InTheTrees wrote: » I'm...this close to going back to iphone. Three years with windows phone and its getting worse. The 950 hardware seems okay. I love the camera. But holy hell the OS is awful. Its bug ridden.
MJohnston wrote: » Running Fast Ring? Slow Ring? Production builds?
Griffinx wrote: » I got a new firmware update on my Meteor 950 yesterday 1078.00038.16025.39004...anyone else?
ablelocks wrote: » Microsoft US Store - free 950 with every purchase of a 950XL until 1/5/2016 - US and Canada stores only, both phones are unlocked
MJohnston wrote: » This is an inventory dump - they're not getting any new US customers onto Windows mobile, so kill off your stock and maybe retain a higher percentage of WP8 handset owners. Europe sales are probably a different story, but at this stage, Windows mobile hardware is in maintenance mode until next year essentially - don't lose money building new handsets, but keep the software progressing at a rapid pace. Hibernate for a while, then come back in a year with killer new hardware designs, top of the line specs, and a big splashy headline feature that makes the OS irresistible (for my money, a combination of a large volume of UWP apps, the finalised Project Islandwood bridge, and x86 Continuum support)
beauf wrote: » Problem is they are losing the user base. It may never come back.
MJohnston wrote: » Two month old post Windows Phone is never coming back, Windows 10 on mobile phones might.
beauf wrote: » I don't see why people keep making that distinction. There really isn't any greater draw for a developer for Windows Mobile than there was for Windows Phone. Because there isn't any money to be made on that small a market share, regardless of which kernel its running.
beauf wrote: » Its an inane distinction. Developers are not on Windows Platform because its difficult to port the mobile device. Its because there is no market, and there is no money in it. Xbox apps won't save it either. There is no reason to make a parking, or a train app, for on an xbox. So there is no reason to make it full stop. So it will never exist for the platform.http://www.windowscentral.com/sonos-confirms-it-wont-be-making-universal-windows-10-apphttp://searchmobilecomputing.techtarget.com/blog/Modern-Mobility/Universal-Windows-apps-have-a-universal-problemhttp://uk.businessinsider.com/microsoft-universal-windows-app-in-windows-10-are-deeply-flawed-2015-8?r=US&IR=T Besides which you don't have to make an app you can just make a website that works for different devices.
beauf wrote: » Anyone using Continuum on a weekly basis? we played with it in the office, but no one using it.
ablelocks wrote: » i'm getting a replacement phone on insurance - carphone warehouse are the supplier. They will send me a voucher and are offering a 950 as a direct replacement for the Lumia 1020 - is there a valid reason to push for the XL?
Fingleberries wrote: » Only if you have big hands The camera on the 950 and XL are the same. The main difference, bar the screen size, is that there is a moderately better CPU in the XL. For most day-to-day tasks you won't notice a difference, if you're using Continuum it feels just a little bit snappier on the XL when you have a few apps running, bit not hugely different. So, it really comes down to personal preference. For me, the screen on the XL was lovely but just too big to be practical ... (it failed the jeans pocket test, fine when standing but you had to be careful sitting down not to impale yourself) That said, if you pick up either handset before 30. June, don't forget to launch the Lumia Offers app and claim your free Continuum Display Dock and 1 year office 365 personal.