Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

BE strike [Read 1st post before posting]

17172747677125

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,511 ✭✭✭Heisenberg1


    Stephen15 wrote: »
    Litter pick? For God's sake how is that gonna make it more efficent for buses are buses do buses not get cleaned back at the depot any way. Also DB/BE not sure about IE afaik employ their own cleaners rather then contracting it to Filipinos on the Minimum wage.

    IE having cleaning services contracted out to ISS I think.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,548 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Stephen15 wrote: »
    Litter pick? For God's sake how is that gonna make it more efficent for buses are buses do buses not get cleaned back at the depot any way. Also DB/BE not sure about IE afaik employ their own cleaners rather then contracting it to Filipinos on the Minimum wage.

    Well that is the point isn't it, do a quick once through the bus to tidy it up between runs, rather then going back to the depot every time it needs to be cleaned. Thus costing the company more money and having to hire in replacement buses at great expense.

    This is the same reason that no BE bus has toilets, despite BE paying 400k for lots of new coaches in the past three years, while all the privates have toilets now. BE Drivers refusing to keep the toilets clean between runs.

    BE drivers feel they are too good to be doing such jobs, while in private companies it is totally normal for drivers to keep the coach clean between runs (obviously they get a deeper clean at the end of the day back in the depot).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,207 ✭✭✭trellheim


    They get to hold onto their jobs. NBRU's O'Leary complaining that Shane Ross is not at the table

    They do not see it like that; they see it as 'nothing-for-nothing' ; Unless jack O connor has taken them aside and said there's no point here lads. take the pain, then this will continue. The rhetoric going around from the Unions suggest there is nothing from outside on the table - maybe a few quid in redundancies above Statutory .....

    Has Oonagh Buckley not being active at all - normally Kieran Mulvey would have had airtime before now


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,106 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    So redundancies and a major cut back in overtime (driving time efficiency).

    Looks like a huge loss for the union, but then there was no real alternative plan that could save the company.

    Seems to me like core pay is protected? That's a win for them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,207 ✭✭✭trellheim


    An increase in core pay was on offer before this dispute started - if that was the problem we did not need the strike


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,857 ✭✭✭TheQuietFella


    Gael23 wrote: »
    Seems to me like core pay is protected? That's a win for them.

    Don't sound so bitter!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,857 ✭✭✭TheQuietFella


    So redundancies and a major cut back in overtime (driving time efficiency).

    Looks like a huge loss for the union, but then there was no real alternative plan that could save the company.

    It has been pointed out here many times and it still doesn't seem to reach the minds of people that a driver is restricted to the hours that he works!
    He cannot work in excess of 80 hours per two week period!

    Good luck to these drivers. They deserve the very best in a high pressure environment!


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,642 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    It has been pointed out here many times and it still doesn't seem to reach the minds of people that a driver is restricted to the hours that he works!
    He cannot work in excess of 80 hours per two week period!

    Good luck to these drivers. They deserve the very best in a high pressure environment!

    It looks like more of those core hours will now be spent driving, less time hanging around.

    The reduction in O/T hours should take some of the pressure off.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,106 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    What are the chances of the union voting in favour of the deal?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,534 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    It has been pointed out here many times and it still doesn't seem to reach the minds of people that a driver is restricted to the hours that he works!
    He cannot work in excess of 80 hours per two week period!

    Good luck to these drivers. They deserve the very best in a high pressure environment!

    There are a lot of people in far more "high pressure environments" I would suggest, who are not getting as well paid and conditioned as "these drivers".

    Hopefully you don't expect them to take even more pressure to satisfy the drivers demands ?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,403 ✭✭✭paulboland


    So redundancies and a major cut back in overtime (driving time efficiency).

    Looks like a huge loss for the union, but then there was no real alternative plan that could save the company.
    It's voluntary severance not redundancies there is a difference
    http://www.redundancy.ie/employee/voluntarysevere.html

    Those that do take up on the voluntary severance existing terms would apply "where people qualify for voluntary severance"

    This will suit lot of the older drivers close to retirement and it's most of these that are on the higher wages


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,642 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    paulboland wrote: »
    It's voluntary severance not redundancies there is a difference
    http://www.redundancy.ie/employee/voluntarysevere.html

    Not really much of a difference when it comes to cutting costs at BE.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,917 ✭✭✭GM228


    Graham wrote: »
    paulboland wrote: »
    It's voluntary severance not redundancies there is a difference
    http://www.redundancy.ie/employee/voluntarysevere.html
    Not really much of a difference when it comes to cutting costs at BE.

