Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

M6 - Galway City Ring Road [planning decision pending]

1…2324262829…102

Comments

  • #1252
    2rkehij30qtza5
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,476 ✭✭✭2rkehij30qtza5


    serfboard wrote: »
    The green route is the one that will be chosen after this charade of a "public consultation" is out of the way.

    The blue route is considered to be much more favourable. Of course all of this could change and the green route could be selected. But my money is FIRMLY 100% on the blue route.


  • #1253
    what_traffic
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,002 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    antoobrien wrote: »
    You're proposing something and one of the grounds of justification is that it's cheap. The relevance is clear to pretty much everyone else here.
    Yes would be very very cheap. Would get rid of all the car traffic either side of the Salmon Weir Bridge.
    Now how much is this bypass to going to cost again?


  • #1254
    Sniipe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,932 ✭✭✭Sniipe


    It has to be yellow, blue or green in my eyes. Can you imagine orange (does it rip through tirellan and NUI?) or red!!
    Does yellow go through parts of Carraig Bán and Scellig Ard?
    Blue or yellow would be nice for me. Green would be nice for people further out of Galway which I think would be most suitable.


  • #1255
    Zzippy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,166 ✭✭✭✭Zzippy


    Kieran Yummy Market wrote: »
    The blue route is considered to be much more favourable. Of course all of this could change and the green route could be selected. But my money is FIRMLY 100% on the blue route.

    By whom?


  • #1256
    what_traffic
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,002 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    Is there a table with number of houses/businesses that need to be knocked per route corridor?


  • #1257
    dubhthach
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,284 ✭✭✭dubhthach


    Sniipe wrote: »
    It has to be yellow, blue or green in my eyes. Can you imagine orange (does it rip through tirellan and NUI?) or red!!
    Does yellow go through parts of Carraig Bán and Scellig Ard?
    Blue or yellow would be nice for me. Green would be nice for people further out of Galway which I think would be most suitable.

    Basic map of routes mapped onto OS map from poll site run by the "Connacht Turbine"

    79d99b3b5246a52553791af38a18c614-54ca0c51686cb.jpg


  • #1258
    dubhthach
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,284 ✭✭✭dubhthach


    If you ask me Blue particularly given it's N59 linkroad would promote commuter traffic from Knocknatallaght, though it would be interesting to see a proper map with proposed junctions on each route. That and it's terminus point in the uncompleted "Bearna Bypass".


  • #1259
    2rkehij30qtza5
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,476 ✭✭✭2rkehij30qtza5


    what_traffic wrote: »
    Is there a table with number of houses/businesses that need to be knocked per route corridor?

    Approximately 30 houses knocked on blue route, which is significantly less than the green route, which has over 100 houses on the proposed alignment. This figure doesn't include houses which will be affected (boundaries affected etc.). ask any of the engineers at the public consultation-they won't have a table to give you though. The red route and orange routes won't go ahead based on cost more than anything else. Cut and cover tunnelling would absolutely not be a feasible option when you have alternatives!

    What you have to remember is that there are corridor lines and until design is complete you won't know where exactly the road goes within the corridor.


  • #1260
    Pete_Cavan
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    It seems they are looking for a "silver bullet" solution which will solve all the problems with one fowl swoop but not considering the reality that funding for this solution will be difficult to obtain given the huge costs involved. All the road options look like €X00,000,000 projects and it will be a long time before that level of funding becomes available. This project is behind the M20, N7 widening and several competing Dublin transport projects so it will be a long time before substantial money for a project like this is made available.

    They would be better looking at cheaper projects which have a realistic chance of getting funding in the next 5-10 years. Incremental improvements which all feed into an overall plan is far more realistic. A new bridge from Terryland to a point above Corrib Village would help take pressure off the QCB, a link from Bothar na dTreabh could ease things a bit and of course an overhaul of public transport with reallocate roadspace and greater priority. Not a. blunt as the options being considered but a lot more likely to happen.

