iamveryhopeful wrote: » haha. very good. I like that. :P thanks buddy. I was always 90% jealous and 10% happy hearing others getting calls. I am still very much interested in seeing results on Friday. I do not think I made the standard this time oh yes and good luck for Friday.
ItWasntMe88 wrote: » I'll update my username to ItWasntVeryGood :cool: Congrats by the way...I see you got "the call"! Well done! I'm about 90% delighted for you and 10% jealous :rolleyes:
iamveryhopeful wrote: » just use your username in this instance..... :P
ItWasntMe88 wrote: » Anybody starting to think they don't want to know the result??lolGot this sinking feeling I've failed miserably :eek:
Homer01 wrote: » It is entirely possible that we could get the results earlier Make sure those phones are charged with notifications on lol
Johannes_Cabal wrote: » I have 2 large inner forearm tattoos and I managed to pass vetting in campaign 1, I wouldn't worry about it.
swl33t wrote: » I'm going insane
Chez123 wrote: » I hope so. Would be devastated to fail on something so stupid! Well providing I passed the AC
Momc82 wrote: » I'm sure if it can be cover by the uniform it wouldn't be a problem.
Chez123 wrote: » I know the feeling. Even if we get in it probably won't be until the end of the year I will definitely be insane by then!! Also does anyone know if anyone has had any problems with vetting due to tattoos? I've a reasonably sized wrist one, is not offensive but unfortunately quite prominent.
Belfast_B2014 wrote: » Friday is edging that little bit closer and im getting even more nervous! Anybody else just wish it was Friday now lol!
Delilahbeau wrote: » There is, it is here. It shows that yes, 85+ was a score that only 6 people achieved. However, further breakdown is available in another FOI found here.https://www.psni.police.uk/globalassets/advice--information/our-publications/disclosure-logs/2015/human-resources/recruitment_campaign_scores.pdf
Redboy12345 wrote: » Excuse my ignorance (first timer) but is there due to be a review of budget/new budget announcement soon? Or was the budget cut in relation to the last campaign something which doesn't happen very often?
Homer01 wrote: » I think what people are saying is if you were to get 85% then you're a shoo in. Not that it is a minimum score. Personally I think you need to get 70+ or else you'll have a long wait or risk the budget getting cut. Is there an FOI on AC scores? I'm surprised that there was only 5 that scored over 85.
Icarus9 wrote: » Folks where is all this 85% nonsense coming from? In campaign 2 there were less than 5 people scored over 85%. Even If you score mid to high 70s and low 80s you will be in the first 2 squads. It all slows down a bit as the scores drop for example if 20 people score in the 80s, 200 people in the 70s, 500 people in the 60s. It all of course depends on how the scoring goes in a particular campaign and this could be a high scoring or low scoring year but the above score ranges for the 1st 2 squads were correct for campaign 2. Good luck to all waiting results!
Belfast_B2014 wrote: Thanks Delilahbeau I don't think my assessment went that well to be honest but at least we don't have too much longer to wait now.
Belfast_B2014 wrote: Thanks. Im glad ive only had to wait from March to find out how badly ive done! and not any longer
Delilahbeau wrote: » Nope. There won't be a difference until the PSNI take the merit list off Deloitte and Start processing the higher scorers. All 1800 of us get our AC results this Friday.
Belfast_B2014 wrote: Is everyone waiting for results this Friday? what I mean is there is no difference when you did your assessment January or March we are all still waiting for the same date to find out.
