FalconGirl wrote: » Or else not enough is been done. I'd love to see a proper set of commandos set up to deal with these ****ers once and for all. Harrass the crap out of them. Drag them and their families out of their beds in the middle of the night, drive them demented. Destroy their ill gotten gains. I don't care. Your involved in drugs, destroying other families so lets see how you like it. The drugs crisis in the city is unacceptable and guards targeting the low level dealers is not working. The head needs to be cut of the snake. No tolerance approach required, our current approach is not working.
bajer101 wrote: » Here's a crazy idea. The government could decriminalise all drugs and instantly remove the control from these criminal gangs. These murders wouldn't happen. Crime would be down. Garda resources would be freed. The money that is saved could be pumped into education and rehabilitation. Drugs are far too serious to be left in the hands of criminals. And best of all, Paul Williams would be out of a job!
Simon2015 wrote: » I'd much rather be on the dole then be dead or in jail. These guys might get rich for a few years but it will catch up on them in the end.
tayto lover wrote: » Legalising drugs will not put these lads out of business. They'll just start other illegal businesses. They haven't the education or work ethic to earn money any other way. It's fallacy to suggest that legalizing drugs will fix the problem but having said that I believe that Cannabis should be decriminalised as it would prevent young people getting criminal records for possession.
bubblypop wrote: » Tobacco is legal in this country. It hasnt stopped criminals smuggling & selling tobacco on the black market. I'm not sure legalising drugs would result in taking the criminals out of drug dealing. There's too much money to be made, legal or not. Also, where would the country get these drugs? Would the government sell them? Would they licence certain companies to sell them? Would they do business with criminal gangs in other countries such as Bolivia or Colombia? It's just not that simple
The flying mouse wrote: » Well I talking mostly about weed here, you would get farmers/people to grow it in warehouses or greenhouses (lol)Once the price ,quality and distribution is right you would certainly take over the market here by making it financially not viable for gangsters to import it. Of course it wouldn't eradicate Crime and I am sure something else would come along to replace it but at least it would put a dent in the huge enormous profits all these lads are making, tax free. Anyway suppose this a discussion for another thread.
ofcork wrote: » Why not have a bigger crackdown on ports/airports to stop the importation in the first place?
Benteke wrote: » Don't know if legalising drugs will make much difference the biggest selling drugs in this country are the drugs that are already legal that you can get over the counter in a pharmacy
Riverireland wrote: » Seriously? What are they? Im aware there is a benzo problem but they are supposed to be prescription only.
humberklog wrote: » I see Greg Lynch was busted at home last night and 300k of drugs seized. I thought he would've been far more careful about being in proximity of the goods. That's a bit of a knock back for the cartel gang.
Nemesis...... wrote: » was it him? or just a picture of him beside a very vague article? Court dates rock
bajer101 wrote: » That's you. But for every one of you there are ten who will choose the other road.
Dawn Rider wrote: » Which part? The canal/ black horse end?
tomofson wrote: » Even if it was him it wouldn't be that much of a knock to the cartel, He is only a replaceable middle man at the end of the day. Might be a bit of an inconvenience but business would go on as usual i can assure you that.
humberklog wrote: » I understand that a loss of product with a Garda estimate of 300k (therefore nowhere near 300k) wouldn't put a ding in the cartel's riches it would be an uncomfortable loss at the present time in a number of ways:
Simon2015 wrote: » I don't buy your argument 99% of people are not involved in gangland crime. It's only a very small percentage of people who will ever get involved in this ****.