    West of the city obviously needs a new road but I don't understand why changes with each option given they all come to roughly the same location. I mean why does the green route bypass Barna but not the red one? Is there an option to terminate the green route east of Barna? I would have thought that the best solution for west of the city should be chosen on its own merits give the road network here needs to be redesigned, although planned in conjunction with the future wider road network.


  • Advertisement
  • #1261
    Sniipe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,932 ✭✭✭Sniipe


    dubhthach wrote: »
    Basic map of routes mapped onto OS map from poll site run by the "Connacht Turbine"

    [NOT_IMG]https://i0.wp.com/files.polldad...b.jpg[/NOT_IMG]
    I think you posted the wrong link... I found this one
    https://polldaddy.com/poll/8617926/
    It seems Blue(42%) is winning followed by green(28%) at the moment


  • #1262
    dubhthach
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,284 ✭✭✭dubhthach


    Sniipe wrote: »
    I think you posted the wrong link... I found this one
    https://polldaddy.com/poll/8617926/
    It seems Blue(42%) is winning followed by green(28%) at the moment

    No I wasn't interested in the poll but the actual map, as it uses the Ordance Survey map it's lot more better then the route maps provided on the N6 site.


  • #1263
    dubhthach
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,284 ✭✭✭dubhthach


    For example:

    2216cf598596e52c54f2a3da37ba7441-54ca0c6d8841f.jpg


  • #1264
    Chris_5339762
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    Pete_Cavan wrote: »
    This project is behind the M20, N7 widening and several competing Dublin transport projects so it will be a long time before substantial money for a project like this is made available.

    When Leo was in charge of Transport he said the Galway bypass scored highest in all the cost benefit analysis of any scheme in the country. I think if this got the go-ahead it would be started fare more quickly than we're used to seeing.


  • #1265
    Pete_Cavan
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Chris_5339762 wrote: »
    When Leo was in charge of Transport he said the Galway bypass scored highest in all the cost benefit analysis of any scheme in the country. I think if this got the go-ahead it would be started fare more quickly than we're used to seeing.
    Do you have a link for that?

    I any case, that scheme is dead so its cba is irrelevant. Whatever scheme is chosen from this process will need a new business case and, regardless of how favourable or not that business case is, funding may have already been committed to other projects before that business case is even prepared. This process seems set up for 20 years of planning and technical reviews and value engineering and whatever else can keep it on the long finger (Irish governments are very good at that) with nothing being done.


  • #1266
    Limerick74
    Registered Users Posts: 469 ✭✭Limerick74


    dubhthach wrote: »
    No I wasn't interested in the poll but the actual map, as it uses the Ordance Survey map it's lot more better then the route maps provided on the N6 site.

    The OS map was also from the N6 project web site. They have both types available for download.


  • Advertisement
  • #1267
    2rkehij30qtza5
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,476 ✭✭✭2rkehij30qtza5


    Pete_Cavan wrote: »
    It seems they are looking for a "silver bullet" solution which will solve all the problems with one fowl swoop but not considering the reality that funding for this solution will be difficult to obtain given the huge costs involved. All the road options look like €X00,000,000 projects and it will be a long time before that level of funding becomes available. This project is behind the M20, N7 widening and several competing Dublin transport projects so it will be a long time before substantial money for a project like this is made available..


    Funding is available for this project.


  • #1268
    antoobrien
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    what_traffic wrote: »
    Yes would be very very cheap. Would get rid of all the car traffic either side of the Salmon Weir Bridge.


    That doesn't make it a good idea.


  • #1269
    antoobrien
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    Pete_Cavan wrote: »
    Do you have a link for that?

    From a dail debate
    I am happy to reiterate the Government's commitment to the Galway city outer bypass, which has a benefit-to-cost ratio, BCR, of 6:1. Of all of the projects on the books, this one has the highest BCR. It makes a great deal of sense. Anyone who knows Galway knows that this project needs to be progressed once we overcome the planning permission issues.
    Pete_Cavan wrote: »
    I any case, that scheme is dead so its cba is irrelevant.

    The CBA is not irrelevant because the estimated costs of the old project were largely known, the benefits won't have gone down much.