    There is a huge difference, voluntary redundancy usually costs a lot more than redundancy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,814 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    It has been pointed out here many times and it still doesn't seem to reach the minds of people that a driver is restricted to the hours that he works!
    He cannot work in excess of 80 hours per two week period!

    Good luck to these drivers. They deserve the very best in a high pressure environment!

    High pressure? You must have it soft if driving a bus seems high pressure to you..


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,904 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    GM228 wrote: »
    There is a huge difference, voluntary redundancy usually costs a lot more than redundancy.

    I was laid off from a job by mutual agreement and it pretty much was them offering a figure and me offering one and agreeing a deal. Far more than statutory. New boss wanted me gone to bring his own henchman in and I found him impossible to work with so we did a deal.

    Voluntary or mutual severance and redundancy are always more than enforced. It will be no different here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,403 ✭✭✭paulboland


    lawred2 wrote: »
    High pressure? You must have it soft if driving a bus seems high pressure to you..
    Road Safety Authority Bus Driver rules
    http://www.rsa.ie/en/RSA/Professional-Drivers/Driving-Safely/Driver-Hours/

    After a driving period of no more than 4.5 hours, a driver must take a break of at least 45 minutes.
    A full 45 minute break can be replaced by a 15 minute plus a 30 minute break, but must be distributed over the 4.5 hour period.
    The maximum daily driving limit is 9 hours (this can be increased to 10 hours twice a week).
    The maximum weekly driving limit is 56 hours.
    The maximum driving time over any two weeks is 90 hours.

    Average working hours is the same as everyone has 48 hours
    There are also rules for working time for drivers. Weekly working time must not exceed an average of 48 hours per week over a reference period. Drivers can work a maximum of 60 hours in a week, providing they don't exceed the average 48 hour limit.


    A Bus Eireann Route for example 2.15 hours driving each way giving a total of 4.3 hours round trip most drivers do 2 round trips in a shift as in around 9 hours a day + breaks and you get delays on routes due to traffic etc causing some end up doing more than 9 hours a day

    Some drivers on very long routes would only be doing one round trip a day simply because the overall driving time = 9 Hours


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,207 ✭✭✭trellheim


    And we are done for the night ; so a deal has not been done, back again tomorrow ; I would have thought this would have been settled today so the Dail or the Government could throw a few quid into the redundancy package before they rise for the Easter break.

    Someone is leaking to the media and wants to kibosh this ....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭horseburger


    devnull wrote: »
    In relation to the Sillian Tours license, this was issued prior to the Public Transport Regulation bill of 2009 and was issued in August 2004. This decision would have been taken by the then Minister for Transport which would have been Seamus Brennan or Martin Cullen, at that time there were no openly published guidelines on licensing and no license types that were made up, there were just licenses, how they were decided on was never shared with the public and never broke down, each one was pretty much decided on a case by case basis.

    As part of the Public Transport Regulation Act of 2009 it was no longer the case and routes that were identical to an existing PSO service or very similar were not approved on the basis that on PSO routes ithe incumbent who gets PSO has an exclusive contract for that route. However, exisiting licenses that were issued before then, would be renewed on a rolling basis, but new licenses would have the publicly defined criteria, enshrined in law based on the 2009 Public Transport Regulation Act, and the NTA's publicly published guidelines.

    I'm not sure you can blame the NTA on this one, what the NTA have done excellently is set a robust set of clearly published licensing guidelines and an act that underpins them, before 2009 that was not the case and the previous arrangement allowed a minister and the department to have discretion, which ultimately was tested out by Swords Express in court and found to be discriminating against them, this was one of the key factors thaht led to the creation of the 2009 Act and clearly published guidelines as opposed to the previous approach of whatever the minister felt on the day he made the decision.

