gangstergossip wrote: » you wouldnt be talking about the man in drag here would you?
Danye wrote: » So the Kinihan / Russian Mob did it together? Sorry poster, I'm not having a go at you, but your post highlights the fact that the media know nothing.
bajer101 wrote: » Ah no, different fella altogether. He used to be Kinahans's main man on the northside and was angered by Gary Hutch's murder. A meeting was arranged and he spotted a bloke in a balaclava and legged it. Then it all kicked off and he has sworn that it will not end until Daniel is killed.
gangstergossip wrote: » i know i was trying to show the media talk complete bull sometimes but the kinahans are in very tight with some russian and spanish gangsters on the costa del sol its not quiet clear who actually killed him but as the rumour goes a gangsters wife asked him to meet her in that bar where he was killed and a certain man from tallaght who escaped a bank robbery on horseback went looking for her after it extremely upset. id put money on it that the kinahans killed hatchets brother though
from_atozinc wrote: » Just on the lad that was killed yesterday. Was it really mistaken identity or is it that he owed money, flexing their muscle etc. If not, any idea how the mixup happened ?
Danye wrote: » Sorry gangstergossip this isn't a personal attack on you but how do you know all this?? Where are you getting it from? Genuine question? Did you read it in the paper?? That certain man from Tallaght is supposedly still in cahoots with the Kinihan crew even after they killed his best friend! The murdered mans brother & son remained friendly and associated with the Kinihans after his murder also. Surely if the Kinihan mob murdered him they'd know more than the bloody papers and not associate with them? Again, I'll repeat my point again, if it's that widely known the inner working of an international crime outfit, why / how are these reporters stories not consistent? Just as an example, for David Byrnes funeral one well known crime reporter who works for UTV tweeted saying 19 limos had left the Byrne household in Crumlin to make its way to the church. Another Sunday World reporter said 11 limos left and a Daily Star reporter said 9 limos left the house. How could they get a simple thing like that wrong?They make stories up to sell papers and make money not caring who they hurt in the process.
Danye wrote: » Sorry gangstergossip this isn't a personal attack on you but how do you know all this?? Where are you getting it from? Genuine question? Did you read it in the paper?? That certain man from Tallaght is supposedly still in cahoots with the Kinihan crew even after they killed his best friend! The murdered mans brother & son remained friendly and associated with the Kinihans after his murder also. Surely if the Kinihan mob murdered him they'd know more than the bloody papers and not associate with them? Again, I'll repeat my point again, if it's that widely known the inner working of an international crime outfit, why / how are these reporters stories not consistent? Just as an example, for David Byrnes funeral one well known crime reporter who works for UTV tweeted saying 19 limos had left the Byrne household in Crumlin to make its way to the church. Another Sunday World reporter said 11 limos left and a Daily Star reporter said 9 limos left the house. How could they get a simple thing like that wrong? They make stories up to sell papers and make money not caring who they hurt in the process.
Muahahaha wrote: » Some media reported yesterday that he was wearing the exact same jacket as the intended target. Not sure if true but the gun being found in a nearby wheelie bin smacks of amateur hour and panic to me, doesn't sound like a profeessional hit, probably more likely someone who had a debt to pay being used by the gangs to carry out the hit.
Bam Bam Mickey wrote: » He had a speaking part in Borstal Boy!
from_atozinc wrote: » A crowd that seems to be very quiet of late is the Dundon gang in Limerick and Limerick gangs in general. Do they have any links with what's going on my on now with the Hutch gang ?
The flying mouse wrote: » Why would the hitter keep the gun ? its no good to anyone else and there is no shortage of them ,most guns used in professional hits as far as i know are left there, If your caught with a gun used in a previous shooting/murder you have lot more on your plate than whatever you been arrested for..The hitter escaped was most likely doubled gloved ,get rid of gun and clothes asap and you have a chance even if stopped later on.
kfallon wrote: » The only thing that surprised me is that Sherrif St is about 100 yards from the Liffey, surprised the hitman didn't head towards the river and dump the gun there.
Augme wrote: » I don't think I've ever heard of a gun being recovered at any other of the major gangland hits. To me the smart thing to do would be to take it with you and get rid of it somewhere that it's very unlikely to be found.
gangstergossip wrote: » the herald are claiming today that the gunman who killed martin orourke by mistake is actually good friends with the main players in the hutch mob, he grew up in the area and would have known murtagh and the rest of the main players since he was a kid.They are claiming he took up a 100 grand contract from a close associate of david byrne to kill murtagh the associate more than likely been liam byrne. they say the hitman is closely connected to a gang of young thugs from the darndale coolock area and a key member of that crew was arrested in a major operation by the organised crime unit. tipperary raid ring any bells people
pablo128 wrote: » That doesn't make sense. If he knew Murtagh so well, how did he shoot the wrong guy?
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://we.vanillicon.com/v2/e1dabb4a294ff0e3daca061094070dd3.svg)
