magma69 wrote: Looking at many of the replies it's just a Traveller bashing free for all though. Hardly good honest debate going on here, just people essentially declaring how much they dislike Travellers.
tomofson wrote: » Maybe if people where allowed to say what way they really feel it might force them to change their behavior. Instead of being forced into submission by the PC brigade people should speak their minds of how they really feel about these things. It is bad for the rest of society and it is especially bad for the travellers if people dont speak about it. How are they meant to know their actions are wrong if they are not criticized?
Junkyard Tom wrote: » Did you ever wonder if maybe the Travellers are as frightened of you as you are of them? Remember they way everyone was afraid of sharks after that film about the shark that killed loads of people at a US beach resort... I think it was called 'The Shark who Killed for Fun' or something like that.
melissak wrote: » I know. Never trust the Mormons I always say.(not really I have never met a Mormon) Op throwing stones at people is not their culture. I know lots of travellers who are sound. Maybe you only notice them when they live down to your expectations and you don’t notice them when they don't conform to your prejudices.
magma69 wrote: » You think a bunch of people ranting about how they hate Travellers on afterhours is going change the behaviour of some bad Travellers? There's a definite discussion to be had about the issues with that particular community, this isn't it. This is a Traveller bashing thread for people to vent their disdain of Travellers.
degsie wrote: » Drunk post?
scamalert wrote: » Anyway op did safe thing and just moved on,while someone else could of scattered couple heads in return and land themselves with record and some jail time just because you know poor minority breeding new degeneration.
B.A._Baracus wrote: » .. and you're pc gone too far :pac:
Samaris wrote: » And complained on boards where he'd get a sympathetic hearing and much whining about awful travellers instead of to the Gardai who could actually do something about these specific people.
magma69 wrote: » Looking at many of the replies it's just a Traveller bashing free for all though. Hardly good honest debate going on here, just people essentially declaring how much they dislike Travellers.
magma69 wrote: » Ah yes, I'm a SJW because I won't chime in on calling Travellers scum.
tomofson wrote: » What can the gardai do bar give them a talking to? The stone throwers where all under the age of prosecution and the adult wasn't actually throwing any stones himself. Even though he was encouraging them and having a good laugh about it.
Samaris wrote: » If the adult was encouraging them, I think he'd be liable on their behalf for being a complete tool. If nothing else, a Garda there would put a stop to any further messing about. But hey, whining on boards about mean Travellers has made all the difference, hasn't it?
tomofson wrote: » Em no I just recognize they are much more likely to cause problems from my own experience, think about it like this for a second. They make up less than one percent of the population yet nine out of ten people has had a bad encounter with them? Do you think those percentages are normal?
melissak wrote: » Nine out of ten people? I think these "percentages" are just made up by you just now. Unless you have conducted a poll... A few bad apples do not imo taint a whole ethnic group as I judge people based on their own behaviour which is all they can control. An English person wronged me once ergo everyone from England is a fcuker?
tomofson wrote: » Yeah because the objective of making this thread was to cure cancer
Samaris wrote: » Your witty repartee is astounding. Meh, if you're going to create a daft thread with the purpose of bashing an entire sector of the population based on a bad encounter that you had (that you reacted to in a rather pathetic manner), you're going to get some slagging along with the yeah-me-too! crowd.
tomofson wrote: » Those are my personal experiences from talking to people about that particular group.
melissak wrote: » Maybe. But we tend to associate with people who share similar views etc and there might be a bit of a confirmation bias going on. Just a thought.
tomofson wrote: » Because of a bad encounter? You clearly missed the part where I stated this is only my latest bad encounter, not only is it my latest bad encounter but its one of the more minor encounters I have had with that particular community.
Samaris wrote: » Did you actually try DOING anything about any of them? Like reporting them? (I can predict how the rest of this conversation will go. "Yes, I reported them and the gardai came out and said "No can do, guv, they're a protected species")