WarZ wrote: » I'm just wondering what are the thoughts of the admins on this issue?
posting needs to be better
Gordon wrote: » Is there anything to be said for another mass?
hullaballoo wrote: » I'd put it down to an almost antediluvian search function rather than anything else.
Wibbs wrote: » The category rejig down to four headings didn't help. At all.
Wibbs wrote: » Another thing that's more a psychological one is the "Closed Account" option. Maybe it's just me to be fair, but I think that sends a really bad signal. 1) it makes your account, you seem less "valuable" and 2) comes across as a negative when reading a thread*. Locals of longer standing know that most come back after a time, some the next day, but to a newbie or lurker it makes Boards look like a declining concern rather than a going one and that's bound to influence how they feel about the site. I'd really be looking hard and asking questions about the actual legal need for that option and if there isn't one getting rid of it with utmost speed.
gallag wrote: » No one going to talk about that there giant elephant standing in the corner? Boards fell down the liberal pc hole of no return! What was it the head honcho Dav said about right wing opinion? Then 90% of mods being left to ultra-left has created an atmosphere of hostility for about 50% of the population, if yous want more traffic then stop moderation on a ideological basis and show more respect to anyone who simply has a differing opinion.
The Hunky Monster wrote: » I'd hazard a guess that moderation is the real reason people are leaving in droves. It's becoming impossible to have an opinion in After Hours or the soccer forum anyway. Moderated to death.
hullaballoo wrote: » It's hackneyed at this stage but people (not just the young uns) have a dreadfully poor attention span these days as well.
gallag wrote: » No one going to talk about that there giant elephant standing in the corner? Boards fell down the liberal pc hole of no return!
Wibbs wrote: » Another thing that's more a psychological one is the "Closed Account" option. Maybe it's just me to be fair, but I think that sends a really bad signal.
smash wrote: » Whether displayed under a username or not, I think the feature itself is a necessity these days with the amount of targeting of users being done. Both on site here and on other forums.
KERSPLAT! wrote: » Read: it's impossible to be a dîck, you always get banned Thousands upon thousands have no issues with moderation but you always get a few who act the bollox, get banned, get carded, etc and blame moderation rather than look at themselves. Then you've the reregs who hate the site and moderation but still stick around because... Well, I don't know why, you'd have to ask one of them. Moderation is far from perfect on boards but it wouldn't be a leading cause for the downturn in users, IMO.