Digital Solitude wrote: » Not sure if this is in the right place, but I was flicking through the forum listings today and came across the gearbest hosted forum. Seems a bit strange that there's a link straight to them after the crap in the Chinese Android Thread last year that got them added to the swear list and made any association and links from users a big no-no. Any explanation for this?
Gearbest: Widest selection of cool and fun gear at the best prices online.
Baldy Conscience wrote: » pieces of silver
Edward Hopper wrote: » Very disappointing if they really are going to accept them on boards, after the huge witch hunt that was devoted to them.
Saul T Nutzz wrote: » Why? There is a massive difference in a company paying Boards to advertise and the carry on ie shilling that members were involved in. One is open and upfront. The other is sneaky and underhanded. Ye all know that anyway.
Winterlong wrote: » But someone has to pay the shill and that someone would have been gearbeast ?
Saul T Nutzz wrote: » What's your point?
Saul T Nutzz wrote: » If Gear best were telling members to post on Boards then its an issue.
Winterlong wrote: » That is my point. We dont know how the shill was working and that is why people are raising this as an issue.
Saul T Nutzz wrote: » What's your point? I don't know how it works but I think it involves members getting referral fees for posting bargain alerts? If Gear best were telling members to post on Boards then its an issue. If people were doing it on their own back then why would GB be held accountable?
Boards.ie: Niamh wrote: » You can still discuss your personal experience. Anyone who was site banned for shilling at the time is still banned. This new sponsored sub forum does not negate the fact that those users broke site rules by shilling.
duffman13 wrote: » Posters got banned becuase they benefited promoting the products of the company.