  • #1270
    Iwannahurl
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    ballinadog wrote: »
    (A) little or no change
    (B) little or no change to the amount of people commuting by car, however they won't now all be in the city on roads not fit to carry them but out on new rd
    (C) little or no change however there would be greater potential to make adjustments to the current infrastructure which would aid this modal shift, which there is currently zero potential for at the mo


    What's the evidence for "little or no change"?

    And why would Galway be any different from, say, Waterford, where car commuting increased 2006-2011 in a post-bypass situation?

    264686.jpg


  • #1271
    Iwannahurl
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    Some interesting (and amusing) bypass-related quotes in today's Galway Independent.
    Cllr Pearce Flannery wrote:
    "Galway is a habitat."
    Cllr Frank Fahy wrote:
    You're destroying communities. There's no use in having bog cotton and butterflies if there's no-one there to protect them."
    A variation of the original route, he B]Cllr John Walsh[/B said, would avoid the destruction of the racecourse, the destruction of Menlo Village and the destruction of the state of the art Kingfisher Gym.
    Galway City Council Director of Services for Planning & Transportation wrote:
    People in Knocknacarra are not going to go out by Moycullen. It [a bypass] has to be close enough to the city to attract people to it.

    Emphasis added by me.

    Regarding that last quote: attract what people? What has a "bypass" to do with "people in Knocknacarra"?


  • Advertisement
  • #1272
    yer man!
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,653 ✭✭✭yer man!


    Iwannahurl wrote: »
    What's the evidence for "little or no change"?

    And why would Galway be any different from, say, Waterford, where car commuting increased 2006-2011 in a post-bypass situation?

    264686.jpg

    I'm living in Waterford for work at the minute and that bypass is a god send. Yeah more people use cars now but that's because its so convenient and doesn't really add to any of the congestion in the city as the factories are all on the periphery. I can get from one side of the city to the other in about 10 minutes at any time of day. Going through the city will take at least 20-30 minutes.


  • #1273
    spacetweek
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,145 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    The Work figures in that don't really show an increase in driving, just less of every other kind of trip due to the economic crisis. We'd need to look at 2015-2020 data to get a better picture of trends.


  • #1274
    L1011
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,551 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Using Waterford figures - as one of the places worst hit by mass job losses in the country, particularly those in the city which were public transport accesible - is incredibly selective for spurious reasons.


  • #1275
    Iwannahurl
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    spacetweek wrote: »
    The Work figures in that don't really show an increase in driving, just less of every other kind of trip due to the economic crisis. We'd need to look at 2015-2020 data to get a better picture of trends.


    Are we looking at the same figures?

    The table shows modal split, pre and post bypass.

    Work trips by car drivers up six percentage points (64% versus 58%).

    Car travel to primary, second and third level education also up.

    The number of secondary students cycling to school dropped from 46 to 20, in a city with a population of c. 47,000 souls.

    On the bright side, in 2011 there were all of 89 students cycling to college, ten more than in 2006.

    yer man! wrote: »
    I'm living in Waterford for work at the minute and that bypass is a god send. Yeah more people use cars now but that's because its so convenient and doesn't really add to any of the congestion in the city as the factories are all on the periphery. I can get from one side of the city to the other in about 10 minutes at any time of day. Going through the city will take at least 20-30 minutes.

    It is you who say it: "more people use cars now".

    L1011 wrote: »
    Using Waterford figures - as one of the places worst hit by mass job losses in the country, particularly those in the city which were public transport accesible - is incredibly selective for spurious reasons.

    Nothing selective about it at all, incredibly or otherwise. Modal share is what it is. As yer man says, "more people use cars now" even though Waterford is "one of the places worst hit by mass job losses".


  • #1276
    Fozzie Bear
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭Fozzie Bear


    Kieran Yummy Market wrote: »
    The blue route is considered to be much more favourable. Of course all of this could change and the green route could be selected. But my money is FIRMLY 100% on the blue route.

    Ya I'd be of the same opinion after going into the Menlo Hotel last night to look it over and talk to some of the engineers there. The green route requires the demolition of 100 odd houses which I was surprised by. I can't see it being a runner for that fact alone with an election coming up in the next 12/18 months. From looking at it last night the blue route looked like the most likely to my eyes.

