a firearm certificate granted under this Act
    and, unless the context otherwise requires, includes a restricted firearm
    certificate, a firearms training certificate and a firearm certificate granted
    under the Firearms (Firearm Certificates for Non-Residents) Act 2000;

    IMHO the context requires that this specific part (f) does not apply to firearms certificates for non-residents.


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    It's fuzzy though grizi. I'd much rather have someone ask the Minister and have him say outright that that's the case, rather than arrange a match, invite people in from abroad, only to find out the hard way that our assumption was wrong.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,393 ✭✭✭✭Vegeta


    grizi wrote:
    I would take it that this part is setting the minimum length of time before you are considered to be ordinarily resident Ireland for firearms purposes.

    For tourists and competition participants, they would be covered by the firearms for non-residents act. The apparent contradiction may be allowed for in the definition of a firearms certificate



    IMHO the context requires that this specific part (f) does not apply to firearms certificates for non-residents.

    Again you're more than likely right but its better to ask the question than regret it later.


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    The live broadcast of the Dail is here. They're getting ready to start debating the CJB now.


  • Registered Users Posts: 47 grizi


    Does any satisfactory definition of a firearms/shooting range exist or could anyone suggest a suitable definition. After all, a shooting range could be just a temporary setup with a group of people firing at an object.

    The absurdity of someone being arrested for firing at a tin can is lessened because it doesn't apply to shotguns and it doesn't apply to amusement arcades etc.

    It's definitely not ideal and I'd like to suggest something better but I'm stumped...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 801 ✭✭✭jaycee


    a shooting range could be just a temporary setup with a group of people firing at an object.
    Very True.. However an "Approved Range" which has been passed and rubber stamped by a so-far undefined "Range Inspector" is another matter and is at the heart of the problem.

    Neither are there definitions of what a "Target" is , without which it's kinda difficult to decide if you are involved in "Target Shooting" in the first place.

    I would have thought that if you shoot , then the thing at which you aim is your target , be it paper , plastic , fur or feather.. Apparently a live target means you are hunting (Which is ok by law ) whereas an [SIZE=-1]Inanimate object is a "Target " type target and is not ok .
    :confused:

    All may not be lost ...
    Pehaps theres a marketing opportunity for genetically engineered bunnies who will be deaf , reluctant to move and fur which will grow concentric circles in alternating highly contrasting monotones. These living target Bunnies (T.B's) would allow us all to neatly stay on-side regarding the law, and if you felt that your scope might need adjustment , just wheel out a "TB". Chickens are another option , might I suggest the name "Shootin C"
    ... On the other hand , that might cause some confusion.
    :rolleyes:

    [/SIZE]


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,335 ✭✭✭newby.204


    grizi wrote:
    Does any satisfactory definition of a firearms/shooting range exist or could anyone suggest a suitable definition. After all, a shooting range could be just a temporary setup with a group of people firing at an object.

    The absurdity of someone being arrested for firing at a tin can is lessened because it doesn't apply to shotguns and it doesn't apply to amusement arcades etc.

    It's definitely not ideal and I'd like to suggest something better but I'm stumped...

    I claim NO credit for the below definitions got them off the links below

    With regards to the definition of a "range"

    A shooting range is a specialized facility designed for firearms practice. Each facility is typically overseen by one or more supervisory personnel, called variously a range master in the United States or a range conducting officer or "RCO" in the UK. These supervisory personnel are responsible for ensuring that all gun safety rules are followed at all times at a shooting range.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_range#Outdoor_range_activities

    With regards to the defnition of a "target"

    sports equipment consisting of an object set up for a marksman or archer to aim at

    http://www.google.ie/search?hl=en&lr=&defl=en&q=define:target&sa=X&oi=glossary_definition&ct=title

    It should be known that i am not a target shooter, never will be, but i find it absurd that Minister McDowell couldnt come up with a definition for either of the above, considering i got loads when i googled them!!!!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,843 ✭✭✭Clare gunner


    Maybe our lords & masters have never heard of Wikipedia,Google,the internet,or a plain good ol Oxford dictionary????:rolleyes: :rolleyes:


Advertisement