Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

IVCA race canceled this Sunday

Options
168101112

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,831 ✭✭✭ROK ON


    lennymc wrote: »
    Playing devils advocate - from a legal perspective, I would have thought being behind a race where there may be multiple breaches of the ROTR would be very different from being behind a sportif, where there are (in theory) a lot less breaches of ROTR. Sportifs could be considered slow moving traffic, and it is up to the traffic behind to overtake safely and legally. The fact that the drivers behind suffer an inconvenience wouldn't have any standing in law as far as I can tell. Besides, the main cause of concern for the authorities seems to be the breaches of ROTR rather than driver inconvenience.

    I think it is inevitable that racing as we know it will change, but really hope it will change for the better.
    True - but I have been caught behind a sportif with several hundred participants spread out over 20km all going slowly in very narrow roads.
    With a races the bunches are smaller than average sportif and the pass relatively briskly.

    In my own experience from living in a place that sees a lot of sportifs, some road races (Ras Mumhan and the Ras every few years), several triathlons. If you are caught behind a sportif you are better off stopping and turning around the races pass quickly. If CI could get evidence of this it might help in building some acceptance if racing. Show that the inconvenience (when RoTR is followed with respect to incoming traffic) is actually pretty minor all things considered. I don't get much of an opportunity to race or do sportifs any more. I would prefer a race to pass my road than a sportif.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,868 ✭✭✭De Bhál


    on the other hand I know which one I'd prefer face in a car if going in the opposite direction.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,888 ✭✭✭pprendeville


    AGS??? Are they some new company putting in a bid for AerLingus?


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,458 ✭✭✭lennymc


    AGS??? Are they some new company putting in a bid for AerLingus?

    They are looking to branch out

    1031517.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,888 ✭✭✭pprendeville


    wav1 wrote: »
    Stamullen and Drogheda both go ahead.Garda help would be nice but neither event perceives that it needs any powers that be to rescue them.

    This is going to sound like a really silly question and I apologise in advance if it is but in the case of these races, are riders expected to stop at Stop signs or will riders be following what the Marshall dictates. No flag then proceed through the stop sign. If the Marshall flags (and by that I mean he is either waving the flag that makes it look like we have to stop or doing something else, I'm actually not sure what the signal is from a Marshall for stopping) then the riders are expected to follow the ROTR and stop at the stop sign?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,561 ✭✭✭Eamonnator


    As we have seen, it takes only one garda to wreck havoc with a cycle race. On any given Sunday, one garda, in uniform, could, if he/she so wished, legally stop any cycle race from taking place. As long as this situation pertains, the problem will persist.
    Race organisers, who have good working relations with their local gardai, don't want to rock the boat. In general race organisers are keeping their heads down, hoping the problem will go away. Cycling Ireland, seemingly, are afraid to stick their nose above the parapet. It would appear that the I.V.C.A. don't know, what to do. Local authorities want to please everybody. The gardai, whether from vindictiveness or a sense of duty, have to uphold the law, as it exists. Bringing all these elements together, in a manner, that satisfies everybody, is a big ask.

    As the saying goes, it's much harder to get the sh** back into the horse.


  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 75,766 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    Hmmzis wrote: »
    What are they saying now? From what I've read here they're trying to keep everything as quiet as possible. From that I'd think they won't really say anything about rebadging an event.
    CI would have to re-write the rule book. Are you suggesting such events would only be open to racing licence holders for example? It's not a race but we are going to award more points to the guy who finishes first than the ones behind. Think about it a little more deeply and you will quickly realise how completely impractical your suggestion is, and that's before the Gardai start to look at it


  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 75,766 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    This is going to sound like a really silly question and I apologise in advance if it is but in the case of these races, are riders expected to stop at Stop signs or will riders be following what the Marshall dictates. No flag then proceed through the stop sign. If the Marshall flags (and by that I mean he is either waving the flag that makes it look like we have to stop or doing something else, I'm actually not sure what the signal is from a Marshall for stopping) then the riders are expected to follow the ROTR and stop at the stop sign?
    I would suggest, from a racers point of view, it will be largely business as usual (although I am sure there will be a little more emphasis on certain issues in the pre race briefing)

    One thing they may consider is making it clear that if the marshals think a dangerous situation may be developing they could possibly step in and hold up the race. That's certainly something that is on the IVCA's agenda.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,888 ✭✭✭pprendeville


    lennymc wrote: »
    They are looking to branch out

    1031517.jpg

    I'm still no clearer who AGS are.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,748 ✭✭✭✭Inquitus


    Beasty wrote: »
    I would suggest, from a racers point of view, it will be largely business as usual (although I am sure there will be a little more emphasis on certain issues in the pre race briefing)

    One thing they may consider is making it clear that if the marshals think a dangerous situation may be developing they could possibly step in and hold up the race. That's certainly something that is on the IVCA's agenda.