    Having said that I was scoffing at the red route until one of the engineers reckoned it actually made a lot of sense from an engineering point of view despite the fact 120+ houses would go. It would be one of the easiest for connections/junctions etc. He was firmly on the fence though about his favourite route or which was most likely to be selected.

    He was also saying he had worked on road and rail projects all over Europe and he and his colleagues had never come across such a difficult and challenging project as this before. There would be normally a pretty obvious preferred/best route to take but not so with Galway.


  • #1277
    antoobrien
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    Iwannahurl wrote: »
    Are we looking at the same figures?

    The table shows modal split, pre and post bypass.

    Work trips by car drivers up six percentage points (64% versus 58%).

    According to table CD010 from the 2011 Census, the numbers of people driving to work in Waterford has actually gone down to 1,378 (you are claiming a rise to 11,811). So any % rise is more than likely down to the 2,609 Job losses among Waterford city residents (table CD303).


  • #1278
    what_traffic
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,002 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    Fozzie Bear wrote: »
    He was also saying he had worked on road and rail projects all over Europe and he and his colleagues had never come across such a difficult and challenging project as this before.

    Find this very hard to believe.
    Galway is only a city of 75K people. They are just making it difficult for themselves so they can justify the 100's of millions it is going to cost.
    European Transport planners in this day and age would not be approaching the problem the way the Irish Road's Engineers are approaching it.


  • #1279
    dubhthach
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,284 ✭✭✭dubhthach


    Iwannahurl wrote: »
    What's the evidence for "little or no change"?

    And why would Galway be any different from, say, Waterford, where car commuting increased 2006-2011 in a post-bypass situation?

    264686.jpg

    The total increase was from 18,793 (car drivers + passengers) to 19,664 which is an increase of 4.63%.

    If you look at drivers alone (which should be a good proxy for cars), we see an increase of 2.88% in the presumed number of cars on Waterford streets, given that the population of Waterford city increased by 2.1% during the period if anything the increase over 5 years is fairly negligible in terms of total population. One thing you fail to mention is that the bridge in Waterford is tolled, if anything this would reduce the amount of commuter traffic crossing the Suir here.

    What's evident is the major increase is in people using car to get to third level, this is probably due to combination of increased student body in WIT as well as availability of more parking on campus. The number of drivers going to work by car only increased by 17 in 5 years! The effect of recession is evident in figures for all sections of commuters.


  • #1280
    Iwannahurl
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    dubhthach wrote: »
    The effect of recession is evident in figures for all sections of commuters.

    The core issue is modal share. Quite clearly the trend was (and probably still is) towards increasing car use -- in a bypassed city (small town really, by EU standards).

    The recession didn't stop that trend, and neither did the bypass. In fact I would argue that, recession or not, the bypass contributed to it, for obvious reasons.

    what_traffic wrote: »
    European Transport planners in this day and age would not be approaching the problem the way the Irish Road's Engineers are approaching it.

    Ireland is more like the UK and US.

    On RTE 1 News last night Economics Correspondence Sean Whelan claimed, if I recall correctly, that car sales in January were back to pre-recession levels.

    In Ireland, second in the EU28 Car Commuting league, that is seen as A Good Thing.

    Make no mistake about it, the main pressure for the Galway "bypass" is coming from car commuters, and it's not because they're so totally dying to switch to public transport as soon as a shiny new road opens.


  • #1281
    antoobrien
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    Iwannahurl wrote: »
    On RTE 1 News last night Economics Correspondence Sean Whelan claimed, if I recall correctly, that car sales in January were back to pre-recession levels.

    In Ireland, second in the EU28 Car Commuting league, that is seen as A Good Thing.

    It depends on what way one looks at it. Of course for people of a certain mindset, any increase in car sales is a very very bad thing, however there's a lot more to consider.

    The stark fact is that new car sales were at abnormally low levels for the past few years, so any reversion to norms will look massive.