    As for why Sillian don't offer as many services as Bus Eireann, pretty obvious isn't it, because they have to pay for their own vehicles and their own insurance and also their own full costs, so they will never sustain the same frequency against a competitor who has all of these paid for by the state. To even compare both operators is laughable, as per normal you are comparing a company who has free buses, insurance and huge amounts of taxpayer money (apples) with one who has none of them (oranges) and wondering why there are more apples.

    Also I don't agree that the Sillian route is identical, their route services a number of places that the 109 does not serve after Navan, so it's not like the route is exactly the same.

    I never said the route was the same, nor did I suggest that the Sillan Tours service, and the 109 service were identical. I also stated that Sillan Tours serve towns beyond Navan and locations and within Navan that are not served on the 109 and 107 Bus Éireann routes, which indicates that I never suggested that they ran an identical service to the Bus Éireann services, to which I referred.

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=103166639&postcount=2157

    I asked, considering that Sillan Tours also serve Navan and Dunshaughlin, what has stopped them from running later services to and from Dublin.

    I asked you this because it seems that the argument you used before - about Bus Éireann having a monopoly on particular routes, and no other operator being permitted to run identical services covering the same towns - seemingly doesn't apply in this case, I guess, because the route is not identical.

    I asked, if the NTA would be receptive to the idea of a company like Sillan Tours operating later services, or more services to and from Dublin throughout the day, on the basis that Sillan also serves Shercock and Cootehill, which are not served on the 109 route.

    I asked that with reference to the services by other private coaches like Collins Coaches and Matthews Coaches, who run services from Dublin, later in the evening than Sillan Tours, and who also run more frequent services to and from Carrickmacross and Dublin, and Dundalk and Dublin, throughout the day.

    I also didn't blame the NTA for anything. Nor did I refer to the NTA in an accusing or negative manner.

    I asked you, if you thought the NTA would be responsive, if Sillan Tours ever did make an application to run later services to and from Dublin, or more regular services to and from Dublin during the day.

    I appreciate the reasons you have given as to why a private company might not make such and application, but do you think the NTA would respond positively to such and application?

    I understand that they would be more likely to get approval from the NTA, for such a proposal, on the basis that they don't run an identical service to the Bus Éireann services.

    You cannot be serious, in interpreting my questions, as blaming the NTA, for anything, or of criticizing private coach operators, or of comparing them negatively against Bus Éireann.

    If anything, my questions about a possibility of Sillan Tours running more services, could just as easily be interpreted, as speaking of this private coach company, in a positive light.

    If I was being negative about Sillan Tours, I wouldn't entertain the idea, on a public discussion forum, that it might increase its services. If it ever did, it would suit people who take Sillan or Bus Éireann, but live beyond Navan or Kells, in Cavan, but not in the Virginia or Cavan Town area.

    It's just that there is an uncertainty about how private companies would operate routes, in a scenario where Bus Éireann was wound down and Bus Éireann routes taken over by other coach companies. A number of posters, on this forum who suggest that Bus Éireann be wound down, cannot say with any certainty, if private operators would show an interest in running many of services that are currently operated by Bus Éireann.

    Other companies deciding against operating particular services, that are currently operated by Bus Éireann, to me, is a very concerning, possible knock on effect, of winding down Bus Éireann.

    I know I have stated this before, but, in my defence, this issue was highlighted in one of the Oireachtas Joint Committee meetings, between various public representatives, and the NTA, on 22nd February.

    http://www.oireachtas.ie/viewdoc.asp?DocID=34662&&CatID=127


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,642 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    paulboland wrote: »

    I'm not sure following the road safety rules constitutes high pressure.

    If you're suggesting overtime is a high-pressure road-safety risk you must be pleased with any result that reduces overtime for the drivers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,045 ✭✭✭PeadarCo


    I asked, considering that Sillan Tours also serve Navan and Dunshaughlin, what has stopped them from running later services to and from Dublin.

    What stops them is that they are a private company and must make money to keep the lights on. If the demand isn't there for a particular service they won't run services.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,403 ✭✭✭paulboland


    Graham wrote: »
    I'm not sure following the road safety rules constitutes high pressure.

    If you're suggesting overtime is a high-pressure road-safety risk you must be pleased with any result that reduces overtime for the drivers.

    What you on about I'm not saying anything about a bus driver overtime been reduced.

