Chain Smoker wrote: » So if your dad was a farmer, and got cancer, before assuming responsibility for the farm while he undergoes treatment, you'll negotiate wages/etc? Obviously you should do that (and some do, usually when there's a clear heir to the throne and/or everyone is able to deal with the fact that he may not be returning to the farm), but there's a pretty good chance everyone'll be swept up in the chaos of the moment. It's pretty easy to say "here's what they should do" when you've no grasp of how big of a role the whole thing takes in everyone's lives and the kinds of societal pressure involved.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » That describes my OH to a T there. Thanks for validating his experiences. Not a good early life for many, and that is where your life starts. Tough times alright. But were they necessary or were they expected? And don't forget they had animal teachers aswell who beat them up too. Whoa, what a start, middle and thank god a good end in life. But what a life. Horrible times for many. But I digress.
Water John wrote: » Sorry, SE, just the same upbringing as your OH. Though times indeed.
messy tessy wrote: » I was with you up until this post. I can't agree with any of this... I would have helped out on the farm since primary school, moving cattle, feeding calves, covering silage pits and all the rest. This was expected to a certain extent, all my sister's and brothers helped too, but that wasn't to say my parents weren't grateful or that we didn't want to. Despite the work I can honestly say I had the best childhood ever, amongst the work was the pure fun - building rafts, swimming, making houses out of bales, silage time was something we all looked forward to every summer. I don't have one photo of me as a child on the farm where I am not smiling and happy. Yes maybe I am glossing over the times where I was standing over calves in depth of winter in the cold and rain, or picking stones in a massive reclaimed field, but I would never ever describe these experiences as horrible or as you said not a good early start to life.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » I think you may have omitted the animal teachers who beat them up after walking up the ditches with no shoes. Because they had no shoes, or were so tired that they could not spell some words correctly. That was another power in rural Ireland along with the Father, the Priest, and then there was the Teacher. Some life experiences on a farm from a young age were magical, others were not. Each to their own.
messy tessy wrote: » Ok entirely different generation, I am 28 and speaking purely about my own experience. I think this is all of topic anyway... I am as Lexie said privileged to have grown up how I did and wouldn't change that for anything.
LexieOnRale wrote: » Who even thinks of money or wills in a time like that? When someone you love is bent over a wall in a shed trying to catch their breath, yellow in the face from that bastard illness, struggling to throw in some food for a couple of animals, what normal person thinks, "Look at dad there, completely shook. Alright dad? Need a hand? Give me the fork, I'll do it... 15 euro an hour should cover it, and don't forget me when it finally catches up with you and kicks your ass." What is wrong with some people, Jesus
Candie wrote: » There's nothing like death and money to bring out the vultures. Sometimes there's terrible unfairness though. My aunts best friend looked after her parents for 10 years while they both succumbed to dementia. They left the farm and house to her brother and nothing to her. She spent her savings on the funerals as the brother said he couldn't contribute. He and his wife kicked her out within weeks of their mothers death.
messy tessy wrote: » I think if you have grown up on a farm you can't be under any illusions of the time and sheer effort running a farm takes.
bubblypop wrote: » I think it's shocking that people assume they are getting everything their parents leave behind. In fact, a lot of people don't just assume, they think they are entitled to it!!! It's your parents money, no one else is entitled to it.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » Not having a go, but realistically, if co habitants could get the same benefits as a married person, in all honesty, why would anyone marry?
bubblypop wrote: » If he gets sick when his kids are grown up, then there is obviously someone doing the job already.
Niemoj wrote: » Slowly but surely Auntie starts making it known to my Nanny and Uncle that "it's not your house", "you just own the contents". "This is MY house" is a line she especially liked.
bubblypop wrote: » Well, I guess it all depends on when he gets sick. If he gets sick when his kids are grown up, then there is obviously someone doing the job already. If the kids are only kids, then its a whole different scenario.
Maireadio wrote: » My view on inheritance is that it is lovely to be left something but one should never plan for their financial future based on expecting one. I also think it's distasteful the way some people seem to be almost tapping their wristwatches at their folks, waiting for them shuffle off. I want my folks here as long as possible, and you know what else? If they want to spend all their money enjoying their retirement, let them! It chills me how obsessed some people are with "their" inheritance.
swimming in a sea wrote: » I've seen it around were I grew up, brothers not talking for a generation after their Dad died young and one got the farm. The other then married into a farm, he also then used to help out two old bachelors and when they died he got their farms, this alienated all the other farming families so now nobody talks to them. For what? he does nothing with all his money and land, he is in his late 70's now and you'd still see him feeding cows at 6am in the winter, he has 4 sons also so will history repeat itself? My dad was a city boy who had romantic ideas about living in the countryside..reality check for him:D
Days and Days wrote: » It is never the children who will fight but the people who marry into the families tend to cause problems.
children who seem to have a sense of entitlement
smurfjed wrote: » My parents solicitor advised them that leaving one sibling out of the will would lead to legal action. Was she wrong?
Turtyturd wrote: » Family currently in the middle of one. Grandmother died and left a clause in her will that the house couldn't be sold until her youngest son had died.....despite the fact she only owned half the property. Solicitors have pretty much laughed at the clause and there were attempts to come to a solution in the beginning but the son is refusing to move out. Nobody talking to each other now, and it's currently in the process of going to court but it's a long slow process.