    It doesn't work. Marshall can't hold up traffic, fast bunch approaches left turn onto main road, car refuses to yield to slow arm down gesture and waved flag, carnage ensues.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,561 ✭✭✭Eamonnator


    I'm still no clearer who AGS are.

    An Garda Siochana


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,561 ✭✭✭Eamonnator


    Inquitus wrote: »
    It doesn't work. Marshall can't hold up traffic, fast bunch approaches left turn onto main road, car refuses to yield to slow arm down gesture and waved flag, carnage ensues.

    That's it in a nutshell.
    As it stands, a marshal has absolutely no power to stop or direct traffic.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,458 ✭✭✭lennymc


    At the IVCA riders briefing it was suggested that if you were a marshal in the situation whereby a motorist decided that they would continue on regardless of you informing them of a potential hazard ahead, the marshal should turn their attention to alerting the riders of the hazard, and the riders should react accordingly.


  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 75,766 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    Inquitus wrote: »
    It doesn't work. Marshall can't hold up traffic, fast bunch approaches left turn onto main road, car refuses to yield to slow arm down gesture and waved flag, carnage ensues.
    IVCA had a CI Commissaire presenting last weekend and that was pretty much his proposal. Each corner requires a "senior marshal" with a good line of vision and a very loud whistle! Once the riders hear that it's an instruction to stop or at the very least proceed with great caution

    EDIT: lenny was there also!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,888 ✭✭✭pprendeville


    Beasty wrote: »
    IVCA had a CI Commissaire presenting last weekend and that was pretty much his proposal. Each corner requires a "senior marshal" with a good line of vision and a very loud whistle! Once the riders hear that it's an instruction to stop or at the very least proceed with great caution

    EDIT: lenny was there also!!

    That's a very good idea. Very simple and effective.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,060 ✭✭✭buffalo


    Beasty wrote: »
    IVCA had a CI Commissaire presenting last weekend and that was pretty much his proposal. Each corner requires a "senior marshal" with a good line of vision and a very loud whistle! Once the riders hear that it's an instruction to stop or at the very least proceed with great caution

    EDIT: lenny was there also!!

    When I'm marshalling, the whistle is normally a routine warning that riders are approaching.

    If you need riders to stop, the signal is a bit like this:



  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 75,766 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    Even with something like that there's going to be a situation where the marshals seek to "warn" motorists of approaching racers and requestng their "co-operation" in holding until the racers go through. Obviously those actions may be subject to some interpretation and could leave marshals in a difficult position if they are approached by Gardai. The alternative is not to seek to "hold" traffic, which would be pretty unworkable on most circuits (but is a perfectly reasonable approach in my mind for TTs and that is the basis on which we have agreement to run TTs in Fingal)


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,888 ✭✭✭pprendeville


    buffalo wrote: »
    When I'm marshalling, the whistle is normally a routine warning that riders are approaching.

    If you need riders to stop, the signal is a bit like this:


    so you need 2 marshalls then, one to "do the sign" and the other to pull the strings?


  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 75,766 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    Beasty wrote: »
    IVCA had a CI Commissaire presenting last weekend and that was pretty much his proposal. Each corner requires a "senior marshal" with a good line of vision and a very loud whistle! Once the riders hear that it's an instruction to stop or at the very least proceed with great caution

    EDIT: lenny was there also!!
    Just to add - I faced a difficult situation in an IVCA race last year when I was stationed as a marshal in Kentstown. As the race approached there was a lot of activity around the church. We quickly established there was a blessing of the graves taking place. I basically went up the road a couple of hundred metres with my warning sign and as soon as I saw the racers I signaled for them to slow down which they duly did (had to stand in the middle of the road for them to do so mind). The message got back to the organisers/safety officer and on all subsequent laps the race was brought under control at a much slower pace as it went through the village


  • Registered Users Posts: 140 ✭✭brasshead


    Beasty wrote:
    Just to add - I faced a difficult situation in an IVCA race last year when I was stationed as a marshal in Kentstown. As the race approached there was a lot of activity around the church. We quickly established there was a blessing of the graves taking place. I basically went up the road a couple of hundred metres with my warning sign and as soon as I saw the racers I signaled for them to slow down which they duly did (had to stand in the middle of the road for them to do so mind). The message got back to the organisers/safety officer and on all subsequent laps the race was brought under control at a much slower pace as it went through the village

    Beasty wrote:
    Just to add - I faced a difficult situation in an IVCA race last year when I was stationed as a marshal in Kentstown. As the race approached there was a lot of activity around the church. We quickly established there was a blessing of the graves taking place. I basically went up the road a couple of hundred metres with my warning sign and as soon as I saw the racers I signaled for them to slow down which they duly did (had to stand in the middle of the road for them to do so mind). The message got back to the organisers/safety officer and on all subsequent laps the race was brought under control at a much slower pace as it went through the village


    Was in the break that day if memory serves! Everyone duly slowed down, though we were still eventually caught :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,338 ✭✭✭Lusk_Doyle


    I'm still no clearer who AGS are.

