Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Was the Republican campaign justifiable?

Options
18911131437

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,798 ✭✭✭karma_


    Zombrex wrote: »
    Loughgall was an attack on a RUC base (how is that equivalent to Bloody Sunday?)

    Simple really, and on two fronts.

    Firstly, there was an innocent bystander killed, and secondly, there was much debate about how the ambush happened. If as you were saying, we took the conflict in the context of a War, then Republicans basically should have accepted the loss rather than question the military of having a shoot-to-kill strategy.

    Bloody Sunday was completely different.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,030 ✭✭✭✭Chuck Stone


    I think of it as more of a conflict than a war. For me a war is between two states. As regards the assassination of IRA operatives, well, live by the sword die by the sword would be my opinion on that.

    The IRA can't really complain about the method of their operatives being killed seeing as they employed similar methods themselves.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,562 ✭✭✭✭Sunnyisland


    Zombrex wrote: »
    Oh right. Odd the IRA didn't have that problem. They seem to boast about it being a war in a way to legitimize what they did.



    Er, I think you mean support throughout the country of Libya, right?


    Don't understand your posts whatsoever.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,562 ✭✭✭✭Sunnyisland


    The treaty is on TG4 at 21.30 tonight. Interesting for those Interested.


  • Registered Users Posts: 43,311 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    Zombrex wrote: »
    Loughgall was an attack on a RUC base (how is that equivalent to Bloody Sunday?)

    The point was Bloody Sunday was a poor example.

    Personally I'd have a big problem with people who thought something like Loughgall or say Gibraltar was wrong by the British or and commemorate the IRA dead as heroes, and then complain about the British Army occupation and the usual spiel about oppression etc. you get.

    In a dirty war like that tragedies were going to happen.

    There is another argument that the forces of law and order should always be held accountable to higher standards than guerrilla type factions. Shoot to kill was an example of honourable RUC officers risking their personal safety to out illegal and immoral actions. Basically "they shouldn't go down to the IRA's level".

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 804 ✭✭✭round tower huntsman


    yes. ira's past present and future have been justified in taking armed action against british military and political persence in ireland.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,684 ✭✭✭JustinDee


    yes. ira's past present and future have been justified in taking armed action against british military and political persence in ireland.
    Whatever your views on the past (were you even around during the 60s, 70s and 80s?), the wishes of the majority of people on this island regarding its future have been clearly indicated so there is absolutely no mandate (their favourite abused word) for any of these murderers to continue.
    They, like their little nr of supporters, must suck it up as 'democracy' is what they claimed to represent and be fighting for.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 905 ✭✭✭FUNKY LOVER


    JustinDee wrote: »
    yes. ira's past present and future have been justified in taking armed action against british military and political persence in ireland.
    Whatever your views on the past (were you even around during the 60s, 70s and 80s?), the wishes of the majority of people on this island regarding its future have been clearly indicated so there is absolutely no mandate (their favourite abused word) for any of these murderers to continue.
    They, like their little nr of supporters, must suck it up as 'democracy' is what they claimed to represent and be fighting for.
    Did the libyan rebels have a mandate for their violence which resulted in 60 thousand civilians killed and thousands maimed?but somehow that was acceptable.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,684 ✭✭✭JustinDee


    Did the libyan rebels have a mandate for their violence which resulted in 60 thousand civilians killed and thousands maimed?but somehow that was acceptable.
    The difference is a minority claiming to speak for everyone and claiming to have majority support.
    Moral relativism about an entirely different situation in an entirely different region with entirely different consequences won't justify the unjustifiable whatsoever.
    The people on this island voted for peaceful compromise hence the improved situation and conditions. The only non-changing elements are made so by a lowly minority.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 905 ✭✭✭FUNKY LOVER


    JustinDee wrote: »
    Did the libyan rebels have a mandate for their violence which resulted in 60 thousand civilians killed and thousands maimed?but somehow that was acceptable.
    The difference is a minority claiming to speak for everyone and claiming to have majority support.
    Moral relativism about an entirely different situation in an entirely different region with entirely different consequences won't justify the unjustifiable whatsoever.
    The people on this island voted for peaceful compromise hence the improved situation and conditions. The only non-changing elements are made so by a lowly minority.
    when do they claim to have the majority support or speak for the majority.if Irish republican history shows anything its quite the opposite in fact.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,684 ✭✭✭JustinDee


    when do they claim to have the majority support or speak for the majority.if Irish republican history shows anything its quite the opposite in fact.
    I take it you're talking about the splinter groups/factions?
    Taking up the ridiculous violent 'cause' themselves and waffling hypocritically about democratic rights etc yet actually usurping the democratic wishes of the overwhelming majority of this island's residents.
    Thats when.
    The other side of the coin is a fascistic putsch against what the island's inhabitants have said they want.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,684 ✭✭✭JustinDee


