Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Google glassed gimps?

Options
24

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 43,028 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    Would wear them in private but wouldn't have the nerve in public.
    Do they have an alarm clock and a AM/FM radio?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,641 ✭✭✭Hardonraging


    syklops wrote: »
    Are we looking at the same girl?


    Maybe you need some google glasses !! or different standards..

    Pighead, would you tap that ? if she were wearing google glasses ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,184 ✭✭✭✭Pighead


    Would wear them in private but wouldn't have the nerve in public.
    Maybe you need some google glasses !! or different standards..

    Pighead, would you tap that ? if she were wearing google glasses ?
    Ridiculous call Hardonraging. That girl isn't remotely fat. Starting to question the friendship we've developed over the past year. Also starting to question the veracity of your username. You sound like a softie to Pighead.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,003 ✭✭✭✭ejmaztec


    The good old days when people used to have a pencil or king size cig behind their ears, and anyone with glasses was called four-eyes.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,676 ✭✭✭✭herisson


    Would wear them in private but wouldn't have the nerve in public.
    Who needs google glasses? They look ridiculous. Ill stick to my laptop and phone for the minute. Plus the fact glasses dont suit me :p


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    the glasses in that picture don't actually exist, the real thing is much bigger and has circuit boards hanging off it so is something much more suitable to wearing in public because you'll look like an injured robot.

    I don't think the technology will catch on until it can be integrated into the glass itself, at that stage you'll find any piece of glass could be a google glasses glass thing. I think that's happen in the next 5 - 10 years.

    So don't worry pighead that picture is of a fantasy, it'll never happen that way and I assume they only released the picture to annoy you because Google are bastards.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,115 ✭✭✭✭castletownman


    I already have a pair of spectacles that help me make decisions and give me various information relative to certain situations.

    They are called Beer Goggles.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,942 ✭✭✭missingtime


    Whatever about how silly you would look wearing them outside, wouldn't it be fairly easy to have these robbed off the top of your head?

    I mean you could just wear them at home, but it would be a bit of a waste.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,068 ✭✭✭yermandan


    Not a chance. Have way too much respect for myself.
    Oh man its great to have you back Pighead. Please commit to at least 1 thread per week old chap. Breath of fresh air is a phrase that doesn't do you justice.

    OT, I think these will be developed over time to be as popular as the iPod was after it's release


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,641 ✭✭✭Hardonraging


    Pighead wrote: »
    Ridiculous call Hardonraging. That girl isn't remotely fat. Starting to question the friendship we've developed over the past year. Also starting to question the veracity of your username. You sound like a softie to Pighead.


    You've hurt me sir in more than ways words can describe.. glasses.. google heartbreak...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,184 ✭✭✭✭Pighead


    Would wear them in private but wouldn't have the nerve in public.
    why didn't they just go with normal glasses? Bloody Jordi la Forge looking yokes!
    Exactly. A severe lack of patience shown by us earthlings yet again. Why couldn't they wait a couple of years until they could make the head mounted display smaller and less obnoxious looking. It's like releasing the electric car when it can only do fcuk all miles before needing a charging.


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    I would probably wear these while out on the bike or running or driving. But not in the pub or going down to the shops. That's just stupid.

    I also wouldn't pay $1500 for them, that too is just stupid.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,559 ✭✭✭✭AnonoBoy


    Would wear them in private but wouldn't have the nerve in public.
    I already have a pair of spectacles that help me make decisions and give me various information relative to certain situations.

    They are called Beer Goggles.

    I have those too! I only wear mine when I'm going on the lash though.

    I think if people wear beer goggles during the day it's a bit eh.... worrying.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,629 ✭✭✭googled eyes


    Not a chance. Have way too much respect for myself.
    Chucken wrote: »
    But, you're way ahead of this trend,googled eyes!

    I'm off to patent the name googled eyes and all similar phrases just incase :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,970 ✭✭✭Lenin Skynard


    Not a chance. Have way too much respect for myself.
    I'm well past the point where glasses are going to make or break how cool I look. I'm gonna look stupid whether or not I wear them so I might as well watch porn through my glasses when I'm walking down the street looking like a stupid fool.


  • Registered Users Posts: 460 ✭✭mcbert


    Going to wait for bing glasses to be released.
    Replace every instance of 'google glasses' in the above, with 'mobile phone', and you have a list of things people said in the early nineties.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,184 ✭✭✭✭Pighead


    Would wear them in private but wouldn't have the nerve in public.
    seamus wrote: »
    I would probably wear these while out on the bike or running or driving. But not in the pub or going down to the shops. That's just stupid.

    I also wouldn't pay $1500 for them, that too is just stupid.
    You don't need google glasses seamus. You've got google brain.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    seamus wrote: »
    I would probably wear these while out on the bike or running or driving. But not in the pub or going down to the shops.
    So just the dangerous situations were you shouldn't be wearing them..


  • Registered Users Posts: 567 ✭✭✭.Henry Sellers.


    They'll never catch on as you need your phone to pretend you're doing something in those long awkward silences. Goggles schmoggles.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,559 ✭✭✭✭AnonoBoy


    Would wear them in private but wouldn't have the nerve in public.
    Pighead wrote: »
    You don't need google glasses seamus. You've got google brain.

    It warms the cockles of my heart to see this bromance continuing so beautifully.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    ScumLord wrote: »
    So just the dangerous situations were you shouldn't be wearing them..
    Exactly! No point in making life too easy, you need some challenges.

    OK, so driving is probably dumb, but cycling and running would be fine. But cars will have HUDs within a few years anyway, so it's all the same.


  • Registered Users Posts: 51,054 ✭✭✭✭Professey Chin


    ScumLord wrote: »
    the glasses in that picture don't actually exist, the real thing is much bigger and has circuit boards hanging off it so is something much more suitable to wearing in public because you'll look like an injured robot.

    I don't think the technology will catch on until it can be integrated into the glass itself, at that stage you'll find any piece of glass could be a google glasses glass thing. I think that's happen in the next 5 - 10 years.

    So don't worry pighead that picture is of a fantasy, it'll never happen that way and I assume they only released the picture to annoy you because Google are bastards.
    That pic is exactly how they look right now. The Verge got a demo worth then a couple weeks ago and they're regularly seen in use by Google employees


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,184 ✭✭✭✭Pighead


    Would wear them in private but wouldn't have the nerve in public.
    mcbert wrote: »
    Replace every instance of 'google glasses' in the above, with 'mobile phone', and you have a list of things people said in the early nineties.
    Wrong. The main problem with these google glasses is the aesthetic value of it all. The fact that they are so in your face (or should Pighead say on your face, he he he he). A list of what people said about phones in the early 90's would probably include:
    Oh, that sounds deadly. As long as they don't expect me to wear it on my face.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    seamus wrote: »
    Exactly! No point in making life too easy, you need some challenges.
    Parents need to stop giving their children the middle name of dangerous.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,245 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    I'm off to patent the name googled eyes and all similar phrases just incase :D

    Like 'Google Dies' ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,565 ✭✭✭southsiderosie


    I think they look stupid and are just another step towards our not being able to focus on anything for more than 8 seconds, but my bigger concern is what these mean for the rest of us.
    The key experiential question of Google Glass isn’t what it’s like to wear them, it’s what it’s like to be around someone else who’s wearing them...

    First, take the video feeds from every Google Glass headset, worn by users worldwide. Regardless of whether video is only recorded temporarily, as in the first version of Glass, or always-on, as is certainly possible in future versions, the video all streams into Google’s own cloud of servers. Now add in facial recognition and the identity database that Google is building within Google Plus (with an emphasis on people’s accurate, real-world names): Google’s servers can process video files, at their leisure, to attempt identification on every person appearing in every video. And if Google Plus doesn’t sound like much, note that Mark Zuckerberg has already pledged that Facebook will develop apps for Glass.

    Finally, consider the speech-to-text software that Google already employs, both in its servers and on the Glass devices themselves. Any audio in a video could, technically speaking, be converted to text, tagged to the individual who spoke it, and made fully searchable within Google’s search index.

    Now our stage is set: not for what will happen, necessarily, but what I just want to point out could technically happen, by combining tools already available within Google.

    Let’s return to the bus ride. It’s not a stretch to imagine that you could immediately be identified by that Google Glass user who gets on the bus and turns the camera toward you. Anything you say within earshot could be recorded, associated with the text, and tagged to your online identity. And stored in Google’s search index. Permanently.

    I’m still not done.

    The really interesting aspect is that all of the indexing, tagging, and storage could happen without the Google Glass user even requesting it. Any video taken by any Google Glass, anywhere, is likely to be stored on Google servers, where any post-processing (facial recognition, speech-to-text, etc.) could happen at the later request of Google, or any other corporate or governmental body, at any point in the future.

    Remember when people were kind of creeped out by that car Google drove around to take pictures of your house? Most people got over it, because they got a nice StreetView feature in Google Maps as a result.

    Google Glass is like one camera car for each of the thousands, possibly millions, of people who will wear the device – every single day, everywhere they go – on sidewalks, into restaurants, up elevators, around your office, into your home. From now on, starting today, anywhere you go within range of a Google Glass device, everything you do could be recorded and uploaded to Google’s cloud, and stored there for the rest of your life. You won’t know if you’re being recorded or not; and even if you do, you’ll have no way to stop it.

    And that, my friends, is the experience that Google Glass creates. That is the experience we should be thinking about. The most important Google Glass experience is not the user experience – it’s the experience of everyone else. The experience of being a citizen, in public, is about to change.


  • Registered Users Posts: 567 ✭✭✭.Henry Sellers.


    You would usually hear someone say "Hey don't hit him he's wearing glasses", But now you'll hear " Hey smash his face in, he's got them stupid Google glasses!!"


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,494 ✭✭✭The_Gatsby


    Gatsby hates Google glasses almost as much as he hates people who speak in the 3rd person.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,969 ✭✭✭hardCopy


    Going to wait for bing glasses to be released.
    seamus wrote: »
    Exactly! No point in making life too easy, you need some challenges.

    OK, so driving is probably dumb, but cycling and running would be fine. But cars will have HUDs within a few years anyway, so it's all the same.

    Google are just pushing this so people will have another reason to embrace self-driving cars (powered by google)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,814 ✭✭✭TPD


    They should look like either this:
    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/11/Cncra2-win-cover.jpg

    Or this:
    http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSYXgqt29aThHQ0JagLv9HR5UB2hzjxIDencT2hgTXW6yTWDU_P

    However even if they did, I probably still wouldn't buy them.


Advertisement