SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » maybe the family wanted to protect his "reputation" in the hope that everything worked out ok and he was found alive somewhere no good to him now though
smash wrote: » Disregarding any of that, if it's the same man as was found today, then he's been contemplating this for 5 days so there's a strong possibility that someone would have seen him and reported it. It's heartbreaking!
Deleted User wrote: » If whoever it is took their own life, then you'll likely not see much coverage of it.
drunkmonkey wrote: » He's not in his 60's the news articles have been wrong all along reporting it.
SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » 50's?
drunkmonkey wrote: » Yea, very close to 60 but not till next year.
john kinsella wrote: » Is this a fact or are you guessing who it is?
UpCork wrote: » Very little news coverage about this. I suppose the silence is, as other posters, have said, to protect the persons' privacy, if it in fact turned out that he just went on the missing list for a while and had not, in fact taken his own life. I remember when the son of Chef Derry Clarke was in a coma, the press reported it as an accident. The family wanted it this way, should he come through, in order to protect his reputation etc. Sadly, he passed away and it was only then that this parents revealed that he had in fact taken his own life
brooke 2 wrote: » That is the age of the person whose name has been mentioned a few times already. The secrecy kind of bugs me, as if Joe/Mary Blogs went missing, it would be all over the media. They would not be according much privacy to those individuals.
septictank wrote: » I think it was on the Marion Finucane show someone said they rang GK and he was fine.
IvyTheTerrible wrote: » I disagree. When other similar incidents happen, either the name isn't released til a body has been identified and family have been informed, or they say that "family do not wish to release the name". I don't see why this unfortunate individual should not be given the same respect. I find the speculation distasteful.
UpCork wrote: » the sooner the stigma will decrease?