    Britain still occupys the North of this island, aslong as they do there will be resistance

    People can object to that but tough
    People have already objected to it and voiced how they want to progress on this island so Tough, you're not wanted.
    'Ireland unfree will never will be at peace' - Padraig Pearse
    Patrick Pearse actually (or PH Pearse). He was never christened Padraig nor adopted the name Padraig.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,815 ✭✭✭Hannibal


    The simple answer to the OP is that yes the republican campaign was justifiable.

    The IRA had no alternative but to enter into a military campaign in 1969, nothing else would have got us to where we are today without it. That's not to say that every thing the IRA done during this campaign was right because somethings were completely wrong. You have to remember that they were fighting one of the best equipped, trained and heavily armed armies in the world and still brought them to a stalemate in a military sense.

    What happened on the political side had nothing to do with the IRA but their campaign did open up many avenues and give republicans leverage in negotiations with the British government.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 208 ✭✭trendyvicar


    Dotsey wrote: »
    The simple answer to the OP is that yes the republican campaign was justifiable.

    The IRA had no alternative but to enter into a military campaign in 1969, nothing else would have got us to where we are today without it. That's not to say that every thing the IRA done during this campaign was right because somethings were completely wrong. You have to remember that they were fighting one of the best equipped, trained and heavily armed armies in the world and still brought them to a stalemate in a military sense.

    What happened on the political side had nothing to do with the IRA but their campaign did open up many avenues and give republicans leverage in negotiations with the British government.

    No they didn't. That's hilarious. The two combatant groups in Northern Ireland were Republican and Loyalist paramilitaries. The role of the security forces was to maintain law and order, minimise the number of dead and injured and 'hold the ring' until a political solution could lead to a normalised and peaceful Northern Ireland.

    Do most young people in Ireland believe your ridiculous claim about 'military stalemates'? LOL


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,562 ✭✭✭✭Sunnyisland


    No they didn't. That's hilarious. The two combatant groups in Northern Ireland were Republican and Loyalist paramilitaries. The role of the security forces was to maintain law and order, minimise the number of dead and injured and 'hold the ring' until a political solution could lead to a normalised and peaceful Northern Ireland.

    Do most young people in Ireland believe your ridiculous claim about 'military stalemates'? LOL



    An internal British Army document released in 2007 stated that the British Army had failed to defeat the IRA but had made it impossible for them to win through the use of violence. I would call that a stalement.

    Ps The part in black is indeed hilarious.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,815 ✭✭✭Hannibal


    No they didn't. That's hilarious. The two combatant groups in Northern Ireland were Republican and Loyalist paramilitaries. The role of the security forces was to maintain law and order, minimise the number of dead and injured and 'hold the ring' until a political solution could lead to a normalised and peaceful Northern Ireland.

    Do most young people in Ireland believe your ridiculous claim about 'military stalemates'? LOL
    Would you define Bloody Sunday and the Ballymurphy Massacre as examples of security forces maintaining law and order?

    Your post is incredibly naive and shows your lack of understanding of the Troubles.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 208 ✭✭trendyvicar


    realies wrote: »
    An internal British Army document released in 2007 stated that the British Army had failed to defeat the IRA but had made it impossible for them to win through the use of violence. I would call that a stalement.

    Ps The part in black is indeed hilarious.

    Another fantasist. Are The Irish Police in a military stalemate with Irish drug gangs? LOL

    The situation in Northern Ireland was a classic inter-communal conflict requiring a political solution, which was eventually found. The security forces could do no more than hold the ring and fill the prisons until that point came.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 208 ✭✭trendyvicar


    Dotsey wrote: »
    Would you define Bloody Sunday and the Ballymurphy Massacre as examples of security forces maintaining law and order?

    Your post is incredibly naive and shows your lack of understanding of the Troubles.

