100cent wrote: » I am opposed to IVF completely. Still on the fence re morning after pill. Keep the questions coming. I hope the answers aren't too inconvenient for you.
robdonn wrote: » I try not to talk to myself, it tends to come across a bit psychopathic... :P
100cent wrote: » Go for it then. Give me the short version of why you advocate for abortion.
lazygal wrote: » Not at all. Should women who take the abortion pill here be imprisoned?
eviltwin wrote: » Do you agree with the criminalization of women who have abortions here?
100cent wrote: » Imprisoning women will solve nothing in my personal view.
lazygal wrote: » Well, speaking only for myself if I'm pregnant and I don't want to be I want to access abortion as early as possible and as late as necessary. And I don't want to have to travel to do that.
100cent wrote: » As I just said, I fail to see a benefit from such action.
lazygal wrote: » Even if they're killing unborn babies? That isn't murder then, with criminal implications?
lazygal wrote: » Throw in some laundry and you're definitely onto something.
eviltwin wrote: » What age group are you? Are you male or female?
100cent wrote: » A form of birth control?
100cent wrote: » I've never used the word murder. Even in murder cases, imprisoning is not always the answer, depending on the circumstances.
lazygal wrote: » No, a form of maternity care. Perhaps in circumstances where my birth control didn't prove effective. Or when my health is at risk. How far should the state go to stop me having an abortion?
robdonn wrote: » "Quality of life over quantity of life" would be my short version.
Lurkio wrote: » Let's imagine a scenario where a woman (we'll say in a relationship, though its fairly irrelevant) uses contraception because she can't have a child at that particular time. There is the risk that she could become pregnant, so in that instance she would have an abortion. What are your alternative solutions for her?
100cent wrote: » Unless its the life of an unborn baby? Then its expendable?
100cent wrote: » Why 'can't she have a child'?
100cent wrote: » So a continuation of birth control? If the first version doesn't work, use the abortion method? Would you wish to have the option of abortion available to you throughout your pregnancy, up to 36 weeks? I'm more than happy with the current legal situation that is in place.
robdonn wrote: » On the contrary, it very much applies to the unborn. Babies shouldn't be born just 'cause.
lazygal wrote: » What does it matter why? What's your alternative for women who've decided to have abortions?
100cent wrote: » Why don't we let Lurkio answer the question.
100cent wrote: » Huh?
lazygal wrote: » How is abortion birth control? And,yes I could face risks to life and health at any stage of pregnancy so of course abortion should be available throughout a pregnancy. It's a medical not a legal matter.
lazygal wrote: » Could you tell me what should my alternative to abortion be in situations where I no longer wish to remain pregnant?
100cent wrote: » Ok, so does the availability up to 36 weeks depend on the reason for to wish to access the abortion?