    Also it's worth pointing out that the average age of cars is levelling off. This means that cars are being taken out of circulation in favour of newer ones.
    Iwannahurl wrote: »
    Make no mistake about it, the main pressure for the Galway "bypass" is coming from car commuters, and it's not because they're so totally dying to switch to public transport as soon as a shiny new road opens.

    Conspiracy theories is over here


  • Advertisement
  • #1282
    Iwannahurl
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    antoobrien wrote: »
    It depends on what way one looks at it. Of course for people of a certain mindset, any increase in car sales is a very very bad thing, however there's a lot more to consider.

    There is indeed.


  • #1283
    what_traffic
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,002 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    Iwannahurl wrote: »
    Ireland is more like the UK and US.

    On RTE 1 News last night Economics Correspondence Sean Whelan claimed, if I recall correctly, that car sales in January were back to pre-recession levels.

    In Ireland, second in the EU28 Car Commuting league, that is seen as A Good Thing.
    True plus we don't actually manufacture them here either. Huge amounts of money flowing out of the country. Very few job's are created by this spend bar on the retail side.
    Any number's available for Limerick City since the Shannon Tunnel was built?


  • #1284
    antoobrien
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    Iwannahurl wrote: »
    There is indeed.

    Well then the increase in car sales is a very good thing because the newer cars mean lower emissions.


  • #1285
    what_traffic
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,002 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    So what is the next stage after the so called public consultation? What is the next timeline?


  • #1286
    Iwannahurl
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    antoobrien wrote: »
    Well then the increase in car sales is a very good thing because the newer cars mean lower emissions.

    Not really.

    The arguments for the bypass now seems to be: (a) the bypass is a good thing because it will not lead to increased car use and may even lead to less car use, (b) even if the bypass leads to increased car use that is a good thing because they will be new cars with lower emissions.

    The fallacies are multiplying.

    Somehow it reminds me of this little gem that appeared in the Irish Times Weekend magazine on 10th January:
    Index -- What's Hot: Cheap petrol. And it's going to get cheaper. Time to plan some big drives.


  • #1287
    antoobrien
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    Iwannahurl wrote: »
    Not really.

    Wanna post something that is not behind a paywall/registration.
    Iwannahurl wrote: »
    The arguments for the bypass now seems to be: (a) the bypass is a good thing because it will not lead to increased car use and may even lead to less car use, (b) even if the bypass leads to increased car use that is a good thing because they will be new cars with lower emissions.

    The fallacies are multiplying.

    It must take some tinfoil hat to read that into what's being posted.


  • #1288
    dubhthach
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,284 ✭✭✭dubhthach


    Iwannahurl wrote: »
    The core issue is modal share. Quite clearly the trend was (and probably still is) towards increasing car use -- in a bypassed city (small town really, by EU standards).

    Given that the bypass is tolled you haven't shown how it's increased car usage in Waterford. Waterford city and environs had an unemployment rate of 12.6% in 2006 but by 2011 it had nearly doubled to 24.6%

    One could thus argue that the reason for large decline in walking to work (23.5%) and massive decline in usage of bus to work (35.6%) is due to this spike in unemployment. As a result the share of "car drivers" increased in total (smaller pool) let even then the increase of commuters driving was on order of 0.1% over 5 years, given population increase of 2.1% between the two census this would imply that in real terms driving to work declined (reflective of near doubling of unemployment).


  • #1289
    Iwannahurl
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    antoobrien wrote: »
    It must take some tinfoil hat to read that into what's being posted.

    Considering the totality of what has been posted on this general subject, the vast majority of which assumes by implication that a "bypass" is the first and perhaps the only solution to Galway's human-made traffic congestion, it would take a brass neck of an exceptional lustre to claim that this proposed new road is intended as anything other than a bonanza for car commuters, aka payback time:
    antoobrien wrote: »
    In a nutshell motorists through various taxes levies and duties in 2010 paid an extra €4 billion in taxes into the exchequer. that figure as a contributer is second only to income tax receipts (€11.5 B). The take from motor tax alone is €950m but the road maintenance (not to be confused with capital improvements, such as building roads or this insanity project), which is paid directly to the councils - not central government or the NRA - is about half that.