    Jesus <snip>!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,004 ✭✭✭Hmmzis


    Beasty wrote: »
    CI would have to re-write the rule book. Are you suggesting such events would only be open to racing licence holders for example? It's not a race but we are going to award more points to the guy who finishes first than the ones behind. Think about it a little more deeply and you will quickly realise how completely impractical your suggestion is, and that's before the Gardai start to look at it

    It's CI's rule book, they wrote it once so they should be able write it again or make amendments to it. Allow leasure riders to ride as weel but as a different group. Same way as we have now with A4-A1/+. It's not a perfect solution and by no means a permanent one. In order to save road racing as a sport in this country the proper solution is to change the law or precisely add a new one that regulates what sporting events can and can't do when using public roads as the venue. What is needed now is a quick fix to bridge the gap. If some sort of agreement can be made with the guards to keep the sport alive then I'm all for it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,458 ✭✭✭lennymc


    CI's Technical rule book currently states that all riders should obey the rules of the road
    CHAPTER T6 - BEHAVIOUR OF PARTICIPANTS IN A CYCLING EVENT
    13. Participants must at all times conform to all traffic regulations in force relative to the course on which the
    race is held.

    Even with a re-written rule book, CI have no power to ignore or over rule the rules of the road.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,748 ✭✭✭✭Inquitus


    Beasty wrote: »
    IVCA had a CI Commissaire presenting last weekend and that was pretty much his proposal. Each corner requires a "senior marshal" with a good line of vision and a very loud whistle! Once the riders hear that it's an instruction to stop or at the very least proceed with great caution

    EDIT: lenny was there also!!

    If a car is travelling at 80kph-100kph along a road, surely there is not enough time to gauge his intentions and alert an oncoming peloton effectively were the driver to decide to simply ignore the Marshal.

    Also given the risks some riders seem willing to take with regard to oncoming traffic are we not likely to see people try to capitalise on these warnings to the detriment of their safety and others safety? While I recognise the method outlined above is about the only way to proceed within the law it strikes me as making racing more dangerous for all concerned.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,458 ✭✭✭lennymc


    That system is not perfect, but with enough marshals it could be workable. There are a lot of people working very hard behind the scenes to try to protect and promote racing, yet, every compromise or suggestion seems to be shot down. What would you suggest as a workable alternative that would keep everyone (especially the authorities) happy?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,221 ✭✭✭07Lapierre


    Inquitus wrote: »
    If a car is travelling at 80kph-100kph along a road, surely there is not enough time to gauge his intentions and alert an oncoming peloton effectively were the driver to decide to simply ignore the Marshal.

    Also given the risks some riders seem willing to take with regard to oncoming traffic are we not likely to see people try to capitalise on these warnings to the detriment of their safety and others safety? While I recognise the method outlined above is about the only way to proceed within the law it strikes me as making racing more dangerous for all concerned.

    This is the argument put forward by the County Council and the Gardai.

    There is no Legal requirement for motorists to stop if signalled to do so by a marshal. BUT, in the event that the driver ignores a request to stop, and the motorists proceeds and there is a collision with oncoming riders, then it really depends on the circumstances of the collision.

    if the motorist is on the correct side of the road, then the race organisers (and the marshals and the riders) are potentially liable.

    The motorists is only liable if he/she is found to be negligent ( e.g. speeding and over the white line).


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,269 Mod ✭✭✭✭Chips Lovell


    Marshals have never been legally entitled to stop traffic. This has always been the situation. Their role is to warn riders and traffic. They can politely ask traffic to stop for a race, but they can't make them stop.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,458 ✭✭✭lennymc


    07Lapierre wrote: »
    if the motorist is on the correct side of the road, then the race organisers (and the marshals and the riders) are potentially liable.

    I don't know if the section below is legally enforceable, or if it would cover the scenario above, but, every rider when taking out a licence agrees that they are responsible for their own actions.
    I understand, and agree, that I participate in events, whether on the public highway or otherwise, at my own risk, and that no liability whatever will attach to the promoter, promoting club, or any officials of any cycling event nor to Cycling Ireland, Provincial Board affiliated thereto, for any injury, loss or damage suffered by me in or by reason of any event however such may be caused.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,221 ✭✭✭07Lapierre


    Marshals have never been legally entitled to stop traffic. This has always been the situation. Their role is to warn riders and traffic. They can politely ask traffic to stop for a race, but they can't make them stop.


    That's correct...and the Gardaí tended to "Turn a blind eye" to this and race organisers were under the impression that in the event of an incident, the gardai would look at the situation sympathetically.

    It has now been confirmed (in Fingal anyway) that that is no longer the case. The law of the land will be applied "to the letter".


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 541 ✭✭✭Bristolscale7


    Did someone say Critical Mass?


Advertisement