kevthegaff wrote: » Was talking to a friend who left for glanbia last year, he was saying glanbia are nearly top of milk league while arra were bottom. Jes us couldn't listen to the nonsense any longer, cut him short. 1 month out of 12 and he's blowing like mad. Lot of the "Big Fellas" around here moved. Funny thing the more profitable enterprises seemed to stay
whelan2 wrote: » Spoke with a farmer yesterday who didnt sign the msa and moved to strathroy last year, he said the amount of pressure lifted off him mentally is unreal and a better milk price to boot
Farmer Ed wrote: » Any truth in the speculation that some of the guys who left Arrabawn might have left a few bills behind them? I wonder how they are managing for credit now?
whelan2 wrote: » The farmer I was talking to yesterday couldn't leave until everything he owed glanbia had been paid. Which took a while
mahoney_j wrote: » Lads yer spouting ****e with accusations like that .how about lads that left dairygold /Glanbia for arra ???.bet some of them left debt but paid it off over time .i know a good few who left for dairygold who still trade with arra ,no issues trade is trade ,business is business
rangler1 wrote: » Tbf it's the least he might do, glanbia isn't a bank......yet
atlantic mist wrote: » ireland processing facilities only running at 57%, eu average is 70% If they would stop under cutting prices when exporting/selling it is easily achievable we are leading the charge with new zeland with accepting lower price for milk as they are trying to clear the market of higher producers
kowtow wrote: » It's like trying to put MacDonalds out of business by standing outside giving away free milk shakes -
atlantic mist wrote: » ireland processing facilities only running at 57%, eu average is 70% our processors wouldnt improve plant inefficiencies as they would have to pay us in line with the rest of europe, that would be a shame all right. If they would stop under cutting prices when exporting/selling it is easily achievable we are leading the charge with new zeland with accepting lower price for milk as they are trying to clear the market of higher producersFew cents of a difference required to move supply to 365 and maximise processing facilities reduce or hold peak milk, surely the two/three cent difference in milk price paid would justify the millions spent on plant sitting their only being half used whats the capital cost on every liter, plus the effect on local communities and economy providing employment all year round instead of seasonal work, would love to see actual costings not hypothetical suggestion that peak supplies will be determined by coop shareholding as done in new Zealand at a future point, all about re filling the coop coffers and once against they aim directly at the supplier where does it stop?
Buford T. Justice V wrote: » Teagasc did an analysis a few years ago on the relative profitabilities of seasonal v year round milk supply. The most profitable for farmers was seasonal supply and the most profitable for processors was year round supply.
Water John wrote: » That makes sense Buford. So should we have seasonal pricing for late Autumn and early Spring? Lets say a down time of 6/8 weeks for both.
kowtow wrote: » The difference in that report linked above was - I think - 0.5c saving to processors from a flat supply curve, but 1.5c extra cost to producers. The report - which seemed very objective and common sense to me - highlighted the extreme simplicity with which it's calculations were reached but to me they seemed as good an approach as any. It does set you thinking about whether the right product mix combined with less seasonal supply, or just a bit more ingenuity along the way, might give us a more robust approach which didn't depend on large scale investments, paid for in advance at top dollar, and only really productive during a short part of the year. One thing I am increasingly certain of - no matter what the efficiency arguments might be - is that one big factory, or one big processor are the road to ruin where Irish dairy is concerned. If the extra cost of seasonal capacity for the whole country amounts to only 0.5c / litre, how does that compare with the notional saving of merging the biggest processors?
Buford T. Justice V wrote: » That was the argument advanced to merge the regional health boards into one authority and the elimination of duplication. I wonder how that turned out:D:D:D
Water John wrote: » Its the merry go round of Irish life and we all just shrug our shoulders. May be we can get some of those new Inds in the Dail to shout stop. We are great a running after the wrong problem and easily diverted to it. Sadly, it costs us in the bottom line.
kevthegaff wrote: » Any hints on prices stabilising this month?
Buford T. Justice V wrote: » Kerry will probably hold as the AGM is later in the month and it's bad enough having farmers at it without having angry farmers at it:rolleyes:
Farmer Ed wrote: » Not sure the minister would agree with you. Watch: Glanbia details its new advance payment scheme for farmers @agrilandIreland http://www.agriland.ie/farming-news/122393/
whelan2 wrote: » Would it not be in Glanbia's best interest to pay an extra cent or 2 per litre rather than spending money on schemes to prolong farmers agony? Is it not supposed to be farmer owned?Agreed on pedigree 6 post wtf was Minister Creed doing being seen to promote these schemes
stanflt wrote: » I'd be very worried about taking part in that scheme- if you take the 2cpl and milk price doesn't recover to 30cpl in 2020 the money will automatically deducted from your milk price- so if you took 2cpl every month from now till then you could realistically be looking at a milk price of 15cpl in 2020
whelan2 wrote: » Wonder is there much interest in it. Apparently there wil be no repayments this year, so does that mean a crap price for the rest of the year?