    Can I have my bypass now please?

    Even in the wider context of IROPI, the project sponsors and supporters can't muster the enthusiasm to at least pretend that the "bypass" is more than just a classic supply-side boost for car commuters. The organisers of the "consultation" process didn't even bother to propose anything of substance under the heading of alternative solutions, and senior officials in local government are pretty clear about what they want:
    Galway City Council Director of Services for Planning & Transportation wrote:
    People in Knocknacarra are not going to go out by Moycullen. It has to be close enough to the city to attract people to it.

    Nothing revelatory about that, of course, because it's precisely what "bypass" enthusiasts have been saying for years:
    ?Cee?view wrote: »
    Ever hear of Kingston Road, Bishop O'Donnell Road, Knocknacarra, Barna, Spiddal, Cois Fharraige? All of these need the bypass now.


  • #1290
    Iwannahurl
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    dubhthach wrote: »
    Given that the bypass is tolled you haven't shown how it's increased car usage in Waterford. Waterford city and environs had an unemployment rate of 12.6% in 2006 but by 2011 it had nearly doubled to 24.6%

    One could thus argue that the reason for large decline in walking to work (23.5%) and massive decline in usage of bus to work (35.6%) is due to this spike in unemployment. As a result the share of "car drivers" increased in total (smaller pool) let even then the increase of commuters driving was on order of 0.1% over 5 years, given population increase of 2.1% between the two census this would imply that in real terms driving to work declined (reflective of near doubling of unemployment).

    We seem to be at cross-purposes here. The issue is modal split, which clearly moved towards a greater share for cars in Waterford between 2006 and 2011. There is absolutely no value in labouring the point further.

    In any case, the Census stats may well be out of date. That was four years ago, and economic circumstances have changed.

    We had another car sales puff piece on RTE's Drivetime this evening, with Brian Lally chatting to happy motorists with money credit available for new vehicles ("that Qashqai is a lovely yoke", sez Brian).

    I'm willing to bet that from 2011 to date the trend in Waterford, and in other "bypassed" towns and cities, has not been towards increased modal share for public transport, walking and cycling. I'm open to correction on that, but I'd be surprised if it was otherwise.

    The basic point, in the context of this thread, is that Irish "bypasses" are in reality not intended as anything other than supply-side measures for motorists.


  • Advertisement
  • #1291
    dubhthach
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,284 ✭✭✭dubhthach


    Two data points do not make a trend, again you are ignoring the fact that over 5 years that the average number of new car-driver commuters grew by 3.4 drivers per year. The cause of modal shift doesn't appear to be the bypass (which as a Type 1 DC has high capacity) it's due to doubling of unemployment in Waterford, resulting in collapse of number of users commuting via other ways (walking/bus). Given that the current unemployment rate in Waterford in 18% (over 7% higher then national average -- 50% higher then 2006) I can't imagine that walking/bus commuter levels have recovered.

    Tbh the only thing I'm seeing is soap-boxing and blatant attempts to derail a thread.


  • #1292
    Aard
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭Aard


    I think that it's fairly safe to say that whether or not there's an extensive public transport element there'll still be a road of some sort of road built. As such, while it is important to discuss things like roadspace allocation, it is also important to discuss what the best route for the (inevitable?) road should be. I've already laid out my arguments for the Red route. My biggest fear for Galway would be that an orbital high-capacity road will encourage (or worse -- facilitate) residential and economic decentralisation in the city. In the long term, this will increase average journey times and distances, which does not bode well for sustainable transport modes. As such it is vitally important that the road be built in a way that mitigates the facilititation of residential and economic decentralisation (aka suburban sprawl). In my opinion the Green route would be the worst of the lot for this. But going by previous bypass roads in Ireland, it appears that engineers prefer the routes that are farthest from town, a pattern that has not always yielded the best results in terms of discouraging sprawl.


  • #1293
    yer man!
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,653 ✭✭✭yer man!


    Iwannahurl wrote: »


    It is you who say it: "more people use cars now".

