shrewdness wrote: » Interesting negotiation tactics Chael would use:https://twitter.com/sonnench/status/722907019632447488
Spudman_20000 wrote: » Chael clearly has no clue how Irish people operate if he thinks for a second Conor would fold with tactics like that. Good thing he's not in charge, the mouth organ.
Cathy.C wrote: » Oh give me a break, Conor only had 10 days notice on fighting Nate too. If Nate wasn't going to be ready for the fight, then he shouldn't have been calling out Conor asking for the damn thing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqUIdJhjZZk
.ak wrote: » Tbh I think UFC need to see the bigger picture. He's a golden goose.
JustShon wrote: » Does anyone have any new, actual, facts about Conor's so-called retirement? Or are we still just speculating based on one tweet?
bajer101 wrote: » It seems like Conor just really didn't want to do the press conference and promotion. This is understandable after Carvalho's death. He was ringside for the Carvalho fight and to come out a couple of week's after and start the PR campaign couldn't have sat easy with him. Conor is all about the razzmatazz and trash talk, and that is just showbiz. But it is also an integral part of his arsenal and it is part of who he is. He couldn't and wouldn't do it this week and that was that. Dana said you have to or you will be pulled - so he said, fine, pull me an he released the tweet and sat back. There is still plenty of time. It's not as if it's the week before the fight. All Conor has to do is sit it out for a few days and make his point and then agree do the promotions at a time that he feels is more appropriate. This bout is definitely still on. It is not about money and it is most definitely not about Conor fearing Nate (that is just bullshít). It is just about Conor saying that he did not want to do the PR stuff now. Dana said you have to, and Conor said no. No prizes for guessing who will win. Fair fúcks Conor.
johnpatrick81 wrote: » I also do not like people using another man's death as some sort of bargaining chip, or even a speculated "excuse".
JustShon wrote: » It's as likely as any of the other theories going around. Nobody has the tiniest shred of evidence for anything they're claiming.
johnpatrick81 wrote: » If he came out with a public statement explaining as such, fair enough. "I'm out, thanks for the cheese, laters" is pathetic.
Tommy Kelly wrote: » I think the very least he could do is come out and say what the hell is going on and quit arsing his employers, sponsors and most importantly his fans around.
rogieop wrote: » No mans ego is going to stop him from walking away from 12/15 million quid ffs. It has absolutely nothing to do with that. He hardballed the ufc. At the minute he has lost, so have the ufc. He's young, 200 isnt the be all and end all. He will be back.
JustTheOne wrote: » The mam is still a legend for what he has achieved.
JustTheOne wrote: » Amazing to think all of this hysteria and it's an Irish fighter! The mam is still a legend for what he has achieved. One of our own, it's fantastic.
T-K-O wrote: » Dana taking the high road.. Maybe he / UFC is behind all of this. If we accept the UFC advised against the Nate rematch, I'm beginning to think they eventually got their way. Conor does not fight at 170 and receives a little sweetener to avoid UFC200. The UFC pulling Conor from the card enables all and sundry to save face.