    I'm not quite sure what happened in either of those two instances - nor do I care. However, one bent copper does not mean the police aren't involved in maintaining law and order.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 905 ✭✭✭FUNKY LOVER


    Dotsey wrote: »
    Would you define Bloody Sunday and th Ballymurphy Massacre as examples of security forces maintaining law and order?

    Your post is incredibly naive and shows your lack of understanding of the Troubles.

    I'm not quite sure what happened in either of those two instances - nor do I care. However, one bent copper does not mean the police aren't involved in maintaining law and order.
    Oh sweet lord.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 208 ✭✭trendyvicar


    Oh sweet lord.

    You know all this crap guys like you talk on line - is it the same material that Sinn Fein feed to the urban underclass and rural illiterates in The Irish Republic to get their votes?

    Military Stalemate...

    Just Campaign...

    Bloody Sunday...

    Ballymurhy...

    Best Equipped Army in The World...

    Just wondering how they explain away the elephant in the room - THE BORDER. LOL


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    You know all this crap guys like you talk on line - is it the same material that Sinn Fein feed to the urban underclass and rural illiterates in The Irish Republic to get their votes?

    Military Stalemate...

    Just Campaign...

    Bloody Sunday...

    Ballymurhy...

    Best Equipped Army in The World...

    Just wondering how they explain away the elephant in the room - THE BORDER. LOL
    They can't. It is just propaganda from Sinn Fein. Some of them don't know if they are coming or going. One minute Martin Mcguinness talks of Unionist outreach and the next niall o'donnghaile is trying to upset people from the PUL community. A very bizarre party.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,562 ✭✭✭✭Sunnyisland


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    They can't. It is just propaganda from Sinn Fein. Some of them don't know if they are coming or going. One minute Martin Mcguinness talks of Unionist outreach and the next niall o'donnghaile is trying to upset people from the PUL community. A very bizarre party.


    Says the man with no answer but no.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 905 ✭✭✭FUNKY LOVER


    Oh sweet lord.

    You know all this crap guys like you talk on line - is it the same material that Sinn Fein feed to the urban underclass and rural illiterates in The Irish Republic to get their votes?

    Military Stalemate...

    Just Campaign...

    Bloody Sunday...

    Ballymurhy...

    Best Equipped Army in The World...

    Just wondering how they explain away the elephant in the room - THE BORDER. LOL
    If you had any notion of things in the north you would see most republicans now view sinn Fein as having sold them out and loathe their president.

    Shows your ignorance to the whole situation really.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,700 ✭✭✭irishh_bob


    Dotsey wrote: »
    Would you define Bloody Sunday and the Ballymurphy Massacre as examples of security forces maintaining law and order?

    Your post is incredibly naive and shows your lack of understanding of the Troubles.

    it isnt naieve , its willfully ignorant


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 208 ✭✭trendyvicar


    If you had any notion of things in the north you would see most republicans now view sinn Fein as having sold them out and loathe their president.

    Shows your ignorance to the whole situation really.

    Must be why so many vote for them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    realies wrote: »
    Says the man with no answer but no.
    What do you mean? If you mean my rejection of a United Ireland, then yes, I do say no. What is wrong with that?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 208 ✭✭trendyvicar


    irishh_bob wrote: »
    it isnt naieve , its willfully ignorant

    Wilfully indifferent.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,562 ✭✭✭✭Sunnyisland


    We cant what keith ?
    Tell us about your great apartheid type state that was and still is a embarrassment to your queen.A state where they wouldn't even give there catholic neighbours the time of day,who treated us like muck,Your days are well gone and you just live in a bubble which keeps getting smaller and smaller every year.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    realies wrote: »
    We cant what keith ?
    Tell us about your great apartheid type state that was and still is a embarrassment to your queen.A state where they wouldn't even give there catholic neighbours the time of day,who treated us like muck,Your days are well gone and you just live in a bubble which keeps getting smaller and smaller every year.
    What are you on about? We live in 2011, not 1969.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 905 ✭✭✭FUNKY LOVER


    realies wrote: »
    We cant what keith ?
    Tell us about your great apartheid type state that was and still is a embarrassment to your queen.A state where they wouldn't even give there catholic neighbours the time of day,who treated us like muck,Your days are well gone and you just live in a bubble which keeps getting smaller and smaller every year.
    And what about how his great state was founded,through violence murder,and enforcing beliefs on the majority who rejected it.

    But of course that's in the past so its ok to talk of republicans been the blame for all the bother in the north.


Advertisement