    Nothing selective about it at all, incredibly or otherwise. Modal share is what it is. As yer man says, "more people use cars now" even though Waterford is "one of the places worst hit by mass job losses".

    This city had one bridge up until recently and no ring road, using a car would get you nowhere at certain periods in the day. Ever since the ring road was put in and the second bridge built, the traffic that didn't need to come into the city to cross the Suir was removed. This really makes a big difference and it's blatantly obvious. Public transport doesn't really work too well here, the population just isn't big enough to allow for an extensive, efficient and cheap system. It is very much centered around the car and that isn't going to change, and I don't really see much of a problem with that to be honest. The city is actually quite like Galway (only in reverse), most housing is on the east side and the industry is on the west side. The difference is that it takes the same amount of time to make it from one side to the other regardless of the the time of day.


  • #1294
    Iwannahurl
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    Aard wrote: »
    But going by previous bypass roads in Ireland, it appears that engineers prefer the routes that are farthest from town, a pattern that has not always yielded the best results in terms of discouraging sprawl.


    I don't believe it's possible, or appropriate, to discuss an issue like that entirely in isolation, but it's a very interesting one to explore all the same.


  • #1295
    Aard
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭Aard


    ^Not sure what you're trying to say there. What's not "appropriate" about what I said?


  • #1296
    dubhthach
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,284 ✭✭✭dubhthach


    antoobrien wrote: »
    I was told yesterday by one of the project engineers that there would be a parallel bridge. Now I wish I'd taken a photo of it because it was clearly a second bridge.

    North or south of the QCB? North and they run into Terryland Castle, south there's still some remains of Terryland House, so they'd have to cut into the Terryland Forest Park.

    Either way they would have to demolish part of the university for it to work (gym south of the bridge, or Science and Engineering Technology building/incubator units north of the bridge), unless of course they want to run it cheek-by-jowl with Engineering building/Nursing building (Áras Moyola).

    Either way I can imagine the red route would lead to an "Expressway revolt" given that it cuts through urban fabric.


  • Advertisement
  • #1297
    dloob
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,831 ✭✭✭dloob


    I like the Orange route because it has a long tunnel and tunnels are cooler than bridges.
    Hey it's as good a reason as any for picking it.


  • #1298
    Iwannahurl
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    Aard wrote: »
    ^Not sure what you're trying to say there. What's not "appropriate" about what I said?


    Nothing! Lest there be any misunderstanding, I was not criticising your remarks. :)

    It's just that I suspect the situation you observe (that engineers prefer the routes that are farthest from town) is a ramified one, and potentially in can-of-worms territory. I'd love to explore it in more detail, but perhaps not in this thread or forum...


  • #1299
    what_traffic
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,002 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    Aard wrote: »
    I think that it's fairly safe to say that whether or not there's an extensive public transport element there'll still be a road of some sort of road built. As such, while it is important to discuss things like roadspace allocation, it is also important to discuss what the best route for the (inevitable?) road should be.

    Interesting point but that is bad planning in my opinion and that's one reason why I have a big problem with the plans that have been laid out. Public transport is out on it's own. That is a nonsense. It should be an integrated element into all plans. No exploration of P&R?


  • #1300
    antoobrien
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    dubhthach wrote: »
    North or south of the QCB? North and they run into Terryland Castle, south there's still some remains of Terryland House, so they'd have to cut into the Terryland Forest Park.

    Either way they would have to demolish part of the university for it to work (gym south of the bridge, or Science and Engineering Technology building/incubator units north of the bridge), unless of course they want to run it cheek-by-jowl with Engineering building/Nursing building (Áras Moyola).

    It'd have to be south due to the proximity of Terryland Castle the the existing road and this seems to be confirmed in the Galway independent yesterday in that one of the city councillors stated that the Kingfisher is in line for demolition should the red route be selected.

    edit: link to the article: http://galwayindependent.com/20150204/news/rocky-road-ahead-S50450.html


  • #1301
    antoobrien
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    Iwannahurl wrote: »
    Considering the totality of what has been posted on this general subject

    tinfoil hat territory again.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement