Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Why evolution is not scientifically possible...

  • 08-01-2013 9:24pm
    #1
    Bannasidhe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭


    Apparently - it's all just a story...




    Gets popcorn....:D


Comments

  • #2
    dlofnep
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    "Evolution that life came from non-life..."

    Evolution does not make this claim - abiogenesis does. Common religitard error #1.

    10 seconds into the video, and something tells me it's not going to get any better from here..


  • #3
    Dades
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,558 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dades


    I foresee an ELE in this thread.


  • #4
    DB21
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,715 ✭✭✭DB21


    Nope. Not watching that. I prefer my brain to not be mush.


  • #5
    Bannasidhe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    dlofnep wrote: »
    "Evolution that life came from non-life..."

    Evolution does not make this claim - abiogenesis does. Common religitard error #1.

    10 seconds into the video, and something tells me it's not going to get any better from here..

    Hard to imagine - but it gets worse.


  • #6
    dlofnep
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    Oh no, not this "no genetic information is gained" schtick. Repeating the same old nonsense. Yawn.


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    Sycopat
    Registered Users Posts: 308 ✭✭Sycopat


    I liked how the little ape pictures had tails. It's when they get the easy basics wrong that you know they haven't a clue.

    The video is based on two claims.

    One of which has nothing to do with evolution. (life not being observed to come from non-life.)

    The other is wrong. (No known mechanism to add genetic 'information' to an organism. Despite genetic information being, literally, a chemical base pair and their being all sorts of ways genetic sequences can be, and have been observed to be, modified.)


  • #8
    Galvasean
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    It's almost like they know they can't disprove it by representing it accurately so do their best to misrepresent it as best they can...


  • #9
    Turtwig
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Dades wrote: »
    I foresee an ELE in this thread.

    morgan-spice-two.jpg?w=500&h=2558


  • #10
    Barr125
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 146 ✭✭Barr125


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    Hard to imagine - but it gets worse.

    You bet it gets worse, there are 6 of these videos, spanning across every single Creationist propaganda slogan/argument that's every been proposed (and shot down in flames.)


  • #11
    condra
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,849 ✭✭✭condra


    Rabble rabble blah culture and presents and toys.... blah blah, protons, science life blah blah, gifts don't come from non-gifts, blah blah in a laboratory, rabble rabble blah .... but if you think about it rationally.... this is all possible with Santa Claus.


  • Advertisement
  • #12
    Andrewf20
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,249 ✭✭✭Andrewf20


    If a creationist wins a noble peace prize or the like, ill then take notice.


  • #13
    DB21
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,715 ✭✭✭DB21


    Andrewf20 wrote: »
    If a creationist wins a noble peace prize or the like, ill then take notice.

    If a creationist wins a nobel prize, I'll discredit the prize.


  • #14
    Solair
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,230 ✭✭✭Solair


    DB21 wrote: »
    If a creationist wins a nobel prize, I'll discredit the prize.

    Well, the nobel peace prize is for bringing about peace.
    You can do that and be a creationist and have no concept of science whatsoever. Same with the nobel prize for literature.

    The Nobel Science prizes are in : Physics, Chemistry, Physiology & Medicine


  • #15
    mickrock
    Registered Users Posts: 1,021 ✭✭✭mickrock


    If evolution is true then Darwinian mechanisms cannot explain it. It's a preposterous idea that random variations and natural selection can account for the diversity and complexity of life. There's no evidence for it.

    The appeal of Darwinian evolution to atheists, and why they are so defensive of it, seems to be because of the blind, undirected elements of the theory.

    I don't think this thread will evolve very much.


  • #16
    DB21
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,715 ✭✭✭DB21


    mickrock wrote: »
    If evolution is true then Darwinian mechanisms cannot explain it. It's a preposterous idea that random variations and natural selection can account for the diversity and complexity of life. There's no evidence for it.

    The appeal of Darwinian evolution to atheists, and why they are so defensive of it, seems to be because of the blind, undirected elements of the theory.

    I don't think this thread will evolve very much.

    LOL


  • #17
    DB21
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,715 ✭✭✭DB21


    Solair wrote: »
    Well, the nobel peace prize is for bringing about peace.
    You can do that and be a creationist and have no concept of science whatsoever. Same with the nobel prize for literature.

    The Nobel Science prizes are in : Physics, Chemistry, Physiology & Medicine

    I'd imagine that's what the person I was responding to meant; a science one


  • #18
    Mardy Bum
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,674 ✭✭✭Mardy Bum


    mickrock wrote: »
    If evolution is true then Darwinian mechanisms cannot explain it. It's a preposterous idea that random variations and natural selection can account for the diversity and complexity of life. There's no evidence for it.

    The appeal of Darwinian evolution to atheists, and why they are so defensive of it, seems to be because of the blind, undirected elements of the theory.

    I don't think this thread will evolve very much.

    GSz4x.gif


  • #19
    mickrock
    Registered Users Posts: 1,021 ✭✭✭mickrock


    ^^^^

    Darwinian evolution falls at the first hurdle.


  • #20
    McG
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭McG


    mickrock wrote: »
    There's no evidence for it..

    It has ALL the evidence. It's the only game in town. You are delusional to think otherwise.


  • #21
    Dades
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,558 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dades


    mickrock wrote: »
    If evolution is true then Darwinian mechanisms cannot explain it. It's a preposterous idea that random variations and natural selection can account for the diversity and complexity of life. There's no evidence for it.

    The appeal of Darwinian evolution to atheists, and why they are so defensive of it, seems to be because of the blind, undirected elements of the theory.

    I don't think this thread will evolve very much.
    And there's the ELE...

    With the first apologist, this thread has become an offshoot of the Creationism dustbin thread.
    Mardy Bum wrote: »
    GSz4x.gif
    Class!


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement