jimmii wrote: » Diaz is 10/11 you must be backing him at that price then surely? Thats like getting 2/1 on a coin flip!
pone2012 wrote: » Didn't you read what I said?? I Don't Gamble
jimmii wrote: » Lol fair enough thats more like giving up free money than gambling.
pone2012 wrote: » I have no interest..I don't know what 11/10 means and I don't care either The same as I have no interest in discussiong gambling on an MMA forum...there's a gambling forum for that I believe Haven't you got anything to say about the actual fight itself?
Depp wrote: » My opinion is if conor manages the jump up to 170 better and gets the cardio side of things right he can use his obvious speed advantage to stay on the outside and pick diaz apart and break him down with shots to the body and not use all his energy trying to get the walk off ko he can get the decision definitely and possibly a finish in the later rounds, in the first round conor connected at will and diaz couldnt touch him till he was already knackered, Conor comes correct and takes diaz seriously he wins 10 times out of 10
pone2012 wrote: » I just can't see him beating Diaz on any level On their feet he cannot hurt or phase Diaz... And Diaz rocked him with a jab and a cross...says it all reallyOn thr ground... Well Conor doesn't stand a chance there Unless he stays back and just picks shots the whole fight...but even then he missed so many the last time...his accuracy wasn't that great So..the evidence suggests it's a no go And I don't gamble tbh...maybe a game of poker here and there..so that's not really relevant to me
sonofenoch wrote: » They were on the ground the end of the 1st round, McGregor got on top and was in control.......a McGregor not blowing out of his ar** could take Diaz, how long could he have taken that first round punishment? if it continued .......you'd swear Diaz was some super fighter reading some on here, he hasn't and probably will never hold a belt.......everyone in the game is beatable, McGregor has shown he is and Diaz has certainly shown he is with 10 losses....to say there is only ever one outcome from this fight is nonsense at best (if agendas are to be ignored)
micks wrote: » Just as well that Diaz was in tip top fighting condition and sharpness and doesnt have any room for improvement from the last fight
newbbieb wrote: » Its a common theme around here for people to look at his record and dismiss him,and i really am not a big fan or anything but his record doesn't tell the whole story of his career.His record is arguably better than Conors when you consider the calibre of opponents he faced. This is mma not boxing unblemished records do not exist for everyone else not called Jon Jones.Fights aren't rigged and the competition is stiff,some of the greatest of all time have double digits losses.
StringerBell wrote: » Why was I even quoted in that? I didn't say Nate Always wins. I would like to know what someones evidence is to hold the belief that Conor is the superior fighter, going off that first fight. The only evidence we have is that Conor threw everything he had, Nate was never in trouble and finished him with ease. To me that is evidence of him being the superior fighter from what we have seen. I didnt say evidence says Nate always wins I didnt say Nate was a sure thing I didnt mention sure things at all I didnt discuss the rematch at all I didnt mention any other fights I didnt mention bookies I've tried to figure it out but I simply have no idea why you included me in the post. You didnt actually address the post you quoted at all either..... I dunno.
sonofenoch wrote: » Fair enough, but then surely you'll disagree with the 'common theme' that McGregor can never win this fight, it's there to be read by multiple people
Devastator wrote: » 10am ET is 3pm here(I think lol).....now if only there was a way for us to watch ESPN
dave1982 wrote: » Seen McGrgors are in talks for their own reality show http://www.breakingnews.ie/showbiz/conor-mcgregors-sister-reveals-were-in-talks-for-our-own-reality-show-736506.html
Devastator wrote: » well F espn. The "full interview" starts 10 mins late, get 5 mins of chat then they tell us "More to come from that later", after waiting for another 10mins through adverts and baseball,hockey sh*te and I've gave up. Im sure someone will cut & paste it together & put it on youtube later
Depp wrote: » heres a bit of it after surfacing anyway!
Stuxnet wrote: » Listening to that awful accent, ...no thanks.
sonofenoch wrote: » What the Irish one? well it's not Stockton in Californ-i-a I'll you that......this one post confirmed my long held suspicion alot of Anti-McGregorites hail from outside the Pale
Devastator wrote: » Thats pretty much the whole 1st section. I gave them too much credit saying it lasted 5 mins
