eviltwin wrote: » If someone took her. I personally think the child died following an accident. I don't think they killed her. I don't believe she was abducted.
iguana wrote: » I'd agree with all of that except that Madeline is the one who has paid (or is even still paying) the highest price.
timthumbni wrote: » I know this theory. I don't think it was like this. I hope it wasn't like this. In the end I don't know and you don't know either.
endacl wrote: » Where's the 'I have no idea. I'm not privy all the pertinent information. I only know what the tabloids print' option in the poll?
Wibbs wrote: » That has been my take on it and this was reinforced for me when the trained and highly respected sniffer dogs brought in smelled cadaver and blood scents in the apartment and the McCann's hire car. Dogs don't have an agenda and in every case those dogs were involved with before and after they were right on the money.
thattequilagirl wrote: » If it was a tragic accident a) Why the cover up? b) Why court so much publicity? Unless by accident you mean they overdosed their daughter? Because that was a theory at the time, but that would be manslaughter at the least.
timthumbni wrote: » I agree with you to an extent but is there any parents that haven't made mistakes with their kids? Lets not forget tHat the real criminal here is the one who took her. the mcanns will have to live with this for the rest of their lives and assuming they had nothing to do with it then they will suffer every day for their loss. I hate even thinking about it and I have no connection to it.
Candie wrote: » I meant they're paying the highest price that they can pay for their actions. I can't bear to think of the price Madeleine paid, or continues to pay.
PandaX9 wrote: » I find it incredibly suspicious that the press at the time did not choose to highlight this point a bit more. The facts of the case have never added up to me nor have the circumstances of the disappearance. The witness statements by friends of the McCanns had also changed a couple of times within realtively short spaces of time. I understand that it can be difficult to recall certain events but it always struck me as odd. The positive identification of the cadaver dogs to the McCann's rental car reminds me of the not too dissimilar Casey Anthony case from 2008-2011 where a toddler was missing for 31 days before her duct-tape covered corpse was found. The mother initially claimed that a nanny had abducted her before that was proven to be false. She also lied about a number of things including her place of work and relationship with her parents. The mother's car boot also had duct-tape with the toddler's DNA on it and according to the a few people, smelt like it had had decomposing remains in it at some point. Most shocking to me of all was that Casey Anthony was found not guilty of first degree murder, aggravated child abuse, and aggravated manslaughter of a child. She was found guilty of providing false information to law enforcement officials. I don't believe the McCann parents are innocent in the Madeleine's disappearance and presumable death. Hopefully I'm wrong and they only thing they are guilty of is neglect but I'm very suspicious of both their behaviour and the investigation as a whole.
deco nate wrote: » BULL****, they left her and her siblings in an unlocked apartment while they went for food an a big piss up. Paying the price my hole. They also said at one point that it was just the same as having a BBQ in your back garden, yet they were in a holiday resort... With 100s of other people and they deem it OK to leave the kids alone and the doors unlocked. Yea that's the same thing. Also how about them ringing the UK right after the so-called abduction happened? Some very strange time lines to their story
wadk wrote: » I suggest you look into an article on independent.ie re Amy fitzpatricks disappearance from an Irish detectives perspective As a friend of mine said today Useless the Spanish cops Could possibly stick the Portuguese police there to Sure why are the met finding it hard to get a break through That's right Portuguese law!
deco nate wrote: » Expand please before I reply
wadk wrote: » Was it not proven she had cuts in that car at time of lease,
deco nate wrote: » Cadaver dogs are just that, they will not respond to blood stains, they literally respond to death smells. Not cuts
wadk wrote: » You've also dismissed anybody else's thoughts or suggestions Go on lug Inform us if you may
wadk wrote: » And??? Where's the fkn body so??
deco nate wrote: » Your posts have added nothing, good luck with yourself. I will not reply to any of your posts from here on in.
deco nate wrote: » Your posts are crazy. Go do a bit of reading before posting ****e
deco nate wrote: » So a poster on here thinks that a cut was reported in the car before she was "kidnapped" Yet the car was hired after she went missing, and then trys to link it to an Irish case, Abe it in and very sad way. Yea. Go away.
Colser wrote: » How two adult educated parents could walk out of an apartment and leave 3 babies alone and then actually sit down for food and drinks with friends is a complete mystery to me...like how could you actually do that? People use monitors in their own houses so how could they ever justify doing what they did? Also I presume that lie detectors aren't used /accepted in actual crimes cases but I would be begging for one if I was in their shoes just to prove that I had nothing to do with the "disappearance".
wadk wrote: » # true detective
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/v2/bb1b435feca4d036f6db42bb67252c40.svg)
