unkel wrote: » Why anyone in their right mind would pay more for that '97 banger Carina (€650) than for that very presentable '01 Accord (€550) is beyond me.
JohnBoy26 wrote: » If the cars are anything like they are in the pics then that accord is a much better buy.
The Sidewards Man wrote: » What does a full electric pack 99 Yaris contain?
Long Time Lurker wrote: » Super valuehttps://youtu.be/3NCjU75U2vs
corcaigh07 wrote: » OK, how about this one?https://www.donedeal.ie/cars-for-sale/peugeot-307-1-4-tdi-nct-2017-895/12429731
Jayop wrote: » Just shy of €906 of tax so they're more or less giving the car away.
Duke O Smiley wrote: » @Trojan - you might look at the Volvo S60 2.4 D5, superb engine and very comfortable cars. Certainly won't compare with a petrol E39 in terms of drivability but if it is comfort you are after then I would look no further. A neighbour had a one running as a taxi until recently with over 250k on the clock and it was very reliable.
cadaliac wrote: » You need a maths lesson I'm afraid. Tax is €710 for 12 months on a 2ltr. Pre 08. That volvo is taxed into next year, but less than 12 months, (April I think) so less than 710, not more.
"Trojan wrote: » To put another option on the table, are there any comfortable commercials near bangernomics territory? Most of them look very rough.
Trojan wrote: » I think I'm going to have to give up the straight six and go tractor engine (I guess the other option is LPG but it's a massive investment for questionable return).
Duke O Smiley wrote: » I will be boo'd for this...but you might get a decent Ssangyong Rexton for around 2k but realistically a bit more, 05 or 06. Great Mercedes running gear in them, and they're genuinely decent to drive. A bit plastic-y inside but in my opinion that is about as bad as it gets with them. You really need to live with one for a bit to understand :P Other than that a lot of 2k commercials (I presume you mean more a car/jeep derived van moreso than a transit or whatever) will indeed be rough. On motorways and the likes they can be a bit noisy when they're hollow in the back
unkel wrote: » And of course you would have to give up the refinement of your current car for a far inferior 4-pot diesel engined car. Needs must and all that, but maybe not quite
unkel wrote: » When I bought my E60 (also the BMW straight 6 petrol) 3 years ago, I put a thread up here asking should I convert to LPG. It didn't make a lot of sense at the time. Now I'm doing a higher mileage and I already have the car longer than I thought I might, so I regret not having gone LPG at the time
Trojan wrote: » To put another option on the table, are there any comfortable commercials near bangernomics territory? Most of them look very rough.
CiDeRmAn wrote: » Anything to look out for with one of these? Basically a Citroen C5 but without the funky hydraulics I think
Long Time Lurker wrote: » But seriously what's everyone's fear of Citroen suspension? Its actually more durable than regular suspension and so easy to work on its child's play. You'll change a sphere watching a YouTube video.
Long Time Lurker wrote: » Hahahahaha Just noticed this now. Plonker.
selectamatic wrote: » Some people just can't stomach the thought of someone they know turning a profit on something they used to own
selectamatic wrote: » It's a sad state of affairs alright.Some sellers do bring it on themselves though. Some people just can't stomach the thought of someone they know turning a profit on something they used to own