Duff wrote: » Lads, this thread, like anything related to Conor on this forum, has gone to shíte.
slicus ricus wrote: » Conor is number 85 on the Forbes rich list (Sports Persons) for anyone interested. His total earnings for the last 12 months of $22m were split between earnings from UFC of $18m and $4m for endorsements. Not bad at all!
weldoninhio wrote: » What are the tax rates for sportsmen in the US? Pretty high I'd imagine. If he's half that he'd be lucky.
Depp wrote: » McGregor pays his tax here still I'd say, definitely spends enough days in the country, also theres some tax exemption in nevada thats why theyve so many fights there! just looked it up, 39.6 national tax for anything in nevada plus state tax on top of that if earned in another state, youch!
raze_them_all_ wrote: » Ireland have a no double tax agreement so the us get nothing if he is taxed here. No mateer what way you look at it, he's well richer than all of us here combined
Depp wrote: » seriously? sweet enough so hes doing very well! just as a side thought, one positive about this whole diaz thing is not having to listen to rda at press conferences, was getting mighty sick of him yammering on about how he was doing it all for jesus, and I'm religious!
raze_them_all_ wrote: » Ireland have a no double tax agreement so the us get nothing if he is taxed here.
Mellor wrote: » I remover around a year ago this topic cane up. A poster(s)here were claiming that he makes more than McGregor. :pac: :pac:
weldoninhio wrote: » Can't believe no one has brought up Robbie Lawlors comments that he was due to fight Conor at 200 and wouldn't have taken the easy tapout, he would have stood it back up and "taken his soul!!!" That would be a massacre. McGregor should never fight Lawlor.
raze_them_all_ wrote: » No no no he could definately take him, How I laughed when people were suggesting that. There is a vast amount at 155 that would smash him and even more at 170. He needs to stay at 145 as long as he can imo, Whats wrong with dominating 1 weight class.
newbbieb wrote: » just be a contender at 55 without ever holding the belt.
finglashoop wrote: » Bisping is the latest proof that anyone can win on any given night Holm, TJ, Miocic were all considered to be fighting monsters as well.
newbbieb wrote: » Yeah thats true i spose i mean if you draw the right fight on the right night,but i can see a GSP style Khabib clean out of the division on the horizon.
Gamebred wrote: » I wouldnt say he cant punch thats a bit harsh but hes gonna beaten like 99.9% of fighters are eventually,the amount of people that have looked untouchable then get beaten of late is crazy,I think that Rag Dolling of RDA has inflated his reputation,a beast for sure but injury prone which cant help his propects and hopes of domination.