menoscemo wrote: » Three words I never thought I would hear you advise :P
Gavlor wrote: » I was talking to a 3.02 runner (in the pub!) during the week and like me, he's missed the barrier a couple of times. One of the non runners asked me what was the difference between my training for 3.01 & 2.58. The only thing I could think of was increased mileage. From my perspective it equated to about 15 miles a week. I reckon if he could add in 15 miles then he'll break it, if he can't then he probably won't.I'm getting wise in my old age!!
FBOT01 wrote: » Does that mean you have dumped the bike and are back pounding the pavement? :P I am hoping to test your mileage theory at some stage this year. I don't plan to increase my weekly mileage significantly during my marathon cycle but do hope the take advantage of the fact that I will have had 18/24 months of pretty good consistent running at higher average weekly mileage than in the couple of year prior to my Berlin attempt. I'll let you know how it works out for me
Gavlor wrote: » You've some serious work done.... What time will you target?? I'm planning on racing Wexford half and maybe the Viking marathon in Waterford but I'll be doing it from a zero mileage base!
tang1 wrote: » Stay away from the doughnuts so!!
ThebitterLemon wrote: » I reckon there's enough hobby joggers around here hoping to go sub 3 this year to get this thread going and share some experiences. I'm gonna give it a lash after a summer cycle of shorter stuff. Current PB 3.05. Hoping to run pb's over the shorter distances this summer and crack on from there. Anyone else trying? TbL
tang1 wrote: » Tell them all how a 3.24 marathoner handed you your ass over 5k last week!! Best of luck with it C, there's no doubt you have it in you, you just need a few variables to go your way for once.
martyboy48 wrote: » What are your current PB's, 5k to HM as a matter of interest?? Sorry, I shouldn't be in this thread, Bulmers74 will be along shortly :pac:
snailsong wrote: » Good luck with that, lemonhead. I'd love to see this thread going again. I might post occasionally, but only as an interested observer. Hoping that after one more good cycle I could be an actual contender.
ThebitterLemon wrote: » 5k: 19.27 5m: 31 high (I'd need to check) 10k: 39.30 10m: 64 something Half: 1.25 Why shouldn't you be here Marty, you've definitely got the ability TbL
BeepBeep67 wrote: » Also don't set yourself an 2:59:59 target, set it at 2:57:59 at least.
Krusty_Clown wrote: » Have to agree with Beepbeep. Set your sights on 2:55 and train accordingly. The difference is a handful of seconds per mile, but mentally, it pulls you away from being on the brink of success/failure to being sure of hitting the sub 3 goal. The actual time you hit on the day is largely irrelevant (as long as you're on the right side of 3 hours). Start thinking 2:55 now - pull yourself away from the bring of failure!
Gavlor wrote: » London ticks all the boxes for me. Fast, huge crowds, loads of boardsies. I'm running London myself next year, well I passed the preliminery interview with passport control over the weekend so it's looking like a possibility! Fwiw, I had faster 5 mile & 10k times than both of you but still couldn't break the 3 hours until I got my half marathon time down to 81 and worked on endurance. Short stuff is important for speed but if you can't sustain it over longer distances then it's a massive ask to run 26.6 @ 6.45.....