martyos121 wrote: » Yes, Jose Aldo the only featherweight champion in UFC history who hadn't lost in years was an easy fight. Stupid, stupid post.
brevity wrote: » He gets plenty of stick for being on talk shows or nightclubs but when he decides to knuckle down he is making a bad decision?
nehe milner skudder wrote: » this fella could ****e on mother theresas head and it would be lauded.
Claude Burgundy wrote: » He got a beating..............this time he's taking it seriously, as in no distractions.
Axwell wrote: » And yet here you are engrossed and talking about it.. Without knowing the full facts its a bit early to be calling it a pathetic farce.
martyos121 wrote: » Yes, exactly as he should. Don't deflect from the fact that you called Aldo and Mendes "easy fights".
mahamageehad wrote: » https://twitter.com/John_Kavanagh/status/723164629975863296
Claude Burgundy wrote: » I didn't i said that he saw they as easy as he didn't feel the need to "shut the world out" and not do press as with this one. No more no less.
CSF wrote: » I don't see how he trolled anyone. He's genuinely off the card, losing out on a big payout in the process. Conor likes money.
nehe milner skudder wrote: » id love if dana told him to revvsie
brevity wrote: » I think he's thinking that if he doesn't cop on he could get seriously hurt. He gets plenty of stick for being on talk shows or nightclubs but when he decides to knuckle down he is making a bad decision?
martyos121 wrote: » Claude Burgundy wrote: » He got a beating..............this time he's taking it seriously, as in no distractions. Yes, exactly as he should. Don't deflect from the fact that you called Aldo and Mendes "easy fights".
That_Guy wrote: » Ironically, Conor's "I want a break from promoting fights" statement has garnered more interest than ever. Well played.