ItWasntMe88 wrote: I think I'm right in saying that 1800 (roughly) were put through from the IST to the AC. Do we know how many they plan to cut that down to with these AC results? Do we know a rough recruitment number for this campaign?
Delilahbeau wrote: » Last time, anyone below 60% got cut. Numbers after the ac results were released were approx 700 to progress. Further numbers lost through vetting and a larger % failed at PCA stage.
ItWasntMe88 wrote: » Thank you So roughly more than half of the existing pool will be cut with tomorrows results. That's good to know. Does the PCA really have that big of a fail rate?? Is it very difficult?
iamveryhopeful wrote: » they make you climb mount Everest in record time. so whoever goes first gets it marginally easier. I did it in 13 minutes bottom to top. was chuffed.....;)
ItWasntMe88 wrote: » Oh hi there iamtalkingthroughmyarse Is that really all they ask you to do?? That seems reasonable and straight forward; can't imagine why so many would fail that :rolleyes:
ItWasntMe88 wrote: » iamnowveryhelpful...thanks fella I've watched the video to be fair but didn't consider it that difficult. I suppose when you're under pressure and cautious of making mistakes it's a whole different story. I'm fairly fit so it would be a matter of going a wee bit harder at the cardio than usual. Anyway, completely irrelevant to me at the moment. Will think more about it should I be luck enough to pass the AC tomorrow. I thought they had done away with the push/pull though?
Johannes_Cabal wrote: » I think the idea as you said was to gather as much information as possible, but also analyse it and make suggestions for further action. I'm probably wrong as my AC was that long ago I can barely remember it. Whenever I start to doubt how I performed I always remind myself that they aren't looking for fully trained constables but those who show promise of becoming one. I think if you were professional, inquisitive and showed a logical approach in what you said/did you'll be grand. Goodluck everyone, not long to go now.
Homer01 wrote: » So who is waiting on their AC result for C3 1509? i.e. it all depends on this result. Me
Drummer64 wrote: » Me!!!! PS I think me and It wasn't me 88 should partner up to fight crime!
ItWasntMe88 wrote: » To the batmobile Robin!! (I really should start acting my age :rolleyes:)
Belfast_B2014 wrote: » Can I be Superman in the Trio!
ItWasntMe88 wrote: » Tomorrow could be the first day of the rest of our lives!
Drummer64 wrote: » Only if you and bats can get along!
ItWasntMe88 wrote: » Me Let's hope we find out early(ish) in the morning.
Homer01 wrote: » I checked the last AC result emails; last year was 3:45 and before that was 1:30 :eek:
Johannes_Cabal wrote: » Can you remember if they where sent on the days Deloitte said at the AC?
Homer01 wrote: » Went back and checked. The day we were waiting for C1 results we got an email saying we wouldn't get them for another four weeks (imagine our joy). We then got them on the second amended date. C2 results were due on the 19th December and they actually arrived on the 16th (forgot about that)
Johannes_Cabal wrote: » Thanks for checking. I remember the feeling in C1 when we got that delay email, I really hope it doesn't happen again. It's looking like tomorrow then. I'm off so it will be a day of constant email refreshing lol.
