Swashbuckler wrote: » Confusing. At the start I thought Conor is definitely off the card. By the end I'm not so sure.
ASOT wrote: » I was confident he wouldnt fight, now I'm 50/50, Nate could force it.
RonanP77 wrote: » Dana said about ten times that Conor is definitely off the card, people need to accept that, I don't understand why so many are still convinced he'll fight.
stephenl15 wrote: » Agreed. I can't see how people can take from that that it's possibly gonna happen
Swashbuckler wrote: » Really? Was it that black and white for people? I've seen enough of Dana at this stage to say that wasn't him at his most convincing.
stephenl15 wrote: » I can see where you're coming from but Dana has been adamant the whole way through and in fairness he's not in the easiest position
Cali_girl wrote: » Wasn't Dana's most convincing performance….
ASOT wrote: » When Diaz comes out and says he's fighting conor or going on vacation the window opens for him to be reinstated its simple.
Cathy.C wrote: » Exactly. And he even then said: "You heard Nate he only wants to fight Conor and so I'd say the conversation between myself and Nate will be short". Saying that kind of thing leaves people thinking that the fight could still be on.
Cathy.C wrote: » Exactly. And he even then said: "You heard Nate he only wants to fight Conor and so I'd say the conversation between myself and Nate will be short". Saying that kind of thing leaves people thinking that the fight could still be on. Again he was at pains to say that he gets accused of pandering to Conor all the time and that this time he won't. Seems to me Dana is using this to get back at his critics. Also, saying that Conor would fight before New York is such BS. All that means is that he has decided not to offer NY to Conor as perhaps he thinks/knows that he might have his eyes on MSG. There is no reason for him to say Conor would fight before then. Sure he can't even get him to the states now, what makes him so sure he would get him that for any other UFC night. Dana is full of it.
Axwell wrote: » Or they just let him go on holiday.. Dana said he wanted to give Nate the chance to be on 200 if he wanted to. Its clear Nate only wants to be if he is fighting Conor. That doesnt mean Dana is going to bend just to please Nate. He said it wasnt fair on the other fighters who made it to the press conference and the whole story about Aldo and the wedding. I really dont see Dana moving on this at this stage. They said they are working on the other title fight and they have UFC New York sorted. That pretty much means that on one of the cards we can expect Robbie vs GSP and the other assuming no injuries after this weekend will be Jon Jones vs Cormier 2. He made it clear Conor will fight on 202,203 against the winner of Frankie vs Aldo.
ASOT wrote: » Ah dont ruin my optimism On the whole GSP thing surely there would have been a leak if he notified USADA he was coming out of retirement? I'd assume they would test him and his results would be on the site, 200 is under 4 months away so he could possibly not be able to fight due to the USADA regulations that I only realised were in place when the conor retirement thing came up.
darced wrote: » Well its unlikely to happen now I'd say and Dana saying he is not getting on the NYC card either....ouch. Nates insistence still leaves a glimmer of hope that an agreement can be reached.
Axwell wrote: » Robbie GSP at MGS