    It's the opposite in fact overtime is part of the shift due to no fault of a driver it's simply down to traffic delays most times same if you was driving yourself you would get delayed which would increase your driving time to your location.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,642 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    paulboland wrote: »
    It's the opposite in fact overtime is part of the shift due to no fault of a driver it's simply down to traffic delays most times same if you was driving yourself you would get delayed which would increase your driving time to your location.

    The same traffic the private operators manage to work with no?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,106 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    It sounds like they are near a conclusion so I don't know why they couldn't just keep going until its finished and have buses back on the road tomorrow.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,595 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    paulboland wrote: »
    What you on about I'm not saying anything about a bus driver overtime been reduced.

    It's the opposite in fact overtime is part of the shift due to no fault of a driver it's simply down to traffic delays most times same if you was driving yourself you would get delayed which would increase your driving time to your location.

    If a driver needs to do a 9 hour shift he should do a 9 hour shift.

    He can do four 9 hour shifts in a week and then on a 5th day he can cover an other route for four hours (assuming 40 hour week before o/t) or be a reserve driver in case of an incident where an extra driver is needed. No over time needed unless he is needed as a reserve driver.

    At the momentime a bus driver will do give nine hours shifts and might run his route 5 times even if it's a 4 hour route.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,683 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    So redundancies and a major cut back in overtime (driving time efficiency).

    Looks like a huge loss for the union, but then there was no real alternative plan that could save the company.

    It has been pointed out here many times and it still doesn't seem to reach the minds of people that a driver is restricted to the hours that he works!
    He cannot work in excess of 80 hours per two week period!

    Good luck to these drivers. They deserve the very best in a high pressure environment!

    This is incorrect it is 90 hours over two weeks. This is driving time not hours logged as working hours. BE's point was the average driver was only clocking a 5.5 hour driving in a day and that is with 1.5 hours OT included. Some here are equating hours at work with tachograph hours. There are completely different.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,403 ✭✭✭paulboland


    Graham wrote: »
    The same traffic the private operators manage to work with no?
    A to B
    Timetable has Bus Depart time and Arrival time

    Example timetable says the journey takes 2.15 hours each way giving you a total time of 4.3 hours to do that run

    Bus drivers get delays on routes due to lots of traffic reasons delays some can be minor some can be a pain in the ass

    Did you ever consider as to why the bus at times is late arriving at a bus stop as in 10 min or half and hour or 40 min late.

    You can get heavy traffic in Dublin and other causes like breakdowns to cause traffic delays.

    When no delays a bus will arrive and depart on time but in the real world that always don't happen


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,403 ✭✭✭paulboland


    If a driver needs to do a 9 hour shift he should do a 9 hour shift.

    He can do four 9 hour shifts in a week and then on a 5th day he can cover an other route for four hours (assuming 40 hour week before o/t) or be a reserve driver in case of an incident where an extra driver is needed. No over time needed unless he is needed as a reserve driver.

    At the momentime a bus driver will do give nine hours shifts and might run his route 5 times even if it's a 4 hour route.
    Driving time is only part of a shift they do other work in a shift beside driving so very often it's more than 9 hours

    Working time is start of shift to end of shift


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭horseburger


    PeadarCo wrote: »
    What stops them is that they are a private company and must make money to keep the lights on. If the demand isn't there for a particular service they won't run services.

    That kind of endorses the concern I have.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,681 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Stephen15 wrote: »
    Litter pick? For God's sake how is that gonna make it more efficent for buses are buses do buses not get cleaned back at the depot any way. Also DB/BE not sure about IE afaik employ their own cleaners rather then contracting it to Filipinos on the Minimum wage.

    Customer perception is important in retaining customers when there's competition. Buses full of rubbish due to not being cleaned on a turn looks bad and stops people coming back.
    That kind of endorses the concern I have.

    What concern? BE have cut Expressway services when service levels have dropped in the past (Route 2 for one major one).

    PSO routes will have timetables, service patterns etc decided by the NTA and will not be adjustable by the operator.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,670 ✭✭✭Peppa Pig


    paulboland wrote: »
    Driving time is only part of a shift they do other work in a shift beside driving so very often it's more than 9 hours
    How often is "very often"?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement