Disney says the Lucasfilm deal would be "dilutive" (cut) its per-share profit in 2013, 2014, and "accretive" (add) to profit in 2015.
Kidchameleon wrote: » The word Minichlorian does not appear in the rough drafts but Lucas had the idea that the force has some kind of biological aspect from early on. He goes into detail about the whole thing in the DVD commentary of the phantom menace.
Zubeneschamali wrote: » Lucas makes up a lot of stuff about things which were "always" in Star Wars.
Kidchameleon wrote: » Zubeneschamali wrote: » Lucas makes up a lot of stuff about things which were "always" in Star Wars. He does indeed but if you look at the quote in my post you'll see that in this case, the concept of midichlorians is not one of those things.
Zubeneschamali wrote: » No, I see a mention of Luke's untrained sister - nothing about midichlorians. Things Lucas said in 2000 about what he thought in 1975 are neither here not there, since we know he made a lot of that up.
Kidchameleon wrote: » Read my last two posts again
Tony EH wrote: » /\ Why didn't they make that bloody film? Sounds better than 'The Force Awakens'.
david75 wrote: » Just started reading Bloodline by Claudia Gray which follows Princess Leia and is set a few years before the Force Awakens. Really good so far. Ben is still training with Luke at this point and she is still married to Han and considering leaving the senate, and I'm guessing the republic finds out Vader was her father and it's a big scandal. (He's on the cover behind her). Rian Johnson who's directing and writing episode 8 and 9 helped write this book and it's confirmed there's lots of connective tissue that'll fill out a lot of things in the films and set others up in the upcoming films.
cowboyBuilder wrote: So it's canon then ? How is it decided what is canon and what isn't ?
Ben Gadot wrote: » Just rewatched it today and it's as enjoyable as ever, just one thing I noticed this time: at the end Leia is looking only at Rey, yet you can see Chewie in the frame and they don't even acknowledge each other. Chewie just breezes past Leia who doesn't even look at him.
Ben Gadot wrote: » Just rewatched it today and it's as enjoyable as ever, just one thing I noticed this time: at the end and after Han's death, Leia is looking only at Rey, yet you can see Chewie in the frame and they don't even acknowledge each other. Chewie just breezes past Leia who doesn't even look at him.
david75 wrote: » Why else would leia who is 'desperate to find her for her Luke' send a girl she's never met to find him?
Sad Professor wrote: » Because of the lightsaber. It called to Rey who used it to defeat Kylo. Leia trusts the Force, thus she sends Rey to Luke. I think this was probably clearer in the script before they re-wrote and re-shot Maz's role, which originally included a lot more stuff about the lightsaber, such as how she found it and a scene in which she gives it to Leia and explains Rey's importance. Leia then gave it to Finn knowing it would find its way back to Rey. Abrams changed this during reshoots to Maz giving it to Finn herself, allowing them to cut the rest of her scenes. I also think it's pretty obvious there was more dialogue between Rey and Leia that was cut, especially in their final scene. As it stands they say barely anything to each other. I see only two reasons for this: it revealed that Rey was Han and Leia's daughter as originally rumoured before Abrams abandoned the idea, or it had left over stuff about the lightsaber that no longer made sense with the Maz stuff excised. I'm leaning towards the latter, especially in light of Abrams's comments about re-writing Han and Rey's relationship after Ford was injured to make it more father/daughter-like. As I've said before, though, I really don't think Abrams had a plan for Rey. The original concept of the character as conceived by Kennedy and/or Arndt was that she would be a stand-in for a new generation of viewers who don't know who Luke Skywalker is, so I don't think they wanted this film bogged down with familial revelations. It's also not Abrams's style to make plans for things - Lost fans will back me up on this. Kasdan had an interview in which he said they did not want to dictate what direction the story would go in, i.e. "we left everything really open ended to maximise future story options", which was precisely the strategy on Lost. If Johnson wants to make Rey Luke's daughter that's up to him, but the way Abrams and Kasdan left it, it could go any number of ways. But given his penchant for orphans, I think that's what she'll be.
david75 wrote: » Ps the orphan thing doesn't fly. They spent so much time in FA on her family and her wondering and them showing them leave. No way would they tie that up with 'she's an orphan'